Controlling Healing and Toughness in Polyurethanes by Branch-Mediated Tube Dilation.

In this work, we propose the use of regular branching of polyurethanes as a way to regulate chain dynamics and govern crystallization in highly dense hydrogen-bonded systems. As a result, robust and healable polyurethanes can be obtained. To this end, we synthesized a range of aliphatic propane diol derivatives with alkyl branches ranging from butyl (C4) to octadecanyl (C18). The series of brush polyurethanes was synthesized by polyaddition of the diols and hexamethylene diisocyanate. Polyurethanes with very short (C < 4) and very long (C = 18) brush lengths did not lead to any significant healing due to crystallization. An intermediate amorphous regime appears for polymers with middle branch lengths (C = 4 to 8) showing a fine control of material toughness. For these systems, the side chain length regulates tube dilation, and significant macroscopic healing of cut samples was observed and studied in detail using melt rheology and tensile testing. Despite the high healing degrees observed immediately after repair, it was found that samples with medium to long length brushes lost their interfacial strength at the healed site after being heated to the healing temperature for some time after the optimal time to reach full healing. Dedicated testing suggests that annealed samples, while keeping initial tackiness, are not able to completely heal the cut interface. We attribute such behavior to annealing-induced interfacial crystallization promoted by the aliphatic branches. Interestingly, no such loss of healing due to annealing was observed for samples synthesized with C4 and C7 diols, which is identified as the optimal healing regime. These results point at the positive effect of branching on healing, provided that a critical chain length is not surpassed, as well as the need to study healing behavior long after the optimal healing times.

Alcoholism is associated with GALR3 but not two other galanin receptor genes.

The neuropeptide galanin is widely expressed in the periphery and the central nervous system and mediates diverse physiological processes and behaviors including alcohol abuse, depression and anxiety. Four genes encoding galanin and its receptors have been identified (GAL, GALR1, GALR2 and GALR3). Recently we found that GAL haplotypes were associated with alcoholism, raising the possibility that genetic variation in GALR1, GALR2 and GALR3 might also alter alcoholism risk. Tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified by genotyping SNP panels in controls from five populations. For the association study with alcoholism, six GALR1, four GALR2 and four GALR3 SNPs were genotyped in a large cohort of Finnish alcoholics and non-alcoholics. GALR3 showed a significant association with alcoholism that was driven by one SNP (rs3,091,367). Moreover, the combination of the GALR3 rs3,091,367 risk allele and GAL risk haplotypes led to a modestly increased odds ratio (OR) for alcoholism (2.4) as compared with the effect of either GAL (1.9) or GALR3 alone (1.4). Likewise, the combination of the GALR3 and GAL risk diplotypes led to an increased OR for alcoholism (4.6) as compared with the effect of either GAL (2.0) or GALR3 alone (1.6). There was no effect of GALR1 or GALR2 on alcoholism risk. This evidence suggests that GALR3 mediates the alcoholism-related actions of galanin.

Influence of psychological factors on risk of temporomandibular disorders.

Psychological characteristics potentially may be a cause or consequence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD). We hypothesized that psychological characteristics associated with pain sensitivity would influence risk of first-onset TMD, but the effect could be attributed to variation in the gene encoding catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). We undertook a prospective cohort study of healthy female volunteers aged 18-34 yrs. At baseline, participants were genotyped, they completed psychological questionnaires, and underwent quantitative sensory testing to determine pain sensitivity. We followed 171 participants for up to three years, and 8.8% of them were diagnosed with first-onset TMD. Depression, perceived stress, and mood were associated with pain sensitivity and were predictive of 2- to 3-fold increases in risk of TMD (P < 0.05). However, the magnitude of increased TMD risk due to psychological factors remained unchanged after adjustment for the COMT haplotype. Psychological factors linked to pain sensitivity influenced TMD risk independently of the effects of the COMT haplotype on TMD risk.

Association of pain relief with drug side effects in postherpetic neuralgia: a single-dose study of clonidine, codeine, ibuprofen, and placebo.

In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, 40 patients with postherpetic neuralgia were given single oral doses of clonidine, 0.2 mg, codeine, 120 mg, ibuprofen, 800 mg, or inert placebo. Pain relief and side effects were recorded for 6 hours. Patients reported significantly more relief after clonidine than after the other three treatments. Codeine and ibuprofen were ineffective. Sedation, dizziness, and other side effects were more frequent after clonidine (74%) or codeine (69%) than after placebo (36%) or ibuprofen (28%). Reported pain relief was greater during trials in which side effects were present. A single, mild side effect was associated with as much additional pain relief as multiple, severe side effects. Clonidine's superiority to codeine, which had a similar incidence of side effects, argues for a specific analgesic effect. In addition, side effects may have contributed to clonidine analgesia, perhaps by suggesting to patients that they had received a potent drug.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of methadone infusions in patients with cancer pain.

To determine the relationship between changes in plasma methadone concentration and pharmacodynamic effects, plasma methadone profiles and pharmacodynamics (analgesia and sedation) were measured during and after the continuous infusion of methadone for 180 to 270 minutes in 15 patients with pain caused by cancer. An increase in plasma methadone concentration resulted in a rapid increase in pain relief or sedation. The estimates of values of 50% of maximum effect (Css50) for pain relief and sedation obtained with a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model varied tenfold to twentyfold among patients; the mean Css50 value for pain relief (0.359 +/- 0.158 [SD] micrograms/ml) was virtually the same as the mean Css50 value for sedation (0.336 +/- 0.205 [SD] micrograms/ml). Similarly, the mean gamma (slope function) for pain relief (4.4 +/- 3.8 [SD]) and sedation (5.8 +/- 5.4 [SD]) did not differ. Examination of hysteresis plots of data obtained during the infusion and for 4 to 5 hours after cessation of the infusion revealed a very rapid equilibration between plasma methadone values and the sites mediating pain relief. There was no indication of the development of tolerance to the pharmacodynamic effects of methadone during the study. This report describes a method for quantitating the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the desirable and undesirable effects of opioid analgesics.

Effects of the 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-proprionic acid/kainate antagonist LY293558 on spontaneous and evoked postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-proprionic acid (AMPA)/kainate antagonists reduce experimentally induced pain. There have been no studies of AMPA/kainate antagonists in clinical pain. METHODS: Analgesic efficacy of intravenous LY293558 (0.4 or 1.2 mg/kg) was compared with that of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine (INN, ketorolac; 30 mg) and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study after oral surgery (n = 70). Study drugs were administered at the onset of moderate pain; pain intensity and relief were measured for 240 minutes. RESULTS: High-dose LY293558 and ketorolac tromethamine were superior to placebo (P < .05) for pain evoked by mouth opening and one of several measures of spontaneous pain: SPID240 +/- SEM for pain evoked by mouth opening was highest for ketorolac tromethamine (151 +/- 58), intermediate for high-dose LY293558 (-45 +/- 35), and least for low-dose LY293558 (-151 +/- 39) and placebo (-162 +/- 50). High-dose LY293558 was superior to placebo at individual time points (45 to 240 minutes) for pain evoked by mouth opening but not for spontaneous pain. The spontaneous summed pain intensity difference over 240 minutes (SPID240 +/- SEM) was highest for ketorolac tromethamine (303 +/- 84), intermediate for high-dose LY293558 (-51 +/- 40) and low-dose LY293558 (-96 +/- 45), and least for placebo (-180 +/- 24). LY293558 was well tolerated, with dose-dependent and reversible side effects including hazy vision in 20% of patients and sedation in 15%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence that an AMPA/kainate antagonist reduces clinical pain. Tests of evoked pain may be more sensitive to certain analgesics than those of spontaneous pain. The evaluation of evoked pain as an outcome measure in analgesic trials may identify potentially useful compounds otherwise missed if only spontaneous pain is evaluated.

The substance P receptor antagonist CP-99,994 reduces acute postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Animal studies suggest that substance P, a peptide that preferentially activates the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor, is involved in pain transmission, with particular importance in pain after inflammation. METHODS: The analgesic efficacy of CP-99,994, a NK1 receptor antagonist, was compared with ibuprofen and placebo in 78 subjects undergoing third molar extraction. The initial 60 subjects randomly received 1 of 3 possible treatments in a double-blind fashion before oral surgery: 750 microg/kg CP-99,994 infused intravenously over 5 hours on a tapering regimen starting 2 hours before surgery, 600 mg oral ibuprofen 30 minutes before surgery, or placebo. In a second study, 18 subjects were randomized to the same regimens starting 30 minutes before surgery to maximize the amount of CP-99,994 circulating during pain onset. RESULTS: In the first study, ibuprofen significantly reduced pain, as measured by visual analog scale, from 90 to 240 minutes postoperatively compared with placebo. CP-99,994 produced analgesia that was significant at 90 minutes (P < 0.01 compared with placebo), but not at subsequent time points. In the second study, ibuprofen and, to a lesser extent, CP-99,994 significantly suppressed pain in comparison to placebo at 60, 90, and 120 minutes (P < 0.05). The incidence of side effects was similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: This replicate demonstration that a NK1 receptor blocker relieves clinical pain supports the hypothesis that substance P contributes to the generation of pain in humans. The reduction in postoperative pain at doses not producing side effects suggests that NK1 antagonists may be clinically useful.

Epidural and intrathecal opiates: cerebrospinal fluid and plasma profiles in patients with chronic cancer pain.

We studied the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma concentration-time profiles of morphine, methadone, and beta-endorphin after lumbar epidural or intrathecal injection in 17 patients with cancer. After epidural injection, all three drugs reached peak levels in lumbar CSF within 34 minutes that were 50 to 1300 times higher than free drug concentrations in plasma. The rate of decline of CSF levels correlated with drug lipid solubility (methadone [t1/2 = 73 minutes] greater than morphine [126 minutes] greater than beta-endorphin [317 minutes]). Plasma levels were comparable with those after intragluteal injection of the same dose. In four patients given intrathecal morphine or methadone, CSF at the C1-2 level contained high levels of morphine as early as 1 hour after injection, but levels of methadone were lower or undetectable. Three of 17 patients reported improved analgesia initially, but none were improved at 2 weeks after chronic therapy. We conclude that analgesia induced by intrathecal or epidural morphine injections is caused by drug acting at both spinal and supraspinal sites. The use of spinal opiates such as morphine is of limited value in patients whose pain is not adequately managed by high systemic doses of morphine-like drugs.

Desipramine relieves postherpetic neuralgia.

Desipramine has the least anticholinergic and sedative effects of the first generation tricyclic antidepressant agents, but its pain-relieving potential has received little study. Other antidepressant agents--notably amitriptyline--are known to ameliorate postherpetic neuralgia, but those agents are often toxic. In a randomized double-blind crossover design, we gave 26 postherpetic neuralgia patients 6 weeks of treatment with desipramine (mean dose, 167 mg/day) and placebo. Nineteen patients completed both treatments; 12 reported at least moderate relief with desipramine and two reported relief with placebo. Pain relief with desipramine was statistically significant from weeks 3 to 6. Psychiatric interview at entry into the study produced a diagnosis of depression for 4 patients; pain relief was similar in depressed and nondepressed patients and was statistically significant in the nondepressed group alone. We conclude that desipramine administration relieves postherpetic neuralgia and that pain relief is not mediated by mood elevation. Blockade of norepinephrine reuptake, an action shared by desipramine, amitriptyline, and other antidepressant agents that have relieved neuropathic pain, may be involved in relief of postherpetic neuralgia.

Pituitary metastasis: incidence in cancer patients and clinical differentiation from pituitary adenoma.

Symptomatic pituitary metastases are uncommon and may be difficult to differentiate from pituitary adenomas. In order to ascertain the incidence of pituitary tumors in cancer patients and to characterize the clinical presentation of pituitary metastases, we reviewed the clinical experience with these tumors at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) during the period 1976-1979 and a recent series of 500 consecutive autopsies in which the pituitary fossa and gland were examined. In the clinical series, a histologic diagnosis was made in three of five patients. Radiologic evaluation, including polytomography and computed tomography, did not reliably distinguish metastasis from adenoma, but the clinical syndromes were distinctive. In the autopsy series, pituitary metastases were found in 3.6% of cases, pituitary adenomas in 1.8%.

Amitriptyline, but not lorazepam, relieves postherpetic neuralgia.

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 58 patients with postherpetic neuralgia received 6-week courses of amitriptyline, 12.5 to 150 mg/d; lorazepam, 0.5 to 6 mg/d; or lactose placebo. Doses were titrated to the maximum level tolerated. Patients rated pain in a diary, using lists of verbal descriptors. Forty-seven percent of patients reported moderate or greater relief with amitriptyline, 16% with placebo, and 15% with lorazepam. Mean amitriptyline dose was 65 mg/d. Greater relief was associated with higher amitriptyline doses, up to the maximum dose of 150 mg/d, and with higher serum tricyclic levels. Lorazepam did not relieve pain and was associated with severe depressive reactions in four patients.

A randomized, controlled trial of high-dose dextromethorphan in facial neuralgias.

BACKGROUND: NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists such as ketamine and dextromethorphan reduce pain in certain neuropathic pain conditions. However, there have been no controlled trials of NMDA antagonists in facial neuralgias. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial compared 6 weeks of oral dextromethorphan with active placebo (low-dose lorazepam) in 19 patients, stratified into three groups: 11 with facial pain and possible trigeminal neuropathy, five with anesthesia dolorosa, and three with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Dosage was titrated in each patient to the highest level reached without disrupting normal activities. RESULTS: Patients completing the trial included 10 with possible trigeminal neuropathy, four with anesthesia dolorosa, and two with trigeminal neuralgia. In patients with possible trigeminal neuropathy and anesthesia dolorosa, dextromethorphan decreased pain by a mean of only 2 to 4%, and these estimates were not significant. Both patients with trigeminal neuralgia had more pain during dextromethorphan treatment than during placebo treatment. Of three patients who demonstrated an analgesic response to dextromethorphan during the main trial, only one repeatedly responded in four subsequent confirmatory drug-placebo crossovers. CONCLUSIONS: Dextromethorphan shows little or no analgesic efficacy in pain due to possible trigeminal neuropathy and anesthesia dolorosa. Additional trials are necessary to conclusively evaluate the efficacy of NMDA-receptor antagonists in trigeminal neuralgia.

High-dose oral dextromethorphan versus placebo in painful diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia.

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists relieve neuropathic pain in animal models, but side effects of dissociative anesthetic channel blockers, such as ketamine, have discouraged clinical application. Based on the hypothesis that low-affinity NMDA channel blockers might have a better therapeutic ratio, we carried out two randomized, double-blind, crossover trials comparing six weeks of oral dextromethorphan to placebo in two groups, made up of 14 patients with painful distal symmetrical diabetic neuropathy and 18 with postherpetic neuralgia. Thirteen patients with each diagnosis completed the comparison. Dosage was titrated in each patient to the highest level reached without disrupting normal activities; mean doses were 381 mg/day in diabetics and 439 mg/day in postherpetic neuralgia patients. In diabetic neuropathy, dextromethorphan decreased pain by a mean of 24% (95% CI: 6% to 42%, p = 0.01), relative to placebo. In postherpetic neuralgia, dextromethorphan did not reduce pain (95% CI: 10% decrease in pain to 14% increase in pain, p = 0.72). Five of 31 patients who took dextromethorphan dropped out due to sedation or ataxia during dose escalation, but the remaining patients all reached a reasonably well-tolerated maintenance dose. We conclude that dextromethorphan or other low-affinity NMDA channel blockers may have promise in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

Amitriptyline relieves diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood.

In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, 29 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy received 6 weeks of amitriptyline and 6 weeks of an "active" placebo that mimicked amitriptyline side effects. Amitriptyline was superior to placebo in relieving pain in weeks 3 through 6. Both steady, burning pain and lancinating pains were relieved. Patients able to tolerate higher amitriptyline doses reported greater relief, through the maximum dose of 150 mg nightly. Amitriptyline analgesia was similar in depressed and nondepressed subgroups and was not associated with mood improvement. We conclude that amitriptyline relieves pain in diabetic neuropathy; this effect is independent of mood elevation.

Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) provide less than satisfactory pain relief for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and the role of opioids is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic and cognitive effects of opioids with those of TCA and placebo in the treatment of PHN. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with PHN were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Each subject was scheduled to undergo three treatment periods (opioid, TCA, and placebo), approximately 8 weeks' duration each. Doses were titrated to maximal relief or intolerable side effects. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity (0 to 10 scale), pain relief (0 to 100%), and cognitive function. Analyses included patients who provided any pain ratings after having received at least a single dose of a study medication. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed two periods, and 44 patients completed all three. Mean daily maintenance doses were morphine 91 mg or methadone 15 mg and nortriptyline 89 mg or desipramine 63 mg. Opioids and TCA reduced pain (1.9 and 1.4) more than placebo (0.2; p < 0.001), with no appreciable effect on any cognitive measure. The trend favoring opioids over TCA fell short of significance (p = 0.06), and reduction in pain with opioids did not correlate with that following TCA. Treatment with opioids and TCA resulted in greater pain relief (38 and 32%) compared with placebo (11%; p < 0.001). More patients completing all three treatments preferred opioids (54%) than TCA (30%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids effectively treat PHN without impairing cognition. Opioids and TCA act via independent mechanisms and with varied individual effect.

A randomized trial of amitriptyline and mexiletine for painful neuropathy in HIV infection. AIDS Clinical Trial Group 242 Protocol Team.

BACKGROUND: Painful sensory neuropathy is a common complication of HIV infection. Based on prior uncontrolled observations, we hypothesized that amitriptyline or mexiletine would improve the pain symptoms. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, 10-week trial of 145 patients assigned equally to amitriptyline, mexiletine, or matching placebo. The primary outcome measure was the change in pain intensity between baseline and the final visit. RESULTS: The improvement in amitriptyline group (0.31+/-0.31 units [mean+/-SD]) and mexiletine group (0.23+/-0.41) was not significantly different from placebo (0.20+/-0.30). Both interventions were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Neither amitriptyline nor mexiletine provide significant pain relief in patients with HIV-associated painful sensory neuropathy.

Transdermal clonidine compared to placebo in painful diabetic neuropathy using a two-stage 'enriched enrollment' design.

Because a variety of mechanisms may generate pain in neuropathic pain syndromes, conventional clinical trial methods may fail to identify some potentially useful drugs; a drug affecting just a single mechanism may work in too few patients to yield a statistically significant result for the trial. To test a previous clinical observation that approximately one-quarter of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy appear responsive to clonidine, we conducted a formal clinical trial of transdermal clonidine in painful diabetic neuropathy patients using a 2-stage enriched enrollment design. In the first stage (study 1), 41 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy completed a randomized, 3-period crossover comparison of transdermal clonidine (titrated from 0.1 to 0.3 mg/day) to placebo patches. Twelve apparent responders from study I were entered into the 'enriched enrollment' second stage (study II), consisting of an additional 4 double-blind, randomized, 1-week treatment periods with transdermal clonidine and placebo. Study I showed that in the overall group of 41 patients, pain intensity differed little during clonidine and placebo treatment. In study II, however, the 12 apparent responders from study I had 20% less pain with clonidine than placebo (95% confidence interval (CI): 4-35% pain reduction; P = 0.015), confirming that their pain was responsive to clonidine. None of the 3 consistent clonidine responders who were tested with the alpha-adrenergic blocker phentolamine had relief of pain, suggesting that clonidine's pain relief is not mediated by a decrease in sympathetic outflow. A post-hoc analysis of many variables suggested that patients who described their pain as sharp and shooting may have a greater likelihood of responding to clonidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Is mechanism-based pain treatment attainable? Clinical trial issues.

Woolf et al have recently called for the development of a mechanism-based pain taxonomy to guide the individualization of treatment based on each patient's pain mechanisms. Although any scientific physician could endorse this ideal, small academic clinical trials so far have failed to identify obvious differences in the response of different pain symptoms in the same condition to various drugs. In contrast, there are clear differences in the analgesic responses of patient groups distinguished on the basis of etiology or tissue origin of pain, factors which tend to be associated with groups of mechanisms. The few tests to diagnose pain mechanisms remain too delicate, time-consuming, or uncomfortable for general clinical use. To understand how best to exploit new mechanistic insights to assign treatments, one must scrutinize the relative value of diagnostic classifications based on etiology, tissue, and individual patients' pain characteristics in large clinical trials. Research priorities should include developing simple methods for assessing pain mechanisms in the clinic and increasing the efficiency of pain assessment methods in clinical trials. I describe a collaborative research agenda for academic pain researchers and funding agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory bodies.

A survey of the nature and perceived impact of quality improvement activities in pain management.

We surveyed members of the American Pain Society (APS) to determine if they were engaged in quality assurance or improvement (QA/I) activities. If so, we queried them about the characteristics of these activities and their perceptions of whether their data appear to show improvements, decrements, or no change in pain outcomes. Of the 222 respondents from at least 180 institutions, 201 (91%) reported that their institutions had a continuous improvement program. One hundred forty-three respondents reported having data on at least one of six pain outcomes at two points in time. The majority reported that their data revealed improvements in outcomes. A large number, however, had not collected data on important outcomes, such as pain intensity and patient functioning. Many APS members are collecting longitudinal data, and interpreting the data as revealing improvements in outcomes. There is a need for rigorously controlled assessment of the effects of QA/I programs on pain outcomes.

The human capsaicin model of allodynia and hyperalgesia: sources of variability and methods for reduction.

Intradermal and topical application of capsaicin have been used to study mechanisms of mechanical allodynia (MA) and pinprick hyperalgesia (PPH) and the efficacy of drugs in relieving these symptoms. However, it is associated with significant inter- and intra-subject variability. In order to improve the model's sensitivity, we examined several potential sources of variability of capsaicin-evoked MA and PPH in healthy volunteers, including skin temperature fluctuations, method (intradermal vs. topical) and site (volar forearm vs. foot dorsum) of administration. In study I, 12 subjects received, in a 6-session, randomized, crossover trial, 1) 250 micrograms of intradermal (ID) CAP to the volar forearm with skin temperature fixed at 36 degrees C (36 ID). 2) 250 micrograms ID CAP with varying skin temperature (VT ID), or 3) 250 microliters of l% CAP patch placed on the skin at 36 degrees C. The resulting MA and PPH areas observed with each method were measured. In study II, a 4-session, randomized crossover trial, 12 subjects were given 100 micrograms ID CAP in the volar forearm or foot dorsum and subsequent areas of MA and PPH recorded. In study I, 5/12 subjects had small MA areas (< or = 5 cm2) and one subject had small PPH areas in at least 4/6 sessions. The most consistent intra-subject responses were seen with the 36 ID method. Correlation coefficients for the two sessions using the same method of administration were: MA; 36 ID r = 0.83, VT ID = 0.19. Topical r = 0.81; PPH: 36 ID r = 0.93; VT ID r = 0.38, Topical r = 0.78. In study II, 4/12 subjects had little MA for both forearm and foot though all subjects developed PPH. However, greater intra-subject consistency (MA: foot: r = 0.84; arm: r = 0.49; PPH: r = 0.87; r = 0.39) and significantly larger areas of MA (15.8 +/- 4.2 vs 9.1 +/- 2.5, p < 0.05) were seen with the foot. (PPH: foot: 28.9 +/- 6.7; arm: 21.6 +/- 4.2, NS). Large variability exists among subjects receiving CAP, with some developing minimal MA. However, these subjects may be screened out prior to entry, increasing the sensitivity of the model, which may be further improved by clamping the skin temperature.