Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a novel progesterone intravaginal ring in sheep.

The objectives of this work were to evaluate the in vitro release and in vivo pharmacokinetics and local tolerability of a novel, segmented ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) intravaginal ring (IVR) delivering progesterone (P) in drug-naïve ovariectomized female Dorset crossbred sheep. Following preparation and assessment of in vitro release of P, animals were randomized into one of six treatment groups: group 1 Crinone® 8% gel (90 mg); group 2 Prometrium® 200-mg capsules; group 3 placebo IVR; group 4 progesterone (P) IVR 4 mg/day; group 5 P IVR 8 mg/day; or group 6 P IVR 12 mg/day. Crinone 8% gel and Prometrium capsules were administered once daily for 28 days. IVRs were inserted vaginally on day 1 and remained in place through day 14; a new ring was administered on day 15 and was removed at day 28. Animals underwent daily examinations to confirm ring placement, and vaginal irritation was scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). Blood samples were taken at scheduled times for pharmacokinetic analysis. Postmortem examinations performed on all IVR groups included vaginal irritation, macroscopic, and microscopic evaluations, including irritation scoring and histopathology. Intravaginal rings were retained over 28 days in all animals. Clinical observations showed no significant abnormal findings in any group. Pharmacokinetic analysis in animals showed sustained release of P over from days 0 through 14 of ring use. Irritation scores and microscopic assessments were consistent with the IVRs being well tolerated. These results will guide future human clinical studies to ultimately develop an IVR for use in women for the prevention of preterm birth.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Novel 17ß-Estradiol and Progesterone Intravaginal Ring in Sheep.

This study reports the preparation, in vitro release, pharmacokinetics, and local tolerability of novel ethylene-vinyl acetate intravaginal rings (IVRs) delivering 17ß-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P), in drug-naïve ovariectomized female Dorset crossbred sheep. After preparation and assessment of in vitro release of E2 and P, animals were randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 (comparator rings releasing 50 or 100 µg/d E2, respectively), groups 3 or 4 (ethylene-vinyl acetate IVRs, 160 µg/d E2 with 4 [160/4 IVR] or 8 mg/d P [160/8 IVR], respectively), or group 5 (160 µg E2 and 10 mg P administered intravenously). IVRs were placed on day 1 and remained in place through day 29. Animals underwent daily examinations to confirm ring placement, and vaginal irritation was scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). Blood samples were taken at scheduled times for pharmacokinetic analysis. Postmortem examinations performed on groups 1-4 were macroscopic and microscopic evaluations, including irritation scoring and histopathology. IVRs were retained over 28 days in all but 1 animal (group 4). In all animal groups, clinical observations showed no significant abnormal findings. Pharmacokinetic analysis in the animals showed sustained release of E2 and P over a 28-day period. Irritation scores and microscopic assessments were consistent with foreign object placement. A novel 2-drug IVR delivery system was well tolerated in a sheep model and pharmacokinetic release was as expected over a 28-day release period. These results will guide future human clinical studies.

Unaltered etanercept pharmacokinetics with concurrent methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of concurrent weekly oral methotrexate administration on the pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a phase 3B trial. As part of a double-blind randomized trial of 682 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly), methotrexate (weekly oral dose, median weekly dose: 20 mg), or etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) plus methotrexate (weekly oral dose, median weekly dose: 20 mg), serum etanercept concentrations were measured in a subset of patients. Serum samples for 98 randomly selected patients (48 receiving etanercept-alone treatment, 50 receiving etanercept plus methotrexate combination treatment) were analyzed to assess the pharmacokinetics of etanercept. A single blood sample was drawn from each patient at baseline and at the week 24 visit. Given the variable sampling time for patients in both groups, a population pharmacokinetic analysis using NONMEM was conducted for etanercept. A final covariate population pharmacokinetic model was constructed based on previously obtained etanercept data from both healthy subjects (n = 53) and patients with RA (n = 212) in 10 prior clinical trials. The predictive performance of the final model was assessed by both bootstrap and data-splitting validation approaches. The final model was then used to estimate Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters for the patients in both treatments in the current trial. The potential effect of the concurrent administration of methotrexate on the pharmacokinetics of etanercept was examined by comparing the clearance values between 2 treatments using statistical criteria. A population 2-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment and with either zero-order (intravenous administration) or first-order (subcutaneous administration) input was selected based on the data from the prior 10 etanercept clinical studies. The following pharmacokinetic parameters (typical value +/- standard error) were estimated: clearance (CL: 0.072 +/- 0.005 L/h), volume of distribution in the central compartment (V(c): 5.97 +/- 0.45 L), volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment (V(p): 2.05 +/- 0.32 L), intercompartment clearance (Q: 0.0645 +/- 0.0093 L/h), first-order absorption rate constant (k(a): 0.0282 +/- 0.0039 1/h), and absolute bioavailability for subcutaneous administration (F: 0.626 +/- 0.056). Interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters was quantified for CL (25.1%), V(c) (41.7%), k(a) (53.1%), and F (24.2%). Residual variability consisted of combined additive (11.4 ng/mL) and proportional error (49.9%). Both age (< 17 years) and body weight (< 60 kg) were found to be important covariates on CL. The results of both validation tests indicated the adequate predictive performance of the population model. Based on the bioequivalence criteria, the Bayesian-estimated clearance for patients receiving etanercept alone (mean: 0.070 L/h) was comparable to that for patients receiving a combination of etanercept and methotrexate (mean = 0.066 L/h). The pharmacokinetics of etanercept were not altered by the concurrent administration of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, no etanercept dose adjustment is needed for patients taking concurrent methotrexate.

Pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as a single-agent treatment of pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin is currently approved to treat CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse in patients older than age 60 years. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory AML. The study population comprised 29 subjects younger than age 18 with AML in first relapse. Dosages of 6, 7.5, and 9 mg/m(2) were administered during the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined following each dose for hP67.6, total calicheamicin derivatives, and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives. hP67.6 pharmacokinetic parameters had a consistent and statistically significant change between the first and second doses. Increases in AUC and decreases in both CL and V(ss) from the first dose to the second dose were consistent with those of the adult population. Changes between dose periods for total calicheamicin derivatives and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives were consistent with those of hP67.6. Changes in pharmacokinetic parameters between dose periods are attributed to saturation of CD33 binding sites and diminished clearance resulting from a lower peripheral blast burden and antigen. Children receiving 9 mg/m(2) had the following hP67.6 pharmacokinetic parameters: C(max), 3.47+/-1.04 mg/L; AUC, 136 +/- 107 mg x h/L; CL, 0.12 +/- 0.15 L/h/m(2); V(ss), 6.5 +/- 5.5 L; and t(1/2), 64 +/- 44 h after their first dose. Mean pharmacokinetic values are similar to values reported in adults. Individual children demonstrated large intersubject variability, similar to adults. The pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients closely follow the profile and variability of adult patients.

Oral bioavailability of pantoprazole suspended in sodium bicarbonate solution.

The bioavailability of pantoprazole when administered as a suspension in sodium bicarbonate solution and as the oral tablet was studied. In an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study, healthy fasting subjects received either one enteric-coated 40-mg pantoprazole tablet by mouth with 240 mL of water or 20 mL of a suspension prepared from one crushed pantoprazole tablet and 840 mg of sodium bicarbonate solution and administered via a nasogastric tube. Treatments were separated by a 48-hour washout period. Blood samples were collected at intervals up to 24 hours after drug administration for measurement of pantoprazole concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and estimation of pharmacokinetic values. A separate study was conducted to determine pantoprazole's stability in the suspension for up to three months at 25, 5, and -20 degrees C; concentrations were measured by HPLC. Twelve subjects completed the study. The suspension yielded pantoprazole Cmax values similar to those of the tablet formulation, but the drug was 25% less bioavailable. There was no lag time for the suspension. The suspension was stable for up to two weeks at 5 degrees C and up to three months at -20 degrees C. A suspension of pantoprazole in sodium bicarbonate solution yielded a Cmax similar to that of the tablet formulation, and the drug was quickly absorbed. However, bio-availability was slightly lower with the suspension than with the tablet.

Excretion of pantoprazole in human breast.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the amount of pantoprazole in human milk following its oral administration to a breast-feeding mother and to estimate human exposure. STUDY DESIGN: One woman was studied over a 24-hour interval after oral administration of 40-mg pantoprazole. Serial plasma and milk samples were collected over 24 hours, and pantoprazole concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. A milk/plasma ratio of 0.022 was observed at tmax, 2 hours after dose administration. Infant exposure was measured as maximum concentration in milk multiplied by an estimated maximum consumption of 200 mL at this time. RESULTS: The relative infant dose was estimated to be 7.3 microg of pantoprazole, which is equivalent to 0.14% of the weight-normalized dose received by the mother. Because pantoprazole is unstable in acidic pH, the systemic dose received by the infant is expected to be lower if the ingested pantoprazole is exposed to acid in the infant's stomach. The mother detected no adverse events in the infant. CONCLUSION: These limited data show that pantoprazole is minimally excreted into breast milk. While it is not known if pantoprazole affects breast milk production, women who are breast-feeding do not have to stop breastfeeding when taking pantoprazole chronically.

Plasma estrogen concentrations after oral and vaginal estrogen administration in women with atrophic vaginitis.

In this open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, two-treatment crossover study, 24 postmenopausal women with moderate to severe atrophic vaginitis received 0.3 mg conjugated estrogens daily for 14 days: 7 days orally (0.3 mg tablet) and 7 days vaginally (0.5 g cream). Steady-state plasma concentrations of E2 and estrone were one-third lower after vaginal versus oral administration of conjugated estrogens.