Immunological and virological response to initial antiretroviral therapy among older people living with HIV in the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy of immunological recovery and virological suppression in response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the growing population of older people living with HIV (PLWH), as treatment regimens become more effective and tolerable. METHODS: An interprovincial Canadian cohort of treatment-naïve PLWH who initiated ART after 1 January 2000 was used and age assessed in decades. Longitudinal absolute CD4 count response to treatment was modelled using generalized estimating equations. Cumulative incidence functions and proportional hazards models with a competing risk of death were used to estimate time to: (1) CD4 ≥ 200 cells/µL, (2) CD4 ≥ 500 cells/µL, (3) virological suppression (≤ 50 copies/mL), and (4) virological failure (> 200 copies/mL). RESULTS: In all, 12 489 individuals starting ART between 2000 and 2016 with one or more post-treatment CD4 count or viral load were included in the analysis. Age > 60 years was associated with lower absolute CD4 recovery (adjusted ß = -31 cells/µL) compared with age ≤ 30 years when pre-treatment CD4 count and other covariates were accounted for. Older age groups were less likely to achieve a CD4 ≥ 500 cells/µL, with the greatest effect in the > 60 group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.84 vs. age ≤ 30). Older age groups were more likely to achieve viral suppression (age > 60, aHR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.37) and less likely to have virological failure (age > 60, aHR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.3-0.71) compared with those aged ≤ 30 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have robust virological responses to ART; however, individuals over the age 60 are more likely to experience blunted CD4 recovery.

Revision parathyroid surgery - challenges and considerations in comparison to primary surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Revision parathyroidectomy is made necessary by recurrent or persistent parathyroid disease. This study aimed to identify challenges in revision surgery compared to primary parathyroid surgery. METHODS: All revision parathyroidectomies performed by one surgeon over a 17-year period were assessed for demographics, imaging, histology, biochemistry, cure rate, gland weight, gland location and gland ectopia, and compared to a series of 100 primary parathyroidectomies. RESULTS: Twenty-eight revision surgical procedures were identified. Sestamibi scanning for gland localisation was superior to ultrasound in both primary and revision surgery. Pre-operative calcium and gland weight were significantly higher in revision cases. There were no significant differences in post-operative calcium levels, pre- or post-operative parathyroid hormone levels, or gland location. 36 per cent of glands excised in revision surgery were ectopic, compared to 25 per cent in primary procedures. The cure rate was significantly lower in revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Revision parathyroidectomy patients present with higher pre-operative calcium and larger adenomas; the cure rate is significantly lower in these patients.

Is it safe for patients to drive after intra-articular knee injection?

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular knee injection is a central component in the current management of knee pain. While this is a routinely performed outpatient procedure, institutional policies for driving post injection differ. This study examines brake response times (BRTs) before and after intra-articular knee injection. Our hypothesis is that BRTs would not significantly differ and thus patients driving ability/safety is unaffected. METHODS: Forty-five patients previously listed for right intra-articular knee injection were prospectively evaluated. Patients underwent baseline assessment of BRT prior to injection. All patients received 10 ml of fluid consisting of one milliliter of 10 mg/ml triamcinolone mixed with nine milliliters of 0.5% levobupivacaine. BRT was re-examined on the same day prior to discharge home. Pre- and post-injection BRTs were examined using the same machine and assessor. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 64.0 ± 12.4 and compromised of 37.8% males. There was no significant difference in the mean pre- and post-injection braking time (0.83 ± 0.29 vs 0.78 ± 0.30 s, p = .42), or in the rate of failed braking time (11.1% vs 6.7%, p = .46). CONCLUSION: This study found that BRT did not significantly differ before and after the intra-articular injection, nor did it cause an increased number of patients failing their BRTs. These findings suggest patients should not be prevented from driving after intra-articular knee injection.

The use of captopril-DTPA scanning in the diagnosis of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in patients with impaired renal function.

We have analyzed our use of captopril-diethylene-triaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) scanning in patients presenting to the Royal Free Hospital predominantly with renal impairment. The sensitivity was found to be as good in patients with bilateral disease or disease of a single kidney as in patients with unilateral disease. On a number of occasions, though, the scan suggested unilateral disease when bilateral disease existed. There were, however, a large number of patients for whom captopril-DTPA scanning was not performed because of severe renal impairment or the possibility of renal artery stenosis in a single functioning kidney.