How does small group continuing medical education (CME) impact on practice for rural GPs and their patients, a mixed-methods study.

Studies which report outcomes of continuing medical education (CME) interventions for rural general practitioners (GPs) are limited. This mixed methods study recruited GPs from four CME small group learning (SGL) tutor groups based in different rural locations in the Republic of Ireland. A two-hour teaching module on deprescribing in older patients was devised and implemented. Assessment of educational outcomes was via questionnaires, prescribing audits and qualitative focus groups. All GPs (n = 43) in these CME-SGL groups agreed to participate, 27 of whom (63%) self-identified as being in rural practice. Rural GPs were more likely to be male (56%), in practice for longer (19 years), and attending CME for longer (13 years). The questionnaires indicated learning outcomes were achieved knowledge increased immediately after the education, and was maintained 6 months later. Twenty-four GPs completed audits involving 191 patients. Of these, 152 (79.6%) were de-prescribed medication. In the qualitative focus groups, GPs reported sharing experiences with their peers during CME-SGL helped them to improve patient care and ensured that clinical practice is more consistent across the group. For rural GPs, CME-SGL involving discussion of cases and the practical implementation of guidelines, associated with audit, can lead to changes in patient care.

What influences on their professional development do general practice trainees report from their hospital placements? A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical learning environment is important in GP specialty training and impacts professional development. Uniquely for GP trainees, about half of their training periods occur in a hospital environment, which is not their final workplace. There is still little understanding of how hospital-based training influences GP's professional development. OBJECTIVES: To seek the views of GP trainees on how their hospital experience contributes to their professional development as a GP. METHODS: This international and qualitative study seeks the views of GP trainees from Belgium, Ireland, Lithuania, and Slovenia. Semi-structured interviews were performed in the original languages. A joint thematic analysis in the English language resulted in key categories and themes. RESULTS: From the four themes identified, GP trainees were found to experience additional challenges on top of the service provision/education tensions, which are common to all hospital trainees. Despite these, the hospital rotation component of GP training is valued by trainees. A strong finding of our study is the need to ensure that learning from the hospital placements is placed firmly in the context of general practice, e.g. GP placements prior or parallel with the hospital placements, educational activities resourced by GPs during their hospital experience, encouraging hospital teachers to have greater awareness of the educational needs of GPs, including an awareness of their training curriculum. CONCLUSION: This novel study highlights how hospital placements for GP trainees could be enhanced. Further study could be broadened to recently qualified GPs, which may uncover new areas of interest.