Evaluation of spinal cord stimulation on the symptoms of anxiety and depression and pain intensity in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is now established as the primary treatment for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Commonly, patients with chronic pain and FBSS often report symptoms of anxiety and depression resulting from this condition. These factors can modulate and amplify the pain experience, therefore, further challenging treatment success. AIMS: This study examined the efficacy of SCS on alleviating the symptoms of anxiety and depression associated with chronic pain as well as pain intensity in a group of patients with FBSS. METHODS: A convenience sample (n = 26) was selected for participation. Questionnaires [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)] were completed and examined pre and post spinal cord implant. RESULTS: Analysis of the data 1 year following SCS indicates that there was a statistical significant improvement in the symptoms of depression and anxiety reported as well as pain intensity in all participants (p < 0.001). Both anxiety and depression scores on the HADS were significantly lower compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Pain intensity scores decreased by ≥50% from baseline in all participants. Opioid analgesia was discontinued by 90% (n = 8) of participants. CONCLUSION: Whilst it is already recognised that SCS reduces pain in FBSS, this study demonstrated that it also reduced the symptoms of anxiety and depression with an associated reduction in opioid consumption.

Gastroesophageal reflux during spontaneous respiration with the laryngeal mask airway.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux during general anesthesia with the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). METHODS: Twenty unpremedicated patients with no risk factors for reflux having day case anesthesia were included. Type of surgery was Orthopedic (n=8), General (n=7) and Gynecological (n=5). The average duration of anesthesia was 38.1 min, range 12 - 71 min. Anesthesia was induced with 1-2 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl and 2-3 mg x kg(-1) propofol and maintained with oxygen 33%, nitrous oxide 66% and isoflurane 1% (end-tidal). Ventilation by hand was performed until spontaneous respiration resumed. To facilitate surgery, 13 patients were placed in the supine and seven in the lithotomy positions. Two pH-sensitive electrodes were used to identify reflux. One was placed in the oesophagus 20 cm from the anterior nares to detect esophageal reflux and the other was placed through the bars of the LMA to detect refluxing material around the LMA. RESULTS: Esophageal reflux occurred in 12 patients (60%), in five of the 13 in the supine position and in all patients in the lithotomy position. The LMA electrode detected a decrease in pH in four cases (20%), all in the lithotomy position. The incidence reflux in the lithotomy and supine positions was different (Exact Probability test; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the lithotomy position predisposes patients to a higher risk of aspiration than the supine position when using a LMA.

Laryngeal mask airway positioning is related to Mallampati grading in adults.

The Mallampati classification is a commonly used means of preoperatively predicting a difficult endotracheal intubation. As the laryngeal portion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) must sit over the larynx, we wondered whether the Mallampati classification also predicts difficulty in achieving adequate seating of the LMA. LMA positioning was assessed prospectively in 100 adult patients by fiberoptic bronchoscopy to determine whether there was a relationship between the ease of seating of the LMA and the Mallampati classification. In 72 patients, optimal seating of the LMA was achieved on the first attempt at insertion, and all these patients were classified as Mallampati class 1 or 2. In all 28 cases of difficulty with LMA insertion, the patients were Mallampati class 2 or 3. In two cases the LMA was abandoned, and in these cases both patients were Mallampati class 3, (P = 0.0001 by chi 2 analysis). We conclude that the Mallampati classification indicates difficulty not only in tracheal intubation but also in achieving an adequate airway with the LMA.