Recontact to return new or updated PALB2 genetic results in the clinical laboratory setting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to recontact individuals with clinically actionable test results identified through a retrospective research study and to provide a framework for laboratories to recontact patients. METHODS: Genetic testing was conducted on 2977 individuals originally referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer testing that had a negative genetic test result. A gene panel was used to identify pathogenic variants in known or newly discovered genes that could explain the underlying cause of disease; however, analysis was restricted to PALB2 for the purposes of this study. A patient recontact decision tree was developed to assist in the returning of updated genetic test results to clinics and patients. RESULTS: Novel clinically actionable pathogenic variants were identified in the PALB2 gene in 18 participants (0.6%), the majority of whom were recontacted with their new or updated genetic test results. Eight individuals were unable to be recontacted; five individuals had already learnt about their new or updated findings from genetic testing outside the context of this study; three individuals prompted cascade testing in family members; two individuals were deceased. CONCLUSION: Novel pathogenic variants in PALB2 were identified in 18 individuals through retrospective gene panel testing. Recontacting these individuals regarding these new or updated findings had a range of outcomes. The process of conveying genomic results within this framework can be effectively accomplished while upholding patient autonomy, potentially leading to advantageous outcomes for patients and their families.

A model for the return and referral of all clinically significant secondary findings of genomic sequencing.

Secondary findings (SFs) identified through genomic sequencing (GS) can offer a wide range of health benefits to patients. Resource and capacity constraints pose a challenge to their clinical management; therefore, clinical workflows are needed to optimise the health benefits of SFs. In this paper, we describe a model we created for the return and referral of all clinically significant SFs, beyond medically actionable results, from GS. As part of a randomised controlled trial evaluating the outcomes and costs of disclosing all clinically significant SFs from GS, we consulted genetics and primary care experts to determine a feasible workflow to manage SFs. Consensus was sought to determine appropriate clinical recommendations for each category of SF and which clinician specialist would provide follow-up care. We developed a communication and referral plan for each category of SFs. This involved referrals to specialised clinics, such as an Adult Genetics clinic, for highly penetrant medically actionable findings. Common and non-urgent SFs, such as pharmacogenomics and carrier status results for non-family planning participants, were directed back to the family physician (FP). SF results and recommendations were communicated directly to participants to respect autonomy and to their FPs to support follow-up of SFs. We describe a model for the return and referral of all clinically significant SFs to facilitate the utility of GS and promote the health benefits of SFs. This may serve as a model for others returning GS results transitioning participants from research to clinical settings.

The risks of cancer in older women with BRCA pathogenic variants: How far have we come?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative risks of all cancers in women from 50 to 75 years of age with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant. METHODS: Participants were women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants from 85 centers in 16 countries. Women were eligible if they had no cancer before the age of 50 years. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and follow-up questionnaires every 2 years. Women were followed from age 50 until a diagnosis of cancer, death, age 75, or last follow-up. The risk of all cancers combined from age 50 to 75 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 2211 women included (1470 BRCA1 and 742 BRCA2). There were 379 cancers diagnosed in the cohort between 50 and 75 years. The actuarial risk of any cancer from age 50 to 75 was 49% for BRCA1 and 43% for BRCA2. Breast (n = 186) and ovarian (n = 45) were the most frequent cancers observed. For women who had both risk-reducing mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before age 50, the risk of developing any cancer between age 50 and 75 was 9%. CONCLUSION: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant have a high risk of cancer between the ages of 50 and 75 years and should be counselled appropriately.

Stay at home: implementation and impact of virtualising cancer genetic services during COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid adoption of virtual clinic processes and healthcare delivery. Herein, we examine the impact of virtualising genetics services at Canada's largest cancer centre. A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate relevant metrics during the 12 weeks prior to and during virtual care, including referral and clinic volumes, patient wait times and genetic testing uptake. The number of appointments and new patients seen were maintained during virtual care. Likewise, there was a significant increase in the number of patients offered testing during virtual care who did not provide a blood sample (176/180 (97.7%) vs 180/243 (74.1%); p<0.001), and a longer median time from the date of pretest genetic counselling to the date a sample was given (0 vs 11 days; p<0.001). Referral volumes significantly decreased during virtual care (35 vs 22; p<0.001), which was accompanied by a decreased median wait time for first appointment (55 days vs 30 days; p<0.001). The rapid virtualisation of cancer genetic services allowed the genetics clinic to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic without compromising clinical volumes or access to genetic testing. There was a decrease in referral volumes and uptake of genetic testing, which may be attributable to pandemic-related clinical restrictions.

Patient-reported outcomes associated with reflex BRCA1/2 tumor and subsequent germline panel genetic testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Reflex genetic testing of tumor tissue is being completed to direct cancer treatment; however, the patient impact of this genetic testing model is unknown. This survey study evaluates psychological outcomes following tumor and germline genetic testing in individuals with a new diagnosis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Individuals were recruited from two hospitals in Toronto, Canada. Participants completed surveys 1 week after receiving tumor results and 1 week after receiving germline results (which included genetic counseling). Outcomes included cancer-related distress (Impact of Events Scale: IES), genetic testing-related distress (Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment: MICRA), and patient satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in outcomes following each genetic test result; Cohen's d was used to evaluate effect size. Subgroup analyses were undertaken according to age at diagnosis (<60 years vs. ≥60 years) and test results (any positive vs. both negative). McNemar's test assessed differences in satisfaction. Fifty-two individuals were included in the analyses. Mean IES scores were similar following disclosure of tumor and germline results (27.39 vs. 26.14; p = 0.481; d = 0.101). Compared to following tumor result disclosure, MICRA scores were significantly lower following receipt of germline results with genetic counseling (27.23 vs. 22.69; p = 0.007; d = 0.435). Decreases in MICRA scores from tumor to germline result disclosure were greater for those diagnosed <60 years or those who received only negative test results. Most individuals were satisfied/highly satisfied following tumor (85.7%) and germline (89.8%) results disclosure (p = 0.774). Reflex tumor, and subsequent germline, genetic testing is a new model of care for cancer patients. In our cohort, genetic testing-related distress decreased significantly following receipt of germline results with genetic counseling, especially for individuals diagnosed under 60 years and those receiving only negative results. Most individuals were satisfied with this model of care.

Contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Background BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation carriers face a high lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives are protective in this population; however, the impact of other types of contraception (e.g. intrauterine devices, implants, injections) is unknown. We undertook a matched case-control study to evaluate the relationship between type of contraception and risk of ovarian cancer among women with BRCA mutations. Methods A total of 1733 matched pairs were included in this analysis. Women were matched according to year of birth, date of study entry, country of residence, BRCA mutation type and history of breast cancer. Detailed information on hormonal, reproductive and lifestyle exposures were collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with each contraceptive exposure. Results Ever use of any contraceptive was significantly associated with reduced risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.52-0.75; P < 0.0001), which was driven by significant inverse associations with oral contraceptives (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.79; P < 0.0001) and contraceptive implants (OR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.73; P = 0.008). We observed a similar effect with use of injections (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.10-1.38; P = 0.14), but this did not achieve significance. No significant associations were observed between patterns of intrauterine device use and risk of ovarian cancer. Conclusions These findings support a protective effect of oral contraceptives and implants on risk of ovarian cancer among women with BRCA mutations. The possible protective effect of injections requires further evaluation.

Reflex BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour genetic testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: streamlined for clinicians but what do patients think?

BACKGROUND: Reflex (automatic) BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genetic testing of tumour tissue is being completed for all newly diagnosed high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in the province of Ontario, Canada. The objective of this study was to measure the psychological impact of tumour genetic testing among individuals with a new diagnosis of HGSOC. METHODS: Participants had a new diagnosis of HGSOC and received reflex BRCA1/2 tumour genetic testing as a component of their care. Eligible individuals were recruited from two oncology centres in Toronto, Canada. One week after disclosure of tumour genetic test results, consenting participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that measured cancer-related distress, dispositional optimism, knowledge of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, recall of tumour genetic test results, satisfaction, and the psychological impact of receiving tumour genetic test results. The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire was used to measure the psychological impact of tumour genetic testing. RESULTS: 76 individuals completed the study survey; 13 said they did not receive their tumour test results. Of the remaining 63 participants, the average MICRA score was 26.8 (SD = 16.3). Higher total MICRA scores were seen among those with children (p = 0.02), who received treatment with primary surgery (p = 0.02), and had higher reported cancer-related distress (p < 0.001). Higher dispositional optimism (p < 0.001) and increasing age (p = 0.03) were associated with lower total MICRA scores. Most (83.5%) participants reported being satisfied/highly satisfied with having tumour testing completed; however, 40.8% could not accurately recall their tumor test results. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to assess psychological outcomes following reflex BRCA1/2 tumour genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with HGSOC. Increased dispositional optimism provided a protective effect, while increased cancer-related distress increased the psychological impact of tumour genetic testing. Educational resources are needed to help increase patient understanding and recall of tumour results, particularly when tumour genetic testing includes analysis of genes that may have implications for hereditary cancer risk. Additional research is required to better understand the patient experience of reflex tumour genetic testing.

Rapid Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations at the Time of Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of rapid genetic testing (RGT) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis on treatment choices. Bilateral mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation offers a reduction in the risk of contralateral breast cancer. It is unclear whether offering RGT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis has an impact on women's surgical decision-making. METHODS: Women with breast cancer diagnosed between June 2013 and May 2018 were recruited from four academic health sciences centers in Toronto, Canada. The participants completed a questionnaire before genetic testing, then one week and one year after disclosure of the genetic test result. Before surgery, RGT was performed. Diagnostic, pathologic, and treatment data were compared between those with and those without a BRCA mutation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1007 women who consented to RGT. The mean age of the participants was 46.3 years, and the median time to result disclosure was 10 days. A BRCA mutation was found in 6% of the women. The women with a BRCA mutation were significantly more likely to elect for bilateral mastectomy than the women without a BRCA mutation (p < 0.0001). Of the BRCA-positive patients, 95.7% reported that they used their genetic test result to make a surgical decision. CONCLUSIONS: The women provided with RGT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis use the genetic information to make treatment decisions, and the majority of those identified with a BRCA mutation elect for a bilateral mastectomy.

The Prevent Ovarian Cancer Program (POCP): Identification of women at risk for ovarian cancer using complementary recruitment approaches.

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) are hereditary; however, historical uptake of genetic testing is low. We used a unique combination of approaches to identify women in Ontario, Canada, with a first-degree relative (FDR) who died from HGSOC without prior genetic testing, and offer them multi-gene panel testing. METHODS: From May 2015-Sept 2019, genetic counseling and testing was provided to eligible participants. Two recruitment strategies were employed, including self-identification in response to an outreach campaign and direct targeting of FDRs of deceased HGSOC patients treated at our institution. The rate of pathogenic variants (PV) in established/potential ovarian cancer risk genes and the benefits/challenges of each approach were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 564 women enrolled in response to our outreach campaign (n = 473) or direct recruitment (n = 91). Mean age at consent was 52 years and 96% did not meet provincial testing criteria. Genetic results were provided to 528 individuals from 458 families. The rate of PVs in ovarian cancer risk genes was highest when FDRs were diagnosed with HGSOC <60 years (9.4% vs. 3.9% ≥ 60y, p = 0.0160). Participants in the outreach vs. direct recruitment cohort had a similar rate of PVs; however, uptake of genetic testing (97% vs. 89%; p = 0.0036) and study completion (95% vs. 87%; p = 0.0062) rates were higher in the former. Eleven participants with pathogenic variants have completed risk-reducing gynecologic surgery, with one stage I HGSOC and two breast cancers identified. CONCLUSION: Overall PV rates in this large cohort were lower than expected; however, we provide evidence that genetic testing criteria in Ontario should include individuals with a deceased FDR diagnosed with HGSOC <60 years of age.

Setting a baseline: A 7-year review of referral rates and outcomes for serous ovarian cancer prior to implementation of oncologist mediated genetic testing.

OBJECTIVE: Despite guidelines recommending that all women with invasive serous ovarian cancer (SOC) are offered genetic testing, published referral and testing rates have been poor. Many centers have implemented novel genetic counseling service delivery models to increase testing rates. In light of increased awareness and implementation of small process changes at our center, this study aims to establish baseline referral rates and testing outcomes prior to diverging from the traditional model of care. METHODS: A list of women diagnosed with SOC at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PM) between 2010 and 2016 was obtained from the PM Cancer Registry and cross-referenced against the genetics database to determine referral rates and outcomes of genetic testing. RESULTS: Of 724 women with SOC, 68% were referred for genetic counseling, with an overall testing rate of 61%. Higher referral rates were seen among women with younger ages at diagnosis and high-grade tumors. Of women tested, 22% were found to have a pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 and 9% in another cancer gene. Notably, 24% of women with a pathogenic variant reported no family history of breast or ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Genetic counseling referral and testing rates for women with SOC are higher than previously reported, yet barriers to referral remain. To maximize genetic testing rates and address increasing patient volumes, clinics may be faced with integrating novel genetic counseling delivery models. Findings from this study may serve as a more accurate baseline to which large scale service delivery changes can be compared.

Year 1: Experiences of a tertiary cancer centre following implementation of reflex BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor testing for all high-grade serous ovarian cancers in a universal healthcare system.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the rate and time to genetic referral, and patient uptake of germline genetic services, before and after implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in a universal healthcare system. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of HSGOC patients diagnosed in the year before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing was conducted. Clinical information (date/age at diagnosis, personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancer, cancer stage, primary treatment, tumor results) and dates of genetics referral, counseling, and germline testing were obtained. Incident rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI were calculated using negative binomial regression. Time to referral was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Fisher Exact tests were used to evaluate uptake of genetic services. RESULTS: 175 HGSOC patients were identified (81 PRE; 94 POST). Post-implementation of tumor testing, there was a higher rate of genetics referral (12.88 versus 7.10/1000 person-days; IRR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.07-2.42) and a shorter median time from diagnosis to referral (59 days PRE, 33 days POST; p = .04). In the POST cohort, most patients were referred prior to receiving their tumor results (n = 63/77; 81.8%). Once referred, most patients attended genetic counseling (94.5% PRE, 97.6% POST; p = .418) and pursue germline testing (98.6% PRE; 100% POST; p = .455). CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing for HGSOC, significant improvements to the rate and time to genetics referral were identified. Additional studies are needed to evaluate physician referral practices and the long-term impact of reflex tumor testing.

Breastfeeding and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

OBJECTIVE: BRCA mutation carriers face a high lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer. The strong inverse association between breastfeeding and the risk of ovarian cancer is established in the general population but is less well studied among women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHOD: Thus, we conducted a matched case-control analysis to evaluate the association between breastfeeding history and the risk of developing ovarian cancer. After matching for year of birth, country of residence, BRCA gene and personal history of breast cancer, a total of 1650 cases and 2702 controls were included in the analysis. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with various breastfeeding exposures. RESULTS: A history of ever-breastfeeding was associated with a 23% reduction in risk (OR = 0.77; 95%CI 0.66-0.90; P = 0.001). The protective effect increased with breastfeeding from one month to seven months after which the association was relatively stable. Compared to women who never breastfed, breastfeeding for seven or more months was associated with a 32% reduction in risk (OR = 0.68; 95%CI 0.57-0.81; P < 0.0001) and did not vary by BRCA gene or age at diagnosis. The combination of breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use was strongly protective (0.47; 95%CI 0.37-0.58; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a protective effect of breastfeeding for at least seven months among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, that is independent of oral contraceptive use.

Evidence of small-fiber neuropathy in neurofibromatosis type 1.

INTRODUCTION: Large-fiber neuropathy is rare in neurofibromatosis type 1, but small-fiber neuropathy has not been studied. METHODS: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 underwent nerve conduction studies for large-fiber assessment. Small-fiber tests included quantitative thermal thresholds, laser Doppler flare imaging, intraepidermal nerve fiber density, and corneal nerve fiber length. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients enrolled, 31 (60%) were female and the mean age was 33.0 ± 12.3 years. Four (8%) patients had abnormal nerve conduction studies. Small-fiber tests were frequently abnormal: thermal thresholds in 7 (13%); laser Doppler flare imaging in 10 (19%); intraepidermal nerve fiber density in 11 (22%); and corneal nerve fiber length in 27 (52%). The mean corneal nerve fiber length was below normative level (10.1 ± 2.7 mm/mm3 ). DISCUSSION: Small-fiber neuropathy may be common in neurofibromatosis type 1, and should be investigated in symptomatic patients.

Modified panel-based genetic counseling for ovarian cancer susceptibility: A randomized non-inferiority study.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic testing identifies cancer patients who may benefit from targeted treatment and allows for enhanced cancer screening and risk-reduction in their at-risk relatives. Traditional models of genetic counseling (GC) cannot meet the increasing demand and urgency for genetic testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new model of service delivery to improve the efficiency of pre-test GC for panel-based genetic testing. METHODS: A parallel, two-armed, randomized non-inferiority study compared traditional and modified pre-test GC models (1:2) prior to panel-based genetic testing. Participants were adult females, whose first-degree relative died of serous ovarian cancer. In the modified group, participants were emailed a 20-minute presentation prior to a scheduled pre-test GC telephone call. Psychosocial and knowledge questionnaires were provided at baseline (P1) and one week after pre-test GC (P2). RESULTS: 382 women completed pre-test GC (256 modified, 126 traditional). There were no differences in marital status, education level or household income. Pre-test GC time was shorter in the modified group (average 19 vs. 46 min, p < 0.001), with no difference in post-test GC time (average 16 min each, p = 0.78). The modified pre-test GC model was found to be non-inferior to traditional GC on measures of cancer-specific distress, depression, anxiety, decisional conflict, ovarian cancer knowledge and satisfaction. Perceived lifetime risk for ovarian cancer decreased to a lesser extent from baseline in women who received modified pre-test GC. CONCLUSIONS: A 20-minute presentation prior to pre-test telephone GC is non-inferior to traditional in-person GC on all variables tested, except for perceived ovarian cancer risk. This modified model improved GC efficiency without negatively affecting psychosocial outcomes, providing an alternative strategy to meet the growing demand for genetic testing.

Evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA-associated gynaecologic malignancies: a Canadian multisociety roadmap.

The landscape of genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients has changed dramatically in recent years. The therapeutic benefits of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in treatment of BRCA1/2-related ovarian cancers has resulted in an increased demand and urgency for genetic testing results, while technological developments have led to widespread use of multi-gene cancer panels and development of tumour testing protocols. Traditional genetic counselling models are no longer sustainable and must evolve to match the rapid evolution of genetic testing technologies and developments in personalized medicine. Recently, representatives from oncology, clinical genetics, molecular genetics, pathology, and patient advocacy came together to create a national multi-disciplinary Canadian consortium. By aligning stakeholder interests, the BRCA Testing to Treatment (BRCA TtoT) Community of Practice aims to develop a national strategy for tumour and germline BRCA1/2 testing and genetic counselling in women with ovarian cancer. This article serves to provide an overview of the recent evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA1/2-associated gynecologic malignancies and outline a Canadian roadmap to facilitate change, improve genetic testing rates, and ultimately improve outcomes for hereditary ovarian cancer patients and their families.

Prevention of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in women with ovarian cancer.

Background Carboplatin-based chemotherapy offers high response rates and improved overall survival for women with epithelial ovarian cancer, but its use is limited by the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic diphenhydramine for hypersensitivity reaction prevention, we reviewed the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and identified patients at high risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Methods Women receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from our institutional database at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Institutional policy was changed in 2009 to introduce diphenhydramine prophylaxis for patients receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin. Additional clinical data were abstracted from the patient record. Results Between 2006 and 2012, 450 women received ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Two hundred and ninety-one women received prophylaxis with diphenhydramine. Carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 41 of 449 patients (9%). Univariable predictors of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions included administration of 8 to 10 cycles of carboplatin, history of other drug allergies and a platinum-free interval >12 months. BRCA mutational status was not predictive. In a multivariable analysis, the number of cycles of carboplatin and a platinum-free interval >12 months were independent predictors of hypersensitivity reactions. There was a trend towards diphenhydramine prophylaxis reducing the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in women with a platinum-free interval compared to continuous delivery; this was most marked when the platinum-free interval was >12 months (n = 64) (OR: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.046-0.83), p = 0.03). Conclusions The administration of diphenhydramine to women who have a platinum-free interval may reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reaction, but prospective evaluation is required.

No. 366-Gynaecologic Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This Committee Opinion outlines the gynaecologic management recommendations for women diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) with respect to screening, contraception, chemoprophylaxis, fertility considerations, risk-reducing surgery, and post-oophorectomy care. INTENDED USERS: This Committee Opinion is designed for gynaecologic oncologists, general gynaecologists, family physicians, genetic counsellors, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, residents, and health care providers. TARGET POPULATION: Adult women (18 years and older) with a pathogenic germline variant in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and other ovarian cancer-associated genes. EVIDENCE: While reviewing evidence, databases searched include Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed. Medical Subject Heading search terms used include BRCA AND gynaecology management, hormone replacement therapy, risk reduction, chemoprophylaxis, fertility from 01/2010 and 10/2017. Literature search was begun 07/2017 and finalized 10/2017. In total 183 studies were identified, and 101 were used. VALIDATION METHODS: The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Table 1). The interpretation of strong and conditional (weak) recommendations is described in Table 2. The Summary of Findings is available upon request. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: We may expect a risk reduction of up to 90% in women predisposed to HBOC who undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The harms of iatrogenic premature menopause are offset by the benefits of risk reduction. By minimizing potential tubal/ovarian/peritoneal cancers, we can expect savings to the health care system. GUIDELINE UPDATE: Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the opinion should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations. SPONSORS: This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

No 366 - Prise en charge gynécologique du cancer du sein et de l'ovaire héréditaire.

OBJECTIF: La présente opinion de comité énumère les recommandations pour la prise en charge gynécologique des femmes ayant reçu un diagnostic de syndrome du cancer du sein et de l'ovaire héréditaire (CSOH) en ce qui a trait au dépistage, à la contraception, à la chimioprophylaxie, aux facteurs à considérer pour la fertilité, à la chirurgie de réduction du risque et aux soins post-ovariectomie. UTILISATEURS CIBLES: La présente opinion de comité s'adresse aux gynécologues oncologues, aux gynécologues généralistes, aux médecins de famille, aux conseillers en génétique, aux infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, aux résidents et aux autres fournisseurs de soins. POPULATION CIBLE: Les femmes adultes (18 ans et plus) présentant une mutation des gènes BRCA1 ou BRCA2 ou d'autres gènes associés au cancer de l'ovaire. DONNéES: Pour la revue de la littérature, les bases de données Medline, Cochrane et PubMed ont entre autres été interrogées. Les termes de recherche des Medical Subject Headings utilisés ont été BRCA ET gynaecology management [prise en charge gynécologique], hormone replacement therapy [hormonothérapie substitutive], risk reduction [réduction des risques], chemoprophylaxis [chimioprophylaxie] et fertility [fertilité], et les recherches ont ciblé les articles publiés entre janvier 2010 et octobre 2017. La recherche de publications s'est déroulée de juillet à octobre 2017. Au total, 183 études ont été sélectionnées, et 101 ont été utilisées. VALEURS: Le contenu et les recommandations ont été rédigés et acceptés par les auteurs principaux. Le Conseil d'administration de la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada a approuvé la version finale avant publication. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée au moyen des critères de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) [tableau 1]. L'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles (faibles) est décrite dans le tableau 2. Le résumé des conclusions peut être fourni sur demande. AVANTAGES DéSAVANTAGES, ET COûTS: Nous pouvons nous attendre à une diminution des risques allant jusqu'à 90 % chez les femmes prédisposées au CSOH qui subissent une salpingo-ovariectomie bilatérale de réduction du risque. Les méfaits associés à la ménopause précoce iatrogène sont compensés par les avantages découlant de la réduction du risque. En réduisant l'occurrence de cancers des trompes, de l'ovaire et du péritoine, nous pouvons nous attendre à des économies dans le système de santé. MIS à JOUR: Une revue des données probantes sera menée cinq ans après la publication de la présente opinion afin de déterminer si une mise à jour complète ou partielle s'impose. Cependant, si de nouvelles données probantes importantes sont publiées avant la fin du cycle de cinq ans, le processus pourrait être accéléré afin que certaines recommandations soient mises à jour rapidement. COMMANDITAIRE: Cette directive clinique a été élaborée à l'aide de ressources financées par la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada.

Case Report: Use of Tumor and Germline Y Chromosomal Analysis to Guide Surgical Management in a 46, XX Female Presenting With Gonadoblastoma With Dysgerminoma.

Gonadoblastomas are rare mixed gonadal tumors that are almost always found in individuals with 46, XY karyotype or some other form of Y chromosome mosaicism. It is extremely rare to diagnose gonadoblastoma in phenotypically normal 46, XX females. Herein, we present a 20-year-old 46, XX female diagnosed with gonadoblastoma and dysgerminoma. Use of cytogenetic and molecular analyses to identify the presence of Y chromosome material in peripheral blood, gonadal, and tumor tissue can exclude mosaicism to provide reassurance to undertake conservative surgical management and preserve fertility.

It's Time for the Genetic Counseling Profession to Embrace Social Media.

Social Media is a powerful and emerging method of communication that is becoming increasingly popular in genetic counseling and other health care communities. Despite its multiple benefits, the Social Media revolution has been met with some resistance in the healthcare setting. Herein, we will describe the potential benefits of Social Media for the genetic counseling profession specifically and explore ways in which any risks can be mitigated and barriers overcome to ensure responsible Social Media use by the profession.