A phase 3 randomized, open-label, multicenter trial for safety and efficacy of combined trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) of women with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) treated with third-line trabectedin (T) + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) vs. PLD monotherapy. METHODS: Women with advanced-relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer were randomly assigned 1: 1 to intravenous infusions of either T + PLD (trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 for 3 h; PLD 30 mg/m2 for 1.5 h, every 3 weeks) or PLD (50 mg/m2 for 1.5 h, every 4 weeks). Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR). At randomization, patients were stratified by time from last dose of first-line platinum therapy to disease progression, ECOG grade 0 or 1, BRCA1/2 germline mutational status, and prior PLD therapy. Exploratory endpoints included OS, PFS, and ORR in the stratified subgroups (PFI, ECOG, BRCA1/2 status, and prior PLD therapy). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01846611. RESULTS: 576 patients were randomized (T + PLD, n = 289; PLD, n = 287). Median OS was 23.8 months with T + PLD vs. 22.2 months with PLD (HR:0.92, 95%CI:0.73-1.18; p = 0.52). Median PFS was 7.52 vs. 7.26 months (HR:0.93, 95%CI:0.76-1.15; p = 0.52); ORR was 46% vs. 35.9% (OR:1.52, 95%CI:1.07-2.16; p = 0.01). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median OS of 34.2 months with T + PLD vs. 20.9 months with PLD (HR:0.54, 95%CI:0.33-0.90; p = 0.016). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median PFS of 10.1 months with T + PLD vs. 7.6 months with PLD (HR:0.72, 95%CI:0.48-1.08; p = 0.039). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and a 6-12 months platinum-free interval (PFI), median OS was 31.5 vs. 14.9 months, respectively (HR:0.37, 95%CI:0.17-0.82; p = 0.011). Grade 3-4 AEs were higher in T + PLD (79%) vs. PLD (54%). CONCLUSION: Combination of T and PLD did not show favorable OS benefit nor safety; however, patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and/or a PFI of 6-12 months appear to have clinically relevant survival benefit with T + PLD. No new safety signals were identified.

Safety and efficacy of trabectedin when administered in the inpatient versus outpatient setting: Clinical considerations for outpatient administration of trabectedin.

BACKGROUND: The results of the randomized, phase 3 ET743-SAR-3007 trial demonstrated that trabectedin had a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared with dacarbazine in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma/liposarcoma after the failure of prior chemotherapy. Patients randomized to trabectedin received a 24-hour intravenous infusion either in an inpatient or outpatient setting. Herein, the authors reported the safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes based on first infusion site of care. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to trabectedin (at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 ) or dacarbazine (1 g/m2 over 20-120 minutes) with overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint and PFS, time to disease progression, objective response rate, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported symptom scoring as secondary endpoints. The setting of the trabectedin infusion was based on institutional preference and categorized based on the setting of the first infusion. RESULTS: Of the 378 patients who were treated with trabectedin, 100 (27%) and 277 (73%), respectively, first received trabectedin in the inpatient and outpatient setting. No differences were observed with regard to PFS or OS based on site of care. The median PFS was 4.1 months versus 4.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.90; P = .49) for inpatients versus outpatients, respectively, and the median OS was 14.3 months versus 13.7 months (hazard ratio, 0.89; P = .40), respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events (classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]) were reported in 87 inpatients (87%) compared with 219 outpatients (79%); grade 3/4 serious adverse events were reported in 43 inpatients (43%) and 92 outpatients (33%). Extravasation occurred in 0 inpatients and 5 outpatients (2%), whereas the incidence of catheter-related complications was similar between groups (16% vs 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients who were randomized to trabectedin received outpatient therapy, the outcomes of the current study suggested equivalent safety and efficacy in either setting.

The IMAAGEN Study: Effect of Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone on Prostate Specific Antigen and Radiographic Disease Progression in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the use of abiraterone acetate (1,000 mg) plus prednisone (5 mg) in patients with high risk, nonmetastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients considered at high risk for progression to metastatic disease (prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or greater, or prostate specific antigen doubling time 10 months or less) received abiraterone acetate plus prednisone daily in 28-day cycles. The primary study end point was the proportion of patients in whom a 50% or greater prostate specific antigen reduction was achieved during cycles 1 to 6. Secondary end points included time to prostate specific antigen progression, time to radiographic evidence of disease progression and safety. RESULTS: Of the 131 enrolled patients 44 (34%) remained on treatment with a median followup of 40.0 months. Median age was 72 years (range 48 to 90). Of the patients 82.4% were white and 14.5% were black. Median screening prostate specific antigen was 11.9 ng/dl and median prostate specific antigen doubling time was 3.4 months. Prostate specific antigen was significantly reduced (p <0.0001) with a 50% or greater prostate specific antigen reduction in 86.9% of cases and a 90% or greater reduction in 59.8%. Median time to prostate specific antigen progression was 28.7 months (95% CI 21.2-38.2). Median time to radiographic evidence of disease progression was not reached but on sensitivity analysis in 15 patients it was estimated to be 41.4 months (95% CI 27.6-not estimable). Baseline testosterone 12.5 ng/dl or greater and a 90% or greater prostate specific antigen reduction at cycle 3 were associated with longer time to prostate specific antigen progression and radiographic evidence of disease progression. Outcomes in black patients were similar to those in other patients. Adverse events, grade 3 or greater adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 96.2%, 61.1% and 43.5% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high risk, nonmetastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer treatment with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone demonstrated a significant 50% or greater prostate specific antigen reduction with encouraging results for the secondary end points, including the safety of 5 mg prednisone.

Abiraterone acetate for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy: final analysis of a multicentre, open-label, early-access protocol trial.

BACKGROUND: In the final analysis of the phase 3 COU-AA-301 study, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone significantly prolonged overall survival compared with prednisone alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy. Here, we present the final analysis of an early-access protocol trial that was initiated after completion of COU-AA-301 to enable worldwide preapproval access to abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy. METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, early-access protocol trial in 23 countries. We enrolled patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after taxane chemotherapy. Participants received oral doses of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily) and prednisone (5 mg twice a day) in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of sustained side-effects, or abiraterone acetate becoming available in the respective country. The primary outcome was the number of adverse events arising during study treatment and within 30 days of discontinuation. Efficacy measures (time to prostate-specific antigen [PSA] progression and time to clinical progression) were gathered to guide treatment decisions. We included in our analysis all patients who received at least one dose of abiraterone acetate. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01217697. FINDINGS: Between Nov 17, 2010, and Sept 30, 2013, 2314 patients were enrolled into the early-access protocol trial. Median follow-up was 5·7 months (IQR 3·5-10·6). 952 (41%) patients had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event, and grade 3 or 4 serious adverse events were recorded in 585 (25%) people. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hepatotoxicity (188 [8%]), hypertension (99 [4%]), cardiac disorders (52 [2%]), osteoporosis (31 [1%]), hypokalaemia (28 [1%]), and fluid retention or oedema (23 [1%]). 172 (7%) patients discontinued the study because of adverse events (64 [3%] were drug-related), as assessed by the investigator, and 171 (7%) people died. The funder assessed causes of death, which were due to disease progression (85 [4%]), an unrelated adverse experience (72 [3%]), and unknown reasons (14 [1%]). Of the 86 deaths not attributable to disease progression, 18 (<1%) were caused by a drug-related adverse event, as assessed by the investigator. Median time to PSA progression was 8·5 months (95% CI 8·3-9·7) and median time to clinical progression was 12·7 months (11·8-13·8). INTERPRETATION: No new safety signals or unexpected adverse events were found in this early-access protocol trial to assess abiraterone acetate for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who progressed after chemotherapy. Future work is needed to ascertain the most effective regimen of abiraterone acetate to optimise patients' outcomes. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.

Impact of a rash management guide in patients receiving apalutamide for high-risk localized prostate cancer in the Apa-RP study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Based on the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, apalutamide is approved for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Skin rash was a common adverse reaction across indications. We hypothesized that earlier identification and intervention could improve rash outcomes. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A prespecified rash management guide outlining recommended skin care practices was provided to all patients enrolled in Apa-RP (NCT04523207). Rash-related safety data from Apa-RP were compared descriptively with data from SPARTAN and TITAN. RESULTS: Patients in Apa-RP experienced improved rash-related outcomes vs those in SPARTAN and TITAN. CONCLUSIONS: Increased vigilance and proactive management may reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of rash during apalutamide treatment.

Coadministration of Apalutamide and Relugolix in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer at High Risk for Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II Apa-RP study evaluates the biochemical recurrence (confirmed prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 0.2 ng/mL)-free rate in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HR-LPC) after radical prostatectomy following adjuvant apalutamide and androgen-deprivation therapy. In this substudy, relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, was evaluated in combination with apalutamide. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the approved standard maintenance dose of relugolix in combination with apalutamide sustains castrate testosterone levels (< 50 ng/dL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with HR-LPC who met all the main study criteria were included in the substudy. Patients received relugolix monotherapy for 2 weeks (loading dose [360 mg] at Day - 14 then 120 mg/day daily until Day - 1), then daily relugolix (120 mg) with apalutamide (240 mg) from Day 1 to Day 28. Endpoints were rate of maintained castration (testosterone < 50 ng/dL) through Day 28 (primary) and safety (secondary). RESULTS: All 12 patients received relugolix and apalutamide and achieved castrate testosterone levels after 2-week relugolix monotherapy (median testosterone 348.5 ng/dL and 8.7 ng/dL at Days - 14 and - 1). All 11 patients who had testosterone measured at Day 28 maintained castrate testosterone (median 10.0 ng/dL) without relugolix dose adjustment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in nine patients during relugolix monotherapy and in eight patients during relugolix + apalutamide coadministration. Hot flush was the most common TEAE reported, in six and four patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Relugolix administered at approved standard doses concurrently with apalutamide was effective in maintaining castrate testosterone levels in HR-LPC without new safety signals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: NCT04523207, 21 August 2020.

The Apa-RP study evaluates the combination of apalutamide with drugs that lower male sex hormones for reducing the risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Patients in this study had their prostate gland surgically removed and were at high risk for disease recurrence. Relugolix, a newly approved oral drug for advanced prostate cancer, lowers blood testosterone (the primary male sex hormone) and, in combination with apalutamide, may reduce the risk of prostate cancer recurrence. The Apa-RP substudy goal was to test whether relugolix lowers blood testosterone and maintains these low levels when administered with apalutamide. Researchers looked at the testosterone levels of 12 patients with early prostate cancer who received standard doses of relugolix alone for 2 weeks followed by apalutamide and relugolix for an additional 28 days. Testosterone was measured before and after 2 weeks of relugolix treatment, and then again 28 days after apalutamide was added. All 12 substudy patients achieved low testosterone levels (< 50 ng/dL) after 2 weeks of relugolix treatment. Testosterone was measured at Day 28 of relugolix + apalutamide treatment in 11 patients, all of whom maintained low testosterone without adjustment of their relugolix dose. Adverse effects were consistent with those previously reported for each drug when administered alone. All 12 patients completed the substudy and moved onto the main study, the longer-term results of which will be reported in the future. In summary, relugolix administered at the same time as apalutamide was effective in maintaining low testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer, without any new safety concerns.

A phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, plus bevacizumab in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent disease received PLD 30 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 on Day 1 plus bevacizumab 10mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle, for a maximum of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) [complete+partial response]; additional endpoints were safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled, 15 (27.8%) completed the study treatment as planned. Intent-to-treat (all enrolled patients) ORR was 72.2% (95% CI: 58.4, 83.5). Median duration of response was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.3, not estimable) and median TTP was 13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4, 16.0). PFS was virtually the same as TTP. Three (5.6%) patients discontinued therapy due to disease progression, and another 3 (5.6%) patients discontinued therapy due to serious adverse events (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 small/large intestinal obstruction/small intestinal perforation, and Grade 3 abdominal abscess). Fifty (92.6%) patients had ≥1 adverse event of interest, most commonly neutropenia (42.6%), hypertension (37.0%), stomatitis (37.0%), proteinuria (37.0%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (27.8%). No appreciable decreases in left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed. CONCLUSION: Most patients responded to PLD, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination therapy. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicities of these agents. These findings present a potential treatment option for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Pirfenidone for diabetic nephropathy.

Pirfenidone is an oral antifibrotic agent that benefits diabetic nephropathy in animal models, but whether it is effective for human diabetic nephropathy is unknown. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 77 subjects with diabetic nephropathy who had elevated albuminuria and reduced estimated GFR (eGFR) (20 to 75 ml/min per 1.73 m²). The prespecified primary outcome was a change in eGFR after 1 year of therapy. We randomly assigned 26 subjects to placebo, 26 to pirfenidone at 1200 mg/d, and 25 to pirfenidone at 2400 mg/d. Among the 52 subjects who completed the study, the mean eGFR increased in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group (+3.3 ± 8.5 ml/min per 1.73 m²) whereas the mean eGFR decreased in the placebo group (-2.2 ± 4.8 ml/min per 1.73 m²; P = 0.026 versus pirfenidone at 1200 mg/d). The dropout rate was high (11 of 25) in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and the change in eGFR was not significantly different from placebo (-1.9 ± 6.7 ml/min per 1.73 m²). Of the 77 subjects, 4 initiated hemodialysis in the placebo group, 1 in the pirfenidone 2400-mg/d group, and none in the pirfenidone 1200-mg/d group during the study (P = 0.25). Baseline levels of plasma biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis significantly correlated with baseline eGFR but did not predict response to therapy. In conclusion, these results suggest that pirfenidone is a promising agent for individuals with overt diabetic nephropathy.

Concomitant use of oral anticoagulants in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving apalutamide: A post-hoc analysis of TITAN and SPARTAN studies.

Apalutamide, an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), is approved for treatment of patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, based on the data from the phase 3 SPARTAN and TITAN studies respectively. Apalutamide is an inducer of cytochrome P450 enzymes and P-glycoprotein, which are involved in the metabolism of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and may thus have potential drug-drug interactions when co-administered with OACs. Concomitant use of certain OACs such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin was allowed in the SPARTAN and TITAN studies. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent thrombotic and embolic adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving concomitant OACs with apalutamide + ADT or placebo + ADT in both the studies. Anticoagulants were identified by WHO Drug Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical level 4 classifications. Thrombotic and embolic AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Version 22.1. Data were analyzed from patients receiving concurrent OACs among all treated patients in SPARTAN (apalutamide + ADT: 95/803 [11.8%]; placebo + ADT: 48/398 [12.1%]) and TITAN (apalutamide + ADT: 31/524 [5.9%]; placebo + ADT: 28/527 [5.3%]). No consequential differences were observed in the occurrence of thrombotic and embolic events between apalutamide + ADT and placebo + ADT groups receiving concomitant OACs in SPARTAN (11.6% vs 12.5%) or TITAN (19.4% vs 21.4%). Grade 3/4 thrombotic and embolic AEs observed in patients receiving concomitant OACs with apalutamide + ADT or placebo + ADT were 6 (6.3%) vs 5 (10.4%) in SPARTAN and 3 (9.7%) vs 1 (3.6%) in TITAN. This analysis suggests that when necessary, concomitant OACs can be used with apalutamide with appropriate monitoring.

Cardiac safety of trabectedin monotherapy or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with sarcomas and ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: As with other alkylating agents, cardiac dysfunction can occur with trabectedin therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) or recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) where treatment options for advanced disease are still limited. Cardiac safety for trabectedin monotherapy (T) for STS or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (T+PLD) for ROC was evaluated in this retrospective postmarketing regulatory commitment. METHODS: Patient data for multiple cardiac-related treatment-emergent adverse events (cTEAEs) were evaluated in pooled analyses of ten phase 2 trials, one phase 3 trial in STS (n = 982), and two phase 3 trials in ROC (n = 1231). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses on pooled trabectedin data revealed that cardiovascular medical history (risk ratio [RR (95% CI)]: 1.90 [1.24-2.91]; p = 0.003) and age ≥65 years (RR [95% CI]: 1.78 [1.12-2.83]; p = 0.014) were associated with increased risk for cTEAEs. Multivariate analyses showed increased risk of experiencing cTEAEs with T+PLD compared to PLD monotherapy (RR [95% CI]: 2.70 [1.75-4.17]; p < 0.0001) and with history of prior cardiac medication (RR [95% CI]: 1.88 [1.16-3.05]; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with STS or ROC who still have limited treatment options, trabectedin may be initiated after carefully considering benefit versus risk. Trial Registration (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT01343277; NCT00113607; NCT01846611.

Pirfenidone is renoprotective in diabetic kidney disease.

Although several interventions slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy, current therapies do not halt progression completely. Recent preclinical studies suggested that pirfenidone (PFD) prevents fibrosis in various diseases, but the mechanisms underlying its antifibrotic action are incompletely understood. Here, we evaluated the role of PFD in regulation of the extracellular matrix. In mouse mesangial cells, PFD decreased TGF-beta promoter activity, reduced TGF-beta protein secretion, and inhibited TGF-beta-induced Smad2-phosphorylation, 3TP-lux promoter activity, and generation of reactive oxygen species. To explore the therapeutic potential of PFD, we administered PFD to 17-wk-old db/db mice for 4 wk. PFD treatment significantly reduced mesangial matrix expansion and expression of renal matrix genes but did not affect albuminuria. Using liquid chromatography with subsequent electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, we identified 21 proteins unique to PFD-treated diabetic kidneys. Analysis of gene ontology and protein-protein interactions of these proteins suggested that PFD may regulate RNA processing. Immunoblotting demonstrated that PFD promotes dosage-dependent dephosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor, potentially inhibiting translation of mRNA. In conclusion, PFD is renoprotective in diabetic kidney disease and may exert its antifibrotic effects, in part, via inhibiting RNA processing.

Data on prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer: Post-hoc data analysis from the phase 3 randomized, open-label study comparing trabectedin and PLD versus PLD alone in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

The data presented herein are supplementary to our published primary article "A phase 3 randomized, open-label, multicenter trial for safety and efficacy of combined trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer"[1]. The exploratory analysis evaluated the impact of prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) therapy in patients who participated in a randomized, open-label study comparing combination therapy of trabectedin and PLD vs PLD alone in third-line recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). These exploratory analyses showed that prior treatment with PLD in ROC does not impact the response and survival rates nor does it increase toxicities or negatively influence survival and response rates in both treatment groups.

Results of a Real-world Study of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone Tolerability (REAAcT).

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in tolerability in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide (ENZA) or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA+P). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase IV, prospective, open-label, multicenter, real-world study. Patients were prescribed ENZA or AA+P at the treating physician's discretion. Computerized tests of 4 cognitive domains (Cogstate), patient-reported outcomes (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 [EORTC QLQ-30], Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-Fatigue], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function [FACT-Cog]), and patient/caregiver surveys were assessed at baseline and 2 months. Safety data were collected. RESULTS: Of 100 treated patients, 92 were evaluable (46/arm). Baseline characteristics were similar, with mild cognitive impairment observed in ∼20% of patients. The FACIT-Fatigue demonstrated a statistically significant worsening from baseline of -4.00 (95% confidence interval, -6.61 to -1.39) for ENZA compared with AA+P, -0.01 (95% confidence interval, -2.40 to 2.38). Overall, more adverse events (AEs) and more AEs of fatigue were reported with ENZA versus AA+P (52% vs. 36% and 26% vs. 8%, respectively). Grade 3/4 AEs were similar (4% vs. 6%). Unique neuropsychiatric AEs reported with ENZA included amnesia, cognitive disorders, memory impairment, and confusional state; those for AA+P included cerebrovascular accident, presyncope, and spinal cord compression. Clinically meaningful cognitive decline was seen in 4 patients on ENZA versus 1 patient on AA+P. However, the overall mean changes from baseline for the Cogstate tests, the EORTC QLQ-C30, and the FACT-Cog assessment were similar and showed no meaningful change. Caregiver survey responses noted more fatigue with ENZA and more moodiness with AA+P compared with patient responses. CONCLUSIONS: Although baseline values were similar, more fatigue and neurocognitive differences were observed with ENZA compared with AA+P.

Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is the prodrug of abiraterone, which inhibits CYP17A1 and testosterone synthesis and prolongs the survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). AA plus prednisone (P) (AA+P) is approved for the treatment of patients with mCRPC. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether long-term use of low-dose P with or without AA leads to corticosteroid-associated adverse events (CA-AEs) in mCRPC patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 2267 patients in COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302. We used an inclusive Standardized MedDRA Queries-oriented approach to identify 112 preferred terms for known CA-AEs, and assessed the incidence of CA-AEs during 3-mo exposure intervals and across all P exposure levels. INTERVENTION: All 2267 patients received 5mg of P twice daily, and 1333/2267 received AA (1g) plus P. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The CA-AE incidence after any P exposure was 25%, 26%, and 23% for any grade, and 5%, 5%, and 4% for grade ≥3 CA-AEs for all patients and the AA+P and P alone groups, respectively. The most common any-grade CA-AEs were hyperglycemia (7.4%, 7.8%, and 6.9% for all patients, AA+P, and P alone, respectively) and weight increase (4.3%, 3.9%, and 4.8%, respectively). When assessed by duration of exposure (3-mo intervals up to ≥30 mo), no discernable trend was observed for CA-AEs, including hyperglycemia and weight increase. The investigator-reported study discontinuation rate due to CA-AEs was 11/2267 (0.5%), and one patient had a CA-AE resulting in death. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose P given with or without AA is associated with low overall incidence of CA-AEs. The frequency of CA-AEs remained low with increased duration of exposure to P. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed adverse events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer during long-term treatment with a low dose of a corticosteroid. We found that long-term treatment with this low-dose corticosteroid is safe and tolerable.

Chronic kidney disease: issues and establishing programs and clinics for improved patient outcomes.

The spectrum of chronic kidney disease (CKD) extends from the point at which there is slight kidney damage, but normal function, to the point at which patients require either a renal transplant or renal replacement therapy to survive. Epidemiological studies suggest there are approximately 20,000,000 patients with various stages of CKD. These patients have many comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, anemia, nutritional and metabolic derangements, and fluid overload. Unfortunately, evidence shows that current CKD care in the United States is suboptimal, and late referral to a nephrologist is often the rule and not the exception. Roles of primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists in the care of patients with CKD remain undefined. Several studies have suggested that care provided by multidisciplinary nephrology teams can improve patient outcomes. Currently, there are published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for anemia management, nutritional therapy, and vascular access placement, with other CKD guidelines under development. The intent of this review includes providing compelling evidence for earlier screening, identification, and management of patients with CKD; showing that current CKD care is suboptimal; encouraging the development of multidisciplinary teams that provide collaborative care to patients with CKD, suggesting roles for PCPs and nephrologists in the care of these patients; describing CKD initiatives from national organizations; and providing a comprehensive checklist that can guide the development of CKD clinics and programs.

An open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease in the long term care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of epoetin alfa administered in extended-dosing intervals to a target hemoglobin (Hb) level not exceeding 12.0 g/dL for the treatment of anemia in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. DESIGN: An open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled study consisting of a 1-week screening phase and a 26-week open-label treatment phase. SETTING: Twenty-seven long term care (LTC) facilities in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with CKD who were not receiving dialysis, who had not received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent for 8 weeks before screening, and whose Hb levels were lower than 11.0 g/dL at screening were eligible. INTERVENTION: In the epoetin alfa group, subjects were administered 20,000 international units epoetin alfa subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W). Dosing was based on the Hb concentration measurement obtained by HemoCue Hb201+System (Quest Diagnostics; Madison, NJ) at the time of the scheduled dose. When the Hb concentration was 11.0 to 11.5 g/dL on 2 consecutive biweekly measurements, the dose was doubled and administered on the day that the second consecutive measurement was obtained. The dosing interval was then extended to every 4 weeks (Q4W). Subjects in the standard of care (SOC) group received treatment for their anemia according to the practice of the LTC facility. MEASUREMENTS: Study visits were every 2 weeks, at which time blood was drawn and used for efficacy analysis. Measurements included: the Hb concentration change from baseline to the end of the study; the proportion of subjects who achieved an Hb response (defined as 2 consecutive Hb measurements at least 1.0 g/dL greater than baseline or 2 consecutive Hb measurements ≥11.0 g/dL at any time during the study); the time to the Hb response; the proportion of subjects who received a transfusion and the number of units of transfused; the proportion of epoetin alfa-treated subjects converting to Q4W dosing; and the proportion of subjects who converted to Q4W dosing and remained on Q4W dosing through the end of the study. RESULTS: A total of 157 subjects were randomized: 118 subjects to the epoetin alfa group and 39 to the SOC group. The mean change in Hb was significantly greater in the epoetin alfa group (0.9 g/dL) compared with the SOC group (0.3 g/dL) (P = .006). A significantly greater percentage of subjects achieved a Hb response in the epoetin alfa group (85.1%) compared with the SOC group (53.8%) (P < .001). The time to achieve a Hb response was significantly shorter in the epoetin alfa group (41 days) than in the SOC group (114 days) (P < .0001). There were no transfusions in the SOC group, whereas 4 subjects (3.5%) required transfusions in the epoetin alfa group. Of the 114 subjects receiving epoetin alfa, 33 (28.9%) subjects were converted to Q4W dosing, and all subjects who converted were able to be maintained on this schedule. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of epoetin alfa in extended-dosing intervals of Q2W followed by Q4W was safe and effective in the treatment of anemia in subjects with CKD who reside in LTC facilities.

A randomized study of extended dosing regimens for initiation of epoetin alfa treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although epoetin alfa is commonly initiated weekly (QW) in anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, recent evidence indicates that it can be initiated every 2 wk (Q2W) and used in maintenance therapy every 4 wk (Q4W). This study examined the feasibility of initiating epoetin alfa Q4W in anemic CKD patients not receiving dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This open-label study randomized subjects (1:2:2:2) to treatment with epoetin alfa 10,000 IU QW, 20,000 IU Q2W, 20,000 IU Q4W, or 40,000 IU Q4W for 16 wk. Subjects were > or =18 yr, had hemoglobin <11 g/dl, a glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and had not received erythropoietic therapy within 8 wk. The primary analysis was a noninferiority comparison of the 40,000 IU Q4W to the 20,000 IU Q2W group in the per-protocol population with respect to hemoglobin change from baseline to the end of study. RESULTS: Of 262 subjects randomized, 229 comprised the per-protocol population. Mean hemoglobin change from baseline for the 40,000 IU Q4W group (1.24 g/dl) was not inferior to the 20,000 IU Q2W group (1.11 g/dl) with the lower limit of 95% CI, -0.21 g/dl. In the QW, 20,000 IU Q2W, 20,000 IU Q4W, and 40,000 IU Q4W groups, 90%, 87%, 75%, and 86% of subjects, respectively, achieved a hemoglobin increase > or =1 g/dl. Serious adverse events were similar across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Epoetin alfa can be initiated Q4W in anemic CKD subjects.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of extended dosing of epoetin alfa in anemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence suggests that epoetin alfa can be administered at extended intervals of up to 4 wk. This open-label, randomized study was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of four dosing regimens of epoetin alfa administered subcutaneously in anemic patients who had chronic kidney disease and were not on dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-eight patients, enrolled from nine centers in the United States, were > or =18 yr of age and had hemoglobin <11.0 g/dl and GFR 12 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Patients received one of four epoetin alfa dosing regimens: 50 IU/kg three times per week, 10,000 IU once weekly, or 20,000 IU every 2 wk for 36 d or 40,000 IU every 4 wk for 64 d. Each regimen provided a similar dosage of epoetin alfa over 4 wk. Dosage adjustments were not permitted. RESULTS: Drug exposure to epoetin alfa over 4 wk, based on area under the curve, was somewhat higher with the extended interval regimens compared with the three-times-weekly regimen. Mean change in hemoglobin during the study period was similar for all regimens. No patients were transfused. Three patients experienced five serious adverse events, none of which was considered treatment related. CONCLUSIONS: Extended dosing interval regimens of epoetin alfa yielded modest pharmacokinetic differences but a similar pharmacodynamic response, suggesting that less frequent, higher dosages of epoetin alfa may be as effective as the current three-times-weekly regimen in anemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis.