Exclusive enteral nutrition: An optimal care pathway for use in children with active luminal Crohn's disease.

AIM: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is recommended as a first-line therapy for active luminal paediatric Crohn's disease, by many contemporary consensus guidelines. However, EEN protocols vary internationally. A key enabler for the use of EEN therapy has been identified as the standardisation of protocols. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal care pathway for use of EEN in children with active luminal Crohn's disease. METHODS: A working group of 11 paediatric gastroenterology dietitians and one paediatric gastroenterologist from Australia and New Zealand was convened to develop a standard optimal care pathway. Seven key areas were identified; clinical indications, workup assessments, EEN prescription, monitoring, food reintroduction, partial enteral nutrition and maintenance enteral nutrition. Recent literature was reviewed, assessed according to the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, and consensus statements were developed and voted on. Consensus opinion was used where literature gaps existed. RESULTS: A total of nineteen consensus statements from the seven key areas were agreed upon. The consensus statements informed the optimal care pathway for children with active luminal undertaking EEN in Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSION: This study developed an EEN optimal care pathway to facilitate standardisation of clinical care for children with active luminal Crohn's disease, and hopefully improve clinical outcomes and identify areas for future research.

A framework to support quality of care for patients with chronic intestinal failure requiring home parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic intestinal failure requiring home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a disabling condition that is best facilitated by a multidisciplinary approach to care. Variation in care has been identified as a key barrier to achieving quality of care for patients on HPN and requires appropriate strategies to help standardize management. METHOD: The Australasian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AuSPEN) assembled a multidisciplinary working group of 15 clinicians to develop a quality framework to assist with the standardization of HPN care in Australia. Obstacles to quality care specific to Australia were identified by consensus. Drafts of the framework documents were based on the available literature and refined by two Delphi rounds with the clinician work group, followed by a further two involving HPN consumers. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence was used to assess the strength of evidence underpinning each concept within the framework documents. RESULTS: Quality indicators, standards of care, and position statements have been developed to progress the delivery of quality care to HPN patients. CONCLUSION: The quality framework proposed by AuSPEN is intended to provide a practical structure for clinical and organizational aspects of HPN service delivery to reduce variation in care and improve quality of care and represents the initial step towards development of a national model of care for HPN patients in Australia. While developed for implementation in Australia, the evidence-based framework also has relevance to the international HPN community.

Parenteral nutrition use in children with cancer.

Multiple disease and treatment-related factors contribute to intestinal insult and influence the nutritional status of children with cancer. Many children with cancer will experience intestinal dysfunction during their cancer journey and children with cancer are a common referral group for inpatient parenteral nutrition. Appropriate use of parenteral nutrition in children with cancer and intestinal failure may alleviate malnutrition and associated risks. However, proper selection of patients, correct parenteral nutrition prescription, and close monitoring is important to avoid unnecessary intestinal failure or parenteral nutrition-related complications, minimize long-term nutritional sequelae or additional costs to health services, and optimize intestinal rehabilitation.

Gastrostomy tube use in children with cancer.

Children with cancer are at risk of malnutrition, which can impair critical childhood processes of growth and development and contribute to poor health outcomes. Enteral nutrition can effectively ameliorate malnutrition or weight loss in children with cancer; however, published nutrition support algorithms contain minimal specific information on gastrostomy tube use, and current literature is limited. Decisions about gastrostomy tube insertion in children with cancer can be challenging. Consideration of gastrostomy tube insertion is only appropriate in children with long-term dependence on enteral nutrition, particularly when nasogastric tube insertion is predicted or proven to be problematic. Specific indications for patient selection are unclear, and referring clinicians may be unaware of important absolute and relative contraindications. Complications are predominantly minor in nature; however, reported rates are high. Morbidity must be weighed carefully against the need and anticipated duration of enteral nutrition support, and further research in this area is needed.

Intractable Feeding Intolerance in Children With Severe Neurological Impairment: A Retrospective Case Review of Nine Children Known to a Pediatric Palliative Care Service.

BACKGROUND: Intractable feeding intolerance in children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) is poorly defined and understood. OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe 9 children with SNI, where intractable feeding intolerance was thought to be a contributor to their deterioration or death. (2) To consider terminology to describe the severe end of the spectrum of feeding difficulties in children with SNI. RESULTS: Mean age at death was 10.3 years (range: 5 - 15.6), and median time from palliative care referral to death was 3.1 months. Location of death was home (n = 3), hospice (n = 1), and hospital (n = 5) with 1 death in intensive care. Gastrointestinal "failure" or "dysfunction" were documented for 7 children, (median time between documentation and death was 3.9 months (range: .1 to 13.1)). All children were fed via a gastrostomy tube during their life (median age of insertion 2.5 years (range: 1.2 to 6.8 years)), and 7 via the jejunal route (median age of insertion 9.2 years (range 2.4 to 14.7 years)). Children lived a median of 9 percent of their lives after jejunal tube feeding was commenced. No child had home-based parenteral nutrition. Multiple symptom management medications were required. CONCLUSION: 'Intractable feeding intolerance' describes a clinical crossroads in a child's life where there is an opportunity to consider the appropriateness of further interventions. Further work should explore predictors of intractable feeding intolerance and the delicate balance between cause or contributor to death. The importance of clinician-family prognostic conversations and goal-concordant care both during life and in the terminal phase is highlighted.

A clinical consensus paper on jejunal tube feeding in children.

BACKGROUND: Feeding problems are common in children with complex medical problems or acute critical illness and enteral nutrition may be required. In certain situations, gastric tube feeding is poorly tolerated or may not be feasible. When feed intolerance persists despite appropriate adjustments to oral and gastric enteral regimens, jejunal tube feeding can be considered as an option for nutrition support. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert working group of the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition was convened. They identified topic questions and five key areas of jejunal tube feeding in children. Literatures searches were undertaken on Pubmed, Embase, and Medline for all relevant studies, between January 2000 and September 2022 (n = 103). Studies were assessed using National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines to generate statements, which were discussed as a group, followed by voting on statements using a modified Delphi process to determine consensus. RESULTS: A total of 24 consensus statements were created for five key areas: patient selection, type and selection of feeding tube, complications, clinical use of jejunal tubes, follow-up, and reassessment. CONCLUSION: Jejunal tube feeding is a safe and effective means of providing nutrition in a select group of pediatric patients with complex medical needs, who are unable to be fed by gastric tube feeding. Appropriate patient selection is important as complications associated with jejunal tube feeding are not uncommon, and although mostly minor, can be significant or require tube reinsertion. All children receiving jejunal tube feeding should have multidisciplinary team assessment and follow-up.

Pulmonary Manifestations of Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, and Liver Diseases in Children.

Pulmonary manifestations of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases are often subtle, and underlying disease may precede overt symptoms. A high index of suspicion and a low threshold for consultation with a pediatric pulmonologist is warranted in common GI conditions. This article outlines the pulmonary manifestations of different GI, pancreatic, and liver diseases in children, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and complications of chronic liver disease (hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension).

Indications and Patterns of Use for Parenteral Nutrition in Pediatric Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer are at risk of treatment related gastrointestinal toxicity and malnutrition. Intestinal dysfunction may preclude or limit use of enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition (PN) may be required. Published indications for PN use in children with cancer are generally nonspecific. We sought to describe patterns of use, indications, and frequency of PN prescription in children with cancer and propose indicators to guide appropriate PN use. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of children with cancer receiving inpatient PN in a tertiary referral pediatric hospital over 12 months was performed using electronic medical record search and paper records. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: PN was prescribed to 88 patients in 111 episodes. Total use (2377 days) represented 24% of annual inpatient days in all children with cancer. Primary clinical indications were mucositis (40%), feed intolerance (29%), postoperative (16%), or "other" (15%), (including nasogastric tube refusal (n = 6)). Patients with hematological cancer had longer median episodes (19 vs 12.5 days) and earlier commencement of PN after diagnosis (50 vs 80 days) than children with nonhematological cancer. Most PN episodes longer than 28 days were in children with hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). CONCLUSION: Inpatient PN use is common in childhood cancer. Indications include mucositis, feed intolerance, and surgical management. Patterns of use are influenced by cancer diagnosis and treatment, with greater use in children with hematological cancer and HSCT. Improved understanding and specific indications may guide appropriate PN prescription and minimize unnecessary risk, cost, and inconsistency in care.

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Children with intestinal failure (IF) have abnormal intestinal anatomy, secretion, or motility, which impairs homeostatic mechanisms and can lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). We sought to describe clinical features at the time of clinically suspected SIBO by experienced clinicians in children with IF on home parenteral nutrition (PN), review specific challenges of diagnostic testing in this population, and describe potential new diagnostic surrogate markers. METHODS: A descriptive single-center retrospective chart review was performed during all episodes of clinically suspected SIBO over 33 months. Information was recorded on clinical symptoms, and diagnostic tests performed. RESULTS: Of all patients on home PN, 71% (12/17) had at least one episode of clinically suspected SIBO (mean 1 episode/year, range 1-7); 50% of patients had short bowel syndrome (SBS), and 50% had non-SBS IF. The average reported symptoms per episode were 1.9 (range 1-5). Children with SBS reported fewer symptoms per episode (1.5) than children with non-SBS IF (2.3). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported symptom, particularly in children with SBS. CONCLUSIONS: Children with IF on home PN are a high-risk group for SIBO. Clinical features of SIBO vary depending on the cause of IF and may mimic symptoms of the underlying condition. Diagnostic tests have innate challenges in this group, and a strong index of clinical suspicion is paramount. Further research is recommended into potential new surrogate markers (urinary metabolite screen, gastric aspirate) for this diagnostically challenging population.

The frequency of constipation in children with nocturnal enuresis: a comparison with parental reporting.

AIMS: To identify the prevalence of constipation in children with nocturnal enuresis presenting to a tertiary paediatric outpatient service and to assess parental and clinician recognition of constipation. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of children with nocturnal enuresis at presentation to a continence service. Data relating to the child's bowel habits, pattern of enuresis and other history items were obtained from parental questionnaires and paediatrician assessments. Presence and severity of constipation was assessed independently by parents and clinicians. Kappa was used to compare agreement between parental reporting and clinician assessment of constipation. RESULTS: Of the 277 participants aged 4.8-17.5 years (median 8.6 years), 36.1% (n = 95) were identified as constipated by the clinician-based scoring method ('Constipation Score') compared with 14.1% from parental reporting (Kappa = 0.155, P = 0.003). Despite the poor overall recognition of constipation by parents, parental and clinician assessment of frequency of bowel motions (Kappa = 0.804) and soiling (Kappa = 0.384) were similar. Major factors influencing parental reporting of constipation were frequency of bowel motions and soiling with less emphasis on straining and stool consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of constipation was high among children with nocturnal enuresis as assessed by clinicians despite poor identification by parents. This may limit optimal diagnosis and management.