Thirty-day outcomes for suboccipital decompression in adults with Chiari malformation type I: a frailty-driven perspective from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

OBJECTIVE: When indicated, patients with symptomatic Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) may benefit from suboccipital decompression (SOD). Although SOD is considered a lower-risk neurosurgical procedure, preoperative risk assessment and careful surgical patient selection remain critical. The objectives of the present study were twofold: 1) describe 30-day SOD outcomes for CM patients with attention to the impact of preoperative frailty and 2) design a predictive model for the primary endpoint of nonhome discharge (NHD). METHODS: There were 1015 CM-I patients who underwent SOD in the 2011-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database, as specified by diagnostic and procedural codes (Current Procedural Terminology code 61343). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze total cohort baseline demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes within 30 days of surgery. Univariate cross-tabulation was used to compare baseline demographics and preoperative characteristics across the NHD and home discharge (HD) cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the discriminative ability of the revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) on NHD. RESULTS: The study cohort had a median age of 36 years, and 80.6% of patients were female. Race distribution was categorized as White (69.9%), Black (16.6%), and other groups (13.6%). The most common preoperative comorbidities were active smoking (24.4%), hypertension (19.2%), and diabetes mellitus (4.7%). The primary outcome of NHD occurred in 4.6% of patients (n = 47). Increasing frailty (measured by the RAI-rev) was associated with a stepwise increase in the rate of NHD: 2.3% for RAI-rev scores 0-10, 5.8% for RAI-rev scores 11-15, 7.6% for RAI-rev scores 16-20, 18.2% for RAI-rev scores 21-25, and 77.8% for RAI-rev scores ≥ 26 (p < 0.001). Other preoperative factors associated with NHD included older age, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, and elevated creatinine (all p < 0.01). The other most common 30-day complications included unplanned readmission (9.3%), unplanned reoperation (5.3%), return to the operating room (5.8%), Clavien-Dindo grade IV (life-threatening) (1.5%), organ space surgical site infection (SSI) (1.5%), superficial SSI (1.4%), and reoperation for a CSF leak (1.1%). Surgical mortality (within 30 days) was extremely rare (1/1015, 0.1%). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that RAI-rev predicted NHD with significant discriminatory accuracy among CM-I patients who received SOD treatment (C-statistic 0.731, 95% CI 0.648-0.814). CONCLUSIONS: This decade-long analysis of a multicenter surgical registry provides internationally representative, modern rates of 30-day outcomes after suboccipital decompression (with or without duraplasty) for adult CM-I patients. Preoperative frailty assessment with the RAI-rev may help identify higher-risk surgical candidates.

Preoperative frailty measured by risk analysis index predicts complications and poor discharge outcomes after Brain Tumor Resection in a large multi-center analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the independent effect of frailty, as measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Administrative (RAI-A) for postoperative complications and discharge outcomes following brain tumor resection (BTR) in a large multi-center analysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing BTR were queried from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSIQP) for the years 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the independent associations between frailty tools (age, 5-factor modified frailty score [mFI-5], and RAI-A) on postoperative complications and discharge outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 30,951 patients who underwent craniotomy for BTR; the median age of our study sample was 59 (IQR 47-68) years old and 47.8% of patients were male. Overall, increasing RAI-A score, in an overall stepwise fashion, was associated with increasing risk of adverse outcomes including in-hospital mortality, non-routine discharge, major complications, Clavien-Dindo Grade IV complication, and extended length of stay. Multivariable regression analysis (adjusting for age, sex, BMI, non-elective surgery status, race, and ethnicity) demonstrated that RAI-A was an independent predictor for worse BTR outcomes. The RAI-A tiers 41-45 (1.2% cohort) and > 45 (0.3% cohort) were ~ 4 (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% CI: 2.1-8.9) and ~ 9 (OR: 9.5, 95% CI: 3.9-22.9) times more likely to have in-hospital mortality compared to RAI-A 0-20 (34% cohort). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing preoperative frailty as measured by the RAI-A score is independently associated with increased risk of complications and adverse discharge outcomes after BTR. The RAI-A may help providers present better preoperative risk assessment for patients and families weighing the risks and benefits of potential BTR.

Matrix metalloproteinases cleave membrane-bound PD-L1 on CD90+ (myo-)fibroblasts in Crohn's disease and regulate Th1/Th17 cell responses.

Increased T helper (Th)1/Th17 immune responses are a hallmark of Crohn's disease (CD) immunopathogenesis. CD90+ (myo-)fibroblasts (MFs) are abundant cells in the normal (N) intestinal mucosa contributing to mucosal tolerance via suppression of Th1 cell activity through cell surface membrane-bound PD-L1 (mPD-L1). CD-MFs have a decreased level of mPD-L1. Consequently, mPD-L1-mediated suppression of Th1 cells by CD-MFs is decreased, yet the mechanism responsible for the reduction in mPDL-1 is unknown. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) has been reported in CD. Herein we observed that when compared to N- and ulcerative colitis (UC)-MFs, CD-MFs increase in LPS-inducible levels of MMP-7 and -9 with a significant increase in both basal and inducible MMP-10. A similar pattern of MMP expression was observed in the CD-inflamed mucosa. Treatment of N-MFs with a combination of recombinant human MMP-7, -9 and -10 significantly decreased mPD-L1. In contrast, inhibition of MMP activity with MMP inhibitors or anti-MMP-10 neutralizing antibodies restores mPD-L1 on CD-MFs. CD-MFs demonstrated reduced capacity to suppress Th1 and Th17 responses from activated CD4+ T cells. By contrast, supplementation of the CD-MF:T-cell co-cultures with MMP inhibitors or anti-MMP neutralizing antibodies restored the CD-MF-mediated suppression. Our data suggest that (i) increased MMP-10 expression by CD-MFs and concomitant cleavage of PD-L1 from the surface of CD-MFs are likely to be one of the factors contributing to the decrease of mPD-L1-mediated suppression of Th1/Th17 cells in CD; and (ii) MMPs are likely to have a significant role in the intestinal mucosal immune responses.

Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy can be performed concurrently to treat rectal and vaginal prolapse. We hypothesized that concurrent procedures might be associated with more complications than rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy alone. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or rectopexy, or concurrent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy were identified in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2013 to 2016. Preoperative characteristics, operative time, and 30-day post-operative complications were compared between groups. Complications were those defined by the ACS Risk Calculator. Descriptive tests and regression methods were utilized for group comparisons. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: We identified 7,232 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, 1,560 laparoscopic rectopexy, and 123 concurrent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy cases. Patients undergoing concurrent procedures were more commonly white, non-Hispanic, non-diabetic, and smokers. Operative time was longest for concurrent procedures, followed by sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing isolated rectopexy were more commonly ≥ American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 (p < 0.0001). Rates of any complication for colpopexy, rectopexy, and concurrent procedures did not differ (6.18%, 7.63%, 8.94%; p = 0.058). Serious complication rates for colpopexy, rectopexy, and concurrent procedures did not differ (5.52%, 6.35%, 8.13%; p = 0.222). Odds of experiencing any complication were higher comparing rectopexy with colpopexy alone (adjusted odds ratio = 1.252, 95% CI 1.002-1.565). Comparing all groups, rectopexy had the highest mortality, reoperation, and transfusion rates (all p < 0.05). Concurrent procedures had the highest surgical site and urinary tract infection rates (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Complications were low for all three procedures. Concurrent repair may be appropriate in well-selected patients.

Andexanet alfa therapy showed No increased rate of thromboembolic events in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage patients: A multicenter electronic health record study.

•Intracranial hemorrhage accounts for two out of every three major intracranial hemorrhages.•Systemic anticoagulation is routinely prescribed for prevention of cerebrovascular accidents.•The FDA approved Andexanet alfa to treat life-threatening bleeding.•Andexanet alfa relationship to outcomes requires further investigation.

Clinically predictive baseline labs for post-operative outcomes of brain tumors using NSQIP database.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the effect of baseline Preoperative Laboratory Values (PLV) on post-operative Brain Tumor Resection (BTR) outcomes in a large national registry. METHODS: We extracted data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for BTR patients 2015-2019 (n = 3 0,951). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for PLV and key surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The most significant PLV predictors of 30-day mortality after BTR included hypernatremia (odds ratio, OR 4.184, 95% CI, 2.384-7.343, p < 0.001), high serum creatinine (OR 2.244, 95% CI 1.502-3.352, p < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR 1.997, 95% CI 1.438, 2.772, p < 0.001), and leukocytosis (OR 1.635, 95% CI 1.264, 2.116, p < 0.001). The most significant predictors of Clavien IV complications were increased INR (OR 2.653, 95% CI 1.444, 4.875, p < 0.01), thrombocytopenia (OR 1.514, 95% CI 1.280, 1.792, p < 0.001), hypoalbuminemia (OR 1.480, 95% CI 1.274, 1.719, p < 0.001), and leukocytosis (OR 1.467, 95% CI 1.306, 1.647, p < 0.001). The most robust predictors of eLOS were increased INR (OR 1.941, 95% CI 1.231, 3.060, p < 0.01) and hypoalbuminemia (OR 1.993, 95% CI 1.823, 2.179, p < 0.001), and those for non-routine discharge included increased INR (OR 1.897, 95% CI 1.196, 3.008, p < 0.01) and hypernatremia (OR 1.565, 95% CI 1.217, 2.012, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Several PLV independently predicted worse outcomes in BTR patients. Baseline labs should be routinely used for the pre-operative risk stratification of these patients.

Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index Predicts Nonhome Discharge and Mortality After Resection in Refractory Epilepsy: Analysis of 1236 Patients From a Prospective Surgical Registry, 2012 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of epilepsy surgery patients remains difficult. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a frailty measurement that augments preoperative risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate RAI's discriminative threshold for nonhome discharge disposition (NHD) and mortality (or discharge to hospice within 30 days of operation) in epilepsy surgery patients. METHODS: Patients were queried from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2020) using diagnosis/procedure codes. Linear-by-linear trend tests assessed RAI's relationship with NHD and mortality. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed by C-statistics (95% CI) in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Epilepsy resections (N = 1236) were grouped into temporal lobe (60.4%, N = 747) and nontemporal lobe (39.6%, N = 489) procedures. Patients were stratified by RAI tier: 76.5% robust (RAI 0-20), 16.2% normal (RAI 21-30), 6.6% frail (RAI 31-40), and 0.8% severely frail (RAI 41 and above). The NHD rate was 18.0% (N = 222) and positively associated with increasing RAI tier: 12.5% robust, 34.0% normal, 38.3% frail, and 50.0% severely frail ( P < .001). RAI had robust predictive discrimination for NHD in overall cohort (C-statistic 0.71), temporal lobe (C-statistic 0.70), and nontemporal lobe (C-statistic 0.71) cohorts. The mortality rate was 2.7% (N = 33) and significantly associated with RAI frailty: 1.1% robust, 8.0% normal, 6.2% frail, and 20.0% severely frail ( P < .001). RAI had excellent predictive discrimination for mortality in overall cohort (C-statistic 0.78), temporal lobe (C-statistic 0.80), and nontemporal lobe (C-statistic 0.74) cohorts. CONCLUSION: The RAI frailty score predicts mortality and NHD after epilepsy surgery. This is accomplished with a user-friendly calculator: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/epilepsy/ .

Preoperative frailty risk in deep brain stimulation patients: Risk analysis index predicts Clavien-Dindo IV complications.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves patients' quality of life in multiple movement disorders and chronic neurodegenerative diseases. There are no published studies assessing frailty's impact on DBS outcomes. We evaluated frailty's impacts on DBS outcomes, comparing discriminative thresholds of the risk analysis index (RAI) to modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) for predicting Clavien-Dindo complications (CDIV). METHODS: Patients who underwent DBS between 2015 and 2019 in the ACS-NSQIP registry were included. We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to examine the discriminative thresholds of RAI and mFI-5 and multivariable analyses for postoperative outcomes. Our primary outcome was CDIV, and secondary outcomes were discharge to higher-level care facility, unplanned reoperation within 30 days, in any hospital, for any procedure related to the index procedure, and extended length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 3795 patients were included. In the ROC analysis for CDIV, RAI showed superior discriminative threshold (C-statistic = 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.80, <0.001) than mFI-5 (C-statistic = 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.70, P = 0.08). On multivariable analyses, frailty stratified by RAI, had independent associations with CDIV, i.e., pre-frail 2-fold increase OR 2.04 (95% CI: 1.94-2.14) p < 0.001, and frail 39% increase OR 1.39 (95% CI: 1.27-1.53), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Frailty was an independent risk-factor for CDIV. The RAI had superior discriminative thresholds than mFI-5 in predicting CDIV after DBS. Our ability to identify frail patients prior to DBS presents a novel clinical opportunity for quality improvement strategies to target this specific patient population. RAI may be a useful primary frailty screening modality for potential DBS candidates.

The 5-item modified frailty index predicts spinal osteotomy outcomes better than age in adult spinal deformity patients: an ACS - NSQIP analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) as compared to chronological age in predicting outcomes of spinal osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) patients. METHODS: Using Current Procedural and Terminology (CPT) codes, the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for adult patients undergoing spinal osteotomy from 2015 to 2019. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status, measured by mFI-5 score, and chronological age on postoperative outcomes. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to analyze the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: A total of 1,789 spinal osteotomy patients (median age 62 years) were included in the analysis. Among the patients assessed, 38.5% (n = 689) were pre-frail, 14.6% frail (n = 262), and 2.2% (n = 39) severely frail using the mFI-5. Based on the multivariate analysis, increasing frailty tier was associated with worsening outcomes, and higher odds ratios (OR) for poor outcomes were found for increasing frailty tiers as compared to age. Severe frailty was associated with the worst outcomes, e.g., unplanned readmission (OR 9.618, [95% CI 4.054-22.818], p < 0.001) and major complications (OR 5.172, [95% CI 2.271-11.783], p < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (AUC 0.838) demonstrated superior discriminative performance than age (AUC 0.601) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The mFI5 frailty score was found to be a better predictor than age of worse postoperative outcomes in ASD patients. Incorporating frailty in preoperative risk stratification is recommended in ASD surgery.

Perioperative Risk Stratification Model for Readmission after Panniculectomy.

BACKGROUND: Readmission is an important metric for surgical quality of care. This study aimed to develop a validated risk model that reliably predicts readmission after panniculectomy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients who had undergone panniculectomy from 2005 to 2018. The outcome of interest was 30-day readmission. The cohort was divided randomly into 70 percent development and 30 percent validation groups. Independent predictors of 30-day readmission were identified using multivariable logistic regression on the development group. The predictors were weighted according to beta coefficients to generate an integer-based clinical risk score predictive of readmission, which was validated against the validation group. RESULTS: For the model selection, 22 variables were identified based on criteria of p < 0.05 percent and complete data availability. Variables included in the development model included inpatient surgery, hypertension, obesity, functional dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, wound class greater than or equal to 3, American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than 3, and liposuction. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the validation group rendered an area under the curve of 0.710, which demonstrates the accuracy of this prediction model. The predicted incidence within each risk stratum was statistically similar to the observed incidence in the validation group ( p < 0.01), further highlighting the accuracy of the model. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a validated risk stratification model for readmission following panniculectomy. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether the implementation of the authors' clinical risk score optimizes safety and reduces readmission rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Modified Frailty Index (mFI) predicts 30-day complications after microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Frailty lacks a universal definition. The modified Frailty Index (mFI) using patient comorbidities can be used to measure frailty. We hypothesized that mFI predicts 30-day complications after microsurgical breast reconstruction. American College of Surgeons' (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) was investigated to identify patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction between 2005-2014 using Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code, 19364. We used mFI as a measure of frailty. The patients were assigned a frailty score based on the number of preoperative comorbid conditions as defined by the mFI. Other risk indices used include age, BMI, wound class, ASA class. Stratification was performed in ascending order for each. The outcome measure was aggregate 30-day complications. Regression analysis was performed followed by Receptor Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the accuracy of each risk index in predicting 30-day complications. Of the 3237 patients 24% experienced complications. Univariate logistic regression analysis found odds ratio of complications for frailty score 1 = 22.1 (CI = 17.9-27.3, p < 0.01), and 2 = 28 (CI = 18.3-43, p < 0.01) compared to frailty score = 0. ROC curve demonstrated mFI with the highest concordance score (c-score = 0.816). Multivariable logistic regression found frailty as the strongest independent predictor of 30-day aggregate complications adjusted OR = 22.24, CI = 17.77-27.82, p < 0.01 when compared to other risk indices. The modified Frailty Index is a simple, reliable, and objective tool that can be used to predict postoperative complications after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The application of this tool can help microsurgeons preoperatively identify patients who are at high risk.Abbreviations: ACS: American College of Surgeons; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; CHF: congestive heart failure; CPT: current procedural terminology; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DM: diabetes mellitus; IRB: institutional review board; mfi: modified frailty index; MI: myocardial infarction; NSQIP: national surgical quality improvement program; PVD: peripheral vascular disease; ROC: receptor operating characteristic; TIA: transient ischemic attach.

Risk Analysis Index and Its Recalibrated Version Predict Postoperative Outcomes Better Than 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in Traumatic Spinal Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the discriminative ability of the Risk Analysis Index-administrative (RAI-A) and its recalibrated version (RAI-Rev), compared to the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for traumatic spine injuries (TSIs). METHODS: The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent surgical intervention for TSI from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database 2015-2019 (n = 6,571). Multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI-Rev, RAI-A, and mFI-5 for 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis showed that with all 3 frailty scores, increasing frailty tiers resulted in worse postoperative outcomes, and patients identified as frail and severely frail using RAI-Rev and RAI-A had the highest odds of poor outcomes. In the ROC curve/C-statistics analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality and morbidity, both RAI-Rev and RAI-A outperformed mFI-5, and for many outcomes, RAI-Rev showed better discriminative performance compared to RAI-A, including mortality (p = 0.0043, DeLong test), extended length of stay (p = 0.0042), readmission (p < 0.0001), reoperation (p = 0.0175), and nonhome discharge (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both RAI-Rev and RAI-A performed better than mFI-5, and RAI-Rev was superior to RAI-A in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in TSI patients. RAI-based frailty indices can be used in preoperative risk assessment of spinal trauma patients.

Advanced frailty assessment tool predicts successful awake craniotomy in a 92-year-old patient: A case report.

Background: The awake craniotomy (AC) procedure allows for safe and maximal resection of brain tumors from highly eloquent regions. However, geriatric patients are often viewed as poor candidates for AC due to age and medical comorbidities. Frailty assessments gauge physiological reserve for surgery and are valuable tools for preoperative decision-making. Here, we present a novel case illustrating how frailty scoring enabled an elderly but otherwise healthy female to undergo successful AC for tumor resection. Case Description: A 92-year-old right-handed female with history of hypertension and basal cell skin cancer presented with a 1-month history of progressive aphasia and was found to have a ring-enhancing left frontoparietal mass abutting the rolandic cortex concerning for malignant neoplasm. Frailty scoring with the recalibrated risk analysis index (RAI-C) tool revealed a score of 30 (of 81) indicating low surgical risk. The patient and family were counseled appropriately that, despite advanced chronological age, a low frailty score predicts favorable surgical outcomes. The patient underwent left-sided AC for resection of tumor and experienced immediate improvement of speech intraoperatively. After surgery, the patient was neurologically intact and had an unremarkable postoperative course with significant improvements from preoperatively baseline at follow-up. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this case represents the oldest patient to undergo successful AC for brain tumor resection. Nonfrail patients over 90 years of age with the proper indications may tolerate cranial surgery. Frailty scoring is a powerful tool for preoperative risk assessment in the geriatric neurosurgery population.

Association of baseline frailty and age with postoperative outcomes in metastatic brain tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of baseline frailty status versus that of chronological age on surgical outcomes of metastatic brain tumor patients remains largely unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate this relationship for preoperative risk stratification using a large national database. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to extract data of metastatic brain tumor patients who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019 (n=5,943). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effect of age and modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) on mortality, major complications, unplanned readmission and reoperation, extended length of stay (eLOS), and non-home discharge. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that frailty status was significantly predictive of 30-day mortality, major complications, eLOS, and non-home discharge. Although increasing age was also a significant predictor of eLOS and discharge to non-home destination, effect sizes were smaller compared with frailty. CONCLUSIONS: The present study, based on analysis of data from a large national registry, shows that frailty, when compared with age, is a superior predictor of postoperative outcomes in metastatic brain tumor patients. A future prospective study, namely a randomized controlled trial, would be beneficial in helping to corroborate the findings of this retrospective study.

Association of baseline frailty status and age with outcomes in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis of 5818 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2015-2019.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of frailty, as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), with that of age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for intracranial meningiomas, using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2015-2019) was queried to analyze data from patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection (N = 5,818). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and mFI-5 score were performed for 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, extended hospital length of stay (eLOS), and discharge to a non-home destination. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for sex, body mass index, transfer status, smoking, and operative time) demonstrated that mFI-5 and age were significant predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients with intracranial meningioma. However, based on odds ratios (OR) and effect sizes, increasing frailty tiers were better predictors than age of adverse outcomes. Severely frail patients showed highest effects sizes for all postoperative outcome variables [OR 11.17 (95% CI 3.45-36.19), p<0.001 for mortality; OR 4.15 (95% CI 2.46-6.99), p<0.001 for major complications; OR 4.37 (95% CI 2.68-7.12), p<0.001 for unplanned readmission; OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.17-4.55), p<0.001 for unplanned reoperation; OR 4.28 (95% CI 2.74-6.68), p<0.001 for eLOS; and OR 9.34 (95% CI 6.03-14.47, p<0.001) for discharge other than home. CONCLUSION: In this national database study, baseline frailty status was a better independent predictor for worse postoperative outcomes than age in patients with intracranial meningioma.

Worse Pituitary Adenoma Surgical Outcomes Predicted by Increasing Frailty, Not Age.

PURPOSE: Increasing patient age has been associated with worse outcomes after pituitary adenoma resection in previous studies, but the prognostic value of frailty compared with advancing age on pituitary adenoma resection outcomes has not been clearly evaluated. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2019 was queried for data for patients aged >18 years who underwent pituitary adenoma resection (n = 1454 identified patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and frailty (5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) were performed on 30-day mortality, major complications, extended length of stay (eLOS), discharge destination, and readmission and reoperation. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare effect of age and mFI-5. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, increasing frailty was significantly associated with greater risk of unplanned readmission (frail: odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.2; severely frail: OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.4-19.8) and a major complication (frail: OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.1-6.1). Severe frailty was also associated with nonhome discharge (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 3.2-35.8) and eLOS (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5-13.4). Increasing age was not associated with any of these outcome measures. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated similar trends. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the mFI-5 score showed higher discrimination for major complications compared with age (area under the curve: 0.624 vs. 0.503; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, and not advancing age, was an independent predictor for major complications, unplanned readmissions, eLOS, and nonhome discharge after pituitary adenoma resection, suggesting frailty to be superior to age in preoperative risk stratification in this patient population.

Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status (as measured by modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]) versus age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect spinal tumor resection patients' data from 2015 to 2019 (n = 4,662). Univariate and multivariate analyses for age and mFI-5 were performed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to a nonhome destination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that mFI-5 was a more robust predictor of worse postoperative outcomes as compared to age. Furthermore, based on categorical analysis of frailty tiers, increasing frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. 'Severely frail' patients were found to have the highest risk, with odds ratio 16.4 (95% confidence interval [CI],11.21-35.44) for 30-day mortality, 3.02 (95% CI, 1.97-4.56) for major complications, and 2.94 (95% CI, 2.32-4.21) for LOS. In ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743) achieved superior discrimination compared to age (AUC = 0.594) for mortality. CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, as measured by mFI-5, is a more robust predictor as compared to age, for poor postoperative outcomes in spinal tumor surgery patients. The mFI-5 may be clinically used for preoperative risk stratification of spinal tumor patients.

Infectious titres of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in patient lesions, methodological considerations in evaluating HPV infectivity and implications for the efficacy of high-level disinfectants.

BACKGROUND: Recent publications from a single research group have suggested that aldehyde-based high-level disinfectants (HLDs), such as ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA), are not effective at inactivating HPVs and that therefore, patients may be at risk of HPV infection from medical devices. These results could have significant public health consequences and therefore necessitated evaluation of their reproducibility and clinical relevance. METHODS: We developed methods and used standardised controls to: (1) quantify the infectious levels of clinically-sourced HPVs from patient lesions and compare them to laboratory-derived HPVs, (2) evaluate experimental factors that should be controlled to ensure consistent and reproducible infectivity measurements of different HPV genotypes, and (3) determine the efficacy of select HLDs. FINDINGS: A novel focus forming unit (FFU) infectivity assay demonstrated that exfoliates from patient anogenital lesions and respiratory papillomas yielded infectious HPV burdens up to 2.7 × 103 FFU; therefore, using 2.2 × 102 to 1.0 × 104 FFU of laboratory-derived HPVs in disinfection assays provides a relevant range for clinical exposures. RNase and neutralising antibody sensitivities were used to ensure valid infectivity measures of tissue-derived and recombinant HPV preparations. HPV infectivity was demonstrated over a dynamic range of 4-5 log10; and disinfection with OPA and hypochlorite was achieved over 3 to >4 log10 with multiple genotypes of tissue-derived and recombinant HPV isolates. INTERPRETATION: This work, along with a companion publication from an independent lab in this issue, address a major public health question by showing that HPVs are susceptible to HLDs. FUNDING: Advanced Sterilization Products; US NIH (R01CA207368, U19AI084081, P30CA118100).

Behind the Mask: An Exploratory Assessment of Female Surgeons' Experiences of Gender Bias.

Though overt sexism is decreasing, women now experience subtle, often unconscious, gender bias as microaggressions. The authors sought to explore the prevalence and impact of the sexist microaggressions female surgeons experience, using a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach (January 2018-April 2018), to identify opportunities for education and prevention. First, all resident, fellow, and attending female surgeons at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNM HSC) were invited to participate in focus groups conducted by experienced moderators using a semistructured interview guide based on the 7 Sexist Microaggressions Experiences and Stress Scale (Sexist MESS) domains. Qualitative analysis was performed using line-by-line manual coding to identify themes aligned with the Sexist MESS domains as well as other gender bias experiences of female surgeons. Next, a survey was sent to all resident, fellow, and attending female surgeons at the UNM HSC, which included the Sexist MESS questionnaire and questions related to surgeon-specific experiences of gender bias that the authors developed based on major thematic categories from the focus groups.Four focus groups of 23 female surgeons were conducted, revealing 4 themes: exclusion, increased effort, adaptation, and resilience to workplace slights. The survey response rate was 64% (65/101 surgeons). Across Sexist MESS domains, the frequency and severity of microaggressions was higher for trainees than attendings. The variables of non-White race/ethnicity, having children under 18, and fellowship training generally did not demonstrate statistical significance. This exploratory study adds to the growing body of evidence that gender bias in surgery continues and frequently manifests as microaggressions. Trainees reported the highest rates and severity of microaggressions and bias experiences. Further research should investigate how to address microaggressions, the experiences of male surgeons, the perspectives of medical students and groups who were reported as often perpetuating gender bias, and the efficacy of possible interventions.