Catheter directed thrombolysis for a pulmonary arterial thrombus on VA ECMO in a child - a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation is considered a high risk support strategy in the paediatric population. METHODS: We describe the case of a 12 year old boy who required V-A ECMO support for rapidly deteriorating cardiomyopathy and developed a massive pulmonary embolus (PE) peri-cannulation. Subsequent investigations were also positive for heparin induced thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: We elected to treat the PE with ultrasound accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis using the advantages of this minimally invasive targeted method to try and resolve the PE and avoid a cerebral haemorrhage, both of which would have taken the patient off the urgent transplant list. CONCLUSION: The PE resolved in 24 h and he went on to receive a cardiac transplant and have a favourable outcome.

RAND appropriateness panel to determine the applicability of UK guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other strategies in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has become the most common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) worldwide. Features of the pathophysiology and clinical presentation partially distinguish it from 'classical' ARDS. A Research and Development (RAND) analysis gauged the opinion of an expert panel about the management of ARDS with and without COVID-19 as the precipitating cause, using recent UK guidelines as a template. METHODS: An 11-person panel comprising intensive care practitioners rated the appropriateness of ARDS management options at different times during hospital admission, in the presence or absence of, or varying severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection on a scale of 1-9 (where 1-3 is inappropriate, 4-6 is uncertain and 7-9 is appropriate). A summary of the anonymised results was discussed at an online meeting moderated by an expert in RAND methodology. The modified online survey comprising 76 questions, subdivided into investigations (16), non-invasive respiratory support (18), basic intensive care unit management of ARDS (20), management of refractory hypoxaemia (8), pharmacotherapy (7) and anticoagulation (7), was completed again. RESULTS: Disagreement between experts was significant only when addressing the appropriateness of diagnostic bronchoscopy in patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Adherence to existing published guidelines for the management of ARDS for relevant evidence-based interventions was recommended. Responses of the experts to the final survey suggested that the supportive management of ARDS should be the same, regardless of a COVID-19 diagnosis. For patients with ARDS with COVID-19, the panel recommended routine treatment with corticosteroids and a lower threshold for full anticoagulation based on a high index of suspicion for venous thromboembolic disease. CONCLUSION: The expert panel found no reason to deviate from the evidence-based supportive strategies for managing ARDS outlined in recent guidelines.

Veno-arterio-venous ECMO for septic cardiomyopathy: a single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: The role of extracorporeal support for patients with septic shock remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our single-centre experience with veno-arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VAV ECMO) in adult patients with severe respiratory failure and septic cardiomyopathy. Clinical data was extracted from electronic medical records including a dedicated ECMO referral and follow-up database. RESULTS: Twelve patients were commenced on VAV ECMO for septic cardiomyopathy for a median of four days (IQR 3.0 to 5.3) between 01/2014 and 12/2017. Five patients (41.7%) had a cardiac arrest prior to initiation of ECMO support. At baseline, median left ventricular ejection fraction was 16.25% (IQR 13.13 to 17.5) and median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 9 kPa (IQR 6.5 to 12.0) [67.50 mmHg (IQR 48.75 to 90.00)]. The survival rate to hospital discharge for VAV ECMO was 75% in this cohort. None of the surviving patients died within the follow-up period (median six month). CONCLUSION: VAV ECMO is a feasible rescue strategy for a small proportion of patients with combined respiratory and cardiac failure secondary to septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy. We provide a detailed report of our experience with this technique. Further research is required comparing the different extracorporeal strategies directly to conventional resuscitation and against each other.

Steroid exposure and outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Background: Corticosteroids are used to treat COVID-19 pneumonia. However, the optimal dose is unclear. This study describes the association between corticosteroid exposure with disease severity and outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective, observational study including adult ICU patients who received systemic corticosteroids for COVID-19 pneumonia between March 2020 and March 2021. We recorded patient characteristics, disease severity, total steroid exposure, respiratory support and gas exchange data, and 90-day mortality. Results: We included 362 patients. We allocated patients to groups with increasing disease severity according to the highest level of respiratory support that they received: high-flow nasal oxygen or continuous positive airway pressure (HFNO/CPAP) in 12.7%, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in 61.6%, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 25.7%. For these three groups, the median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) age was 61 (54-71) vs 58 (50-66) vs 46 (38-53) yr, respectively (P<0.001); median (IQR) APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II scores were 12 (9-15) vs 14 (12-18) vs 15 (12-17), respectively (P=0.006); the median (IQR) lowest P a O 2 /FiO2 ratio was 15.1 (11.8-21.7) vs 15.1 (10.7-22.2) vs 9.5 (7.9-10.9) kPa, respectively (P<0.001). Ninety-day mortality was 9% vs 27% vs 37% (P=0.002). Median (IQR) dexamethasone-equivalent exposure was 37 (24-62) vs 174 (86-504) vs 535 (257-1213) mg (P<0.001). 'Pulsed' steroids were administered to 26% of the IMV group and 48% of the ECMO group. Patients with higher disease severity who received pulse steroids had a higher 90-day mortality. Conclusions: Corticosteroid exposure increased with the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Pulsed dose steroids were used more frequently in patients receiving greater respiratory support. Future studies should address patient selection and outcomes associated with pulsed dose steroids in patients with severe and deteriorating COVID-19 pneumonia.

Prevalence and Indications for Oxygenator Circuit Replacement in Patients Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we aimed to describe the rate of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit change, the associated risk factors and its relationship with patient characteristics and outcome in patients receiving venovenous (VV) ECMO at our center between January 2015 and November 2017. Twenty-seven percent of the patients receiving VV ECMO (n = 224) had at least one circuit change, which was associated with lower ICU survival (68% vs 82% p=0.032) and longer ICU stay (30 vs . 17 days p < 0.001). Circuit duration was similar when stratified by gender, clinical severity, or prior circuit change. Hematological abnormalities and increased transmembrane lung pressure (TMLP) were the most frequent indication for circuit change. The change in transmembrane lung resistance (Δ TMLR) gave better prediction of circuit change than TMLP, TMLR, or ΔTMLP. Low postoxygenator PO 2 was indicated as a reason for one-third of the circuit changes. However, the ECMO oxygen transfer was significantly higher in cases of circuit change with documented "low postoxygenator PO 2 " than those without (244 ± 62 vs. 200 ± 57 ml/min; p = 0.009). The results suggest that circuit change in VV ECMO is associated with worse outcomes, that the Δ TMLR is a better predictor of circuit change than TMLP, and that the postoxygenator PO 2 is an unreliable proxy for the oxygenator function.

Outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients managed in a high-volume severe respiratory failure and ECMO centre in the United Kingdom.

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic institutions have needed to develop pragmatic clinical pathways to balance the excess critical care demand and local resources. In this single-centre retrospective cohort study we describe the outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) critical care service. Patients were managed according to a local respiratory failure management pathway that was predicated on timely invasive ventilation when indicated and tailored ventilatory strategies according to pulmonary mechanics. Between 2 March and 25 May 2020 GSTT critical care service admitted 316 patients with confirmed COVID-19. Of the 201 patients admitted directly through the Emergency Department (ED) with a completed critical care outcome, 71.1% survived to critical care discharge. These favourable outcomes may serve to inform the wider debate on optimal organ support in COVID-19.

A survey on the practices and capabilities in the management of respiratory failure in South East England.

INTRODUCTION: The variability of acute respiratory distress syndrome management may affect the referral practice to severe respiratory failure centres. We described the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in our catchment area. METHODS: An electronic survey was administered to 42 intensive care units in South-East England. RESULTS: Response rate was 71.4%. High-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation were used 'often' in moderate-acute respiratory distress syndrome by 46.7% and 60%. During invasive ventilation, 90% preferred pressure control, targeting tidal volumes of 6-8 ml/kg (53.3%) or 4-6 ml/kg (46.7%). Positive end-expiratory pressure was selected by positive end-expiratory pressure/inspiratory fraction of oxygen tables (50%) or decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trials (20%). Neuro-muscular blockers were widely used, although routinely by only 3.3%. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (10%) and inhaled nitric oxide (13.3%) were rarely used. None used oesophageal manometry. Recruitment manoeuvres were used 'often' by 26.7%. Equipment (90%) and protocols (80%) for prone position were common, with sessions mostly lasting 12-18 h. CONCLUSIONS: Although variable, practice well reflected the available evidence. Proning was widely practiced with good availability of educational resources and protocolised care.

Assessment of Right Ventricular Function With CT and Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: Changes in right ventricular size and function are frequently observed in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The majority of patients who receive venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation undergo chest CT and transthoracic echocardiography. The aims of this study were to compare the use of CT and transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate the right ventricular function and to determine the prevalence of acute cor pulmonale in this patient population. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, single-center, cohort study. SETTING: Severe respiratory failure and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center. PATIENTS: About 107 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome managed with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: Chest CT to evaluate right ventricular size and transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate right ventricular size and function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 107 patients had a qualitative assessment of right ventricular size and function on transthoracic echocardiography. Quantitative measurements were available in 54 patients (50%) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography and in 107 of patients (100%) who received CT. Right ventricular dilatation was defined as a right ventricle end-diastolic diameter greater than left ventricular end-diastolic diameter upon visual assessment or an right ventricle end-diastolic diameter/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and/or right ventricle cavity area/left ventricular cavity area of greater than 0.9. Right ventricle systolic function was visually estimated as being normal or impaired (visual right ventricular systolic impairment). The right ventricle was found to be dilated in 38/107 patients (36%) and in 58/107 patients (54%), using transthoracic echocardiography or CT right ventricle end-diastolic diameter/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, respectively. When the CT right ventricle cavity/left ventricular cavity area criterion was used, the right ventricle was dilated in 19/107 patients (18%). About 33/107 patients (31%) exhibited visual right ventricular systolic impairment. Transthoracic echocardiography right ventricle end-diastolic diameter/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter showed good agreement with CT right ventricle cavity/left ventricular cavity area (R 2 = 0.57; p < 0.01). A CT right ventricle cavity/left ventricular cavity area greater than 0.9 provided the optimal cutoff for acute cor pulmonale on transthoracic echocardiography with an AUC of 0.78. Acute cor pulmonale was defined by the presence of a right ventricle "D-shape" and quantitative right ventricle dilatation on transthoracic echocardiography or a right ventricle cavity/left ventricular cavity area greater than 0.9 on CT. A diagnosis of acute cor pulmonale was made in 9/54 (14% patients) on transthoracic echocardiography and in 19/107 (18%) on CT. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in right ventricular size and function are common in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with up to 18% showing imaging evidence of acute cor pulmonale. A CT right ventricular cavity /left ventricular cavity area greater than 0.9 is indicative of impaired right ventricular systolic function.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in HIV-positive patients with severe respiratory failure: a retrospective observational case series.

The objective is to describe the outcomes of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe respiratory failure (SRF). The design and setting was a single centre retrospective observational case series, from January 2012 to June 2017, at a tertiary university hospital and regional referral centre for ECMO in the United Kingdom. The participants were all patients referred with SRF and HIV infection. The main outcome measure was patient 90-day survival. Twenty-four patients were referred, of whom nine received ECMO. Six out of nine (67%) of patients were alive at 90 days. Median duration of ECMO was 18 days. There were no identified differences between survivors and non-survivors. ECMO can be used successfully in selected patients with HIV and SRF, including those with poor HIV control and high illness severity. HIV status alone should not exclude patients from treatment with extracorporeal therapy.

A Retrospective Observational Case Series of Low-Flow Venovenous Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Use in Patients with Respiratory Failure.

We aimed to describe the use of venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. We performed a retrospective case note review of patients admitted to our tertiary regional intensive care unit and commenced on ECCO2R from August 2013 to February 2015. Fourteen patients received ECCO2R. Demographic data, physiologic data (including pH and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood [PaCO2]) when starting ECCO2R (t = 0), at 4 hourly intervals for the first 24 hours, then at 24 hour intervals until cessation of ECCO2R, and overall outcome were recorded. Patients are reported separately depending on whether the indication for ECCO2R was an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n = 5), or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and persisting hypercapnoea (n = 9). Patients were managed with ECCO2R (Hemolung, ALung Inc, Pittsburgh, PA). Median duration of ECCO2R was 5 days. Four complications related to ECCO2R were reported, none resulting in serious adverse outcomes. Ten patients were discharged from intensive care unit (ICU) alive. A statistically significant improvement in pH (p = 0.012) was demonstrated. Our observational series of ECCO2R shows that this technique can be safely used to achieve therapeutic goals in patients requiring lung protection, and in COPD, in line with current publications in this area.

Medicines management in the theatre suite.

The safe management of medicines within the theatre complex, from storage to administration, is a key component in preventing patient safety incidents. Simple measures, such as double-checking or clear labelling, can be utilised to reduce the risk of inadvertent drug administration. However, the recognition that human factors contribute to errors has led to more advanced, electronic solutions being utilised. One such automated system, involving barcoding together with visual and auditory cues, is currently under assessment by the National Patient Safety Agency.