Child-Adult Transition in Sarcoidosis: A Series of 52 Patients.

(1) Background: Pediatric sarcoidosis is a rare and mostly severe disease. Very few pediatric series with a prolonged follow-up are reported. We aimed to evaluate the evolution of pediatric sarcoidosis in adulthood. (2) Material and methods: Patients over 18-years-old with a pediatric-onset sarcoidosis (≤15-year-old) who completed at least a three-year follow-up in French expert centers were included. Clinical information at presentation and outcome in adulthood were studied. (3) Results: A total of 52 patients were included (34 prospectively in childhood and 18 retrospectively in adulthood), with a mean age of 12 (±2.7) at diagnosis. The median duration time of follow-up was 11.5 years (range 3-44.5). Relapses mostly occurred during treatment decrease (84.5%), others within the three years after treatment interruption (9.1%), and rarely when the disease was stable for more than three years (6.4%). Sarcoidosis was severe in 11 (21.2%) in adulthood. Patients received a high corticosteroid cumulative dose (median 17,900 mg) for a median duration of five years (range 0-32), resulting in mostly mild (18; 35.3%) and rarely severe (2; 3.8%) adverse events. (4) Conclusions: Pediatric-onset sarcoidosis needed a long-term treatment in almost half of the patients. Around one fifth of pediatric-onset sarcoidosis patients had severe sarcoidosis consequences in adulthood.

International and multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the use of biologics in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Despite conventional immunosuppressants, active and steroid-dependent systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a therapeutic challenge. Only one biologic, belimumab, has been approved, but other biologics are sometimes used off-label. Given the lack of evidence-based data in some clinical situations encountered in real life, we developed expert recommendations for the use of biologics for SLE. METHODS: The recommendations were developed by a formal consensus method. This method aims to formalize the degree of agreement among experts by identifying, through iterative ratings with feedback, the points on which experts agree, disagree or are undecided. Hence, the recommendations are based on the agreed-upon points. We gathered the opinion of 59 French-speaking SLE experts from 3 clinical networks dedicated to systemic autoimmune diseases (FLEUR, IMIDIATE, FAI2R) from Algeria, Belgium, France, Italy, Morocco, Switzerland and Tunisia. Represented medical specialities were internal medicine (49%), rheumatology (34%), nephrology (7%), dermatology (5%), pediatrics (3%) and cardiology (2%). Two methodologists and 3 strictly independent SLE expert groups contributed to developing these recommendations: a steering group (SG) (n=9), an evaluation group (EG) (n=28) and a reading group (RG) (n=22). Preliminary recommendations were drafted by the SG, then proposed to the EG. Each EG member rated the degree of agreement from 1 to 9 (1: lowest; 9: strongest) for each recommendation. After 2 rating rounds, the SG submitted a new version of the recommendations to the RG. With comments from the RG, the SG finalised the recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 17 final recommendations were formulated by the SG, considering all agreement scores and comments by the EG and RG members and the two methodologists. These recommendations define the subset of patients who require a biologic; the type of biologics to use (belimumab, rituximab, etc.) depending on the organ involvement and associated co-treatments; what information should be given to patients; and how to evaluate treatment efficacy and when to consider discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 17 recommendations for the good use of biologics in SLE were formulated by a large panel of SLE experts to provide guidance for clinicians in daily practice. These recommendations will be regularly updated according to the results of new randomized trials and increasing real life experience.

Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2).

AIM: FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia. CONCLUSION: FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.

Adult-onset Still's disease revealed by perimyocarditis and a concomitant reactivation of an EBV infection.

We describe a 17-year-old patient presenting perimyocarditis as the initial manifestation of the adult-onset Still's disease. Corticotherapy was rapidly successful but induced major acute hepatitis in relation with Epstein-Barr virus reactivation. After 1 year, even if the global outcome is favourable, a slightly lowered ejection fraction still persists. Former case reports and differential diagnosis with reactive haemophagocytic syndrome would be discussed.

Concomitant axillary mycobacteriosis and neuro-sarcoidosis: diagnostic pitfalls.

There are many similarities between mycobacteriosis, in particular, tuberculosis, and sarcoidosis such as predominant intrathoracic localisation (even if all organs and tissues may be concerned), great variability of phenotypic expression, and granulomatous inflammatory reaction, caseous necrosis not being an absolute criterion of tuberculosis. Moreover, microbial (or mycobacterial?) agents may play a role in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis which remains a diagnosis of exclusion particularly in atypical cases. The authors report a case of a non-immunocompromised female patient who presented, simultaneously, isolated axillary tubercular adenitis and neuro-sarcoidosis without any other localisation. This case illustrates the difficulty to distinguish between both of these two diseases and thus to choose an adequate treatment when diagnosis is not proven. Moreover, our patient (human leucocyte antigen B27 positive) presented symptoms of spondylarthritis which also may have a nosological link with tuberculosis or sarcoidosis.