RESUMO
This article reports a comparative prospective study aimed to explore and compare nurses' perceptions of bedside clinical handover in 3 different settings (emergency unit, ICU, and medical ward). Results revealed that the participant nurses' perceptions varied significantly for different aspects of the handover process. Our data demonstrate department-specific variations in perceptions related to the adequacy, organization, relevance, availability of charts, use of charts for review, ease of following the information, and timeliness of the information.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente , Humanos , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Enfermagem de Cuidados CríticosRESUMO
We aimed to develop and validate a model for the criteria for admission of COVID-19 patients to the intensive care unit (ICU). A Delphi design study was conducted. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine the degree of agreement among the experts to validate the content of the admission criteria tool. Eleven experts determined the validity. The evaluation was conducted using a 4-point rating scale. The accepted CVI value was 0.50 and more. The model was validated with 31 items in the 5 dimensions, with the item-CVI of 1, a face validity index of 1, and a scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) value of 1. We have developed and validated a red flag prediction model for ICU admission of COVID-19 patients. The accurate implementation of this model could improve the outcomes of those patients and possibly decrease mortality.