Direct observation of differences of carotenoid polyene chain cis/trans isomers resulting from structural topology.

In the present paper, trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS) and theoretical calculations have been used to study carotenoid geometrical motifs generated by photoisomerization from the all-trans geometry. Multiple geometric isomers of the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin were separated using TIMS (R > 110) for [M](+), [M + H](+), and [M - 18](+) molecular species. Comparison of observed cross sections with those obtained from molecular dynamics calculations showed that the number of cis double bonds and s-cis single bonds in the polyene chain determine the topology space of the carotenoid. The intensities of IMS signals are correlated with the relative stability of these geometric isomers.1,2 The most stable isomer is the all-trans geometry regardless of the ionization state ([M - 18](+), [M](+), and [M + H](+)), and structural stability decreases with the increasing number of cis and/or s-cis bonds in the polyene chain.

Analysis of macular carotenoids in the developing macaque retina: The timeline of macular pigment development.

In the mature retina, the components of the macular pigment, lutein (L), R,R-zeaxanthin (RRZ), R,S-zeaxanthin (RSZ, meso-zeaxanthin) are most concentrated in the central macula. L and RRZ are of dietary origin but RSZ is produced in situ from L. The relative proportions of L and Z isomers vary across the retina with eccentricity in the adult retina. Early reports have shown that during development, the proportions of L and Z isomers undergo changes as the total pigment levels increase. The methods described here demonstrate the unique utility of chiral phase HPLC to measure the amounts of L, RRZ, and RSZ, discriminating between the two zeaxanthin stereoisomers. In three concentric retinal sections of macaque retinas chiral phase HPLC has been employed to document the developmental changes in the distribution of each L, RSZ, and RRZ during the period just prior to full term gestation through 19 months after birth. The net rate of accumulation of carotenoids within the central retina during the first 20 months is quasi-linear and fit by a linear regression. During development, the rate of transport of L (0.12 (±0.033)ngmm-2mo-1 (SE)) into the central 2mm of the retina is double that of RRZ (0.062 (±0.02)ngmm-2mo-1 (SE)). The rate of accumulation of RSZ (0.06 (±0.01)ngmm-2mo-1 (SE)) is comparable to that of RRZ. In the peripheral retina, the rates of accumulation of L and RRZ are not correlated with increasing age, whereas accumulation of RSZ does correlate with age. The changing proportions of L to Z isomers in the central retina during development are explained by the rates for carotenoid accumulation within the central retina. At birth, the macular pigment in the central retina is dominated by L and RRZ, 0.35±0.11 and 0.21±0.054ngmm-2. In the central retina, RSZ was rarely detected in the youngest tissues analyzed. It can be estimated to represent 6% of the total macular pigment (0.033±0.11ngmm-2) at birth based on extrapolation from measurements in the peripheral retina and the ratio of L/(RRZ+RSZ) is ≈1.5. At maturity, the concentrations for L, RRZ, and RSZ in the central macaque retina are estimated to be 1.7, 1.8 and 1.08ngmm-2, with L/(RRZ+RSZ) being 0.6.

Comparison of dietary supplementation with lutein diacetate and lutein: a pilot study of the effects on serum and macular pigment.

UNLABELLED: The responses of subjects taking a 20 mg/day lutein diacetate supplement were compared with that for a 20 mg/day crystalline lutein or a placebo. Ten subjects, assigned to each of three groups, lutein diacetate (group 1), lutein (group 2), and a placebo (group 3), were supplemented for 24 weeks. Groups 1 and 2 consumed a dose equivalent to 20 mg per day of free lutein. Serum samples, collected at baseline, and at weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24 were analyzed by HPLC. Macular Pigment Optical Density (MPOD) was obtained by heterochromatic flicker photometry at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24. RESULTS: The average serum lutein concentrations for weeks 6 to 24 expressed as a ratio to the baseline value (±S.D.) were 5.52 ± 2.88 for group 1, 4.43 ± 1.61 for group 2, and 1.03 ± 0.25 for group 3. The median rate of macular pigment increase (milli-absorbance units/week) for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 2.35, 1.55, and 0.19 mAU/wk, respectively. P-values for these serum and MPOD increases are both highly significant when compared to placebo. The average serum response was about 25% higher for group 1 compared with group 2 and, the median MPOD response was 52% higher for group 1 than group 2. P-values calculated for the differences in these increases were, p = 0.066, marginally significant, for serum, and p = 0.09 approaching significance, for MPOD.

Interferential laser therapy in the treatment of shoulder pain and disability from musculoskeletal pathologies: a randomised comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Interference is an important feature of the waves. When two or more in phase light waves meet, a new and reinforced wave is generated. Shoulder pain is a common clinical problem and laser is one of the treatments frequently used to relieve it. OBJECTIVE: To test the safety of interferential laser therapy generated by two independent low level lasers and compare its effectiveness with conventional single laser therapy in the reduction of shoulder musculoskeletal pain and associated disability. DESIGN: Randomised and single-blind controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Physiotherapy Unit and Rehabilitation Department of Ramon y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid). PARTICIPANTS: 200 patients with shoulder musculoskeletal pain were randomly assigned in two groups, 100 people each. INTERVENTIONS: Group I, experimental (n=100) received interferential laser, placing two probes opposite each other over the shoulder joint. Group II, control (n=100) received conventional laser therapy, using a single probe along with a second inactive dummy probe. Lasers used were GaAlAs diode (810 nm, 100 mW), in continuous emission. Laser was applied in contact mode through ten sessions, on 5 shoulder points (7 Joules/point) per session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: visual analogue scale (VAS) score and shoulder pain disability index (SPADI), recorded before and after laser treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences between both groups in the reduction of pain, either assessed by VAS scale (median difference=0, 95% CI of the difference = -.6 to .5, p = 0.81) or SPADI index (median difference = .4, 95% CI of the difference = -2.9 to 3.8, p = 0.80), using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Comparison between the scores recorded before and after the treatment, within each group, showed significant differences for VAS during movement (median difference=3, 95% CI of the difference = 2.07 to 4, p < 0.001) and SPADI index (median difference=3.5, 95% CI of the difference = 2.67 to 3.85, Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001), for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the application of two low level lasers in order to generate interference inside the irradiated tissue showed to be a safe therapy. Both interferential and conventional laser therapy reduced shoulder pain and disability. Nevertheless, differences between them were not detected. Future research in this field could include applying this technique with other laser parameters or application forms.