Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase in Adult Patients with Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) relative to intravenous (IV) alteplase in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke are insufficiently established. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with acute minor stroke. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with minor stroke. Functional and safety outcomes in 90 days were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio 4.3.1. Subanalyses were performed restricted to non-disabling minor strokes and NIHSS score ≤ 3. PROSPERO (CRD42023440986). We included five studies with a total of 6,340 patients, of whom 4,050 (63.9%) received DAPT. The follow-up period for all included studies was 90 days. There was no significant difference for individual outcomes of mRS 0-1 (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.85-1.89; p = 0.25), mRS 0-2 (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69-1.43; p = 0.97), or all-cause mortality (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.20-3.13; p = 0.75) between groups. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was significantly lower (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.003-0.36; p < 0.001) in patients treated with DAPT compared with IV alteplase. In terms of mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2, we found no significant difference in both subgroup analyses. We found no statistically significant difference between DAPT and IV alteplase regarding functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-1 and 0-2) or all-cause mortality at 90 days in patients with minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, DAPT was associated with a significantly lower rate of sICH.

Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a benefit of brexpiprazole in managing agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing brexpiprazole with placebo in patients with agitation and AD. Three studies comprising 1,048 patients were included. In patients with agitation and AD, brexpiprazole significantly improved the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory total score (CMAI) at any dose (MD -3.05; 95% CI -5.12, -0.98; p < 0.01; I2 = 19%) and at 2 mg (MD -4.36; 95% CI -7.02, -1.70; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) over 12 weeks. Brexpiprazole at any dose and 2 mg also showed benefit in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of illness (CGI-S) score as related to agitation over 12 weeks (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.36, -0.05; p < 0.01; I2 = 35%). There is no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of at least one treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.95, 1.37; p = 0.16; I2 = 45%) and all-cause mortality (RR 1.99; 95% CI 0.37, 10.84; p = 0.42; I2 = 0%). Brexpiprazole at any dose significantly increased the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS; MD 0.47; 95% CI 0.28, 0.66; p < 0.01). Our results suggest that brexpiprazole is more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of agitation in AD patients. Further studies are still necessary to confirm long-term effects of brexpiprazole.Prospero registry: CRD42023486694.

Hypertonic Saline Solution Versus Mannitol for Brain Relaxation During Craniotomies: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The preferred osmotic agent used for brain relaxation during craniotomies remains unclear, either mannitol (MAN) or hypertonic saline (HTS). Hence, we sought to compare these solutions in this population. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until August 02, 2023. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to evaluate a possible link between Brain Relaxation Score and tumor volume. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials and 1031 patients were included, of whom 631 (61%) underwent surgery for supratentorial tumor resection. Compared with MAN, HTS achieved better rates of brain relaxation (80% vs 71%; odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% CI 1.22-2.33; P = .001; I2 = 0%), which was also demonstrated in the subgroup analysis of patients with supratentorial brain tumor (78% vs 65%; OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.36-2.99; P = .0005; I2 = 0%); a minor number of patients requiring a second dose of osmotic agent (14% vs 28%; OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.27-0.69; P = .0003; I2 = 0%); a lower fluid intake (mean difference -475.9341 mL; 95% CI -818.8952 to -132.9730; P = .007; I2 = 88%); and lower urine output (mean difference -462.0941 mL; 95% CI -585.3020 to -338.8862; P = <.001; I2 = 96%). Hospital length of stay and focal neurological deficits did not reach a statistically significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: In this updated meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that HTS is associated with more beneficial outcomes than MAN in patients undergoing craniotomy.

Gantenerumab for early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gantenerumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid ß protein (Aß) in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). The authors sought to evaluate gantenerumab safety and efficacy in early AD patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 2 December 2023. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression analysis was conducted to evaluate a possible link between baseline Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) at follow-up. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4 RCTs and 2848 patients were included, of whom 1580 (55%) received subcutaneous gantenerumab. Concerning clinical scores, the placebo group achieved better rates of change in the Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13) (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19- -0.03; p = 0.008569; I2 = 0%). Gantenerumab was strongly associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H: (19.67% vs. 2.31%; RR 9.46; 95% CI 5.55-16.11; p = <0.000001; I2 = 10%) and (21.95% vs. 12.38%; RR 1.79; 95% CI 1.50-2.13; p = <0.000001; I2 = 0%), respectively. DISCUSSION: In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that gantenerumab is not safe and efficient for early AD, showing no improvement in clinical scores for AD and being associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H.