ANMCO Position Paper: hospital discharge planning: recommendations and standards.

The hospital discharge is often poorly standardized and affected by discontinuity and fragmentation of care, putting patients at high risk of both post-discharge adverse events and early readmission. The present ANMCO document reviews the modifiable components of the hospital discharge process related to adverse events or re-hospitalizations and suggests the optimal methods for redesigning the whole discharge process. The key principles for proper hospital discharge or transfer of care acknowledge that the hospital discharge: • is not an isolated event, but a process that has to be planned as soon as possible after the admission, ensuring that the patient and the caregiver understand and contribute to the planned decisions, as equal partners; • is facilitated by a comprehensive systemic approach that begins with a multidimensional evaluation process; • must be organized by an operator who is responsible for the coordination of all phases of the hospital patient journey, involving afterward the general practitioner and transferring to them the information and responsibility at discharge; • is the result of an integrated multidisciplinary team approach; • appropriately uses the transitional and intermediate care services; • is carried out in an organized system of care and continuum of services; and • programs the passage of information to after-discharge services.

n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the prevention of arrhythmia recurrence after electrical cardioversion of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study.

AIMS: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often recurs after direct current electrical cardioversion (ECV). As several experimental and clinical studies suggest that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may have antiarrhythmic properties even at the atrial level, we aimed to evaluate whether oral supplementation with PUFAs, in addition to conventional antiarrhythmic drugs, could reduce the recurrence rate of the arrhythmia after ECV of persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients (mean age 69.3 years, 33% females) with persistent AF were randomly assigned to receive 3 g/day of PUFAs until ECV and 2 g/day thereafter (104 patients) or placebo (100 patients) for 6 months, beginning at least 1 week before ECV. Selection of conventional antiarrhythmic prophylaxis was left to local medical advice. The cardiac rhythm was assessed by both trans-telephonic monitoring and clinical visits. Primary end-point was the recurrence rate of AF. Sinus rhythm was restored, either spontaneously or after ECV, in 187 patients (91.7%); 95 patients (91.4%) on PUFAs and 92 patients (92.0%) on placebo (P=not significant). AF relapsed in 56 (58.9%) of the PUFAs patients and in 47 (51.1%) of the placebo patients (P=0.28). The mean time to AF recurrence was 83±8 days in the PUFAs group and 106±9 days in the placebo group (P=0.29). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the hypothesis that, in patients undergoing ECV of chronic persistent AF, supplementation with PUFAs in addition to the usual antiarrhythmic treatment reduces recurrent AF.

[ANMCO Position paper: From acute to chronic disease: the needs of complex cardiac patients]. / Position paper ANMCO: Bisogni assistenziali del malato cardiopatico complesso: dalla fase acuta alla fase cronica.

Managing a patient suffering from a chronic disease requires a multidisciplinary team that can take care of them beyond the simple coordination of various specialties. In this context, a central role in the treatment of chronic heart disease is the continuity of care that should promote organic integration among different hospital departments, hospital and community. This position paper of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) aims at defining the general principles to inspire care for complex cardiac patients at different phases of the disease. A multidisciplinary integrated holistic approach uses analytical tools able to understand the elements that characterize complexity and therefore suggest appropriate management strategies: (i) care pathways aimed at optimizing treatments; (ii) care pathways in intensive care and ward in a multidisciplinary perspective; (iii) integration of social and health needs; (iv) nursing role in the context of continuity of outpatient, community and home care; (v) promotion of educational interventions.

Early invasive versus early conservative strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: An outcome research study.

BACKGROUND: An early invasive strategy (EIS) has been shown to yield a better clinical outcome than an early conservative strategy (ECS) in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACSs), particularly in those at higher risk according to the GRACE risk score. However, findings of the clinical trials have not been confirmed in registries. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of patients with NSTEACS treated according to an EIS or a ECS in a real-world all-comers outcome research study. METHODS: The primary hypothesis of the study was the non-inferiority of an ECS in comparison with an EIS as to a combined primary end-point of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndromes at one year. Participating centres were divided into two groups: those with a pre-specified routine EIS and those with a pre-specified routine ECS. Two statistical analyses were performed: a) an 'intention to treat' analysis: all patients were considered to be treated according to the pre-specified routine strategy of that centre; b) a 'per protocol' analysis: patients were analysed according to the actual treatment applied. Cox model including propensity score correction was applied for all analyses. RESULTS: The intention to treat analysis showed an equivalence between EIS and ECS (11.4% vs. 11.1%) with regard to the primary end-point incidence at one year. In the three subgroups of patients according to the GRACE risk score (⩽ 108, 109-140, > 140), EIS and ECS confirmed their equivalence (5.3% vs. 3.9%, 8.4% vs. 7.6%, and 20.3% vs. 20.9%, respectively). When the per protocol analysis was applied, a reduction of the primary end-point at one year with EIS vs. ECS was demonstrated (6.2% vs. 15.3%, p=0.021); analysis of the subgroups according to the GRACE risk score numerically confirmed these data (3.1% vs. 6.5%, 5.1% vs. 10.0%, and 10.8% vs. 24.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life registry of all-comers NSTEACS patients, ECS was non-inferior to EIS; however, when EIS was applied according to clinical judgement, a reduction of clinical events at one year was demonstrated.

[ANMCO Position paper: Hospital discharge planning]. / Position paper ANMCO: Gestione della dimissione ospedaliera.

Hospital discharge is often poorly standardized and is characterized by discontinuity and fragmentation of care, putting patients at high risk of post-discharge adverse events and early readmission. The present ANMCO position paper reviews the modifiable components of the hospital discharge process related to adverse events or rehospitalizations and suggests the optimal methods for redesign the whole discharge process. The key principles for proper hospital discharge or transfer of care acknowledge that hospital discharge:- is not an isolated event, but a process that has to be planned immediately after admission, ensuring that the patient and the caregiver understand and contribute to the planned decisions as equal partners;- is facilitated by a comprehensive systemic approach that begins with a multidimensional evaluation process;- must be organized by an operator who is responsible for the coordination of all phases of the hospital patient pathway, involving afterwards the physician and transferring to them the information and responsibility;- is the result of an integrated multidisciplinary team approach;- uses appropriately the transitional and intermediate care services;- is carried out in an organized system of care and continuum of services;- programs the passage of information to after-discharge services.

Fast cardiologist-administered midazolam for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and the feasibility of sedation administered by cardiologists with rapid intravenous bolus of midazolam followed by flumazenil infusion during transthoracic biphasic electrical cardioversion (TEC) for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-five consecutive patients (119 females, mean age 67.4 +/- 8.5 years) with either acute (24 patients) or persistent AF (mean arrhythmia duration 3.7 +/- 3.0 months) underwent TEC. Midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) was administered as rapid intravenous bolus by the cardiologist, whereas the anaesthesiologist was simply alerted. At the end of the procedure, intravenous flumazenil 0.25 mg was given, followed by 0.25 mg over 1 h. Patients received continuous electrocardiographic and pulse-oxymetric monitoring. RESULTS: Adequate sedation was obtained in 262 patients (98.9%), with a mean midazolam dose of 4.4 +/- 0.9 mg. After drug administration, the mean time to patient's sedation and reawakening were 3.1 +/- 1.9 and 6.1 +/- 2.7 min, respectively. The mean reduction in oxygen saturation was 5.4 +/- 3.7%. Sinus rhythm was restored in 254 patients (95.8%). All but 41 patients (15.5%) were completely amnesic. None reported pain. No adverse events were registered. No urgent call for the anaesthesiologist was made. CONCLUSIONS: Conscious sedation with fast-administered midazolam followed by flumazenil for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is safe, effective and well tolerated, easing the procedure and shortening its duration.