Depression and anxiety are associated with worse baseline function in hip arthroscopy patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between baseline depression and anxiety and preoperative functional status in hip arthroscopy patients. METHODS: A prospective, institutional review board-approved orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively study 104 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Enrolled patients were administered baseline questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) preoperative expectations, and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). RESULTS: The average baseline PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores were 49.9 ± 9.8 and 55.5 ± 9.3, respectively. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that greater baseline PROMIS Anxiety correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.013). Bivariate analysis showed that greater PROMIS Depression correlated with worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.001), PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), SS (p < 0.001), and NPS score (p = 0.004). After controlling for confounders, multivariable analysis confirmed increased PROMIS Depression as an independent predictor of worse preoperative PROMIS PF (p = 0.009), MODEMS Expectations (p = 0.025), and NPS score (p = 0.002). Increased PROMIS Anxiety was predictive of worse baseline PROMIS PI (p < 0.001), Fatigue (p < 0.001), and Social Satisfaction (p < 0.001). A previous clinical diagnosis of depression or anxiety was only an independent predictor of worse baseline PROMIS Fatigue (p = 0.002) and was insignificant in all other models. CONCLUSION: Increasing severity of depression and anxiety correlated with and predicted worse functional status at baseline in hip arthroscopy patients. As compared to clinical diagnosis of anxiety and depression, PROMIS metrics have superior utility in recognizing potentially modifiable mental health concerns that predict worse preoperative status. Ultimately, the study identifies an at-risk population undergoing hip arthroscopy that requires particular attention and potential mental health intervention in the preoperative setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication that may require revision ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Non-anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is thought to be a frequent cause of graft failure; however, there is a lack of evidence to support this belief. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-anatomic femoral tunnel placement is associated with increased risk of revision ACL-R. METHODS: After screening all 315 consecutive patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL-R by a single senior orthopedic surgeon between January 2012 and January 2017, 58 patients were found to have both strict lateral radiographs and a minimum of 24 months follow-up without revision. From a group of 456 consecutive revision ACL-R, patients were screened for strictly lateral radiographs and 59 patients were included in the revision group. Femoral tunnel placement for each patient was determined using a strict lateral radiograph taken after the primary ACL-R using the quadrant method. The center of the femoral tunnel was measured in both the posterior-anterior (PA) and proximal-distal (PD) dimensions and represented as a percentage of the total distance (normal center of anatomic footprint: PA 25% and PD 29%). RESULTS: In the PA dimension, the revision group had significantly more anterior femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (38% ± 11% vs. 28% ± 6%, p < 0.01). Among patients who underwent revision; those with non-traumatic chronic failure had statistically significant more anterior femoral tunnel placement than those who experienced traumatic failure (41% ± 13% vs. 35% ± 8%, p < 0.03). In the PD dimension, the revision group had significantly more proximal femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (30% ± 9% vs 38% ± 9%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 58 patients with successful primary ACL-R compared with 59 patients with failed ACL-R, anterior and proximal (high) femoral tunnels for ACL-R were shown to be independent risk factors for ACL revision surgery. As revision ACL-R is associated with patient- and economic burden, particular attention should be given to achieving an individualized, anatomic primary ACL-R. Surgeons may reduce the risk of revision ACL-R by placing the center of the femoral tunnel within the anatomic ACL footprint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Treatment strategies for ACL injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines to manage ACL injury is largely based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened determine consensus regarding best available evidence on operative versus non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organising Committee and Session Chairs. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty per cent agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting and pivoting sports, early anatomical ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomical ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field may assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatment with patients after an ACL injury Level of evidence: Level V.

Editorial Commentary: Suprascapular Nerve Decompression Can Be Effective, But Should You Have the Nerve to Do It?

Isolated suprascapular neuropathy that requires surgical decompression is rare. Arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression is an effective treatment for correctly indicated patients, but identifying which patients would benefit from decompression is challenging. While good outcomes and low complication rates after arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression have been reported by expert surgeons, this procedure has potential for neurovascular injury in inexperienced hands. Given the rarity of the condition, the difficulty with accurate diagnosis, and the potential risks from surgical intervention, we believe that these patients are best treated in a tertiary referral practice.

Impact of pre-operative recreational marijuana use on outcomes two years after orthopaedic surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between recreational marijuana use and patient-reported outcomes two years after orthopaedic surgery. We hypothesized that pre-operative recreational marijuana use would be associated with less pain, better function, and better mental health measures two years after orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective orthopaedic registry at a single urban institution. A total of 1710 patients completed the pre-operative assessment and 1103 patients (64.5%) completed the two-year follow-up questionnaires. The cohort was then divided into two groups based on reported preoperative recreational marijuana usage, and statistical analysis was performed to determine if marijuana use was associated with two-year outcomes. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Marijuana use was reported by 47 (4.3%) patients. Significantly worse scores for two-year PROMIS Anxiety (53.2 vs. 49.2, p = 0.005), PROMIS Depression (51.1 vs. 46.5, p = 0.001), Met Expectations (63.1 vs. 74.4, p = 0.024), Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (71.7 vs. 80.4, p = 0.005), and Numeric Satisfaction Scale (75.6 vs. 83.1, p = 0.041) were associated with marijuana use. Marijuana users also had less improvement of Numeric Pain Scores at the operative site (- 1.8 vs. - 2.7, p = 0.037) and greater decrease in Marx activity scores for lower extremities (- 12.3 vs. - 3.9, p = 0.024). Marijuana use was not an independent predictor of any outcome measure in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Marijuana use was associated with worse mental health scores, lower activity level, less pain relief, and worse satisfaction two years after orthopaedic surgery. However, after controlling for confounding variables, marijuana use was not predictive of any two-year outcome measure. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.

PURPOSE: A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. METHODS: To establish a standardized approach to assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA; USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method. RESULTS: In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories-early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific PROs and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid- to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. CONCLUSION: This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group.

PURPOSE: A precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sports and their previous activity level. The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury RTS Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS and description of the RTS continuum, as well as to provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision-making. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence. RESULTS: Key points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the pre-injury level of sport and involves a criteria-based progression from return to participation to return to sport, and ultimately return to performance. Purely time-based RTS decision-making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along a RTS continuum with decision-making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer-reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors and concomitant injuries. CONCLUSION: The resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing and methods for the biologic assessment of healing and recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative vs. non-operative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to report the consensus statements on operative vs. non-operative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. Sixty-six international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the Scientific Organizing Committee and Session Chairs for the three working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements prior to the meeting and provided the initial agreement and comments on the statement via an online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Eighty percent agreement was defined a-priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative v. non-operative treatment of ACL injury reached the consensus during the Symposium. Nine statements achieved unanimous support, two reached strong consensus, one did not achieve consensus, and one was removed due to redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended due to the high risk of secondary meniscus and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight plane activities, non-operative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and non-operative treatments with patients after an ACL injury.Level of evidence V.

Prevalence of femoro-acetabular impingement in non-arthritic patients with hip pain: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: As the prevalence of femoro-acetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in symptomatic patients who lack evidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains to be described, the purpose of this study was to calculate the prevalence of FAIS in this patient population. METHODS: Libraries of PubMed, Embase, and Ovid were systematically reviewed for all studies between 2009 and 2019, investigating femoro-acetabular impingement and hip pain. Level I-IV studies delineating patients with hip pain who do not have OA (Tonnis or Outerbridge grades < three) were included. Demographics, outcomes, radiographic parameters, and criteria were entered into a meta-analysis to calculate the incidence of FAIS in non-arthritic symptomatic hips. RESULTS: In total, 2264 patients (2758 hips) were included in the pooled analysis. Weighted mean age was 31 years. The incidence of FAIS in patients with no evidence of osteoarthritis but who complain of hip pain is 61% (47.3-74.4%). In total, 1483 hips were diagnosed with FAIS. Of the studies that described the rates of all three of the various subtypes of FAIS in their reports, 37% had a combined-type, 38% had a cam-type, and 25% had a pincer-type FAIS. CONCLUSION: Femoroacetabular impingement should be suspected in 47 to 74% of patients with hip pain and without arthritis. Physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for FAIS in young patients presenting with hip pain, as FAIS is a common and treatable condition that, if left alone, may lead to hip degeneration.

Editorial Commentary: Tibial Attachment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Just 1 Piece to the Complex Puzzle of Individualized, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a complex, biologic structure that continues to be explored in the literature. Given the individual uniqueness of the ACL, variation exists, and studies continue to attempt to tease out what is truly important for ACL reconstruction. Although individual components of the ACL structure provide function, the ACL works as a dynamic structure, in unison with the surrounding bony morphology, to produce normal knee kinematics. Ultimately, in ACL reconstruction, the surgeon is tasked with restoring the native dimensions, collagen orientation, and insertion sites according to the individual anatomy.

Orthopaedic surgery patients who use recreational marijuana have less pre-operative pain.

AIMS: To determine the baseline clinical characteristics of recreational marijuana users undergoing outpatient orthopaedic surgery. We hypothesized that patients who report marijuana use would have worse pain, function, and general health status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine-hundred and thirty-seven patients undergoing outpatient orthopaedic surgery were asked to fill out patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools. These PROs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests and legacy PROs unique to each patients' surgical site. RESULTS: Forty patients (4.2%) reported marijuana use. Marijuana use was associated with younger age (33 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001), having a history of fewer operations (1.8 vs. 3.2, p < 0.05), single marital status (68 vs. 38%, p < 0.01), and having a history of smoking cigarettes (63 vs. 31%, p < 0.0001). Marijuana use was found to be significantly associated with greater Marx lower extremity activity rating scale scores (8.5 points vs. 6.1 points, p < 0.05) and decreased pain intensity in the operative site (3.7 points vs. 5.0 points, p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis found that marijuana use was an independent factor associated with less pain intensity in the operative site (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our studies support other national studies that report increased marijuana use among younger patients and those who smoke cigarettes. The results do not support our hypothesis, as marijuana use was associated with less pain and better lower extremity activity rating scale scores when compared to non-users. Further research is warranted to analyze the effects of marijuana use on orthopaedic surgery patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

Biomechanical Comparison of Four- versus Six-Strand Transosseous Suture Repair for Patellar Tendon Rupture.

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair is indicated for patellar tendon ruptures that result in loss of knee extensor mechanism function. However, biomechanical studies report conflicting results when comparing transosseous suture versus suture anchor repair techniques. This discrepancy may be due to inconsistencies in experimental design as these studies use various numbers of suture strands. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to compare the ultimate load of four- versus six-strand transosseous suture repair. Secondary objectives are to compare gap formation after cyclical loading and mode of failure. METHODS: Six pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen were randomly allocated to either four- or six-strand transosseous suture repair. Specimen underwent preconditioning cyclical loading and then load to failure. RESULTS: The six-strand repair had a significantly higher maximum load to failure compared with the four-strand repair (mean difference = 319.3 N [57.9%], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in gap length after cyclical loading or at max load. There were no significant differences in mode of failure. CONCLUSION: Utilizing a six-stand transosseous patella tendon repair construct with one additional suture increases overall construct strength by over 50% compared with a four-strand construct.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety in Elective Knee Surgery Patients.

Mental health has been shown to play an important role in patient-reported outcomes (PRO); however, there is a general lack of literature describing patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) depression and anxiety computer adaptive tests in elective knee surgery patients. The purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms before and after elective knee surgery and to determine whether these symptoms influence postoperative functional outcomes. An institutional review board-approved prospective orthopaedic registry was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing elective knee surgery from June 2015 to November 2018. Electronic surveys collecting patient demographic information and PROs were administered pre- and postoperatively. Of the 663 patients that completed baseline questionnaires, 466 completed 2-year follow-up (70.3%). PROs included PROMIS depression, PROMIS anxiety, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and PROMIS physical function (PF). Wilcoxon rank sum and Spearman's rank order correlation were utilized to determine associations between variables. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. Average PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly improved 2 years after surgery. PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly correlated with each other. PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly correlated with PROMIS PF and IKDC scores. After controlling for confounders on multivariable analysis, worse 2-year PROMIS anxiety was predictive of less functional improvement and worse 2-year PF and IKDC, while worse 2-year PROMIS depression was predictive of less improvement in IKDC. This study confirms the important relationship between mental health and functional outcomes. Given that psychiatric comorbidities are potentially modifiable with treatment, proper recognition could potentially lead to better orthopaedic outcomes. In addition, the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms postoperatively, as documented by PROMIS computer adaptive tests, may act as a barrier to achieving optimal functional outcomes after elective knee surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Preoperative opioid use is associated with worse preoperative patient-reported outcomes in hip arthroscopy patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to define the rate of preoperative opioid use among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, ascertain which clinical factors are associated with opioid use, and assess the effect of preoperative opioid usage on preoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. METHODS: A single institution orthopedic registry was retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome with or without labral tear between 2015 and 2022. Patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in six domains, Numeric Pain Scores (NPS), and Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System expectations domain preoperatively. Patients' charts were reviewed to determine demographic factors and identify any active opioid prescription within 6 weeks before surgery. Bivariate analysis was used to determine associations between preoperative opioid use and baseline PROs. Statistically significant bivariate associations were further tested by multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included (age 39.7 â€‹± â€‹12.0 years; 87 females; body mass index 27.4 â€‹± â€‹5.7 kg/m2). There were 21 patients (17%) using opioids preoperatively. Prior orthopedic or other surgery and lower education level were associated with preoperative opioid use. Patients with preoperative opioid use scored statistically significantly worse compared with those without preoperative opioid use on baseline PROMIS Physical Function (38.6 vs 40.5, p â€‹= â€‹0.01), Pain Interference (65.9 vs 60.2, p â€‹= â€‹0.001), Fatigue (60.7 vs 51.6, p â€‹= â€‹0.005), Social Satisfaction (38.2 vs 43.2, p â€‹= â€‹0.007), and Depression (54.2 vs 48.8, p â€‹= â€‹0.01). Preoperative opioid use was also associated with statistically significantly worse preoperative NPS for both the operative hip (6.3 vs 4.6, p â€‹= â€‹0.003) and whole body (3.0 vs 1.4, p â€‹= â€‹0.008). Preoperative opioid use was an independent predictor of worse baseline PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, Social Satisfaction, and NPS for the operative hip. CONCLUSION: Patients using opioids preoperatively had worse baseline PROs for physical function, pain, social satisfaction, and depression than those not using opioids preoperatively. When controlling for confounding variables, preoperative opioid use was independently predictive of worse baseline pain, fatigue, and social satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

PROMIS cluster analysis predicts two-year outcomes in knee surgery patients.

Aims & objectives: Meaningful clinical interpretation of orthopaedic patient-reported outcome scores remains challenging. Grouping scores may be more meaningful than individual score analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine if grouping knee surgery patients into four preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clusters would have prognostic value for two-year postoperative outcomes. Materials & methods: 488 of 697 (70%) patients undergoing elective knee surgery at a single urban institution were enrolled in an orthopaedic registry and completed two-year follow up. Patients were administered questionnaires for PROMIS, International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), and Surgical Satisfaction (SSQ-8). A k-means cluster analysis was performed to identify preoperative PROMIS clusters. Chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted for bivariate analyses. Least-squares multiple linear regression models were performed to identify if cluster group was an independent predictor. Results: Cluster analysis revealed four clusters of patients. Psychological distress was most significant in determining classification. More impaired clusters were associated with higher rates of arthroplasty, African American race, preoperative opioid use, lower income, higher comorbidity index, and other sociodemographic and operative factors. Worse preoperative cluster status was associated with higher chance of achieving minimally clinically important change (MCID) on all metrics except PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), IKDC, and MARS. Multivariable analysis confirmed better preoperative cluster as predictive of better PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PI, IKDC scores, and satisfaction. Worse preoperative cluster was predictive of greater improvement on PF and PI but not IKDC. Conclusion: Preoperative PROMIS clusters have prognostic value in predicting outcomes for knee surgery patients. Better preoperative cluster function predicts superior outcomes. While worse preoperative cluster predicts worse outcome, all clusters still significantly improve, so worse preoperative cluster is not a contraindication to surgery.

Surgeon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction volume and rates of concomitant meniscus repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of surgeon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) volume on rates of ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair versus meniscectomy and subsequent meniscus surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from a database of all ACLR performed between 2015 and 2020 at a large integrated health care system. Surgeon volume was categorized as < 35 ACLR per year (low-volume), and ≥ 35 ACLR per year (high-volume). Rates of concomitant meniscus repair and meniscectomy were compared between low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Subgroup analyses compared the rates of subsequent meniscus surgery and procedure time based on surgeon volume and meniscus procedure type. RESULTS: A total of 3,911 patients undergoing ACLR were included. High-volume surgeons performed concomitant meniscus repair statistically significantly more often than low-volume surgeons (32.0% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression indicated 4.15 times higher odds of meniscus repair among high-volume surgeons. Subsequent meniscus surgery occurred more commonly following ACLR with meniscus repair among low-volume surgeons (6.7% vs 3.4%, p = 0.047), but not high-volume surgeons (7.0% vs 4.3%, p = 0.079). Low-volume surgeons also had longer procedure times for concomitant meniscus repair (129.9 vs 118.3 min, p = 0.003) and meniscectomy (100.6 vs 95.9 min, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study shows that surgeons with lower volume of ACLR select meniscus resection statistically significantly more often than higher-volume surgeons. However, an abundance of literature is available to show that meniscus loss negatively affects the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in patients Therefore, as demonstrated in this study by high-volume surgeons, the meniscus should be repaired and protected whenever possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Response Bias for Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Surveys after Knee Surgery.

The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) survey is an emerging tool used to capture patient satisfaction after elective surgery. Evaluating patient satisfaction is important; however, quality improvement (QI) surveys used to capture the patient experience may be subject to nonresponse bias. An orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent ambulatory knee surgery from June 2015 to December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PGAS survey nonresponse and response. In the cohort of 1,161 patients, 142 (12.2%) completed the PGAS survey. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that male sex, Black race, not living with a caretaker, student or unemployment status, and worse preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue were predictors of nonresponse. The results of this study highlight the presence of nonresponse bias in the PGAS survey after elective knee surgery.

Preoperative Factors Associated with Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Scores after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Patient satisfaction is increasingly used as a metric to evaluate the quality of healthcare services and to determine hospital and physician compensation. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) satisfaction scores, and to evaluate the effect of each PGAS domain score on the total PGAS score variability in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A review of a Press Ganey (PG) database at a single center was performed for patients undergoing ACLR between 2015 and 2019. Ninety-nine patients completed the PGAS survey and 54 also completed preoperative demographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for an orthopaedic registry. PGAS scores were calculated and bivariate analysis was performed. Multivariable linear regression determined the effect of each of the six PGAS domains on the total PGAS score variability. In the total cohort of 99 patients, no factors were significantly associated with the total PGAS score or any domain scores. For the 54 patients who also participated in the orthopaedic registry, none of the preoperative PROMs were significantly correlated with total PGAS score. However, having a college degree (89 vs. 95 or 97 points; p = 0.02) and continuous femoral nerve catheter (92 vs. 100 points; p = 0.04) was associated with lower personal issue domain scores, while patients with a greater number of prior surgeries had worse registration domain scores (ρ = -0.27; p = 0.049). For the entire cohort, the registration and facility domains contributed the most variability to the total PGAS score, while the physician domain contributed the least. Few preoperative factors are associated with PGAS scores, and total PGAS scores do not significantly correlate with baseline PROMs. Surgeons may have limited ability to improve their PGAS scores given most of the variability in total scores stems from systemic aspects of the patient experience.

Predictors of PROMIS Physical Function at 2 Years following Knee Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) 2 years following knee surgery, and identify preoperative factors associated with postoperative PROMIS PF. Three hundred and sixty-five patients, age 17 years and older, undergoing knee surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed multiple questionnaires prior to surgery and again 2 years postoperatively including PROMIS PF, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), joint and body numeric pain scales (NPS), Tegner's activity scale (TAS), and Marx's activity rating scale (MARS). Mean PROMIS PF improved from 41.4 to 50.9 at 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with 2-year IKDC scores. Older age, female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, unemployment, lower income, government insurance, smoking, preoperative opioid use, having a legal claim, comorbidities, previous surgeries, higher body mass index (BMI), and knee arthroplasty were associated with worse 2-year PROMIS PF. Multivariable analysis confirmed that lower BMI, less NPS body pain, and higher MARS were independent predictors of greater 2-year PROMIS PF and better improvement in PROMIS PF. In this large, broad cohort of knee surgery patients, multiple preoperative factors were associated with PROMIS PF 2 years postoperatively. PROMIS PF scores improved significantly, but worse 2 year PROMIS PF scores and less improvement from baseline were independently predicted by higher BMI, greater NPS body pain, and lower MARS activity level. PROMIS PF can be implemented as an efficient means to assess outcomes after knee surgery.