Reproducibility of Metacarpal Bone Mineral Density Measurements Obtained by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Early Arthritis.

Reduction in cortical bone mineral density at diaphysis of metacarpal bones of the hand, evaluated by dual X-ray radiogrammetry, has a bad prognostic value in patients with early arthritis. Nevertheless, this technique is hardly accessible in clinical practice. By contrast, evaluation of cortical bone mineral density at that location has not been previously assessed by conventional dual X-ray absorptiometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements at diaphysis of metacarpal bones using conventional dual X-ray densitometry in a population of healthy volunteers and patients with early arthritis. Nondominant hand dual X-ray densitometry was performed at three consecutive times with complete hand replacement in 27 subjects: 10 early arthritis and 17 healthy volunteers. Three different evaluators analyzed the 3 measurements of second to fourth metacarpal bones. To assess the reproducibility and accuracy of the measurements, intra- and interobserver agreement degrees, intra- and interclass correlation coefficients, smallest difference detectable assessment, and Bland Altman graphs were calculated. The coefficients of variation obtained for the different metacarpal evaluations were 2.25%, 2.91%, 2.85%, and 2.07% for metacarpal-2, metacarpal-3, metacarpal-4, and mean metacarpal-second to fourth, respectively, with a smallest difference detectable of 0.028, 0.034, 0.028, and 0.03 g/cm2, respectively. The mean intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients between of metacarpal second to fourth were 0.990 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982-0.995) and 0.995 (95% CI: 0.991-0.997), respectively. As expected, women had lower bone mineral density at metacarpal bones, especially after menopause. The results obtained in this study show an excellent reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements at diaphysis of metacarpal bones of the hand, measured by conventional dual X-ray densitometry, in a mixed population of healthy subjects and patients with early arthritis. This is of great interest for longitudinal studies in patients with early arthritis.

Rituximab induces a lasting, non-cumulative remodelling of the B-cell compartment.

OBJECTIVES: Reconstitution of B-cells after their therapeutic depletion with rituximab mimics the ontogeny of the B-cell linage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, little is known about the effects of multiple cycles of treatment on the repletion kinetics and their long-lasting effects on the B-cell compartment. We therefore compared the recovery capacity of the B cell subpopulations between patients who experienced their first cycle of rituximab and those who experienced successive cycles. METHODS: The distribution of the different B-cell subsets was characterised by multiparametric flow cytometry in the peripheral blood of 29 patients in the first rituximab course (naïve cycles) and 40 patients in successive cycles. Samples were obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, and 8 months of each cycle. RESULTS: The baseline percentage of B-cell subsets was similar among successive cycles. Therefore, successive cycles were grouped for comparison with naïve cycles. Patients in naïve cycles had higher percentages at baseline of both total and memory B-cells. However, the recovery of the different B-cell subsets was similar between naïve and successive cycles. In naïve patients the percentage of transitional B-cells significantly correlated with disease activity at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab induces a long-term reshape of the B-cell compartment while multiple cycles of rituximab do not induce cumulative effects on B-cell subpopulations. Transitional B-cells seem to be associated with higher disease activity, although further studies are needed to determine if they can be used as a biomarker to predict the need for rituximab retreatment.

Experience With the Use of Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain: RITAR Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There is evidence supporting that there are no relevant clinical differences between dosing rituximab 1000 mg or 2000 mg per cycle in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical trials, and low-dose cycles seem to have a better safety profile. Our objective was to describe the pattern of use of rituximab in real-life practice conditions. METHODS: Rituximab for RA in clinical practice (RITAR) study is a retrospective cohort study from 2005 to 2015. Eligibility criteria were RA adults treated with rituximab for active articular disease. Response duration was the main outcome defined as months elapsed from the date of rituximab first infusion to the date of flare. A multivariable analysis was performed to determine the variables associated with response duration. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients and 409 cycles were described, 93.0% seropositive and 80.7% women. Rituximab was mainly used as second-line biological therapy. On demand retreatment was used in 94.6% of cases versus fixed 6 months retreatment in 5.4%. Median response duration to on demand rituximab cycles was 10 months (interquartile range, 7-13). Multivariable analysis showed that age older than 65 years, number of rituximab cycles, seropositivity, and first- or second-line therapy were associated with longer response duration. The dose administered at each cycle was not significantly associated with response duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that 1000 mg rituximab single infusion on demand is a reasonable schedule for long-term treatment of those patients with good response after the first cycles, especially in seropositive patients and when it is applied as a first- or second-line biological therapy.

Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies are associated with decreased bone mineral density: baseline data from a register of early arthritis patients.

Since the previous studies showed that anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) can induce osteoclasts differentiation and activation, even before arthritis onset, the aim of our study was to determine whether ACPA-positivity is associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline visit of a register of early arthritis (EA) patients. The study population comprised 578 patients (80% females) from our EA clinic with a median disease duration, 5.1 months (p25-p75: 6-8); median age, 53.6 years (41.9-66.1), 38% ACPA-positive, and 55% fulfilling 2010 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. BMD was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine, hip, and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the non-dominant hand to evaluate both systemic and juxta-articular bone mass. ACPA titers were determined through enzyme immunoassay. The effect of ACPA on BMD was analyzed using multivariable analysis based on generalized linear models adjusted for various confounders. ACPA-positive patients showed lower bone mass at lumbar spine and hip, but no differences were observed at MCP joints compared to ACPA-negative patients. However, ACPA-positive patients displayed higher disease activity and disability than ACPA-negative patients. After adjustment for gender, age, body mass index, and other bone-related variables, the presence of ACPA remained significantly associated with lower BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip but not at MCP joints. Disease activity was not associated with baseline bone mass. Our data reinforce the previous preclinical findings suggesting that the systemic bone loss detected at the initial phases of early ACPA-positive arthritis is independent of inflammatory status and, therefore, could be mediated by ACPA.