Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different chemotherapy regimens delivered with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Concomitant administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is currently recognized as the standard of treatment in locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicities of three different chemotherapy regimens delivered concurrently with radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who received the PE (cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 plus etoposide, 50 mg/m(2), on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33), PD (docetaxel, 20 mg/m(2), on day 1 plus cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2), on day 1, every week), and PC (carboplatin, AUC 2 plus paclitaxel, 45 mg/m(2), on day 1, every week) regimens concurrently with radiotherapy. A total of 227 patients were evaluated in the study. Median follow-up time was 13 months (2-101). There were 27 females (11.9 %) and 200 males (88.1 %) with a median age of 61 (38-82) years. The PD group had higher rates of esophagitis, mucositis, and anemia (p < 0.05). The PC group had higher rates of neuropathy (p = 0.000). The progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10 months for patients in the PC group, 15 months for patients in the PD group, and 21 months for the PE group (p = 0.010). Patients in the PC group had a median overall survival time of 23 months, those in the PD group 27 months, and those in the PE group 36 months (p = 0.098). Combination of cisplatin-etoposide with radiotherapy led to a more favorable outcome compared with the other two regimens. It shows generally manageable toxicity profile and compliance to treatment is noticeable.

Biological subtypes and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the survival outcomes and biological subtype in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 422 breast cancer patients with brain metastases between 2001 and 2011 from referral centers in Turkey. The study population was divided into four biological subtypes according to their hormone receptor status and HER2 expression. RESULTS: Systemic treatment prolonged median overall survival (OS) after brain metastases in the entire group (14 vs. 3.2 months, p < 0.001). It also prolonged median OS after brain metastases in the triple negative (7.5 vs. 1.6 months, p = 0.010) and luminal A (14.3 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.003) subgroups. The median OS for untreated patients, chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy receiving patients, and chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy plus targeted therapy receivers was 2, 5.8, and 17.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001), in the HER2-overexpressing subgroup. In the luminal B subgroup, it was 3.7, 5.3, and 15.4 months, respectively (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The use of systemic therapy improves OS after brain metastases in all biological subgroups. Targeted therapies also improve OS after brain metastases in HER2-positive patients. The combined use of targeted therapies and lapatinib are superior to single use and trastuzumab, respectively, in these patients.

Netrin-1 concentrations in patients with advanced gastric cancer and its relation with treatment.

CONTEXT: Netrin-1 is found to be elevated and usable as a diagnostic biomarker in many human cancers. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated serum Netrin-1 concentrations in patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with those in a healthy group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced gastric cancer and thirty healthy people were included in the study. Serum netrin-1 concentrations were measured by quantitative ELISA method in both groups. RESULTS: The mean serum Netrin-1 concentrations were found to be significantly higher in patients with gastric cancer than in healthy controls. The mean serum Netrin-1 concentrations were found to be significantly higher in patients with gastric cancer before the beginning of chemotherapy when compared after the completion of third cycle. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that netrin-1 concentrations elevated in advanced gastric cancer compared to a healthy control group and netrin-1 concentrations decreased with chemotherapy.

Early PSA response to antiandrogen therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma patients: A predictive marker for progression-free survival?

PURPOSE: Enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate (AA) are the main therapeutic approaches for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the failure of androgen deprivation therapy during or following docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline (four weeks after anti-androgen therapy) in predicting long-term progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 65 patients who had histologically confirmed metastatic prostate cancer and were treated with AA or enzalutamide in the post-docetaxel period. Serum PSA levels were evaluated at 4th and then 12th week. The main goal of this study was to demonstrate that an early PSA decline predicts PFS. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and June 2019, the medical records of 65 patients were collected. Of these patients, 38 (58.5%) received AA and 27 (41.5%) enzalutamide. Early PSA response rate (RR; ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% from baseline at the 4th week) was identified in 38.5% (n=25) and 15.3% (n=10) of the patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, we found that PSA RR≥ 30% in patients had a statistically significant advantage in terms of PFS ( HR: 0.38, 95% CI (0.13-0.71;p=0.03). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 30% PSA RR was significantly associated with a better PFS.

New horizons from novel therapies in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a relatively rare, but highly lethal cancer of the pleural mesothelial cells. Its pathoge-nesis is integrally linked to asbestos exposure. In spite of recent developments providing a more detailed understanding of the pathogenesis, the outcomes continue to be poor. To date, trimodality therapy involving surgery coupled with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy remains the standard of therapy. The development of resistance of the tumor cells to radiation and several che-motherapeutic agents poses even greater challenges in the management of this cancer. Ionizing radiation damages cancer cell DNA and aids in therapeutic response, but it also activates cell survival signaling pathways that helps the tumor cells to overcome radiation-induced cytotoxicity. A careful evaluation of the biology involved in mesothelioma with an emphasis on the workings of pro-survival signaling pathways might offer some guidance for treatment options. This review focuses on the existing treatment options for MPM, novel treatment approaches based on recent studies combining the use of inhibitors which target different pro-survival pathways, and radiotherapy to optimize treatment.

The impact of total neo-adjuvant treatment on nonoperative management in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: The evaluation of 66 cases.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to assess if adherence to a total-neoadjuvant-treatment (TNT) protocol followed by observation(watch-and-wait) led to the successful nonoperative-management of low-rectal-cancer. METHODS: In this study, patients with primary, resectable-T3-T4, N0-N1 distal-rectal-adenocarcinoma underwent-chemoradiotherapy + consolidation-chemotherapy (TNT). During the-TNT-period, endoscopy, MRI, and FDG-PET/CT were performed. We allocated patients with complete-clinical-tumor-regression, who underwent endoscopy every two months, MRI every-four-months, and PET/CT every-six-months-after-treatment, to the observation-group(OG). All other patients were referred for surgery. The OG was followed-up. The primary endpoint was local tumor-ecurrence after allocation to the OG. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, we enrolled 66-patients. Of 60-patients who were eligible to participate, 39 had complete-clinical-response(cCR) and were allocated to the OG, six underwent local-excision (LE), and 15 underwent total-mesorectal-excision (TME). The median follow-up duration was 22 (9-42) months. The local-recurrence-rate in the OG was 15.3%, and the LE and TME rates were 16.6% and 0%, respectively. All recurrence cases were salvaged through either LE or TME. The-distant-metastasis rate was 5.1%, 16.6%, and 12.5% in the OG, LE, and TME groups, respectively. The endoscopic negative-predictive-value(NPV) was 50%, and the positive-predictive-value(PPV) was 76.9% in the surgery group (LE + TME). MRI; NPV-50%, PPV-76.9%. PET/CT; NPV-100%, PPV-93.3%. Six patients(28.57%) from surgery group achieved complete pathological response (cPR). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated a high proportion of selected-rectal-cancers with-cCR after neo-adjuvant-therapy could potentially be managed non-operatively, and major surgery may be avoided.

Pretreatment PET/CT Standardized Uptake Values Play a Role in Predicting Response to Treatment and Survival in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the role of standardized uptake values (SUVs) of the primary tumor in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationship between SUV and response to treatment was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the efficient cut-off value for detecting response to treatment was determined. The effects of SUV on response to treatment and survival were investigated. RESULTS: 90 patients with a median age of 58 years (range 39-83 years) were included. Median follow-up was 11 months. The suitable cut-off SUV for determination of response was found to be 10 in ROC analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of this value were 85.7% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 63-96) and 61.8% (95% CI 49-73) (area under the curve 0.783; p = 0.0001), respectively. The overall objective response rate in patients with involvement above the cut-off value was 93.3% compared to 59.1% in those with involvement below the cut-off value (p < 0.0001). In uni- and multivariate analysis, favorable effects of limited-stage disease on response to treatment were established (p < 0.05). The effect of an SUV higher than the cut-off value on progression-free survival was borderline (p = 0.085). CONCLUSION: These data may contribute to identifying prognostic disease characteristics and response to treatment.