Arthroscopic Latarjet yields better union and prevention of instability compared to arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine whether arthroscopic Latarjet procedure or arthroscopic bony Bankart repair provide better outcomes in terms of rates of recurrent instability, non-union and complications, as well as clinical scores and range of motion. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane databases, applying the following keywords: "Arthroscopic bony Bankart" OR "Arthroscopic osseous Bankart" AND "Arthroscopic Latarjet" OR "Arthroscopic coracoid bone block". RESULTS: The systematic search returned 1465 records, of which 29 were included (arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, n = 16; arthroscopic Latarjet, n = 13). 37 datasets were included for data extraction, on 1483 shoulders. Compared to arthroscopic Latarjet, arthroscopic bony Bankart repair had significantly higher instability rates (0.14; CI 0.10-0.18; vs 0.04; CI 0.02-0.06), significantly lower union rates (0.63; CI 0.28-0.91 vs 0.98; CI 0.93-1.00), and significantly lower pain on VAS (0.42; CI 0.17-0.67 vs 1.17; CI 0.96-1.38). There were no significant differences in preoperative glenoid bone loss, follow-up, complication rate, ROWE score, ASES score, external rotation, and anterior forward elevation between arthroscopic Latarjet and arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. CONCLUSION: Compared to arthroscopic Latarjet, arthroscopic bony Bankart repair results in significantly (i) higher rates of recurrent instability (14% vs 4%), (ii) lower union rates (63% vs 98%), but (iii) slightly lower pain on VAS (0.45 vs 1.17). There were no differences in complication rates, clinical scores, or postoperative ranges of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A new self-assessment tool following shoulder stabilization surgery, the auto-Walch and auto-Rowe questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) are increasingly used for patient evaluation, as well as for scientific research. Few are used for practical purposes in the clinical setting, and few are reliable enough to allow proper feedback to physicians. Two of the most commonly used assessment tools in shoulder instability are the Walch-Duplay and the Rowe scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of self-administered versions of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores following shoulder stabilization procedure. METHODS: Between the months of May and December 2021, all patients who were followed in one of six institutions for shoulder instability were included. Patients were required to anonymously fill a self-administered version of Walch-Duplay and Rowe score. The classic scores were measured by the surgeon. Correlations between self-assessment and physician-assessment were then recorded. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were evaluated during the study period. Using the Spearman coefficient for correlation, a strong correlation (r > 0.5) was found between the results of the self-administered questionnaire and the surgeon-measured score. The difference between surgeon- and patient-administered questionnaires was non-significant. CONCLUSION: The self-administered version of the Walch-Duplay and Rowe questionnaires can reliably be used in the clinical setting for post-operative follow-up of patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Ultrasound Evaluation of Anterior Acromioclavicular Relationship in the Horizontal Plane on 40 Healthy Subjects. A New Possibility for Differential Diagnosis of Acromioclavicular Disjunctions Rockwood Stage 3 and 4? A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of an ultrasound examination of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) performed by an orthopaedic surgeon to analyze anterior ACJ relationship in the horizontal plane. DESIGN: Prospective observational study on healthy subjects. SETTING: The study was conducted in 2017 in a university department of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. PATIENTS (OR PARTICIPANTS): Forty consecutive volunteers aged 18 to 40 years were involved. INTERVENTIONS (OR ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS OR INDEPENDENT VARIABLES):: The ultrasound examination was performed by 2 orthopaedic surgeons with a SonoSite M-Turbo portable ultrasound machine (Fujifilm, Japan). Distance measurement between the anterior edge of the clavicle (AECL) and the anterior edge of the acromion (AEAC) was done on the right side, then on the left one and repeated by the same examiner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of measurements was analyzed as primary outcome. Concordance of distance measurements between the right and left sides on the same subject was evaluated, as well as the "typical morphology" of the ACJ in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: The intra- and interexaminer reproducibility for AECL-AEAC distance measurements was, respectively, 0.95 (0.93-0.97) and 0.87 (0.84-0.90). The correlation between the right and left sides was significant (P < 0.001), with a reproducibility of 0.86 (0.83-0.89). Twenty-seven (67.5%) volunteers were considered to have a "perfect alignment" of the AECL and AEAC. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that it is possible to evaluate with good reproducibility the anterior AC relationship in the horizontal plane and that both sides are similar on the same subject.

Learning Curves in the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: A Multicenter Analysis of the First 25 Cases of 5 International Surgeons.

PURPOSE: To analyze the learning curves of 5 experienced, fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons and their respective 25 first arthroscopic Latarjet cases in regard to surgical time, graft placement, complication rates, and recurrent instability. METHODS: The first 25 arthroscopic Latarjet procedures of 5 surgeons were retrospectively analyzed in an international multicenter setting, and thus 125 patients were included in this study. The surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative events out of the ordinary, and graft positioning were examined. RESULTS: The 125 patients consisted of 16 women (12.8%) and 109 men (87.2%). In 81.6% (n = 102), surgery was undertaken as a first-line procedure, whereas 18.4% (n = 23) were revisions. Surgical time decreased significantly from an average of 123.8 minutes (range 70 to 210) to 92.6 minutes (range 50 to 160) from the first 5 cases to the last 5 cases of each surgeon within a period of <2 years. Overall, 22 events in 21 patients requiring additional treatment were reported (17.6%). Five (4%) were unlikely to affect final outcome and did not require revision surgery. Twelve (9.6%) required revision surgery that was not trauma related yet was prone to affect outcomes. Five events were trauma-related (4%), 4 requiring revision surgery and 1 treated conservatively. Overall, 6 patients (4.8%) had recurrent shoulder instability, 3 as a result of a traumatic event. Conventional radiology showed the bone-block in ideal positioning in 93 cases (74.4%), flush with the glenoid in a true anteroposterior view. In 3 cases (2.4%), it was considered too high, 15 too low (12%), 5 too lateral (4%), and 15 too medial (12%). Some patients had combinations of the above. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that surgical time in arthroscopic Latarjet can be significantly reduced after only 20 cases. However, complication rates did not decrease over this time. The authors believe that the arthroscopic Latarjet is a challenging yet viable technique to treat anterior shoulder instability, achieving results equal to the open technique with advantages of the arthroscopic setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: Graft and Fixation Positioning Assessed With 2-Dimensional Computed Tomography Is Not Equivalent With Standard Open Technique.

PURPOSE: To analyze graft and fixation (screw and EndoButton) positioning after the arthroscopic Latarjet technique with 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and to compare it with the open technique. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study (March 2013 to June 2014). The inclusion criteria included patients with recurrent anterior instability treated with the Latarjet procedure. The exclusion criterion was the absence of a postoperative CT scan. The positions of the hardware, the positions of the grafts in the axial and sagittal planes, and the dispersion of values (variability) were compared. RESULTS: The study included 208 patients (79 treated with open technique, 87 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with screw fixation [arthro-screw], and 42 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with EndoButton fixation [arthro-EndoButton]). The angulation of the screws was different in the open group versus the arthro-screw group (superior, 10.3° ± 0.7° vs 16.9° ± 1.0° [P < .001]; inferior, 10.3° ± 0.8° vs 15.7° ± 0.9° [P < .0001]). The angulation of the EndoButtons was 5.7° ± 0.5°; this was different from that of open inferior screws (P = .003). In the axial plane (level of equator), the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 1.5 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]; arthro-EndoButton, 0 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (0.9 ± 0.2 mm medial). At the level of 25% of the glenoid height, the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 0.3 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]); (arthro-EndoButton, 0.7 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (1.0 ± 0.2 mm medial). Higher variability was observed in the arthro-screw group. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique resulted in higher positions (55% ± 3% of graft below equator) and the arthro-EndoButton technique resulted in lower positions (82% ± 3%, P < .0001) versus the open technique (71% ± 2%). Variability was not different. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the position of the fixation devices and position of the bone graft with the arthroscopic techniques are statistically significantly different from those with the open technique with 2-dimensional CT assessment. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique provides the highest positions, and the arthro-EndoButton technique, the lowest. Overall, the mean position of the bone block with the open Latarjet technique in the axial plane is slightly medial to the joint line, as recommended. Conversely, with the arthroscopic techniques, the bone grafts are more lateral with a slight overhang. The main differences are observed in the dispersion of the values (more extreme positions) with the arthro-screw technique, given the acknowledged limitations. Despite the statistical significance, the clinical significance of these differences is yet unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Is the two-dimensional computed tomography scan analysis reliable for coracoid graft positioning in Latarjet procedures?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop a computed tomography (CT)-based measurement protocol for coracoid graft (CG) placement in both axial and sagittal planes after a Latarjet procedure and to test its intraobserver and interobserver reliability. METHODS: Fifteen postoperative CT scans were included to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of a standardized protocol among 3 senior and 3 junior shoulder surgeons. The evaluation sequence included CG positioning, its contact area with the glenoid, and the angle of its screws in the axial plane. The percentage of CG positioned under the glenoid equator was also analyzed in the sagittal plane. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the values were interpreted according to the Landis and Koch classification. RESULTS: The ICC was substantial to almost perfect for intraobserver agreement and fair to almost perfect for interobserver agreement in measuring the angle of screws in the axial plane. The intraobserver agreement was slight to almost perfect and the interobserver agreement slight to substantial regarding CG positioning in the same plane. The intraobserver agreement and interobserver agreement were both fair to almost perfect concerning the contact area. The ICC was moderate to almost perfect for intraobserver agreement and slight to almost perfect for interobserver agreement in analyzing the percentage of CG under the glenoid equator. CONCLUSION: The variability of ICC values observed implies that caution should be taken in interpreting results regarding the CG position on 2-dimensional CT scans. This discrepancy is mainly explained by the difficulty in orienting the glenoid in the sagittal plane before any other parameter is measured.

High Rates of Return to Play and Low Recurrence Rate After Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Rugby Players.

Purpose: To analyze the rate of return to play, changes in athletic level, and recurrence rate and to report subjective outcomes in a series of rugby players with anterior shoulder instability who underwent an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study done in 2 centers on rugby players who were operated on between January 2011 and December 2020 was performed. Rugby players who underwent arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder stabilization with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were included. Rugby players were grouped according to their competitive level in their country (recreational, regional, national, and international). Data collected included return to sport after surgery, time to return to rugby, athletic level before and after surgery, patient satisfaction, and subjective scores. Recurrence and apprehension rates were also evaluated. Results: A total of 73 subjects were included. Mean age at time of surgery was 23 ± 5 years. Mean duration of follow-up was 5 ± 2.6 years. Eighty-four percent of rugby players returned to rugby within a mean period of 6.6 months. Initial athletic level was a significant factor (P = .012) for not returning to sport, with 67% of patients who initially played at a recreational level not returning to rugby and 33% of patients who initially played at a regional league level not returning. All national and international players returned to play. Of the 12 non-returning rugby players, only 30% did not return because of their shoulder. Mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 90 ± 9%. Recurrence rate was 7%. Conclusions: Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure proved its efficacy in managing recurrent anterior shoulder instability in rugby players. Return to play was achieved in almost all cases, with low recurrence rates. Despite high global return to the same level of sport, the higher the level of competition, the harder it is for rugby players to resume sport at the same level. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Failure of coracoid bone-block.

The rate of recurrence of anterior unidirectional instability is lower after coracoid bone-block than with other techniques, even if failures still occur with this difficult procedure. Failure may consist in recurrent instability (dislocation, subluxation, unstable painful shoulder) or despite absence of obvious clinical signs, in radiologic failure (non-union, fracture), biologic failure (osteolysis) or infection, all of which may require revision surgery or lead to late instability or subclinical chronic apprehension. Clinical, X-ray and CT assessment identifies the type of failure and may lead to a second surgery being discussed with the patient according to functional demand. Technical error is often implicated and is generally due to deficient coracoid preparation, insufficient conjoint and coracoid tendon release or problems of positioning and fixing the bone-block on the glenoid. There are 2 types of revision surgery. Iliac bone-block involves the same demands as coracoid bone-block; it stabilises the shoulder and provides very good functional results. Although less effective, anterior capsule repair can also stabilise the shoulder when associated to posterior Hill-Sachs lesion remplissage by infraspinatus tenodesis. Osteoarthritis of the shoulder may set in after any surgical revision and impair the result.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Is healing enough?

HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair most commonly results in good clinical outcomes, however understanding of predictive factors influencing the final clinical outcome is limited. AIM: The purpose of our study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with healed supraspinatus tendon after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to identify its pre- and peri-operative predictive factors of good clinical results. METHODS: A multi-center prospective study followed up 188 patients, who had a healed tendon after an arthroscopic repair of isolated supraspinatus tear. Inclusion criteria were: age under 70 years old, isolated supraspinatus tear, stage 0 or I of fatty infiltration, healed supraspinatus tendon at one year postoperatively and the same arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair used in all patients. Clinical assessment used Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Ultrasound (US) control checked tendon repair quality based on Sugaya classification. Types I-II-III were considered as healed. RESULTS: The average age of our cohort was 57.57 (range; 41 to 70) years and the female to male ratio was 1.14 (range; 100 to 87). The average preoperative CMS was 53.75±13.50 (mean±SD; range; 16 to 83). At final follow up, the average postoperative CMS was 79.95±12.05 (mean±SD; range; 28 to 100). 12.22% (23/188) of patients, who had a CMS score below 70, had a clinically significant difference compared to the average CMS, due to the fact that the minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) in CMS is 10. A statistical analysis has shown that in patients with lower scores there was only a significant dominance of females (p-value=0.001). No difference was found in regards to age, preoperative CMS, fatty degeneration and other factors. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that despite all patients had a healed repair of supraspinatus, not all of them experienced a good final clinical outcome. The only factor negatively influencing the final clinical outcome was a female gender. No other structural factors seemed to influence the final clinical results. Futures studies should focus more on analyzing which personality traits and other psychosocial factors play an important role in determining the final outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective cohort study.

Revision of failed Latarjet with the Eden-Hybinette surgical technique.

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability are highly satisfactory although recurrences are possible. Surgical revision is challenging, and often requires an iliac crest bone graft as described by Eden and Hybinette. The aims of our study were to analyze the outcomes of the Eden-Hybinette technique after failed Latarjet procedure, determine the failure and complication rates, and analyze the risk of osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the Eden-Hybinette technique would yield good outcomes after failed Latarjet procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study (9 hospitals) by the French Shoulder and Elbow Society (SoFEC) involving 46 patients who underwent revision surgery with an Eden-Hybinette procedure after failed Latarjet stabilization. The patients had a minimum follow-up of 1year and the outcomes were evaluated based on the Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score and radiographs. RESULTS: The mean age at the final assessment was 32years. The mean follow-up was 38 months and 86% of patients had a stable shoulder with an overall satisfaction rate of 80%. Postoperatively, the Rowe score averaged 76/100 and the Walch-Duplay score averaged 68/100; 60% of patients had resumed their sports participation. Return to sport was statistically correlated with age (p=0.0001), osteoarthritis (p=0.05) and time elapsed between the two surgical procedures (p=0.0001). The Rowe score was statistically correlated with osteoarthritis (p=0.01). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our study is one of the largest on the Eden-Hybinette procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The outcomes at 3years' follow-up were satisfactory in 80% of patients and 86% had stable shoulders. The osteoarthritis rate was low (11%), although the follow-up period was relatively short. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, non-randomized multicenter retrospective study.

Increased T2 signal intensity in the distal clavicle does not justify acromioclavicular resection arthroplasty during rotator cuff repair.

INTRODUCTION: Acromioclavicular (AC) arthropathy can contribute to shoulder pain; it can be treated surgically by distal clavicle resection (DCR). The aim of this study was to determine whether increased T2 signal intensity in the clavicle on MRI is an argument in favour of AC resection arthroplasty by DCR during rotator cuff repair. METHODS: The MRI images from 107 shoulders in 107 patients were analysed. We looked for statistical relationships and correlations between shoulders with T2 hyperintensity (HI+) and those without (HI-) before surgery and then in shoulders with T2 hyperintensity (HI+) that underwent AC resection arthroplasty (AC+) and those who did not (AC-). RESULTS: On MRI, T2 hyperintensity in the AC joint was correlated with sex (more often found in men) and radiological signs of AC arthropathy. There was no statistical correlation before surgery, particularly with AC pain, or after surgery, with outcomes in shoulders undergoing DCR. CONCLUSION: When repairing rotator cuff tears, the presence of T2 hyperintensity on MRI in the distal clavicle is not a predictor of better clinical outcomes after AC resection arthroplasty is done. The AC pain may be related to the rotator cuff tear instead. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective randomised study.

Benefits of distal clavicle resection during rotator cuff repair: Prospective randomized single-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tears often occur in combination with acromioclavicular (AC) arthropathy. But it can be difficult to separate pain caused by the rotator cuff tear from pain caused by the AC joint, despite clinical and other examinations. Distal clavicle resection (DCR) is increasingly being done at the same time as arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between patients who simultaneously undergo DCR and patients who do not. The primary hypothesis was that DCR improves the clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind study of 200 patients who underwent isolated supraspinatus repair using the same technique. The patients were randomized into two groups: 97 patients who also underwent DCR and 103 patients who did not. The patients were followed until 1 year postoperative according to a standardized radiological and clinical review protocol. RESULTS: At 1 year postoperative, all the clinical outcomes were worse in the DCR group, although only external rotation with elbow at side (53° vs. 59°, p=0.04) and the SSV (86.5 vs. 90.1, p=0.04) were statistically different. Overall shoulder pain was higher in the DCR group during the first 3 months postoperative (p=0.04). At 1 year, the DCR group had more residual pain; this pain was mainly located on the superior side of the shoulder (p=0.03), especially when more than 11 mm was resected (p=0.01). More of the shoulders in the DCR group had failures in rotator cuff healing based on ultrasonography (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: Our hypothesis was not confirmed. We do not recommend doing routine DCR with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, prospective randomized simple blind study.

Screw Removal Can Resolve Unexplained Anterior Pain Without Recurrence of Shoulder Instability After Open Latarjet Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability can be successfully treated using Latarjet procedures, although a small proportion of patients report unexplained pain. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to report the prevalence and characteristics of patients with unexplained pain without recurrent instability after open Latarjet procedures and to determine whether screw removal can alleviate pain. The hypothesis was that unexplained pain without recurrent instability might be due to soft tissue impingements against the screw heads and that the removal of screws would alleviate or reduce pain. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 461 consecutive shoulders treated by open Latarjet procedures for anterior instability between 2002 and 2014. Unexplained anterior pain was present in 21 shoulders (4.6%) and treated by screw removal at 29 ± 37 months (mean ± SD). Postoperative assessment at >12 months after screw removal included complications, visual analog scale for pain (pVAS), subjective shoulder value, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and ranges of motion. The study cohort comprised the shoulders of 20 patients (9 women, 11 men) aged 25 ± 6 years (median, 25 years; range, 16-34 years) at screw removal and involved the dominant arm in 13 (62%) shoulders. RESULTS: Screw removal alleviated pain completely in 14 shoulders (67%; pVAS improvement, 6.4 ± 1.8; median, 6; range, 3-8) and reduced pain in the remaining 7 (33%; pVAS improvement, 2.4 ± 1.4; median, 2; range, 1-5). At 38 ± 23 months after screw removal, 2 recurrences of instability unrelated to screw removal occurred. The subjective shoulder value was 79% ± 22% (median, 90%; range, 0%-95%); Rowe score, 85 ± 20 (median, 95; range, 30-100); and Walch-Duplay score, 82 ± 19 (median, 85; range, 25-100). Mobility improved in active forward elevation (171°± 14°), external rotation with the elbow at the side (61°± 12°), and external rotation with the arm at 90° of abduction (67°± 13°) and especially in internal rotation, with only 2 shoulders (10%) limited to T12 spine segment. CONCLUSION: The present findings confirm that unexplained anterior pain after Latarjet procedures can be related to the screws used to fix bone blocks, which can safely be alleviated or reduced by screw removal.

Is conventional radiography still relevant for evaluating the acromioclavicular joint?

INTRODUCTION: Conventional radiography using an anteroposterior view of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is the gold standard for evaluating arthritic degeneration. OBJECTIVE: Based on a standardised AP view of the AC joint, the objective of this study was to determine whether this radiographic view is reliable and reproducible for evaluating the AC joint space. METHODS: A cadaver scapula-clavicle unit, free of osteoarthritis, was used for this study. The scapula was positioned in a stand; and then with fluoroscopy guidance, a strict AP view of the AC joint was taken. Starting from this "0" position, a radiograph was taken by varying the angle by 5°, 10°, and 15° in every plane in space. All radiographs were taken during a single session to ensure the distance between the X-ray tube and scapula did not change. The images were then exported to OsiriX for processing; the superior and inferior AC distance and the joint area were measured. RESULTS: There was no reproducibility in the AC joint measurements as a function of the incidence angle relative to a strict AP view. CONCLUSION: Conventional radiography using an AP view of the AC joint cannot be used to do a fine analysis of arthritic degeneration of this joint. It is likely that only CT scan or MRI is sufficient to analyse osteoarthritis in this joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, basic science study.

Prospective study of tendon healing and functional gain after arthroscopic repair of isolated supraspinatus tear.

INTRODUCTION: In case of failure of non-operative treatment of isolated supraspinatus tear, tendon surgery can improve shoulder function and alleviate pain. The present study hypothesis was that isolated supraspinatus repair shows good healing, with improved clinical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre study followed up 199 patients (mean age, 57 years) for one year. Inclusion criteria comprised: isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tear, retraction grade<3, with the same double-row arthroscopic technique. Clinical assessment used Constant score at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months. Ultrasound control checked tendon repair quality on the Sugaya criteria, types I-II-III being considered as healed. RESULTS: At one year, mean Constant score had increased by 26 points (p<0.001). Healing rate was 94% (n=187): Sugaya type I, 46% (n=92); type II, 41% (n=81); type III, 7% (n=14). Mean Constant score was significantly higher in case of healing: 81 vs. 70 points (p=0.002). Constant score progression was identical in both healing groups throughout follow-up. Univariate analysis showed no correlation between epidemiological or tear-related factors and tendon healing. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of isolated small supraspinatus tear provided 94% healing. Clinical results were better when healing was achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, prospective cohort study.

Modified Margin Convergence: Over-Under Lacing Suture Technique.

The principle of margin convergence can be applied to rotator cuff repair to enhance the security of fixation by decreasing the mechanical strain at the margins of the tear. We describe a suture technique, over-under lacing, that reproduces the same margin convergence, with equal tissue tension across the entire surface area of the cuff. A consecutive series of patients affected by massive U-shaped rotator cuff tears were treated by this repair technique. Preoperative diagnosis, tear assessment, and grading of fatty infiltration of the cuff muscles were based on arthro-computed tomography evaluation. The technique passes 2 sutures from the medial to lateral margin of the tear, with a knotless suture anchor for tendon-to-bone fixation. The proposed technique seems to reduce tensile strain on the repaired tendon, can reconstruct the rotator cuff cable, and can attain the balanced pull of the tendon in a medial-to-lateral fashion. The over-under lacing suture technique is both simple and reproducible. This technique may achieve the goals of margin convergence with satisfactory preliminary clinical results for patients with massive rotator cuff tears.

Doubling of serum creatinine in clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and individual patients: adequate use in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of doubling of serum creatinine (DSC) has never been assessed in renal transplantation. We evaluated it in terms of its use for clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and individual patients. METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal study in 896 renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: Death-censored graft loss occurred in 133 patients, during follow-up (up to 21 years). DSC was a risk factor for graft loss; however, the relative risk was different in patients with glomerular filtration rate less than 40 vs. more than or equal to 40 mL/min (hazard ratio: 14.5 [95% confidence interval: 7.4-28.4] vs. 47.8 [28.4-80.6], P=0.0051). Parameters influencing creatinine value (weight, age, sex) did not modify DSC's predictive value. The use of the composite endpoint DSC or death-censored graft loss instead of death-censored graft loss alone in clinical trials would reduce sample size by 7.1% to 9.0%. The annual probability of DSC to graft loss transition decreased from 76% (follow-up <1 year) to 5% (follow-up ≥10 years). Median graft half-life after DSC was 10 months [95% confidence interval: 6-18] but varied with increasing time to DSC (<1 year: 1 month [0.5-6]; 3-4.9 years: 15 months 5/67) and reference creatinine (<130 µmol/L: 3 months 2/6); ≥130 µmol/L: 25 months 15/37). CONCLUSIONS: DSC may be adequately used to refine the risk of death-censored graft loss for individual patients. However, the use of DSC as an endpoint in clinical trials marginally affects sample size, and the probability of DSC to graft loss transition is not constant, which limits the use of DSC in cost-effectiveness analyses of renal transplantation.