Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phys Rev Lett ; 105(1): 018104, 2010 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20867484

RESUMO

A high throughput method was designed to produce hyperpolarized gases by combining low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization with a sublimation procedure. It is illustrated by applications to 129Xe nuclear magnetic resonance in xenon gas, leading to a signal enhancement of 3 to 4 orders of magnitude compared to the room-temperature thermal equilibrium signal at 7.05 T.


Assuntos
Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Transição de Fase , Xenônio/química , Temperatura
2.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 4(7): 1061-72, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21558411

RESUMO

Differentially methylated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) biomarkers, identified in vitro and validated in well-characterized surgical specimens, have shown poor clinical correlation in cohorts with different risk profiles. To overcome this lack of relevance, we used the HumanMethylation27 BeadChip, publicly available methylation and expression array data, and quantitative methylation specific PCR to uncover differential methylation in OSCC clinical samples with heterogeneous risk profiles. A two stage design consisting of discovery and prevalence screens was used to identify differential promoter methylation and deregulated pathways in patients diagnosed with OSCC and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Promoter methylation of KIF1A (κ = 0.64), HOXA9 (κ = 0.60), NID2 (κ = 0.60), and EDNRB (κ = 0.60) had a moderate to substantial agreement with clinical diagnosis in the discovery screen. HOXA9 had 68% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a 0.81 Area Under the Curve (AUC). NID2 had 71% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a 0.79 AUC. In the prevalence screen, HOXA9 (κ = 0.82) and NID2 (κ = 0.80) had an almost perfect agreement with histologic diagnosis. HOXA9 had 85% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and a 0.95 AUC. NID2 had 87% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and a 0.91 AUC. A HOXA9 and NID2 gene panel had 94% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and a 0.97 AUC. In saliva, from OSCC cases and controls, HOXA9 had 75% sensitivity, 53% specificity, and a 0.75 AUC. NID2 had 87% sensitivity, 21% specificity, and a 0.73 AUC. This phase I Biomarker Development Trial identified a panel of differentially methylated genes in normal and OSCC clinical samples from patients with heterogeneous risk profiles. This panel may be useful for early detection and cancer prevention studies.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/genética , Metilação de DNA , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/genética , Neoplasias Bucais/genética , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/genética , Saliva/metabolismo , Proteínas de Ligação ao Cálcio , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevenção & controle , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Cinesinas/genética , Boca/metabolismo , Boca/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Bucais/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/prevenção & controle , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA