Diagnostic value of Xpert® BC Detection, Bladder Epicheck®, Urovysion® FISH and cytology in the detection of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Following the current guidelines, diagnosis and staging for upper urinary tract tumours (UTUC) can be performed with Computed Tomography, urography, ureterorenoscopy (URS) and selective cytology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Xpert®-BC-Detection and the Bladder-Epicheck®-test in the detection of UTUC and compare it with cytology and the Urovysion®-FISH test using histology and URS as gold standard. METHODS: A total of 97 analyses were collected through selective catheterization of the ureter before URS to test for cytology, Xpert®-BC-Detection, Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®-FISH. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using histology results/URS as reference. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 41.9% for cytology, 64.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 87.1% for Urovysion®-FISH. The sensitivity of Xpert®-BC-Detection was 100% in both, LG and HG tumours, sensitivity of cytology increased from 30.8% in LG to 100% in HG, for Bladder-Epicheck® from 57.7% in LG to 100% in HG and of Urovysion®-FISH from 84.6% in LG to 100% in HG tumours. Specificity was 4.5% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 93.9% for cytology, 78.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 81.8% for Urovysion®-FISH. PPV was 33% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 76.5% for cytology, 58.8% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 69.2% for Urovysion®FISH. NPV was 100% for Xpert®-BC-Detection, 77.5% for cytology, 82.5% for Bladder-Epicheck® and 93.1% for Urovysion®FISH. CONCLUSION: Bladder-Epicheck® and Urovysion®FISH along with cytology could be a helpful ancillary method in the diagnosis and follow-up of UTUC while due to its low specificity Xpert®-BC Detection seems to be of limited usefulness.

Efficacy and Safety of Two Fosfomycin Regimens as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomised Study.

PURPOSE: Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis; unfortunately, this procedure is not free from complications. Recent studies have shown an increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a prostate biopsy prophylaxis protocol using 2 vs. 3 fosfomycin doses. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-seven patients undergoing transrectal systematic ultrasound (US)-guided (n = 277) or transrectal fusion prostate biopsy (n = 20) were prospectively evaluated and randomized by date of birth, to receive 2 (even years, group A) versus 3 doses of fosfomycin (odd years, group B), and prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomized to group A (n = 162) or group B (n = 135). The 2 groups were comparable with respect to age, comorbidity, PSA value, prostate volume, operative time and urine culture results. Out of 297 patients, 44 (14.8%) developed complications after the procedure; 2.7% (8/297) of patients developed fever >38° requiring hospitalization (6 [3.7%] in group A and 2 [1.5%] in group B, p = 0.29). Patients who underwent fusion biopsy were more frequently readmitted in comparison with patients undergoing US-guided prostate biopsy (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The low fever and prostatitis rate suggest that fosfomycin prophylaxis is safe and efficient. There is no significant difference in clinical outcome between the 2 dosage regimens.

Loss of membranous expression of the intracellular domain of EpCAM is a frequent event and predicts poor survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

AIMS: Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is a widely used immunohistochemical marker for epithelial human malignancies. Antibodies to target EpCAM are usually directed against its ectodomain (EpEX), but do not detect the intracellular domain (EpICD). The aim of this study was to compare membranous EpEX versus EpICD expression by immunohistochemistry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Concurrent EpEX and EpICD expression was investigated retrospectively in cancerous and matched non-neoplastic tissue samples from patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In total, 317 paired samples of pancreatic tissue from 88 patients were analysed and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. In non-cancerous tissue, a high concordance of membranous EpEX and EpICD expression was observed and defined as the expression of the full-length EpCAM (EpEX(+)/EpICD(+) phenotype, EpCAM(MF)), which was highly predominant. In contrast, while most tumour samples were EpEX positive, loss of membranous EpICD expression (EpEX(+)/EpICD(-) phenotype, EpCAM(MT)) was observed in one-third of cases, and these patients had a significantly shortened disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that loss of membranous EpICD expression is a frequent event and predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Additional studies evaluating the predictive and prognostic value of the expression of different membranous EpCAM variants are warranted in epithelial cancers.

Perforation during TUR of bladder tumours influences the natural history of superficial bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Bladder perforation is the second most common complication during transurethral resection of bladder tumours. It is unknown whether perforation affects the natural history of the tumour through cell seeding. The aim of this study was to study the impact of perforation on the oncologic outcomes of bladder carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2007, 926 consecutive patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumours at our institution; 327 cases were staged ≥ pT2 and were treated immediately with cystectomy and/or multimodal therapy and therefore excluded from the study. An additional 34 cases without urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Of the remaining 565 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, 457 (80.8 %) were male and 108 (19.2 %) were female with a mean age of 69.5 years in men and 67.3 years in women. Thirty-seven patients (6.5 %) experienced bladder perforation at the time of tumour resection. This group of patients (Group 1) was compared to the remaining 528 patients (Group 2) who did not experience a bladder perforation. RESULTS: Patients with bladder wall perforation experienced a shorter disease-free survival in both univariate (p = 0.003) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.006). In addition, subsequent recurrences revealed stage progression of recurrent disease (p = 0.05) and trended to a higher number of cystectomies in the perforated group of patients (p = 0.06). Nevertheless, perforation did not appear to influence overall survival (p = 0.127) or cancer-specific survival (p = 0.141). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that bladder perforation during resection of superficial bladder tumours is burdened by a shortened disease-free survival and T-stage progression.

Recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: prognostic models including multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization molecular grading.

OBJECTIVE: To test the prognostic value of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of tumor cells in urine for prediction of the recurrence and progression of tumor in patients with intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: A total of 168 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were included in the study. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was carried out on the bladder wash urine collected before resection. Tumors were classified as low molecular grading if they had a diploid chromosomal pattern or only a loss of p16 or ch3 aneuploidy, and as high molecular grading if they showed aneuploidy of ch7 or 17. Cox regression models assessed the added prognostic value of fluorescence in situ hybridization for primary tumor recurrence or progression, respectively. RESULTS: Median follow up was 67 months. A total of 57% of tumors were classified as low molecular grading. The 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 68% and 49% for low molecular grading, and 47% and 30% for high molecular grading, respectively. The 2- and 5-year progression-free survival was 95% and 84% for low molecular grading, and 79% and 58% for high molecular grading tumor patients, respectively. Molecular grading (hazard ratio 1.60; P = 0.03) was associated with recurrence, when also accounting for histopathology and a patient's characteristics. Both cancer severity score (hazard ratio 1.51; P < 0.01) and molecular grading (hazard ratio 2.53; P < 0.01) independently and positively predicted progression in multivariable models. The C-index for predicting recurrence increased from 0.58 to 0.61 when molecular grading fluorescence in situ hybridization was included in the model, and from 0.68 to 0.72 when predicting progression. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization-based molecular grading increases the accuracy of a prognostic model, predicting both recurrence and progression in patients with intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Prospective evaluation of the RT-PCR based urinary marker Bladder Epicheck® as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract tumor.

BACKGROUND: Upper-tract-urothelial-carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5-10% of all urothelial-neoplasms with increasing incidence in the last decades. Current standard tools for diagnosis of UTUC include cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography and ureterorenoscopy (URS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Bladder Epicheck® Test as diagnostic tool for UTUC diagnosis and recurrence. METHODS: Overall, 136 urine samples, selective collected from upper-urinary-tract before URS for suspicion of UTUC were analyzed with cytology and Bladder Epicheck® Test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of both markers were calculated and compared to URS and/or histology as reference. RESULTS: UTUC was detected in 40 cases (33.3%), among them 30 were classified as low-grade (LG) and 10 as high-grade (HG). Overall sensitivity of Bladder Epicheck® for UTUC detection was 65% compared to 42.5% for cytology, increasing to 100% for Bladder Epicheck® and 90% for cytology if considering only HG tumors. Overall specificity of Bladder Epicheck® was 81.2% and of cytology 93.7%. PPV and NPV were 63.4% and 82.2% for Bladder Epicheck® and 77.2% and 76.5% for cytology. Considering an EpiScore cut-off >75, instead of 60, specificity of Bladder Epicheck® improves to 89% and PPV to 74.2%. Limitations include the use of a marker validated only for bladder-cancer and the relatively small number of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its high sensitivity for HG tumors, the Bladder Epicheck® Test can be used in diagnosis and treatment decision-making of UTUC. Furthermore, it could be very useful in follow-up of UTUC, after endoscopic treatment to postpone or avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration. Even if further studies are needed to validate these findings, Bladder Epicheck® could be a promising clinical tool for detection of UTUC.

HPV L1 detection discriminates cervical precancer from transient HPV infection: a prospective international multicenter study.

The benefits of cytology-based cervical cancer screening programs in reducing morbidity and mortality are well recognized. Especially, overtreatment of human papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions may have a negative impact on reproductive outcomes for fertile women. To optimize the clinical management an objective standard is needed to distinguish precancer that requires treatment, from spontaneously resolving HPV infections. In the current study, we examined the prognostic relevance of HPV-L1 capsid protein analysis with Cytoactiv in an international prospective multicenter study including 908 HPV high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions (LSIL/HSIL) during a follow-up period of 54 months. The clinical end points of the study were histologically confirmed CIN3+ as progression, CIN1/2 for stable disease and repeated negative Pap smears as spontaneous clinical remission. The difference of the clinical outcome of HPV-L1-negative and HPV-L1-positive cases was statistically highly significant (P-value<0.0001) independent of the classification as mild dysplasia (LSIL) and moderate dysplasia (HSIL). Of the HPV-L1-negative HPV high-risk positive mild/moderate dysplasias 84% progressed to CIN3, as compared with only 20% of the HPV-L1-positive cases. The data from our study show that HPV-L1 detection allows to identify transient HPV infections and precancerous lesions within the group of HPV high-risk positive early dysplastic lesions. The high progression rate of HPV-L1-negative mild and moderate dysplasia emphasizes the precancerous nature of these lesions. A close follow-up with colposcopy and histological evaluation is advisable and removal of these lesions should be considered. The low malignant potential of HPV-L1-positive cases, however, indicates transient HPV infection, justifying a watch and wait strategy with cytological follow-up, thus preventing overtreatment especially for women in their reproductive age.

Evaluation of the M371-Test Under Real-life Conditions for Diagnosis and Follow Up of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to establish the performance of the M371-Test on the Thermocycler Rotor-GeneQ (Qiagen) platform for diagnosis and follow-up of testicular tumors and to evaluate the test under real-life conditions in comparison to the classical markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients, of median age 29 years (range=24-84) were included in this prospective study at our institution between March 2021 and September 2022. Of the 44 patients, 23 had a suspicion of testicular cancer (TC) and 21 were under follow-up for TC. In total, 96 M371-Tests were performed and compared with AFP, ß-HCG, LDH using histological diagnosis and/or computer tomography (CT) scan as the gold standard. RESULTS: In the patients with suspicion of TC, the M371-Test showed a sensitivity of 73.7%, AFP of 21%, LDH of 31.6% and ß-HCG of 42.1%. In the patients under follow-up for TC, the M371-Test showed a sensitivity of 86.4%, AFP of 50%, LDH of 31.8% and ß-HCG of 63.6%. In germ cell tumours (GCT)/non-seminomas, M371-Test had a sensitivity of 83.3%, AFP of 77.8%, LDH of 38.9% and ß-HCG of 66.7%. In GCT/seminomas, M371-Test had a sensitivity of 85%, AFP of 5%, LDH of 30% and ß-HCG of 50%. CONCLUSION: Under real life conditions performed on the real-time Thermocycler Rotor-GeneQ (Qiagen) platform, the M371-Test shows an outstanding performance and is far beyond the sensitivity of the classical markers for detecting GCTs and in the follow-up of patients after GCT, especially in seminomas.

Accurate risk assessment of patients with asymptomatic hematuria for the presence of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: Bladder cancer is frequently diagnosed during a workup for hematuria. However, most patients with microscopic hematuria and many with gross hematuria are not appropriately referred to urologists. We hypothesized that in patients presenting with asymptomatic hematuria the risk of having bladder cancer can be predicted with high accuracy. Toward this end, we analyzed risk factors in patients with asymptomatic hematuria and developed a nomogram for the prediction of bladder cancer presence. METHODS: Data from 1,182 consecutive subjects without a history of bladder cancer undergoing initial evaluation for asymptomatic hematuria were collected at three centers. Clinical risk factors including age, gender, smoking status, and degree of hematuria were recorded. All subjects underwent standard workup including voided cytology, upper tract imaging, and cystourethroscopy. Factors associated with the presence of bladder cancer were evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The multivariable analysis was used to construct a nomogram. Internal validation was performed using 200 bootstrap samples. RESULTS: Of the 1,182 subjects who presented with asymptomatic hematuria, 245 (20.7 %) had bladder cancer. Increasing age (OR = 1.03, p < 0.0001), smoking history (OR = 3.72, p < 0.0001), gross hematuria (OR = 1.71, p = 0.002), and positive cytology (OR = 14.71, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of bladder cancer presence. The multivariable model achieved 83.1 % accuracy for predicting the presence of bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder cancer presence can be predicted with high accuracy in patients who present with asymptomatic hematuria. We developed a nomogram to help optimize referral patterns (i.e., timing and prioritization) of patients with asymptomatic hematuria.

Xpert® bladder cancer detection as a diagnostic tool in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: preliminary results.

Objectives: Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents about 5-10% of all urothelial malignancies with an increasing incidence. The standard diagnostic tools for the detection of UTUC are cytology, computed tomography (CT) urography, and ureterorenoscopy (URS). No biomarker to be included in the daily clinical practice has yet been identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of Xpert® Bladder-Cancer (BC)-Detection in the diagnosis of UTUC. Methods: Eighty-two patients underwent 111 URS with Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion® analysis of UT for suspicion of UTUC. Twenty-four cases were excluded from the analysis due to a non-diagnostic Xpert® BC-Detection, cytology, or Urovysion®. Samples were analyzed with upper tract (UT) urinary cytology, with Xpert® BC-Detection on UT urines, and with Urovysion® Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. After urine collection, the patients underwent retrograde pyelography and/or URS, and if positive a UT biopsy. The Xpert® BC-Detection was reported by the software as negative or positive [cut-off total Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) = 0.45]. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytology, Xpert® BC-Detection and Urovysion-FISH were calculated using URS and/or histology results as reference. Results: In all, 27 (31%) of 87 URS resulted positive, with 20 low-grade (LG) and 7 high-grade (HG) tumors. Overall sensitivity was 51.9% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 92.6% for Urovysion. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 26% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. For Xpert® BC-Detection, sensitivity was 100% both in LG and in HG, and for Urovysion-FISH, it increased from 90% in LG to 100% in HG tumors. PPV was 82.4% for cytology, 35% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 73.5% for Urovysion. NPV was 81.4% for cytology, 100% for Xpert® BC-Detection, and 96.2% for Urovysion. Conclusion: The excellent NPV of Xpert® BC-Detection allows to avoid unnecessary endoscopic exploration of the UT, reducing invasiveness and URS complications in the follow-up of UTUC.

Diagnostic value of Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor in the follow-up of patients affected by non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: an update.

AIMS: Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor is a urinary marker based on the evaluation of five target mRNAs overexpressed in patients with bladder cancer (BC). The aim of our study is to update our results regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on 1015 samples of 416 patients (mean age 72.2 ± 10.3 years) under follow-up for NMIBC. Patients underwent voided urinary cytology, the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor test and cystoscopy and, if positive, a transurethral resection of the bladder. Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor was reported as negative or positive: cut-off total Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) = 0.5. RESULTS: We identified 168 recurrent tumours: 126 (75%) were low-grade (LG) and 42 (25%) high-grade (HG). Overall sensitivity was 17.9% for cytology, 52.4% for Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor and 54.2% for the two tests combined. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 6.3% in LG to 52.4% in HG tumours whereas Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor showed a sensitivity ranging from 42.9% in LG to 80.9% in HG tumours. Combined cytology and Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor yielded an overall sensitivity of 45.2% for LG and 80.9% for HG tumours. Overall specificity was 98.5% for cytology and 78.4% for Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor and 78.2% for the two tests combined. The area under the curve (AUC) for Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor was 0.71; stratifying the patients according to the European Association of Urology risk groups, the AUC was 0.69, 0.67 and 0.85 for low, intermediate and high risk, respectively (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Our data confirm a significantly higher sensitivity of Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor than for cytology in a larger patient cohort. The test performed very well in terms of specificity but could not reach the high value of cytology. Along with voided urinary cytology the test could allow to reduce cystoscopies in follow-up patients, reducing discomfort to the patients and costs.

Comparison of 2 new real-time polymerase chain reaction-based urinary markers in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2 new real-time polymerase chain reaction-based urinary markers with each other and with urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and/or histology in patients being followed for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: A total of 487 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were evaluated using voided urine cytology, the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor, the Bladder EpiCheck test, and white light cystoscopy. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity was 27.17% for cytology, 64.13% for the Bladder EpiCheck test, and 66.3% for the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor. The overall specificity was 98.82% for cytology, 82.06% for the Bladder EpiCheck test, and 76.47% for the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor. The negative predictive value was very similar for the 3 tests at 83.56% for cytology, 89.42% for the Bladder EpiCheck test, and 89.35% for the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor. When combined, the Bladder EpiCheck test and Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor detected overall 79.35% of the tumors: 70.37% in low-grade and 92.11% in high-grade tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor and Bladder EpiCheck test were found to perform very well in terms of sensitivity. Together, the 2 tests detected approximately 92.11% of high-grade tumors. Their specificity was high but could not reach the excellent value of cytology. The negative predictive value was the same for both tests and was higher than that for cytology, especially when the tests were used together (92.24%). These 2 new tests hold promise as urinary biomarkers. They may be used in combination to maximize sensitivity in a less invasive way, thereby reducing invasiveness in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and decreasing discomfort for the patients as well as complications and costs.

Diagnostic predictive value of Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor in the follow-up of patients affected by non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

AIMS: Cystoscopy and urine cytology represent the gold standard for monitoring superficial bladder cancer (BC). Xpert BC Monitor is a new urinary marker based on the evaluation of five target mRNAs overexpressed in patients with bladder cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert BC Monitor in follow-up of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: 230 patients were included in this prospective study. Xpert BC Monitor cut-off was set to 0.5. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytology, Xpert BC Monitor and their combination were calculated and compared with cystoscopy/histology. RESULTS: 52/230 patients showed a NMIBC recurrence, 45 low grade (LG) and 7 high grade (HG). Overall sensitivity was 11.5% for cytology, 46.2% for Xpert BC Monitor and 48.1% for the two tests combined. Sensitivity of cytology increased from 4.4% in LG to 57.1% in HG tumours whereas for the Xpert BC Monitor it was 40% in LG and 85.7% in HG tumours. Combined cytology and Xpert BC Monitor yielded an overall sensitivity of 42% for LG and 85.7% for HG. Overall specificity was 97.2% for cytology, 77% for Xpert BC Monitor and 75.8% for the two tests. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity for the Xpert BC Monitor Test was significantly higher than for cytology. The test performed very well in terms of specificity but could not reach the value of cytology, while PPV and NPV performed approximately the same for both tests.

Diagnostic predictive value of the Bladder EpiCheck test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Bladder EpiCheck test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and to compare it with the accuracy of urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and/or histology. METHODS: In total, 243 patients were enrolled in the current study. Patients were evaluated by voided urine cytology, by the Bladder EpiCheck test, and by white-light cystoscopy. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 33.3% for cytology, 62.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 66.7% for the 2 tests combined. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 7.7% in low-grade (LG) tumors to 66.6% in high-grade (HG) tumors; whereas, for the Bladder EpiCheck test, the sensitivity was 46.1% in LG tumors and 83.3% in HG tumors. Combined cytology and Bladder EpiCheck testing yielded an overall sensitivity of 56.4% for LG tumors and 90% for HG tumors. Overall specificity was 98.6% for cytology, 86.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 85.6% for the 2 tests combined. The positive predictive value was 92% for cytology and 68.2% for Bladder EpiCheck. For the 2 tests combined, it was 68.6%. The negative predictive value was similar for the 2 tests: 75.8% for cytology, 82.9% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 84.5% for the 2 tests combined. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the Bladder EpiCheck test was significantly higher than that of cytology. The test performed very well in terms of specificity but could not reach the high value of cytology. The positive predictive value was higher for Bladder EpiCheck, whereas the negative predictive value was approximately the same for both tests.

Urachal carcinoma: from gross specimen to morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis.

Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is an exceedingly rare neoplasm that develops from the urachus, an embryologic remnant of the urogenital sinus and allantois. The most commonly encountered histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study is to characterize a series of UrC by morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. We retrospectively investigated seven cases of UrCs and assessed patient symptoms, imaging, histologic features, immunohistochemical profile, molecular characteristics, pathologic stages, and type of treatment. Immunostaining for CK7, CK20, Muc-2, CDX2, GATA3, ß-catenin, and CK34ßE12 was carried out on each neoplasm and on seven non-neoplastic urachal remnants as the control group. Additionally, a mutational analysis was performed using the QIAact Actionable Insights Tumor Panel Kit, which analyzes KRAS, NRAS, KIT, BRAF, PDGFRA, ALK, EGFR, ERBB2, PIK3CA, ERBB3, ESR1, and RAF1. Our cohort comprised five females and two males with a mean age of 64 years. UrCs consisted of two mucinous cystadenocarcinomas and five invasive, non-cystic adenocarcinomas. Carcinoma antigen expression profile was positive for CK20 and negative for CK34ßE12 and GATA3 in all cases. Five of seven cases stained positively for Muc-2 and CDX2. On the contrary, non-neoplastic urachal remnants were immunoreactive for CK34ßE12, CK7, and GATA3. Mutational analysis gave a positive result in four out of seven (57.1%) cases. All four positive tumors showed RAS mutation and one an additional mutation in PIK3CA. Urachal tumors exhibit peculiar morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. Due to the advanced stage at presentation, individualized treatment should be undertaken.

Urinary cytology and nuclear matrix protein 22 in the detection of bladder cancer recurrence other than transitional cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22), compared with urinary cytology, in predicting the recurrence of bladder cancer that is not transitional cell carcinoma (non-TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested the sensitivity, specificity and the predictive accuracy of NMP22 in the context of non-TCC bladder cancer recurrence, and compared it to the performance of urinary cytology. The study group comprised 2687 patients with history of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer from 10 centres across four continents. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 64.8 years and 75.4% were men; of all patients, 513 (19.1%) had positive urinary cytology, 906 (33.7%) had a positive NMP22 test (>or=10 units/mL) and 80 (3.0%) had non-TCC recurrence. Most of these, i.e. 60 (75%), were stage >or=T2. The sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology were, respectively, 20.0% and 94.8%, vs 77.5% and 81.8% for NMP22 of >or=10 units/mL. The predictive accuracy of urinary cytology was 57.5%, vs 87.1% for NMP22 >or= 10 units/mL. A combined model that included dichotomized NMP22 and urinary cytology was 85.3% accurate. CONCLUSION: The ability of a NMP22 level of >or=10 units/mL to predict non-TCC recurrence was better than that of urinary cytology, suggesting that NMP22 might have a role in the surveillance of patients at risk of non-TCC recurrence.

The value of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ test in the detection and follow-up of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder.

BACKGROUND: Urine bound tests, which have been developed for the early detection of urothelial cancer (UC), do not seem to match cytology in the detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) as their sensitivity in the case of CIS is poor. ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ in CIS seems promising, but the number of analysed CIS is still small. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of this test in the detection and follow-up of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients, with histologically verified CIS of the urinary bladder, were included in the study. At the first diagnosis, patients underwent cytology, cystoscopy, bioptical bladder mapping and ImmunoCyt/uCyt+. All patients underwent BCG instillation therapy. The patients were followed with cytology, ImmunoCyt/uCyt+, cystoscopy and bladder mapping after every BCG cycle and then every 3 months. RESULTS: At the first CIS diagnosis, the sensitivity of cytology and ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ was 100%. At the first control after therapy, cytology detected 81.8% of recurrences and ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ detected 90.9%. At the second control, both tests each detected 50% of recurrences. At every control, the combination of both the tests together gave a sensitivity of 100%. The specificity of cytology after therapy improved from 88.2% at the first control up to 100% at the third control. The specificity of ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ after BCG initially decreased from 70.6% to 55.5% and finally increased to 88.9%. CONCLUSION: ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ is as sensitive as cytology in the first diagnosis of CIS. In the follow-up, even if it is less sensitive, its combination with cytology leads to detection of 100% of the recurrences. Despite decreasing specificity after therapy, the value remains acceptable and increases during maintenance therapy. The ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ test could play an important role in controlling the response of patients to instillation therapies or in the modification of their application schedules.

Urinary cytology in bladder cancer: why is it still relevant?

Bladder carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and cystoscopy with cytology is currently considered the gold standard for the detection and surveillance of primary tumors and for the follow-up of patients after transurethral resection. Even if cytology has a low sensitivity especially in low-grade bladder carcinomas, the high specificity and the inexpensive nature of the equipment required, justify performing it. The greatest value of cytology for patients with low-grade, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the detection of those lesions that may progress to high-grade urothelial carcinoma.