Pathophysiological dissociation of the interaction between time pressure and trait anxiety during spatial orientation judgments.

Spatial orientation is achieved by integrating visual, vestibular and proprioceptive cues. Individuals that rely strongly upon visual cues to facilitate spatial orientation are termed visually dependent. Heightened visual reliance commonly occurs in patients following vestibular dysfunction and can influence clinical outcome. Additionally, psychological factors, including anxiety, are associated with poorer clinical outcome following vestibular dysfunction. Given that visual dependency measures are affected by psychological and contextual influences, such as time pressure, we investigated the interaction between time pressure and anxiety upon visual dependency in healthy controls and vestibular migraine patients. Visual dependency was assessed using a "Rod and Disk" task at baseline and under time pressure (3 s to complete the task). Non-situational (trait) and situational (state) anxiety levels were quantified using the Spielberg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. We calculated the change in visual dependency (VD) [∆VD = VDtime pressure  - VDbaseline ] and correlated it with participants' trait anxiety scores. We observed a significant negative correlation between trait anxiety and the change in VD (R2  = .393, p < .001) in healthy controls and a positive correlation in dizzy patients (R2  = .317, p < .001). That is, healthy individuals that were more anxious became less visually dependent under time pressure (i.e., more accurate), whereas less anxious individuals became more visually dependent. The reverse was observed in vestibular migraine patients. Our results illustrate that anxiety can differentially modulate task performance during spatial orientation judgements under time pressure in healthy individuals and dizzy patients. These findings have potential implications for individualised patient rehabilitation therapies.

Exploring the Impact of Using Patient-Specific 3D Prints during Consent for Skull Base Neurosurgery.

Objectives Informed consent is fundamental to good practice. We hypothesized that a personalized three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of skull base pathology would enhance informed consent and reduce patient anxiety. Design Digital images and communication in medicine (DICOM) files were 3D printed. After a standard pre-surgery consent clinic, patients completed part one of a two-part structured questionnaire. They then interacted with their personalized 3D printed model and completed part two. This explored their perceived involvement in decision-making, anxiety, concerns and also their understanding of lesion location and surgical risks. Descriptive statistics were used to report responses and text classification tools were used to analyze free text responses. Setting and Participants In total,14 patients undergoing elective skull base surgery (with pathologies including skull base meningioma, craniopharyngioma, pituitary adenoma, Rathke cleft cyst, and olfactory neuroblastoma) were prospectively identified at a single unit. Results After 3D model exposure, there was a net trend toward reduced patient-reported anxiety and enhanced patient-perceived involvement in treatment. Thirteen of 14 patients (93%) felt better about their operation and 13/14 patients (93%) thought all patients should have access to personalized 3D models. After exposure, there was a net trend toward improved patient-reported understanding of surgical risks, lesion location, and extent of feeling informed. Thirteen of 14 patients (93%) felt the model helped them understand the surgical anatomy better. Analysis of free text responses to the model found mixed sentiment: 47% positive, 35% neutral, and 18% negative. Conclusion In the context of skull base neurosurgery, personalized 3D-printed models of skull base pathology can inform the surgical consent process, impacting the levels of patient understanding and anxiety.

Comparison of External Ventricular Drains with Ventricular Access Devices for the Emergency Management of Adult Hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE: We compared external ventricular drains (EVDs) with percutaneous continuous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage via ventricular access devices (VADs) for the acute management of hydrocephalus in adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all ventricular drains inserted for a new diagnosis of hydrocephalus into noninfected CSF over four years. We compared infection rates, return to theatre, and patient outcome between EVDs and VADs. We explored the effect of duration of drainage, frequency of sampling, hydrocephalus aetiology, and catheter location on these outcomes using multivariable logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: We included 179 drains (76 EVDs and 103 VADs). EVDs were associated with a higher rate of unplanned return to theatre for replacement or revision (27/76, 36%, vs. 4/103, 4%, OR: 13.4 95%CI: 4.3-55.8). However, infection rates were higher in VADs (13/103, 13% vs. 5/76, 7%, OR: 2.0, 95%CI: 0.65-7.7). EVDs were 91% antibiotic impregnated whereas VADs were 98% nonimpregnated. In multivariable analysis, infection was associated with duration of drainage (median: 11 days prior to infection for infected drains vs. 7 days total for noninfected drains), but not drain type (VADs vs. EVDs OR: 1.6, 95%CI: 0.5-6). CONCLUSIONS: EVDs had a higher rate of unplanned revisions but a lower infection rate compared to VADs. However, in multivariable analysis choice of drain type was not associated with infection. We suggest a prospective comparison of antibiotic impregnated VADs and EVDs using similar sampling protocols to assess whether VADs or EVDs for acute hydrocephalus have a lower overall complication rate.