Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Invest New Drugs ; 37(1): 118-126, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29995286

RESUMO

Background Galunisertib inhibits type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor serine/threonine kinase. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of galunisertib in combination with sorafenib in Japanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients and methods This open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter, nonrandomized phase 1b study consisted of two dose levels of galunisertib, 160 or 300 mg/day, in combination with sorafenib 800 mg/day. Galunisertib 80 mg or 150 mg was administered orally twice daily for 14 days followed by 14 days of rest plus sorafenib 400 mg administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The dose-limiting toxicity evaluation was 28 days after the first dose. Safety measures, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity were assessed. Results Fourteen patients, 7 at each galunisertib dose, were enrolled and treated. Three dose-limiting toxicities were reported for 2 patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hypophosphatemia (14 patients [100%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (12 patients [85.7%]), and decreased platelet count (10 patients [71.4%]). The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were hypophosphatemia (10 patients [71.4%]) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (7 patients [50.0%]). No grade 5 TEAEs were reported. The pharmacokinetic profile of galunisertib in combination with sorafenib was similar to that previously reported for galunisertib. Eleven patients had a best overall response of stable disease, and 1 patient achieved a partial response by hepatocellular carcinoma-specific modified RECIST. Conclusions These data are consistent with the known safety profile for galunisertib and sorafenib and confirm tolerability of the recommended dose of galunisertib (150 mg twice daily for 14 days) in combination with sorafenib in Japanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor do Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta Tipo I/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/enzimologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/enzimologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Sorafenibe/administração & dosagem , Distribuição Tecidual
2.
Br J Cancer ; 119(10): 1208-1214, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30318515

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Galunisertib is the first-in-class, first-in-human, oral small-molecule type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor (ALK5) serine/threonine kinase inhibitor to enter clinical development. The effect of galunisertib vs. placebo in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer was determined. METHODS: This was a two-part, multinational study: phase 1b was a non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, and dose-escalation study; phase 2 was a randomised, placebo- and Bayesian-augmented controlled, double-blind study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma considered candidates for first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine. Patients were randomised 2:1 to galunisertib-gemcitabine (N = 104) or placebo-gemcitabine (N = 52). Gemcitabine dose was 1000 mg/m2 QW. Primary endpoints for phases 1b and 2, respectively, were phase 2 dose and overall survival. Secondary objectives included tolerability and biomarkers. RESULTS: Dose-escalation suggested a 300-mg/day dose. Primary objective was met: median survival times were 8.9 and 7.1 months for galunisertib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79 [95% credible interval: 0.59-1.09] and posterior probability HR < 1 = 0.93). Lower baseline biomarkers macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 were associated with galunisertib benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Galunisertib-gemcitabine combination improved overall survival vs. gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, with minimal added toxicity. Future exploration of galunisertib in pancreatic cancer is ongoing in combination with durvalumab.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/farmacocinética , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Placebos , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Pirazóis/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Transdução de Sinais , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Gencitabina
3.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 83(5): 975-991, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30887178

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Galunisertib, the first small molecule transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) receptor inhibitor, plus gemcitabine resulted in the improvement of survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, but markers to identify patients likely to respond are lacking. METHODS: In the Phase 1b/2 JBAJ study, 156 patients were randomized 2:1 to galunisertib + gemcitabine (N = 104) or placebo + gemcitabine (N = 52). Clinical outcome data were integrated with baseline markers and pharmacodynamic markers while patients were on treatment, including circulating proteins using a multi-analyte panel, T cell subset evaluation, and miRNA profiling. RESULTS: Baseline biomarkers associated with overall prognosis regardless of treatment included CA19-9 and TGF-ß1. In addition, IP-10, FSH, MIP-1α, and PAI-1 were potential predictive proteins. Baseline proteins that were changed during treatment included amphiregulin, CA15-3, cathepsin D, P-selectin, RAGE, sortilin, COMP, eotaxin-2, N-BNP, osteopontin, and thrombospondin-4. Plasma miRNA with potential prognostic value included miR-21-5p, miR-301a-3p, miR-210-3p, and miR-141-3p, while those with potential predictive value included miR-424-5p, miR-483-3p, and miR-10b-5p. CONCLUSIONS: Galunisertib + gemcitabine resulted in improvement of overall survival, and 4 proteins (IP-10, FSH, MIP-1α, PAI-1) were potentially predictive for this combination treatment. Future studies should also include baseline evaluation of miR-424-5p, miR-483-3p, and miR-10b-5p. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01373164.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , MicroRNAs/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento Transformadores beta/antagonistas & inibidores , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/patologia , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Taxa de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
4.
Thromb Haemost ; 64(3): 369-73, 1990 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2151407

RESUMO

The antithrombotic effect of a specific thromboxane A2 receptor blocking drug, AH23848, on radio-labelled platelet deposition in mature Dacron aorto-bifemoral grafts has been evaluated in patients. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to AH23848 70 mg, aspirin 300 mg plus dipyridamole 75 mg or placebo 8-hourly for 9 days. AH23848 inhibited platelet aggregation induced by the thromboxane A2 mimetic U-46619; no such effect was observed with aspirin plus dipyridamole. 111In-platelet uptake was measured as the thrombogenicity index (TI) which is a measure of the daily rate of accumulation of platelets by the graft. The mean (s.e. mean) value of 0.193 (0.029) on placebo was significantly reduced to 0.115 (0.022) by AH23848 (p less than 0.05) but only to 0.175 (0.028) by aspirin plus dipyridamole. There was no difference in mean platelet life span between the three treatment groups. The pronounced antithrombotic effect of AH23848 implicates thromboxane A2 in the process of platelet deposition in arterial prostheses and demonstrates the considerable promise of thromboxane receptor blocking drugs as antithrombotic therapy.


Assuntos
Compostos de Bifenilo/farmacologia , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Receptores de Prostaglandina/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Aspirina/farmacologia , Compostos de Bifenilo/efeitos adversos , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dipiridamol/farmacologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenotereftalatos , Receptores de Tromboxanos
5.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 39(4): 314-21, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22936231

RESUMO

In less than twenty years, what began as a concept for the treatment of exsanguinating truncal trauma patients has become the primary treatment model for numerous emergent, life threatening surgical conditions incapable of tolerating traditional methods. Its core concepts are relative straightforward and simple in nature: first, proper identification of the patient who is in need of following this paradigm; second, truncation of the initial surgical procedure to the minimal necessary operation; third, aggressive, focused resuscitation in the intensive care unit; fourth, definitive care only once the patient is optimized to tolerate the procedure. These simple underlying principles can be molded to a variety of emergencies, from its original application in combined major vascular and visceral trauma to the septic abdomen and orthopedics. A host of new resuscitation strategies and technologies have been developed over the past two decades, from permissive hypotension and damage control resuscitation to advanced ventilators and hemostatic agents, which have allowed for a more focused resuscitation, allowing some of the morbidity of this model to be reduced. The combination of the simple, malleable paradigm along with better understanding of resuscitation has proven to be a potent blend. As such, what was once an almost lethal injury (combined vascular and visceral injury) has become a survivable one.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/tendências , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Laparotomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA