Wide variability of shoulder and elbow case volume in orthopedic surgery residency.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of certain shoulder and elbow procedures (eg, shoulder arthroplasty), resident exposure to these surgeries remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volumes of commonly performed shoulder and elbow procedures. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating US orthopedic surgery residents was assessed. Procedures of the shoulder and humerus/elbow were categorized into predefined ACGME categories: repair/revision/reconstruction, fracture/dislocation, and arthroscopy. The average number of cases performed per resident in each of these categories was directly compared from 2016 to 2020. The 10th and 90th percentiles of case volumes within each category of procedures was compared from 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: There was a 31% increase in the number of shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction cases between 2016 and 2020 (average: 27.5 to 36.1; P < .001), followed by a 23% increase for elbow fracture/dislocation (24.4 to 30; P < .001), 21% increase for elbow repair/revision/reconstruction (10.6 to 12.8; P < .001), and 16% increase for shoulder arthroscopy (69 to 79.7; P < .001). No significant changes were found for shoulder fracture/dislocation and elbow arthroscopy. There was a wide case volume variability for each procedure, particularly for shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction, where there was a nearly 5-fold difference in the number of cases performed between the 10th and 90th percentiles of residents in 2020 (13 vs. 62 cases, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The case category shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction has seen the largest relative increase in the shoulder and elbow case volume of graduating orthopedic surgery residents, most likely reflecting the national rising trends of shoulder arthroplasty. However, our study shows that there is wide variability in resident exposure to these cases. Implementation of shoulder arthroplasty case minimum requirements might help reduce case variability and discrepancies in resident education.

Pediatric Shoulder Arthroscopy is Effective and Most Commonly Indicated for Instability, Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy, and Partial Rotator Cuff Tears.

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to systematically evaluate the literature on pediatric shoulder arthroscopy and outline its indications, outcomes, and complications. Methods: This systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and OVID Medline were searched for studies reporting the indications, outcomes, or complications in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy under the age of 18 years. Reviews, case reports, and letters to the editor were excluded. Data extracted included surgical techniques, indications, preoperative and postoperative functional and radiographic outcomes, and complications. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Results: Eighteen studies, with a mean MINORS score of 11.4/16, were identified, including a total of 761 shoulders (754 patients). Weighted average age was 13.6 years (range, 0.83-18.8 years) with a mean follow-up time of 34.6 months (range, 6-115). As part of their inclusion criteria, 6 studies (230 patients) recruited patients with anterior shoulder instability and 3 studies recruited patients with posterior shoulder instability (80 patients). Other indications for shoulder arthroscopy included obstetric brachial plexus palsy (157 patients) and rotator cuff tears (30 patients). Studies reported a significant improvement in functional outcomes for arthroscopy indicated for shoulder instability and obstetric brachial plexus palsy. A significant improvement was also noted in radiographic outcomes and range of motion for obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients. The overall rate of complication ranged from 0% to 25%, with 2 studies reporting no complications. The most common complication was recurrent instability (38 patients of 228 [16.7%]). Fourteen of the 38 patients (36.8%) underwent reoperation. Conclusion: Among pediatric patients, shoulder arthroscopy was indicated most commonly for instability, followed by brachial plexus birth palsy, and partial rotator cuff tears. Its use resulted in good clinical and radiographic outcomes with limited complications. Level of Evidence: Systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

The Relative Citation Ratio: Evaluating a New Measure of Scientific Influence Among Academic Sports Medicine Surgeons.

Background: Objective measures of research influence are being increasingly utilized to evaluate and compare academic faculty. However, traditional bibliometrics, such as the Hirsch index and article citation count, are biased by time-dependent factors and are limited by a lack of field normalization. The relative citation ratio (RCR) is a new field- and time-normalized article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the RCR among fellowship-trained academic sports medicine surgeons and to analyze physician factors associated with RCR values. We hypothesized that the mean RCR score for fellowship-trained academic sports medicine surgery faculty will fall above the NIH standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the iCite database for all fellowship-trained sports medicine surgery faculty associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in December 2021. In eligible faculty, the mean RCR, weighted RCR, and total publication count were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and presence of additional degrees. A mean RCR value of 1.0 is the NIH-funded field-normalized standard. The data herein are presented as the median and interquartile range, in addition to the mean and standard deviation, to account for outliers of the mean and weighted RCR scores. Results: A total of 624 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgery faculty members from 160 orthopaedic surgery residency programs were included in the analysis. Overall, faculty produced impactful research, with a median RCR of 1.6 (interquartile range, 1.0-2.2) and a median weighted RCR of 19.3 (interquartile range, 5.1-69.3). Advanced academic rank and career longevity were associated with increased weighted RCR and total publication count. All subgroups analyzed had an RCR value >1.0. Conclusion: Study findings indicate that fellowship-trained academic sports medicine surgery faculty are highly productive and produce impactful research, as evidenced by the high median RCR value relative to the benchmark NIH RCR value of 1.0.

Has Public Interest in Elective Spine Surgery Returned to Pre-COVID 19 Levels? A Google Trends Analysis.

Objective To utilize Google trends to examine the effects of changing rules and regulations on public interest regarding elective spine surgery.  Methods This is a retrospective review analyzing data from Google trends to quantify public interest in elective cervical and lumbar fusion as restrictions related to COVID-19 were released. Three time periods were created surrounding the release of restriction on elective surgery on March 13, 2020, by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). "Pre-COVID" was defined as the four-month period directly preceding the national ban on elective surgery (11/13/2019 to 3/13/2020). "COVID" was defined as the four-month time period directly after the national ban on elective surgery (3/13/20-7/13/20), and "Post-COVID" was defined as the time period starting four months after the restrictions on elective surgeries first took place (7/13/20-11/13/20). Relative search volume (RSV) was assessed during all three time periods and compared using an analysis of variance test.  Results Search volume for all terms pertaining to cervical and lumbar fusion declined precipitously after the release of restrictions on elective surgery. Additionally, search volume has yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. However, for many of the terms public interest has been steadily increasing and signals the return in demand for these procedures.  Conclusion Public interest in elective spine surgery has been increasing as restrictions continue to loosen and many patients that deferred care will drive increased demand for the foreseeable future.

Hip Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Is Low Among Graduating Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate case volume and variability of hip arthroscopy exposure among graduating orthopaedic residents. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopaedic surgery residents were assessed. Arthroscopy procedures of the pelvis/hip were identified. The average number of cases performed per resident was compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine the percent change in case volume. The 10th, 30th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of case volumes from 2016 to 2020 were presented to demonstrate case volume variability. Results: There was no change in the number of hip arthroscopy procedures between 2016 and 2020 [average: 8.4 ± 10 (range: 0 to 87) vs. 9.8 ± 12 (range: 0 to 101)] (P = .995). There was a wide variability in case volume among residents. The 90th percentile of residents performed 24 cases in 2020, compared to 2 cases in the 30th percentile and 0 cases amongst the 10th percentile of residents. Conclusions: Despite the growing popularity of hip arthroscopy, resident exposure to this highly technical procedure remains limited, with about one-third of residents performing 2 or less cases by graduation. Clinical Relevance: Understanding case volume and variability is important for orthopaedic surgery programs to ensure that graduating residents are gaining adequate exposure.

Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio Among Academic Orthopedic Hand Surgeons: A Novel Measure of Research Impact.

Background: Publication metrics such as article citation count and the Hirsch index (h-index) are used to evaluate research productivity among academic faculty. However, these bibliometric indices are not field-normalized and yield inaccurate cross-specialty comparisons. We evaluate the use of the relative citation ratio (RCR), a new field-normalized article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), among academic orthopedic hand surgeons and analyze physician factors associated with RCR values. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the iCite database. Fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons affiliated with accredited orthopedic surgery residency programs were included. Mean RCR, weighted RCR, and publication count were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and presence of additional degrees. Mean RCR represents the total number of citations per year of a publication divided by the average number of citations per year received by NIH-funded papers in the same field. Mean RCR serves as a measure of overall research impact. A value of 1.0 is the NIH-funded field-normalized standard. Weighted RCR is the sum of all article-level RCR scores and represents overall research productivity. Results: A total of 620 academic orthopedic hand surgeons from 164 programs were included. These physicians produced highly impactful research with a median RCR of 1.27 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.86-1.66). Weighted RCR was associated with advanced degree, advanced academic rank, and longer career duration. Conclusions: Fellowship-trained academic orthopedic hand surgeons produce highly impactful research. Our benchmark data can be used to assess grant outcomes, promotion, and continued evaluation of research productivity within the hand surgery community.

The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall.

Background: It is critical for orthopedic surgery residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the content and resources utilized by the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to continuously guide study and educational efforts. This study presents an updated analysis of the shoulder and elbow section of the OITE. Methods: All OITE questions, answers, and references from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. The number of shoulder and elbow questions per year was recorded, and questions were analyzed for topic, imaging modalities, cognitive taxonomy, and references. We compared our data to the results of a previous study that analyzed shoulder and elbow OITE questions from 2002 to 2007 to examine trends and changes in this domain overtime. Results: There were 177 shoulder and elbow questions (126 shoulder, 71.2%; 51 elbow, 28.8%) of 1863 OITE questions (9.5%) over a 7-year period. The most commonly tested topics included degenerative joint disease/stiffness/arthroplasty (31.6%), anatomy/biomechanics (16.9%), instability/athletic injury (15.3%), trauma (14.7%), and rotator cuff (13.6%). Half of all questions involved clinical management decisions (49.7%). A total of 417 references were cited from 56 different sources, the most common of which were the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (23.3%), Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (20.4%), and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (16%). The average time lag from article publication to OITE reference was 7.7 years. Compared with a prior analysis from 2002 to 2007, there was a significant increase in the number of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE (5.5% to 9.5%; P < .001). Recent exams incorporated more complex multistep treatment questions (4.4% vs. 49.7%; P < .001) and fewer recall questions (42.2% vs. 22%; P < .001). There was a significant increase in the use of imaging modalities (53.3% vs. 79.1%; P < .001). No significant differences in the distribution of question topics were found. Conclusions: The percentage of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE has nearly doubled over the past decade with greater emphasis on critical thinking (eg, clinical management decisions) over recall of facts. These findings should prompt educators to direct didactic efforts (eg, morning conferences and journal club) toward case-based learning to foster critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills.

Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-supported relative citation ratio among American orthopedic spine surgery faculty: A new bibliometric measure of scientific influence.

Background: Publication metrics have been traditionally used to compare research productivity amongst academic faculty. However, traditional bibliometrics lack field-normalization and are often biased towards time-dependent publication factors. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new, field-normalized, article-level metric, known as the "relative citation ratio" (RCR), that can be used to make accurate self, departmental, and cross-specialty comparisons of research productivity. This study evaluates the use of the RCR amongst academic orthopedic spine surgery faculty and analyzes physician factors associated with RCR values. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the iCite database for all fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgery (OSS) faculty associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic surgery residency program. Mean RCR, weighted RCR, and total publication count were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and presence of additional degrees. A value of 1.0 is the NIH-funded field-normalized standard. Student t-tests were used for two-group analyses whereas the analysis of variance tests (ANOVA) was used for between-group comparisons of three or more subgroups. Statistical significance was achieved at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 502 academic OSS faculty members from 159 institutions were included in the analysis. Overall, OSS faculty were highly productive, with a median RCR of 1.62 (IQR 1.38-2.32) and a median weighted RCR of 68.98 (IQR 21.06-212.70). Advancing academic rank was associated with weighted RCR, career longevity was associated with mean RCR score, and male sex was associated with having increased mean and weighted RCR scores. All subgroups analyzed had an RCR value above 1.0. Conclusions: Academic orthopedic spine surgery faculty produce impactful research as evidenced by the high median RCR relative to the standard value set by the NIH of 1.0. Our data can be used to evaluate research productivity in the orthopedic spine community.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Secondary to Fibrolipomatous Hamartoma of the Median Nerve.

Fibrolipomatous hamartoma (FLH) is a rare, benign neoplasm that affects the median nerve predominantly and can present with compressive symptoms. MRI can be used to diagnose this condition without the need for a nerve biopsy. While no definitive treatment has been described, open carpal tunnel release for nerve decompression is currently the standard of care to alleviate compressive neuropathies of the median nerve. In this report, we describe a case of FLH diagnosed via MRI in which the patient's symptoms responded to open carpal tunnel release.

Simultaneous Bilateral Patellar Tendon Rupture in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Simultaneous bilateral patellar tendon rupture is an infrequent and debilitating injury. Although tendon rupture is associated with multiple systemic diseases, there is limited literature regarding its association with osteogenesis imperfecta and successful treatment techniques. We report a case of a 56-year-old man with a history of osteogenesis imperfecta type I who experienced bilateral patellar tendon rupture following a fall from standing height in the absence of other risk factors. Both injuries were effectively treated with primary open repair utilizing Krackow suture technique and transosseous tunnel fixation bilaterally. The patient demonstrated full functional recovery at 14-month follow-up. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a risk factor for the development of bilateral patellar tendon rupture. Open bilateral transosseous suture repair has proven to be successful despite defects in type 1 collagen and underlying tendon weakness.

Anterior Hip Dislocation After Hip Arthroscopy Complicated by Iliopsoas Bursitis.

Hip dislocation after hip arthroscopy is an uncommon postoperative complication. We report a case of a 51-year-old woman who underwent right hip arthroscopy and presented with an anterior hip dislocation on postoperative day five. The index surgery involved capsulotomy, cam lesion debridement, and femoroplasty for an anterosuperior labral tear and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. The patient underwent an uneventful recovery course until eight weeks postoperatively she developed iliopsoas bursitis. Her symptoms were managed conservatively with activity modification and physical rehabilitation. Complete resolution of symptoms was reported by the six-month follow-up visit, and no further dislocations or instability had been reported at 12 months. Anterior hip dislocation is a rare complication following hip arthroscopy and patients may experience persistent iliopsoas bursitis several months following successful reduction.

Wide Variability of Pediatric Knee Arthroscopy Case Volume in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate orthopaedic surgery resident case volume and variability for adult and pediatric knee arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopaedic surgery residents were analyzed. The average number of total (adult and pediatric), adult, and pediatric knee arthroscopy cases were compared from 2016 to 2020. The 10th and 90th percentiles of case volumes for adult and pediatric knee arthroscopy procedures were compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine caseload variability. RESULTS: There was an 18% increase in pediatric knee arthroscopy cases between 2016 and 2020 (average: 13.9 ± 10 to 16.4 ± 13; P < .005), a 5.4% decrease in adult knee arthroscopy cases (100 ± 45 to 94.6 ± 47; P < .027), and a 2.6% decrease in total knee arthroscopy (113.9 ± 47 to 111 ± 51; P = .264) cases. There was an 11-fold difference in the number of pediatric knee arthroscopy cases performed between the 10th and 90th percentile of residents in 2020 (3 vs 33 cases, respectively), a 3.28-fold difference for adult knee arthroscopy (47 vs 154, respectively), and a 2.98-fold difference for total knee arthroscopy (59 vs 176, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric knee arthroscopy comprises a small yet growing percentage of total knee arthroscopy case volume of graduating orthopaedic surgery residents. However, wide variability in resident exposure is present and likely masked by the abundance of adult cases performed each year. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings presented in this study may assist in optimizing arthroscopy resident education. Existing ACL reconstruction and knee arthroscopy case minimum requirements could be updated to include a set number of pediatric cases. These changes might help reduce case volume variability and discrepancies in resident education.