Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiol Clin North Am ; 62(3): 453-471, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553180

RESUMO

Heart transplantation is a pivotal treatment of end-stage heart failure, and recent advancements have extended median posttransplant life expectancy. However, despite the progress in surgical techniques and medical treatment, heart transplant patients still face complications such as rejection, infections, and drug toxicity. CT is a reliable tool for detecting most of these complications, whereas MR imaging is particularly adept at identifying pericardial pathologies and signs of rejection. Awareness of these nuances by radiologists, cardiologists, and surgeons is desired to optimize care, reduce morbidities, and enhance survival.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Radiologia , Humanos , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Radiografia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
2.
Chest ; 2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423278

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasing, but candidacy selection processes are variable and subject to bias. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the reasons behind venovenous ECMO candidacy decisions, and are decisions made consistently across patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of all patients, admitted or outside hospital referrals, considered for venovenous ECMO at a tertiary referral center. Relevant clinical data and reasons for candidacy determination were cross-referenced with other noncandidates and candidates and were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: Eighty-one consultations resulted in 44 noncandidates (54%), 29 candidates (36%; nine of whom subsequently underwent cannulation), and eight deferred decisions (10%). Fifteen unique contraindications were identified, variably present across all patients. Five contraindications were invoked as the sole reason to deny ECMO to a patient. In patients with three or more contraindications, additional contraindications were cited even if the severity was relatively minor. All but four contraindications invoked to deny ECMO to a patient were nonprohibitive for at least one other candidate. Contraindications documented in noncandidates were present but not mentioned in 21 other noncandidates (47%). Twenty-six candidates (90%) had at least one contraindication that was prohibitive in a noncandidate, including a contraindication that was the sole reason to deny ECMO. Contraindications were proposed as informing three prognostic domains, through which patterns of inconsistency could be understood better: (1) irreversible underlying pulmonary process, (2) unsurvivable critical illness, and (3) clinical condition too compromised for meaningful recovery. INTERPRETATION: ECMO candidacy decisions are inconsistent. We identified four patterns of inconsistency in our center and propose a three-domain model for understanding and categorizing contraindications, yielding five lessons that may improve candidacy decision processes until further research can guide practice more definitively.

3.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 11(2)2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38392260

RESUMO

The current understanding of the safety of heart transplantation from COVID-19+ donors is uncertain. Preliminary studies suggest that heart transplants from these donors may be feasible. We analyzed 1-year outcomes in COVID-19+ donor heart recipients using 1:3 propensity matching. The OPTN database was queried for adult heart transplant recipients between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2022. COVID-19+ donors were defined as those who tested positive on NATs or antigen tests within 21 days prior to procurement. Multiorgan transplants, retransplants, donors without COVID-19 testing, and recipients allocated under the old heart allocation system were excluded. A total of 7211 heart transplant recipients met the inclusion criteria, including 316 COVID-19+ donor heart recipients. Further, 290 COVID-19+ donor heart recipients were matched to 870 COVID-19- donor heart recipients. Survival was similar between the groups at 30 days (p = 0.46), 6 months (p = 0.17), and 1 year (p = 0.07). Recipients from COVID-19+ donors in the matched cohort were less likely to experience postoperative acute rejection prior to discharge (p = 0.01). National COVID-19+ donor heart usage varied by region: region 11 transplanted the most COVID-19+ hearts (15.8%), and region 6 transplanted the fewest (3.2%). Our findings indicate that COVID-19+ heart transplantation can be performed with safe early outcomes. Further analyses are needed to determine if long-term outcomes are equivalent between groups.

4.
Ann Surg Open ; 5(1): e368, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883934

RESUMO

Objective: To assess the effects of the 2020 United States Public Health Service (PHS) "Increased Risk" Guidelines update. Background: Donors labeled as "Increased Risk" for transmission of infectious diseases have been found to have decreased organ utilization rates despite no significant impact on recipient survival. Recently, the PHS provided an updated guideline focused on "Increased Risk" organ donors, which included the removal of the "Increased Risk" label and the elimination of the separate informed consent form, although the actual increased risk status of donors is still ultimately transmitted to transplant physicians. We sought to analyze the effect of this update on organ utilization rates. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database which compared donor organ utilization in the 2 years before the June 2020 PHS Guideline update for increased-risk donor organs (June 2018-May 2020) versus the 2 years after the update (August 2020-July 2022). The organ utilization rate for each donor was determined by dividing the number of organs transplanted by the total number of organs available for procurement. Student t test and multivariable logistic regression models were used for analysis. Results: There were 17,272 donors in the preupdate cohort and 17,922 donors in the postupdate cohort; of these, 4,977 (28.8%) and 3,893 (21.7%) donors were considered "Increased Risk", respectively. There was a 2% decrease in overall organ utilization rates after the update, driven by a 3% decrease in liver utilization rates and a 2% decrease in lung utilization rates. After multivariable adjustment, donors in the postupdate cohort had 10% decreased odds of having all organs transplanted. Conclusions: The 2020 PHS "Increased Risk" Donor Guideline update was not associated with an increase in organ utilization rates in the first 2 years after its implementation, despite a decrease in the proportion of donors considered to be at higher risk. Further efforts to educate the community on the safe usage of high-risk organs are needed and may increase organ utilization.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA