Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 379(26): 2529-2539, 2018 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Plumbing systems are an infrequent but known reservoir for opportunistic microbial pathogens that can infect hospitalized patients. In 2016, a cluster of clinical sphingomonas infections prompted an investigation. METHODS: We performed whole-genome DNA sequencing on clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Sphingomonas koreensis identified from 2006 through 2016 at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. We cultured S. koreensis from the sinks in patient rooms and performed both whole-genome and shotgun metagenomic sequencing to identify a reservoir within the infrastructure of the hospital. These isolates were compared with clinical and environmental S. koreensis isolates obtained from other institutions. RESULTS: The investigation showed that two isolates of S. koreensis obtained from the six patients identified in the 2016 cluster were unrelated, but four isolates shared more than 99.92% genetic similarity and were resistant to multiple antibiotic agents. Retrospective analysis of banked clinical isolates of sphingomonas from the NIH Clinical Center revealed the intermittent recovery of a clonal strain over the past decade. Unique single-nucleotide variants identified in strains of S. koreensis elucidated the existence of a reservoir in the hospital plumbing. Clinical S. koreensis isolates from other facilities were genetically distinct from the NIH isolates. Hospital remediation strategies were guided by results of microbiologic culturing and fine-scale genomic analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This genomic and epidemiologic investigation suggests that S. koreensis is an opportunistic human pathogen that both persisted in the NIH Clinical Center infrastructure across time and space and caused health care-associated infections. (Funded by the NIH Intramural Research Programs.).


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Reservatórios de Doenças/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Engenharia Sanitária , Sphingomonas/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Hospitais Federais , Humanos , Metagenômica , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sphingomonas/efeitos dos fármacos , Sphingomonas/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos , Abastecimento de Água , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(4): 1167-70, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26888898

RESUMO

Perirectal surveillance cultures and a stool culture grew Aeromonas species from three patients over a 6-week period and were without epidemiological links. Detection of the blaKPC-2 gene in one isolate prompted inclusion of non-Enterobacteriaceae in our surveillance culture workup. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed that the isolates were unrelated and provided data for Aeromonas reference genomes.


Assuntos
Aeromonas hydrophila/enzimologia , Aeromonas hydrophila/genética , Canal Anal/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Genoma Bacteriano , Análise de Sequência de DNA , beta-Lactamases/genética , Adulto , Aeromonas hydrophila/classificação , Aeromonas hydrophila/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Fezes/microbiologia , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Epidemiologia Molecular
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(4): 414-419, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30729903

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center, patients colonized or infected with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are placed in contact isolation until they are deemed "decolonized," defined as having 3 consecutive perirectal swabs negative for VRE. Some decolonized patients later develop recurrent growth of VRE from surveillance or clinical cultures (ie, "recolonized"), although that finding may represent recrudescence or new acquisition of VRE. We describe the dynamics of VRE colonization and infection and their relationship to receipt of antibiotics. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of patients at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, baseline characteristics were collected via chart review. Antibiotic exposure and hospital days were calculated as proportions of VRE decolonized days. Using survival analysis, we assessed the relationship between antibiotic exposure and time to VRE recolonization in a subcohort analysis of 72 decolonized patients. RESULTS: In total, 350 patients were either colonized or infected with VRE. Among polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive, culture (Cx)-negative (PCR+/Cx-) patients, PCR had a 39% positive predictive value for colonization. Colonization with VRE was significantly associated with VRE infection. Among 72 patients who met decolonization criteria, 21 (29%) subsequently became recolonized. VRE recolonization was 4.3 (P = .001) and 2.0 (P = .22) times higher in patients with proportions of antibiotic days and antianaerobic antibiotic days above the median, respectively. CONCLUSION: Colonization is associated with clinical VRE infection and increased mortality. Despite negative perirectal cultures, re-exposure to antibiotics increases the risk of VRE recolonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Enterococcus faecium , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia/complicações , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Adulto Jovem
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(12): 1166-72, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) is difficult to treat and eradicate. Several reports describe isolation and environmental cleaning strategies that controlled hospital MDRAB outbreaks. Such interventions were insufficient to interrupt MDRAB transmission in 2 intensive care unit-based outbreaks in our hospital. We describe strategies that were associated with termination of MDRAB outbreaks at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. METHODS: In response to MDRAB outbreaks in 2007 and 2009, we implemented multiple interventions, including stakeholder meetings, enhanced isolation precautions, active microbial surveillance, cohorting, and extensive environmental cleaning. We conducted a case-control study to analyze risk factors for acquiring MDRAB. In each outbreak, infection control adherence monitors were placed in MDRAB cohort areas to observe and correct staff infection control behavior. RESULTS: Between May 2007 and December 2009, 63 patients acquired nosocomial MDRAB; 57 (90%) acquired 1 or more of 4 outbreak strains. Of 347 environmental cultures, only 2 grew outbreak strains of MDRAB from areas other than MDRAB patient rooms. Adherence monitors recorded 1,330 isolation room entries in 2007, of which 8% required interventions. In 2009, around-the-clock monitors recorded 4,892 staff observations, including 127 (2.6%) instances of nonadherence with precautions, requiring 68 interventions (1.4%). Physicians were responsible for more violations than other staff (58% of hand hygiene violations and 37% of violations relating to gown and glove use). Each outbreak terminated in temporal association with initiation of adherence monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Although labor intensive, adherence monitoring may be useful as part of a multifaceted strategy to limit nosocomial transmission of MDRAB.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/prevenção & controle , Acinetobacter baumannii , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Modelos Logísticos , Maryland/epidemiologia , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Roupa de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Clin Liver Dis ; 14(1): 119-36; ix-x, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20123445

RESUMO

Viral hepatitis was first identified as an occupational hazard for health care workers more than 60 years ago. For the past few decades, hepatitis B has been one of the most significant occupational infectious risks for health care providers. With the increasing prevalence of hepatitis C infections around the world, occupational transmission of this flavivirus from infected patients to their providers has also become a significant concern. Several factors influence the risk for occupational blood-borne hepatitis infection among health care providers, among them: the prevalence of infection among the population served, the infection status of the patients to whom workers are exposed (ie, the source patient's circulating viral burden), the types and frequencies of parenteral and mucosal exposures to blood and blood-containing body fluids, and whether the patient or provider has been immunized with the hepatitis B vaccine. This article reviews patient-to-provider, patient-to-patient, and provider-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B and C in the health care setting. Current prevention strategies, precautions, and guidelines are discussed.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/transmissão , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/transmissão , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Reação Transfusional , Estados Unidos , Vacinação
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(12): 1137-42, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19860562

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although influenza vaccination of healthcare workers reduces influenza-like illness and overall mortality among patients, national rates of vaccination for healthcare providers are unacceptably low. We report the implementation of a new mandatory vaccination policy by means of a streamlined electronic enrollment and vaccination tracking system at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of a new mandatory staff influenza vaccination program. METHODS: A new hospital policy endorsed by all the component NIH institutes and the Clinical Center departments mandated that employees who have patient contact either be vaccinated annually against influenza or sign a declination specifying the reason(s) for refusal. Those who fail to comply would be required to appear before the Medical Executive Committee to explain their rationale. We collected in a database the names of all physician and nonphysician staff who had patient contact. When a staff member either was vaccinated or declined vaccination, a simple system of badge scanning and bar-coded data entry captured essential data. The database was continuously updated, and it provided a list of noncompliant employees with whom to follow up. RESULTS: By February 12, 2009, all 2,754 identified patient-care employees either were vaccinated or formally declined vaccination. Among those, 2,424 (88%) were vaccinated either at the NIH or elsewhere, 36 (1.3%) reported medical contraindications, and 294 (10.7%) declined vaccination for other reasons. Among the 294 employees without medical contraindications who declined, the most frequent reason given for declination was concern about side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a novel vaccination tracking process and a hospital policy requiring influenza vaccination or declination yielded dramatic improvement in healthcare worker vaccination rates and likely will result in increased patient safety in our hospital.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/métodos , Vacinas contra Influenza , Programas Obrigatórios/organização & administração , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Cooperação do Paciente , Estados Unidos
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(8): 764-8, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19580436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial outbreaks of Legionnaires disease have been linked to contaminated water in hospitals. Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable and, when infected, have a high mortality rate. We report the investigation of a cluster of cases of nosocomial pneumonia attributable to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 that occurred among patients on our stem cell transplantation unit. METHODS: We conducted a record review to identify common points of potential exposure, followed by environmental and water sampling for Legionella species from those sources. We used an air sampler to in an attempt to detect aerosolized Legionella and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to compare clinical and environmental isolates. RESULTS: The most likely sources identified were the water supply in the patients' rooms and a decorative fountain in the radiation oncology suite. Samples from the patients' rooms did not grow Legionella species. Cultures of the fountain, which had been restarted 4 months earlier after being shut off for 5 months, yielded L. pneumophila serogroup 1. The isolates from both patients and the fountain were identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Both patients developed pneumonia within 10 days of completing radiation therapy, and each reported having observed the fountain at close range. Both patients' infections were identified early and treated promptly, and both recovered. CONCLUSIONS: This cluster was caused by contamination of a decorative fountain despite its being equipped with a filter and ozone generator. Fountains are a potential source of nosocomial Legionnaires disease despite standard maintenance and sanitizing measures. In our opinion, fountains present unacceptable risk in hospitals serving immunocompromised patients.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Doença dos Legionários/transmissão , Microbiologia da Água , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Unidades Hospitalares , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Legionella pneumophila/classificação , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologia , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA