Testing the model of judicial stress using a COVID-era survey of U.S. federal court personnel.

Non-judicial court personnel, critical to a well-functioning justice system, experience overloaded dockets and the responsibility of making significant decisions, contributing to cognitive stress. Understanding and mitigating their stress is essential for maintaining judicial efficiency. We adapted Miller and Richardson's Model of Judicial Stress to assess stress in a broad sample of non-judicial court personnel (n = 122), including judges, lawyers, and administrative staff. Participants responded to surveys about their stress levels, job performance, and health; they also completed cognitive performance tasks. The findings indicated that stress negatively affected employee outcomes including cognitive performance, job performance, job satisfaction, and health outcomes. Notably, perceived job performance had declined compared to the previous year, suggesting that the pandemic was an additional significant stressor. Based on the data, the Model of Judicial Stress is also applicable to other types of courtroom personnel, underlining its relevance across various judicial roles.

How to phase II: Timelines, perceptions, and suggestions from PGY-1 residency program directors.

BACKGROUND: Phase II was implemented in 2016 to provide structure for applicants and unmatched residency pharmacy programs to interact. Previous literature has provided some approaches for this process; however, clarification on navigating the phase II process to successfully match for applicants and their mentors is still needed. In addition, with phase II occurring for >6 years, there is a need for continual evaluation. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to describe (1) program phase II structure and timelines, (2) program personnel demand, and (3) perceptions of and suggestions for phase II from postgraduate year (PGY)1 residency program directors (RPDs) to provide clarity to applicants, mentors, and residency stakeholders. METHODS: A 31-item survey was developed including 9 demographic items, 13 program-specific timeline-based items, 5 skip-logic items on screening interviews, and 4 qualitative questions on the benefits, drawbacks, and suggested changes to phase II. The survey was disseminated to PGY-1 RPDs participating in phase II with available contact information in June 2021 and May 2022, with 3 weekly reminders. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 180 of the 484 RPDs participating in phase II (37.2% response rate). Programs participating in the survey had an average of 1.4 positions (± 0.7) open in phase II and 31 applicants (± 31) per open position. The timelines for screening applications, contacting applicants, and conducting interviews were variable. For qualitative data, RPDs appreciated the structured process and noted high-quality and geographic diversity of applicants in phase II. However, challenges reported were the quantity of applications, lack of time to fully review applications, and technical issues. Suggested changes included an extended phase II timeline, universal application deadline, and technical improvements. CONCLUSION: The structured approach of phase II was an improvement compared with historical approaches; however, variability exists in timelines for programs. Respondents identified further opportunities to refine phase II to benefit residency stakeholders.

Community pharmacist-provided opioid intervention frequencies and barriers.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are well-positioned to engage in opioid-related harm reduction activities (i.e., opioid interventions). However, several barriers to providing these interventions have been identified. Comparing the frequencies of opioid interventions and identifying which barriers are perceived to have the highest impact in providing interventions will yield valuable information for increasing opioid use disorder (OUD) care access within pharmacies. OBJECTIVES: To (1) characterize the frequency of 9 opioid interventions in community practice settings and (2) assess community pharmacists' perceptions of what impact 15 key barriers have on providing opioid interventions. METHODS: This was a multi-state, cross-sectional, and descriptive survey study. Opioid interventions evaluated included prevention (e.g., OUD screening) and treatment (e.g., OUD resource referral); barriers encompassed confidence and knowledge, work environment, provider interactions, and patient interactions. Respondents were recruited from 3 community pharmacy practice-based research networks in the Midwest and South regions of the US. Recruitment and telephone survey administration occurred between December 2021 and March 2022. Descriptive statistics were computed and open-ended items were reviewed to identify common themes. RESULTS: Sixty-nine of 559 pharmacists contacted (12.3%) completed the survey. All opioid interventions were reported to be provided less frequently than indicated in practice. Screening and referral interventions were provided least frequently, at 1.2 and 1.6 times on average, respectively, to the last 10 patients for which respondents felt each intervention was needed. Patient refusal, minimal or no reimbursement, inadequate staffing and time, and negative patient reactions were identified as the highest-impact barriers to providing opioid interventions. Approximately 26% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that pharmacy school adequately prepared them to provide opioid interventions in practice. CONCLUSION: Prioritizing the resolution of pharmacy work environment barriers will support pharmacists in routinely providing opioid interventions. Changes in Doctor of Pharmacy curricula and continuing education are also indicated to further prepare pharmacists to engage in opioid-related harm reduction.

Judges' emotion: an application of the emotion regulation process model.

Courtrooms are often emotionally charged atmospheres where parties have a vested interest in the proceedings and their outcomes. Judges are exposed to a wide range of emotions and stressors in the course of their work. Though the ideal of a dispassionate judge persists, more empirical work is needed to identify how judges regulate their own emotional experience in court. Using Maroney and Gross typology of emotion regulation strategies, this study explored the self-reported use and preference of these strategies among a sample of U.S. judges. Using both quantitative and qualitative approaches, we found that judges reported using a variety of intrinsic (self-directed) and extrinsic (directed toward others) emotion regulation strategies, though judges reported using some strategies such as suppression more frequently than others. We also found that many of the strategies judges described matched a subset of the strategies described by Maroney and Gross supporting their typology.

National survey identifying community pharmacist preceptors' experience, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors influencing intent to recommend cannabidiol products.

OBJECTIVES: The primary study objective was to characterize community pharmacist preceptors' experience, clinical and legislative knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cannabidiol (CBD). The secondary study objective was to identify which of these factors influenced intent to recommend CBD products. METHODS: A 36-item survey was used to collect respondent demographics, experience, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding CBD. Items assessing attitudes, behaviors, and intent were developed using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Community pharmacist preceptors for schools of pharmacy across the United States were eligible to complete an electronic survey open for 12 weeks from January to April 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondent demographics, experience, knowledge, and TPB constructs. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate which factors influenced intent. RESULTS: The survey was disseminated to an estimated 2242 community pharmacist preceptors and received 295 responses (13.2% response rate). Of the 272 respondents who met eligibility criteria to progress through the survey, the survey was completed in its entirety by 236 respondents (86.8% completion rate). For experience items, most respondents (70.7%) reported receiving previous education on CBD. Almost half (48.4%) reported CBD sales in their pharmacies, whereas 89.1% reported answering clinical questions about CBD. For knowledge items, respondents performed poorly on CBD adverse effect and drug interaction items. Many respondents were not comfortable counseling on (49.0%) or recommending (56.1%) CBD products for patient use. Most (74.5%) believed more research was needed before they would feel comfortable recommending CBD products. Most (57.8%) reported not having reliable CBD resources available in their pharmacies. Subjective norms and previous CBD education or personal research were the only factors found to have direct influences on respondents' intent to recommend CBD products. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist to fill knowledge gaps, enhance confidence, and provide desired educational resources for community pharmacist preceptors on CBD products.

Moral disengagement, locus of control, and belief in a just world: Individual differences relate to adherence to COVID-19 guidelines.

We examined relationships between moral disengagement, locus of control, and just world beliefs and adherence to COVID-19 containment measures. We predicted that these individual differences would be more influential for adherence than beliefs about the pandemic (e.g., its origins and one's perceived susceptibility to infection). COVID-19-related measures of these three individual differences were each significantly associated with adherence even after controlling for demographics and pandemic beliefs although beliefs about the severity of the virus and the benefits of containment measures also significantly related to adherence. Beliefs were associated with the individual difference measures and political orientation. Moral disengagement, the strongest individual difference predictor, was associated with lower support for each pandemic containment precaution (e.g., mask wearing). These results can be used to frame messages to increase adherence to public health measures.

Judges' experiences with mitigating jurors' implicit biases.

Implicit bias can influence jury decision-making. Training judges about implicit bias is a fairly new endeavor, and not all judges are necessarily aware of these biases. Even when judges are aware that biases exist, they might not know whether or not they should alert jurors to such biases or how to appropriately do so. It is currently unknown how many judges alert jurors to implicit bias (e.g. via instructions or juror orientation). The purpose of this study is to discuss judges' beliefs and practices regarding implicit bias in the courtroom. The findings indicate that the majority of judges (72%) do not alert jurors to implicit bias. Many judges were found to have a lack of awareness or understanding about implicit bias, but many now feel that alerting jurors about bias is important and would like to do so in the future.

Trust in the jury system: a comparison of Australian and U.S. samples.

Public trust in the criminal justice system, including the jury system, is important for maintaining a democracy that is fair for all citizens. However, there is little research on trust in the jury system generally and even less cross-country comparison research specifically. Trust in the jury system might relate to other legal attitude measures (e.g., authoritarianism). This study identified the degree to which trust in the jury system relates to legal attitudes and compared perceptions of trust between the U.S. and Australia. Community members completed a survey that included measures of trust in the jury system and legal attitudes. The U.S. sample had higher levels of trust in juries than the Australian sample. In both samples, just world beliefs and legal authoritarianism were positively related to trust. Results have both theoretical and practical implications regarding legal attitudes, trust in the jury system, and public opinions of juries in each country.

Indiana community pharmacist preceptors' knowledge and perceptions of medication-assisted treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to characterize the Indiana community-based pharmacist preceptors' knowledge and perceptions of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD). The secondary objectives were to explore the desired resources, dispensing concerns, and preceptors' involvement in precepting students. DESIGN: A 38-item survey was used to collect respondent demographics, knowledge, and perceptions of MAT for OUD. Perception questions were developed using the social cognitive theory and were adapted from previously published surveys with investigators' permission. SETTING: Community-based Indiana pharmacist preceptors were eligible to complete an electronic survey in February and March 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize preceptor knowledge and perceptions of MAT for OUD. Desired MAT resources, dispensing concerns, and level of involvement in precepting students were collected. Respondent demographics were collected to characterize the study sample. RESULTS: Of the 116 survey responses, 104 were eligible, and 79 community-based pharmacist preceptors completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 76.0%. For knowledge questions, the overall correct score was 56.2%. Respondents had high correct scores on questions related to medication access. However, respondents either self-identified or performed poorly on the following knowledge items: Food and Drug Administration-approved MAT products for OUD, the need to provide an opioid-free interval before initiating treatment with buprenorphine and naltrexone, pregnancy recommendations, and treatment of severe OUD. Respondents reported positive perceptions on MAT for OUD, but identified concerns regarding diversion and misuse of MAT. Most respondents reported a desire for additional education on different aspects of MAT for OUD. Dispensing concerns and preceptors' involvement with students in MAT ranged from no concern and lack of involvement to many different concerns and full student involvement. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist to fill identified gaps in knowledge, enhance perceptions, and provide desired continuing education for community-based pharmacist preceptors on MAT for OUD.

Perception of immunizations and vaccine recommendation sources for persons living with HIV compared with persons without HIV.

OBJECTIVES: To measure and compare the perception of immunizations, immunization status, and recommendation sources in persons living with HIV (PLWHs) and persons without HIV and determine a strategy for improving immunization rates by increasing awareness of pharmacy services. DESIGN: A 19-item survey based on the Health Belief Model assessed patients' perceptions and recommendation sources regarding immunization acceptance for specific vaccines: Tdap, pneumococcal, and hepatitis B (HepB). Survey items used a 5-point Likert-type scale assessing participants' perceptions, with questions identifying participants' most trusted sources of immunization information and patient demographics. Survey questions were designed to identify perceived susceptibility and severity of vaccine-preventable illness, barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy regarding immunization acceptance, and sources of patient-trusted immunization information. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey recruitment occurred in Indiana and included any patient 18 years of age or older picking up medications at a specialty pharmacy predominantly serving PLWHs or a traditional community chain pharmacy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included perceived barriers to immunization acceptance obtained from Likert-type scale questions, patient-reported immunization rates of selected vaccines (Tdap, pneumococcal pneumonia, and HepB), and trusted immunization recommendation sources. Logistic regression was performed to model association between perceived barriers, HIV status, and immunization recommendation sources. RESULTS: A total of 142 participants (68 PLWHs, 74 persons without HIV) completed the survey. PLWHs were more likely to have immunization barriers, but this was not statistically significant (odds ratio 2.537, 95% confidence interval 0.585-10.996). Both participant groups reported "family doctor" as the most trusted source, with only 5% selecting "pharmacist." Significantly fewer PLWHs reported completing the HepB series (18% vs. 52%; P = 0.0224). CONCLUSION: PLWHs possess barriers to immunization acceptance similar to persons without HIV yet report lower rates of HepB vaccine completion. Although pharmacists were less frequently selected as the most trusted source, additional studies on percptions of pharmacists' role in immunizing PLWHs should be considered.

Judicial stress: the roles of gender and social support.

Because judges experience a myriad of occupational stressors, they are at risk of experiencing secondary trauma, burnout, negative mental/physical health, poor job performance and low job satisfaction. These experiences might not be uniform, however, as gender and social support might mitigate such stress-related outcomes. Judges from two states in the United States completed a variety of stress and subjective performance measures. Social support was related to less perceived stress, less burnout, and more job satisfaction, but only for males. This suggests that males and females might receive qualitatively different types of social support. Different types of social support could differ in their ability to buffer judges from these stress-related outcomes. Further, among judges with high social support, females scored higher than males on subjective job performance; the opposite pattern occurred for judges with low social support. Thus, a lack of social support appears to have a negative effect on performance self-appraisals but only for females. Results have implications for the psychological study of stress and for programs designed to reduce judges' stress.

Individual Differences Relate to Support for Insanity and Postpartum Depression Legal Defenses: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement.

Postpartum depression defense (PPDD) is a form of insanity defense often used when mothers harm their children. Although courts have determined that insanity defenses, including PPDD, can be used as legitimate criminal defenses, such defenses are often misunderstood among jurors and laypersons. The current survey of 467 undergraduates examines relationships between individual differences and support for PPDD and the insanity defense. Need for cognition was found to be positively related to support for PPDD and the insanity defense, while legal authoritarianism (LA) was found to be negatively related to support for both defenses. Faith in intuition is negatively related to support for the insanity defense. In this sample, women are more likely than men to support the PPDD, but not the insanity defense. Additionally, relationships between support and both the need for cognition and LA are partially mediated by moral disengagement, which is negatively related to support for PPDD and insanity defenses. These results replicate a model used in different legal contexts. Implications for legal and academic communities are discussed.

Best practices for PGY1 letters of intent: Recommendations from a modified Delphi process.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide consensus recommendations from residency program leaders on letters of intent (LOIs) written by postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residency candidates. METHODS: A 3-round modified Delphi process was used to determine consensus among PGY1 residency program leaders across the country. A screening and demographic survey was utilized to ensure representation of panelists. The initial items for round 1 of the study were developed using existing published literature, with pilot testing by 2 residency program directors. For each round, respondents rated items on a 7-point Likert scale, with opportunities to provide qualitative feedback and modifications for lower-rated items. For future rounds, items were adjusted based on respondent feedback. Only items meeting predefined consensus were included in the final recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 254 pharmacists were invited to participate in the panel, with 41 completing the demographic and study consent survey. There were 35 participants in round 1, 34 of whom remained for rounds 2 and 3. The panel created 18 LOI recommendations for PGY1 residency candidates. Most recommendations were focused on the content of the LOI, while others were related to formatting. CONCLUSION: The recommendations from this study can be employed by PGY1 pharmacy residency candidates to enhance their likelihood of success in the residency application process.

Comparison of Clinical Interventions between Student Pharmacists on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences in Indianapolis, Indiana versus Eldoret, Kenya.

Student pharmacists can have a positive impact on patient care. The objective of this research was to compare clinical interventions made by Purdue University College of Pharmacy (PUCOP) student pharmacists completing internal medicine Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPE) in Kenya and the US. A retrospective analysis of interventions made by PUCOP student pharmacists participating in either the 8-week global health APPE at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH-Kenya) or the 4-week adult medicine APPE at the Sydney & Lois Eskenazi Hospital (SLEH-US) was completed. Twenty-nine students (94%) documented interventions from the MTRH-Kenya cohort and 23 (82%) from the SLEH-US cohort. The median number of patients cared for per day was similar between the MTRH-Kenya (6.98 patients per day, interquartile range [IQR] = 5.75 to 8.15) and SLEH-US students (6.47 patients per day, IQR = 5.58 to 7.83). MTRH-Kenya students made a median number of 25.44 interventions per day (IQR = 20.80 to 28.95), while SLEH-US students made 14.77 (IQR = 9.80 to 17.72). The most common interventions were medication reconciliation/t-sheet rewrite and patient chart reviews for MTRH-Kenya and the SLEH-US, respectively. This research highlights how student pharmacists, supported in a well-designed, location-appropriate learning environment, can positively impact patient care.

Analysis of Pharmacy Cardiac Optimization Clinic for Patients with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation Detected via Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Clinic.

For patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), arrythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF) can be detected and actions taken to rapidly assess and initiate treatment where appropriate. Actions include timely initiation of anticoagulation, review of blood pressure, and optimization of cholesterol/lipids to prevent unfavorable outcomes, such as stroke and other cardiovascular complications. Delays to initiating anticoagulation can have devastating consequences. We sought to implement a virtual clinic, where a pharmacist reviews patient referrals from a CIED clinic after detecting AF from the CIED. Anticoagulation choice is determined by patient-specific factors, and a shared patient-provider decision to start oral anticoagulation is made. In addition, blood pressure readings and medications are assessed with lipid-lowering therapies for optimization. A total of 315 patients have been admitted through this clinic and anticoagulated over a two-year span; in addition, 322 successful interventions were made for optimization of cardiac therapy. Rapid initiation of anticoagulation within five days of referral was likely to have reduced unfavorable outcomes, such as stroke and other cardiovascular optimizations, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Opioid Use Disorder Curricular Content in US-Based Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the instructional settings, delivery methods, and assessment methods of opioid use disorder (OUD) content in Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs; assess faculty perceptions of OUD content; and assess faculty perceptions of a shared OUD curriculum. METHODS: This national, cross-sectional, descriptive survey study was designed to characterize OUD content, faculty perceptions, and faculty and institutional demographics. A contact list was developed for accredited, US-based PharmD programs with publicly-accessible online faculty directories (n = 137). Recruitment and telephone survey administration occurred between August and December 2021. Descriptive statistics were computed for all items. Open-ended items were reviewed to identify common themes. RESULTS: A faculty member from 67 (48.9%) of 137 institutions contacted completed the survey. All programs incorporated OUD content into required coursework. Didactic lectures were the most common delivery method (98.5%). Programs delivered a median of 7.0 h (range, 1.5-33.0) of OUD content in required coursework, with 85.1% achieving the 4-hour minimum for substance use disorder-related content recommended by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Just over half (56.8%) of faculty agreed or strongly agreed that their students were adequately prepared to provide opioid interventions; however, 50.0% or fewer perceived topics such as prescription interventions, screening and assessment interventions, resource referral interventions, and stigma to be covered adequately. Almost all (97.0%) indicated moderate, high, or extremely high interest in a shared OUD curriculum. CONCLUSION: Enhanced OUD education is needed in PharmD programs. A shared OUD curriculum was of interest to faculty and should be explored as a potentially viable solution for addressing this need.

How voluntariness of apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender.

Apologies are important in social interactions. Study 1 investigated participants' reactions after being insulted by a confederate and receiving no apology, a voluntary apology, a coerced apology with consequences (i.e., explicitly coerced apology), or a coerced apology without consequences (i.e., implicitly coerced apology). Receiving any apology produced more positive perceptions of the offender and less serious recommended punishments than no apology. Study 2 replicated Study 1, except participants read about the insult and imagined being a victim (instead of being an actual victim as in Study 1). Actual victims distinguished between types of apologies while hypothetical victims did not. Results have implications for court-ordered apologies.

The Relationship between Workplace Incivility and Well-Being in Administrative Court Judges.

Judicial stress is an important area of study, as judges' decisions have life-altering consequences for the immediate parties and, sometimes, society in general. Although there are numerous studies of judicial stress, few have specifically investigated the relationship between judicial stress and workplace incivility (i.e., rude or condescending behavior with ambiguous intent). This survey investigated relationships between workplace incivility and judicial stress, health, and job outcomes in a group of administrative judges. Overall, judges reported moderate levels of stress and low exposure to incivility. They indicated that incivility is a moderate problem, with attorneys as the most common source of incivility. Supporting the Model of Judicial Stress, workplace incivility was positively associated with levels of stress and compassion fatigue and negatively associated with job satisfaction. The relationships between incivility and measures of mental health, physical health, and compassion fatigue were all mediated by stress. Implications for judicial stress interventions include the need for judicial training and interventions to curb incivility.

How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.

Jurors' decision-making processes are often influenced by extra-legal factors, including judgments of defendants and plaintiffs. Two studies comparing the decisions of university students with those of community jurors sought to determine if extra-legal factors such as individual differences (including identity as a student or juror participant), the reason for surgery (medically necessary vs. elective), the type of surgery (e.g., gastric bypass, nasal reconstruction) or weight of the patient influenced jurors' decisions and perceptions in medical malpractice suits, such that participants would hold negative perceptions of overweight patients or patients who undergo elective surgeries. Results indicate that students and jurors differ in perceptions of the patient's injury and perceptions of risk, which explains some of the variance in liability verdicts. Students were more likely to find doctors liable, but also were more likely to assign responsibility to patients than were jurors. Patients who had undergone elective surgery were seen as more responsible for their situation - and their doctors were assigned less responsibility - than those who had undergone a medically necessary surgery. Tests of weight bias showed that jurors found overweight patients less responsible for their situation than patients of normal weight, but students showed the opposite pattern. Theoretical explanations are explored and implications discussed.