Dental general anaesthesia--will the service disappear? A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify likely future trends in recruitment of consultant anaesthetists to the ambulatory dental general anaesthetic (DGA) services. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of all anaesthetic specialist registrars (SpRs) in their final year of training, within Mersey and South-Western Deaneries in the U.K. RESEARCH DESIGN: A questionnaire divided into a quantitative section to establish level of training in ambulatory DGA, and a qualitative section designed to elicit opinions and attitudes towards ambulatory DGA services. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (27/36). Within both regions 81% (22/27) had received practical training in ambulatory DGA procedures. SpRs in the South-Western Deanery held the greatest misgivings about the ambulatory DGA technique. Once appointed to Consultant position only 11% (3/27) of respondents expressed a definite interest in providing ambulatory DGA services. CONCLUSIONS: Within the Northwest and Southwest of England, most specialist registrars in anaesthetics receive training in ambulatory DGA, although their future commitment to the delivery of these services is questionable.

The occurrence of dental pain and extractions over a 3-year period in a cohort of children aged 3-6 years.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the occurrence of dental pain and extractions in young children in relation to the caries and restoration history of their primary molar teeth. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 739 children aged 2.8 to 6.2 years attending 50 dental practices in the North West of England followed for 3 years. Incidence rates for pain and extraction in primary molar teeth were calculated for children with and without dental caries. Tooth years at risk of extraction or pain were calculated for each primary molar according to whether they were caries-free, carious and unrestored, or restored. RESULTS: A total of 119 (16.1 percent) children had caries at recruitment and 157 developed caries during follow-up. Each year approximately one in five children with caries, but only one in 100, who was caries-free, presented with dental pain. In the whole population, each year, approximately one in 40 children had a primary molar tooth extracted but in children with caries it was one in 10. In the total cohort, incidence.of pain was higher in unrestored carious teeth than restored, but incidence of extraction was higher in restored than in unrestored teeth. CONCLUSION: The majority of children attending general dental practice remained caries-free and did not experience pain or extraction over 3 years. Children with caries had a substantial risk of developing pain or having an extraction. The study was unable to demonstrate that restoring carious primary molar teeth prevents pain and extraction.

The prescription and outcomes of fissure sealants applied to a group of high caries risk children by general dental practitioners working in the North West of England.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use and outcomes of fissure sealants applied to the first permanent molars (FPMs) of children with high caries risk. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General dental practices in North West England. PARTICIPANTS: 677 children between the ages of 5 and 14 years who had dmfs > or =2, and regularly attended 50 general dental practitioners. OUTCOMES: Analyses were performed at patient level. Logistic regression models, taking into account the clustering of subjects within dental practices, were fitted to identify whether the decision to fissure seal FPMs was significantly associated with gender, socio-economic status, number of carious primary teeth and percentage of carious primary teeth filled. Similar logistic regression models were fitted for caries experience in FPMs. RESULTS: Poorer children were significantly (p < 0.05, OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71, 0.99) less likely to receive fissure sealants than affluent children, whilst girls (p < 0.01, OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.12) were more likely to have sealants than boys. The total number of carious primary teeth was also a significant (p < 0.01, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.25) independent predictor of dentists' decisions to fissure seal FPMs. For each carious primary tooth, the odds of having caries in FPMs increased by 1.16 (95% CI = 1.06, 1.26). Analysis showed that pit and fissure caries in FPMs was not affected by the presence or absence of fissure sealants. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to fissure seal FPMs is affected by caries experience in the primary dentition. Girls and affluent children were more likely to receive fissure sealants. It appears that the placement of fissure sealants by general dental practitioners was not effective in preventing pit and fissure caries in these high-risk children.

General dental practitioner's views on dental general anaesthesia services.

OBJECTIVE: Policy has recently changed on provision of dental general anaesthetic services in England. The aim of this study was to investigate general dental practitioners' views about dental general anaesthetics, the reduction in its availability and the impact on care of children with toothache. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and clinical case scenarios. PARTICIPANTS: General dental practitioners providing NHS services in the North West of England. RESULTS: 93 general dental practitioners were interviewed and 91 answered a clinical case scenario about the care they would provide for a 7-year-old child with multiple decayed teeth presenting with toothache. Scenario responses showed variation; 8% would immediately refer for general anaesthesia, 25% would initially prescribe antibiotics, but the majority would attempt to either restore or extract the tooth causing pain. Interview responses also demonstrated variation in care, however most dentists agree general anaesthesia has a role for nervous children but only refer as a last resort. The responses indicated an increase in inequalities, and that access to services did not match population needs, leaving some children waiting in pain. CONCLUSIONS: Most general dental practitioners support moving dental general anaesthesia into hospitals but some believe that it has widened health inequalities and there is also a problem associated with variation in treatment provision. Additional general anaesthetic services in some areas with high levels of tooth decay are needed and evidence based guidelines about caring for children with toothache are required.

The development of a consensus among primary care dentists of referral criteria for school dental screening.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain consensus amongst a sample of primary care dentists in the North West of England on a set of clinical criteria that should trigger referral following school dental screening. DESIGN: Delphi process. SETTING: Primary dental care, England 2002. METHOD: Primary care dentists in the North West of England were randomly selected to complete a two round 'Delphi exercise' that included 10 potential referral criteria. The dentists were invited to express their level of support for the inclusion of each referral criterion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of agreement for each referral criterion. Acceptance of any criterion was that the interquartile range should be no more than 3 scale points with the lower value being no less than 7. RESULTS: Eighty-eight dentists, (72.7%), completed the Delphi exercise. Six referral criteria met with the groups' approval: Child with caries in permanent dentition. Child with darkened/discoloured permanent incisors. Child aged 9-10 years with overjet greater than 10 mm. Child over six years with either gross plaque, calculus or swollen gums. Child with evidence of sepsis. Child registered with a GDP with caries in permanent dentition. CONCLUSION: It is possible for a representative sample of primary care dentists in the North West to agree referral criteria following school dental screening.

The effectiveness of school dental screening: dental attendance and treatment of those screened positive.

OBJECTIVE: To determine dental attendance and treatment outcomes following two models of dental screening. DESIGN: An observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Infant, primary and junior schools in the North West of England. SUBJECTS: Children aged six to nine years at the start of the study. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received a screening examination according to either a 'Traditional model' or 'New model' of school dental screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attendance at a dentist within four months of the intervention and treatment received by children referred via the 'New model' with caries in their permanent teeth. RESULTS: In the 'New model' of school dental screening 46% of screened positive and 41% of screened negative children attended a dentist during the study period. Some 44% of children referred with caries in permanent teeth attended a dentist and 53% of those attending received treatment for the referred condition. Larger proportions of children from disadvantaged backgrounds were screened positive but higher proportions of children from more affluent backgrounds attended the dentist and subsequently received treatment. CONCLUSION: School dental screening has a minimal impact on dental attendance and only a small proportion of screened positive children receive appropriate treatment. The programme fails to reduce inequalities in utilisation of dental services.

General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars.

AIM: To ascertain general dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel (pre-formed metal) crowns to restore carious primary molars. METHOD: Ninety-three general dental practitioners were selected at random from those practising in Lancashire, Cheshire and Greater Manchester in 2003 and interviewed separately about the clinical care they provide to the primary dentition. Before the interview participants recorded the care they would provide for a case scenario, describing a child with a carious lesion that the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) guidelines indicate should be treated with a stainless steel crown. RESULTS: In answering the case scenario only six (7%) of the dentists reported that they would fit a stainless steel crown. Of the 93 dentists interviewed 71% knew of the BSPD guidelines, but only 18% had ever fitted a stainless steel crown in general practice. Reasons given for not using stainless steel crowns were they are inappropriate for many children, time consuming to fit, difficult to manipulate, expensive, and ugly. CONCLUSION: The BSPD guidelines on the use of stainless steel crowns do not reflect the views of the majority of general dental practitioners who consider these crowns unsuitable for most children and an impractical restorative technique in busy daily practice.

Enamel defects in the deciduous dentition as a potential predictor of defects in the permanent dentition of 8- and 9-year-old children in fluoridated Cheshire, England.

It is claimed that dental fluorosis in both deciduous and permanent teeth is increasing in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. What is unclear is whether fluoride-induced enamel opacities in the deciduous dentition are associated with the subsequent appearance of enamel defects in the permanent dentition. The aim of this study was to establish whether a relationship existed between the presence of diffuse enamel defects on the deciduous molars and permanent incisors of schoolchildren who were lifetime residents in an optimally fluoridated community in Cheshire, England. The dentitions of eight-and nine-year-old children were examined by two examiners, each unaware of the findings of the other. There was a significant increased risk of diffuse enamel defects in the permanent incisors for those children who presented with diffuse defects on their first deciduous molars (Relative Risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.0) or second deciduous molars (Relative Risk, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.36 to 2.54). In light of these findings, it is worth considering the potential of the presence of enamel defects in deciduous molars in children aged 1 to 3 years as a predictor of the future appearance of similar lesions in their permanent incisors.

The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the type of restorative materials used in general dental practice and their effects on the outcomes of restorative treatment of primary teeth. METHOD: The study involved a retrospective investigation of case notes of 677 child patients of 50 general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the northwest of England. The history of dental care received by each child during the primary dentition period was recorded. The type of restorative material used and the number of times that each tooth was restored were recorded. The proportion of primary teeth that were extracted due to pain or sepsis was calculated according to whether they were filled by amalgam or glass ionomer, or were left unfilled. RESULTS: Of the treated teeth, 61% of first and 55% of second primary molars were restored with glass ionomer. Some 27.4% of first molars restored with amalgam required repeat restorations, compared with 42.5% of those filled with glass ionomer. The difference was highly significant (p<0.001). For all primary molar teeth, there was no difference in the proportion of extractions, according to the type of restorative material used or if carious teeth were left unrestored. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of GDPs, glass ionomer restorations are used most commonly and are significantly more likely to require replacement than amalgam restorations. The type of restorative material used had no influence on outcomes.

Oral heath status of 12-year-old children in Nepal in 1994.

A survey of twelve-year-old Nepalese children was undertaken in 1994 according to the WHO pathfinder methodology and examination criteria. The study sample was drawn from randomly selected schools within the capital city, and two randomly selected urban settings, together with children drawn from schools in four randomly selected villages within rural Nepal. Three hundred and sixty children were examined. Drinking water samples were obtained from all sources at each examination site and subsequently analysed for fluoride content. The overall caries experience in the country was found to be very low or low. Analysis of drinking water samples revealed that with the exception of one town in the south of the country, all sites had low fluoride levels.

Community dental service based out of hours emergency dental care--a pilot study.

Twenty-nine out-of-hours calls were received during the 6-week period. Advice was offered to 27 patients and two call-outs were made for treatment of acute abscesses in children. Eight patients claimed to be under treatment with the CDS, 17 claimed to be registered with a general dental practitioner, while four claimed not to be registered. A demand for an emergency service was demonstrated, as was the need to define accurately the categories of patients eligible for emergency treatment within the CDS. The pilot study also highlighted the requirement to fund this service adequately.

Does the dental profession know how to care for the primary dentition?

Across the UK many thousands of young children regularly attend the GDS for routine dental care. Once in the dental surgery the same story is repeated countless times - preventive advice is delivered, reassurance given, caries is treated and the case notes are written up by the dentist. The whole interaction is a largely unremarkable event and is accepted by patient, parent and dentist. The records of all these individual clinical episodes remain within each practice and until a patient returns for further care can expect to lay undisturbed.

Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the relationship between dental pain (and its sequelae), and the extent of restorative care provided for primary molars, amongst children who regularly attend a general dental practitioner. METHODS: A retrospective review of the clinical case notes of 677 children with caries who attended 50 general dental practitioners on a regular basis. Analyses were performed at the subject level. Logistic regression models were fitted for the dependent variables whether or not pain, a dental extraction for pain or sepsis and a course of antibiotics was recorded, after taking into account the proportion of carious teeth that were restored, the total number of carious teeth, the age caries was first recorded, gender and the clustering of the subjects within dental practices. RESULTS: Almost half of the children in the study (48%) were recorded as having at least one episode of pain. Total decay experience in the primary molars was a significant predictor of pain, extraction due to pain or sepsis and prescription of antibiotics. There was no significant association between the proportion of carious teeth restored and each of the three dependent variables. CONCLUSIONS: For those children who regularly attend their general dental practitioner and who have decay in their primary molars, dental pain is a common finding. Total decay experience in primary molars is the principal predictor of pain, extraction due to pain and the need for antibiotics, whilst the level of restorative care in the primary dentition is less important. In order to reduce the incidence of dental pain in young children, effective methods of preventing caries at the individual and public health levels need to be expanded.

The relationship between registration and dental health benefit in 8- and 9-year-old children in Cheshire.

The dental treatment needs of 8- and 9-year-old children registered with a GDP for at least 6 months were compared with the dental treatment needs of children from a similar social background who were neither registered nor regularly attending the Community Dental Service. The children were examined by one of the authors without prior knowledge of registration status for evidence of treatment need. Unequivocal treatment need was defined as untreated dental caries in permanent teeth, sepsis associated with deciduous teeth, instanding maxillary incisors, and untreated permanent teeth fractured into dentine; untreated caries in the deciduous teeth was also recorded. Registration status of the children was subsequently obtained from the Dental Practice Board. Sixty-three per cent of the children had been registered with a GDP for at least 6 months at the time of the survey, 6% had been registered for less than 6 months and 31% had never been registered under the new dental contract. Of the children who had been registered for more than 6 months, 18.5% had unequivocal treatment need as against 17.5% in the unregistered group; 40.4% of the registered children had decay in their deciduous teeth, as against 36.5% of the unregistered children. Comparison of the dental treatment needs of registered and unregistered children showed no significant difference between the two groups.

The influences on preventive care provided to children who frequently attend the UK General Dental Service.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the relationship between the preventive and restorative care provided to children who frequently attend the General Dental Service in the UK after taking into account socio-economic status, gender and dental caries experience. SETTING: General dental practices in the North West of England. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: The study design involved a retrospective investigation of case notes of 677 children who regularly attended 50 general dental practitioners. The complete history of the dental care received by each child during the primary dentition period was recorded. Analyses took place at the patient level. Information was recorded on the total number of carious teeth and restorative and preventive care provided to the children. Preventive care was categorised as dietary advice, oral hygiene instruction, prescription of fluoride tablets and application of fluoride varnish. Socio-economic status was measured using the Townsend score of the electoral ward of residence of each subject. Logistic regression models, taking into account the clustering of the subjects within dental practices were fitted to identify whether or not socio-economic status was significantly associated with provision of each category of preventive care, after controlling for gender, the total number of teeth affected by caries and the proportion of carious teeth which were restored. RESULTS: Children from poorer backgrounds were significantly more likely to receive oral hygiene instruction than their more affluent peers. Socio-economic status did not influence dentists' decisions to prescribe fluoride tablets, but children from affluent backgrounds were significantly more likely to have fluoride varnish applied to their teeth than children from deprived backgrounds after controlling for other factors. The more teeth affected by decay significantly increased the odds of giving dietary advice, prescription of fluoride tablets and application of fluoride varnish, but had no effect on whether or not oral hygiene instruction was given. As the percentage of decayed but filled teeth decreased the odds of giving dietary advice or applying fluoride varnish increased significantly. Conclusion It would appear that dentists are providing appropriate preventive care according to the aetiological causes of dental disease. They also look to be providing preventive care in compensation for decisions not to restore carious primary teeth. However the preventive care provided seems to be reactive to disease patterns, and in this high risk group of patients does not seem to be particularly effective.

Parental attitudes to the care of the carious primary dentition.

OBJECTIVES: To examine parents' attitudes to the dental care of their children, taking into account the family's socio-economic background, dentally-related behaviour including the child's level of dental anxiety and dental treatment history. METHODS: A cross sectional study of all 5-year-old children living in Ellesmere Port and Chester. All children were clinically examined; dmft and its components were recorded. A postal questionnaire was sent to the children's parents to measure their preferences for dental care with reference to two scenarios, (1) if their child had a carious but asymptomatic primary tooth, or (2) if their child had a carious primary tooth which was causing toothache. Parents were also asked to provide information on the dental attendance pattern of their child and an assessment of their child's dental anxiety. Family socio-economic status was recorded using the Townsend material deprivation index of the electoral ward in which they resided. RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to the home addresses of the 1,745 children who were clinically examined, and 1,437 were returned, giving a response rate of 82%. In both scenarios the majority of parents were happy to leave the decision on treatment to the dentist. In the asymptomatic tooth scenario, approximately one third of parents wanted the tooth to remain untreated but periodically monitored, only 6% expressed a desire to have their child's tooth restored. Multivariate analysis showed that parents of children who had a filling (OR 4.32 95%CI 2.21-8.43) or extraction (OR 2.24 95%CI 1.11-4.53) in the past were significantly more likely to want restorative care for their children. In the scenario where the child had toothache, multivariate analysis confirmed that parents had a preference for an intervention (extraction or filling) if they lived in a deprived area (Townsend score OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.16) or if their child had had an extraction (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.59, 11.88) or filling (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05, 5.45) in the past, after controlling for gender, attendance and parentally reported anxiety. When preference for an extraction was considered as the dependent variable, there was no significant relationship with past restorative treatment. In both scenarios there was no association between parentally reported anxiety of the child and parental preferences for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this part of the UK, there was little explicit support amongst parents for the restoration of asymptomatic carious primary teeth. Parental expectations for the dental care of young children with caries in their primary teeth, were closely related to the treatment experiences of the child. Families living in deprived areas expressed a preference for more interventionist care than their more affluent counterparts. Parentally judged anxiety of the child or their past dental attendance behaviour had no association with parents' preferences for the care of their children.

The relationship between anxiety and dental treatment experience in 5-year-old children.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between dental anxiety, dental attendance and past treatment history in 5-year-old children after taking into account confounding influences. METHODS: A cross sectional study of all 5-year-old children living in Ellesmere Port and Chester. All children were clinically examined and dmft and its components were recorded. A postal questionnaire was sent to parents of participating children to identify whether children attended the dentist on a regular asymptomatic basis or only when experiencing problems. Additionally parents were asked to judge whether they and their child were anxious about dental treatment. The socio-economic status of the family was measured using the Townsend Material Deprivation Index of the electoral ward in which they resided. The bivariate relationships between anxiety and reported attendance experience, past extraction and restoration history were using chi-square and t-tests. Multiple logistic regression analyses identify predictors for dental anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 1,745 children received both a clinical examination and a questionnaire and 1,437 parents responded, a response rate of 82.3%. One in ten parents (10.8b) judged their child to be dentally anxious. Anxious children had significantly (p<0.001] more caries experience (dmft 2.58 vs 1.12). Multiple logistic regression analyses confirmed that anxious children were more likely to be irregular attenders (OR 3.33, 95% Cl 2.22, 5.00), have anxious parents (OR 1.60,95% Cl 1.09, 2.36), and to have undergone dental extraction in the past[OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.10, 5.85), after controlling for gender and socio-economic status. A past history of restoration was not a significant predictor of anxiety after controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Dental anxiety is a fairly common condition in 5-year-old children in the North West of England. It is closely associated with asymptomatic, irregular attendance pattern, a history of extraction and having a dentally anxious parent. The cause and effect dynamics of these relationships need to be determined.

A review of a child population dental preventive programme in Halton and St Helens.

INTRODUCTION: An evaluation was undertaken to measure the dental health of five cohorts of 5-year-old children living in Halton and St Helens, each cohort having had a different length of time they were exposed to a population dental prevention programme before their fifth birthday. METHOD: The dental health of each of five consecutive cohorts of 5-year-old children was measured epidemiologically using standardised methods. RESULTS: The mean level of active decay (dt) in the cohort that had the greatest exposure to the preventive intervention (cohort 5, 2011/12) was 0.83, whereas the mean level of active decay in the cohort with no exposure to the preventive programme (cohort 1, 2007/8) was 1.07. This represents a reduction of 22% in the mean level of active decay in 5-year-olds. There was also a 5.9% absolute increase in the number of 5-year-old children free from decay experience between cohorts 5 and 1. Children living in Halton and St Helens with postcodes in the more socially deprived index of multiple deprivation (IMD) tertiles gained the most from the programme. Comparing cohort 5 and cohort 1, the increase in the proportion of children free from decay was greatest in IMD tertiles 1 and 2 and least in IMD tertile 3 (least socially disadvantaged). CONCLUSION: Following a four-year population dental preventive programme the dental health of 5-year-old children living in Halton and St Helens has improved and dental health inequalities have reduced. As there was no control group, the effects seen are associative and cannot be assumed to be causative.

A cluster-randomized controlled trial: fluoride varnish in school children.

We conducted a school-based parallel cluster randomized controlled trial with 36-month follow-up of children aged 7 to 8 years. Primary schools were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 3 applications of fluoride varnish (22,600 ppm) each year or no intervention. The primary outcome was DFS increment in the first permanent molars, with the hypothesis that 9 applications of varnish over 3 years would result in a lower increment in the test group. Follow-up measurements were recorded by examiners blind to the allocation. Ninety-five schools were randomized to the test and 95 to the reference groups; 1473 (test) and 1494 (reference) children participated in the trial. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out with random effects models. The DFS increment was 0.65 (SD 2.15) in the test and 0.67 (SD 2.10) in the reference groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. We were unable to demonstrate an effect for fluoride varnish when it was used as a public health intervention to prevent caries in the first permanent molar teeth (Inter-national Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Registration: ISRCTN: #72589426).

Preventing decay in children: dare we risk the 'risk assessment' model in practice?

Encouraging dental prevention seems like a logical approach given that dental decay is a preventable disease and while the 2006 dental contract provides preventive opportunities, there is confusion about the best approach to the prevention of decay in those children that attend their dentist. Should we provide prevention for all children attending their dentist (the population approach) or should we target those children who are at greatest risk (risk assessment approach)?