Respiratory symptoms after TB treatment completion: A qualitative study of patient and provider experiences in urban Blantyre, Malawi.

Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) survivors experience a high burden of residual and recurrent respiratory symptoms after TB treatment completion. However, guidelines for the investigation and care of symptomatic TB-survivors are limited. We used qualitative methods to explore patient and provider understandings, experience and practice around respiratory symptoms in the post-TB period. We conducted in-depth interviews with PTB-survivors who had experienced respiratory symptoms (cough, chest pain, breathlessness) after successful TB treatment completion in Blantyre, Malawi (n = 23). We completed focus group discussions with TB-Officers (n = 12), and in-depth interviews with health care workers (n = 18) from primary and tertiary health facilities. Interviews were conducted in Chichewa, and thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. Our data highlight that TB survivors have negative experiences of respiratory symptoms after TB treatment completion, with anxiety about the cause of symptoms, uncertainty about if and how to return to care, and fear of recurrent TB disease. Our findings suggest four critical practices which shape this experience including: limited counselling at TB treatment completion; the lack of clear health seeking pathways to return to care; the use of TB-focused investigations for those returning to care; and heterogeneous approaches to TB retreatment decisions. This study highlights that the post-TB period is a critical part of the patient's experience of TB disease. Current practices create a negative patient experience, and carry clinical and public health risks including delayed diagnosis of TB relapse, missed diagnosis of cardio-respiratory disease, and misuse of antimicrobials and TB retreatment. Formative guidelines are needed to improve the care of symptomatic TB-survivors.

Asthma symptoms, severity, and control with and without a clinical diagnosis of asthma in early adolescence in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country, school-based, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid urbanisation and population growth in sub-Saharan Africa has increased the incidence of asthma in children and adolescents. One major barrier to achieving good asthma control in these adolescents is obtaining a clinical diagnosis. To date, there are scant data on prevalence and severity of asthma in undiagnosed yet symptomatic adolescents. We therefore aimed to assess symptom prevalence and severity, the effect of symptoms on daily life, and objective evidence of asthma in young adolescents from sub-Saharan Africa with and without a clinical diagnosis of asthma by spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). METHODS: We designed a two-phase, multi-country, school-based, cross-sectional study to assess symptom prevalence and severity in sub-Saharan African adolescents. In phase 1 we surveyed young adolescents aged 12-14 years who were attending selected primary and secondary schools in Blantyre in Malawi, Durban in South Africa, Harare in Zimbabwe, Kampala in Uganda, Kumasi in Ghana, and Lagos in Nigeria. The adolescents were screened for asthma symptoms using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC) questionnaire. Then, after opt-in consent, symptomatic adolescents were invited to complete a detailed survey on asthma severity, treatment, and exposure to environmental risk factors for phase 2. Adolescents performed the European Respiratory Society's diagnostic tests for childhood asthma. A positive asthma test was classified as a forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) predicted under 80%, a FEV1 under the lower limits of normal, or FEV1 divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) under the lower limits of normal; positive bronchodilator responsiveness or reversibility was defined as either an increase in absolute FEV1 of 12% or more, or an increase of 200 mL or more, or both, after 400 µg of salbutamol (shortacting ß2 agonist) administered via a metered-dose inhaler and spacer, or FeNO of 25 parts per billion or higher, or any combination of these. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03990402) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Nov 1, 2018, and Nov 1, 2021, we recruited 149 schools from six regions in six sub-Saharan countries to participate in the study. We administered phase 1 asthma questionnaires from Jan 20, 2019 to Nov 11, 2021, and from 27 407 adolescents who were screened, we obtained data for 27 272 (99·5%). Overall, 14 918 (54·7%) adolescents were female and 12 354 (45·3%) adolescents were male, and the mean age was 13 years (IQR 12-13); nearly all recruited adolescents were of black African ethnicity (26 821 [98·3%] of 27 272). In phase 1, a total of 3236 (11·9% [95% CI 11·5-12·3]) reported wheeze in the past 12 months, and 644 (19·9%) of 3236 had a formal clinical diagnosis of asthma. The prevalence of adolescents with asthma symptoms ranged from 23·8% in Durban, South Africa to 4·2% Blantyre, Malawi. Using ISAAC criteria, severe asthma symptoms were reported by 2146 (66·3%) of 3236 adolescents, the majority of whom (1672 [77·9%] of 2146) had no diagnosis of asthma by a clinician. Between July 16, 2019, and Nov 26, 2021, we administered the phase 2 questionnaire to the 1654 adolescents who had asthma symptoms in phase 1 and consented to proceed to the second phase. In the phase 2 cohort, 959 (58·0%) were female and 695 (42·0%) were male, and the mean age was 13 years (IQR 12-14). One or more diagnostic tests for asthma were obtained in 1546 (93·5%) of 1654 participants. One or more positive asthma tests were found in 374 (48·8%) of 767 undiagnosed adolescents with severe symptoms, and 176 (42·4%) of 415 of undiagnosed adolescents with mild-to-moderate symptoms. Of the 392 adolescents in phase 2 with clinician-diagnosed asthma, 294 (75·0%) reported severe asthma symptoms, with 94 (32·0%) of those with severe symptoms not using any asthma medication. In general, findings in both phases 1 and 2 were consistent across sub-Saharan African countries. INTERPRETATION: A large proportion of adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa with symptoms of severe asthma do not have a formal diagnosis of asthma and are therefore not receiving appropriate asthma therapy. To improve the poor state of asthma control in sub-Saharan Africa, potential solutions such as educational programmes, better diagnosis, and treatment and screening in schools should be considered. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research and UK Medical Research Council.

Characterising sources of PM2·5 exposure for school children with asthma: a personal exposure study across six cities in sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: Air pollution is the second largest risk to health in Africa, and children with asthma are particularly susceptible to its effects. Yet, there is a scarcity of air pollution exposure data from cities in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to identify potential exposure reduction strategies for school children with asthma living in urban areas in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: This personal exposure study was part of the Achieving Control of Asthma in Children in Africa (ACACIA) project. Personal exposure to particulate matter (PM) was monitored in school children in six cities in sub-Saharan Africa (Blantyre, Malawi; Durban, South Africa; Harare, Zimbabwe; Kumasi, Ghana; Lagos, Nigeria; and Moshi, Tanzania). Participants were selected if they were aged 12-16 years and had symptoms of asthma. Monitoring was conducted between June 21, and Nov 26, 2021, from Monday morning (approximately 1000 h) to Friday morning (approximately 1000 h), by use of a bespoke backpack with a small air pollution monitoring unit with an inbuilt Global Positioning System (GPS) data logger. Children filled in a questionnaire detailing potential sources of air pollution during monitoring and exposures were tagged into three different microenvironments (school, commute, and home) with GPS coordinates. Mixed-effects models were used to identify the most important determinants of children's PM2·5 (PM <2·5 µm in diameter) exposure. FINDINGS: 330 children were recruited across 43 schools; of these, 297 had valid monitoring data, and 1109 days of valid data were analysed. Only 227 (20%) of 1109 days monitored were lower than the current WHO 24 h PM2·5 exposure health guideline of 15 µg/m3. Children in Blantyre had the highest PM2·5 exposure (median 41·8 µg/m3), whereas children in Durban (16·0 µg/m3) and Kumasi (17·9 µg/m3) recorded the lowest exposures. Children had significantly higher PM2·5 exposures at school than at home in Kumasi (median 19·6 µg/m3vs 14·2 µg/m3), Lagos (32·0 µg/m3vs 18·0 µg/m3), and Moshi (33·1 µg/m3vs 23·6 µg/m3), while children in the other three cities monitored had significantly higher PM2·5 exposures at home and while commuting than at school (median 48·0 µg/m3 and 43·2 µg/m3vs 32·3 µg/m3 in Blantyre, 20·9 µg/m3 and 16·3 µg/m3vs 11·9 µg/m3 in Durban, and 22·7 µg/m3 and 25·4 µg/m3vs 16·4 µg/m3 in Harare). The mixed-effects model highlighted the following determinants for higher PM2·5 exposure: presence of smokers at home (23·0% higher exposure, 95% CI 10·8-36·4), use of coal or wood for cooking (27·1%, 3·9-56·3), and kerosene lamps for lighting (30·2%, 9·1-55·2). By contrast, 37·2% (95% CI 22·9-48·2) lower PM2·5 exposures were found for children who went to schools with paved grounds compared with those whose school grounds were covered with loose dirt. INTERPRETATION: Our study suggests that the most effective changes to reduce PM2·5 exposures in these cities would be to provide paving in school grounds, increase the use of clean fuel for cooking and light in homes, and discourage smoking within homes. The most efficient way to improve air quality in these cities would require tailored interventions to prioritise different exposure-reduction policies in different cities. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Barriers to childhood asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicountry qualitative study with children and their caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: This study identifies barriers and provides recommendations to improve asthma care in children across sub-Saharan Africa, where qualitative data is lacking despite high rates. DESIGN: One of the aims of our National Institute for Health Research global health research group 'Achieving Control of Asthma in Children in Africa' was to use qualitative thematic analysis of transcribed audio recordings from focus group discussions (FGDs) to describe barriers to achieving good asthma control. SETTING: Schools in Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda) and Harare (Zimbabwe). PARTICIPANTS: Children (n=136), 12-14 years with either asthma symptoms or a diagnosis and their caregivers participated in 39 FGDs. All were recruited using asthma control questions from the Global Asthma Network survey. RESULTS: There were four key themes identified: (1) Poor understanding, (2) difficulties experienced with being diagnosed, (3) challenges with caring for children experiencing an acute asthma episode and (4) suboptimal uptake and use of prescribed medicines. An inadequate understanding of environmental triggers, a hesitancy in using metred dose inhalers and a preference for oral and alternate medications were identified as barriers. In addition, limited access to healthcare with delays in diagnosis and an inability to cope with expected lifestyle changes was reported. Based on these findings, we recommend tailored education to promote access to and acceptance of metred dose inhalers, including advocating for access to a single therapeutic, preventative and treatment option. Furthermore, healthcare systems should have simpler diagnostic pathways and easier emergency access for asthma. CONCLUSIONS: In a continent with rapidly increasing levels of poorly controlled asthma, we identified multiple barriers to achieving good asthma control along the trajectory of care. Exploration of these barriers reveals several generalisable recommendations that should modify asthma care plans and potentially transform asthma care in Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 269211.

A cross-country qualitative analysis of teachers' perceptions of asthma care in sub-Saharan Africa.

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease among school-going adolescents worldwide. However, the burden of severe asthma is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore teachers' perceptions of asthma care across six African countries. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. FGDs were conducted in Kumasi(Ghana), Blantyre (Malawi), Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Kampala (Uganda), and Harare (Zimbabwe) between 01 November 2020 and 30 June 2021. We identified two key themes related to asthma care; barriers to asthma care and suggestions to improve the care of adolescents with asthma. Barriers reported by teachers included a lack of knowledge and skills among themselves, adolescents, and caregivers. In addition, some traditional beliefs of teachers on asthma exacerbated challenges with asthma care in schools. Regarding suggestions, most teachers identified a need for all-inclusive asthma training programmes for teachers, adolescents and caregivers, focusing on acute episodes and mitigating triggers. Utilising teachers with personal experiences with asthma to advocate and support these initiatives was suggested. Further suggestions included the need for annual screening to enable early identification of adolescents with asthma and clarify restrictions on teachers administering asthma medications. Teachers across African schools identify multiple barriers to asthma care. Structured school education programs and annual asthma screening are key to addressing some barriers to care.