Sex determination using free fetal DNA at early gestational ages: a comparison between a modified mini-STR genotyping method and real-time PCR.

OBJECTIVE: Recently the use of free fetal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in maternal plasma and serum has been applicable for noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis. In this study, we applied a new algorithmic base conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping method and also real-time PCR for detecting fetal X and Y-chromosome sequences in maternal plasma to determine fetal sex in pregnant women in their early gestational ages (5-13 weeks). Finally, we compared the efficiency of each method in sex determination. STUDY DESIGN: DNA was extracted from 106 pregnant women and their husbands' blood samples. Fetus mini-short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping was accomplished through amplification of 19 mini-STRs and 3 non-STR markers using conventional PCR followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. Simultaneously, TaqMan real-time PCR was done with the use of DYS14-specific primers and probe. RESULTS: In conventional PCR method, 47 cases were diagnosed to be male and 49 to be female. In comparison, real-time PCR amplified DYS14 (Y-marker) sequences in 45 pregnant women plasma samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 95.9% and 98% for conventional PCR and 91.8% and 100% for real-time PCR method, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to our study, the conventional PCR method was more sensitive than real-time PCR and it could be employed in future clinical diagnostics singly or in combination with real-time PCR.

Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment.