RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Plaque rupture (PR) and plaque erosion (PE) are 2 distinct, different, and most common culprit lesion morphologies responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the prevalence, distribution, and characteristics of peripheral atherosclerosis in ACS patients with PR vs PE has never been studied. The aim of this study was to assess peripheral atherosclerosis burden and vulnerability evaluated by vascular ultrasound in ACS patients with coronary PR vs PE identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Between October 2018 and December 2019, 297 ACS patients who underwent preintervention OCT examination of the culprit coronary artery were enrolled. Peripheral ultrasound examinations of carotid, femoral, and popliteal arteries were performed before discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 265 of 297 (89.2%) patients had at least one atherosclerotic plaque in a peripheral arterial bed. Compared with coronary PE, patients with coronary PR had a higher prevalence of peripheral atherosclerotic plaques (93.4% vs 79.1%, P < .001), regardless of location: carotid, femoral, or popliteal arteries. The number of peripheral plaques per patient was significantly larger in the coronary PR group than coronary PE (4 [2-7] vs 2 [1-5], P < .001). Additionally, there was a greater prevalence of peripheral vulnerable characteristics including plaque surface irregularity, heterogeneous plaque, and calcification in patients with coronary PR vs PE. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral atherosclerosis exists commonly in patients presenting with ACS. Patients with coronary PR had greater peripheral atherosclerosis burden and more peripheral vulnerability compared to those with coronary PE, suggesting that comprehensive evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis and multidisciplinary cooperative management maybe necessary, especially in patients with PR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03971864).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optical flow ratio (OFR) is a novel computational fractional flow reserve derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, the impact of combining post-stenting morphology (OCT) and physiology (OFR) remains largely unknown. METHOD: OCT and OFR were analyzed at the independent core laboratory. Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. Suboptimal stent deployment was identified with at least one TLF-related OCT or OFR characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 448 ACS patients (459 vessels) were assessed. Stent expansion<80%, MSA<4.5 mm2 and stent edge lipid-rich plaque and OFR<0.90 were independent predictors of TLR (all p value<0.001). Patients with OCT-suboptimal [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 7.88, 95% CI: 2.73-22.72, p<0.001] or OFR-suboptimal (adjusted HR: 5.78, 95% CI: 2.54-13.14, p<0.001) stent deployment showed significantly higher risk of TLF compared to those with optimal stent deployment with a significant interaction (pinteraction<0.001). OCT and OFR both-suboptimal stent deployment was confirmed as an independent predictor of TLF (adjusted HR: 9.39, 95% CI: 4.25-20.76, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Combined OCT and OFR conferred an optimal reclassification of stent deployment, which may aid in decision-making regarding a tailored PCI strategy for optimal stent deployment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance, there is limited evidence for optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. AIMS: We investigated the role of OCT in guiding a reperfusion strategy and improving the long-term prognosis of STEMI patients. METHODS: All patients who were diagnosed with STEMI and who underwent pPCI between January 2017 and December 2020 were enrolled and divided into OCT-guided versus angiography-guided cohorts. They had routine follow-up for up to 5 years or until the time of the last known contact. All-cause death and cardiovascular death were designated as the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 3,897 patients were enrolled: 2,696 (69.2%) with OCT guidance and 1,201 (30.8%) with angiographic guidance. Patients in the OCT-guided cohort were less often treated with stenting during pPCI (62.6% vs 80.2%; p<0.001). The 5-year cumulative rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in the OCT-guided cohort were 10.4% and 8.0%, respectively, significantly lower than in the angiography-guided cohort (19.0% and 14.1%; both log-rank p<0.001). All 4 multivariate models showed that OCT guidance could significantly reduce 5-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] in model 4: 0.689, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.551-0.862) and cardiovascular mortality (HR in model 4: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.536-0.895). After propensity score matching, the benefits of OCT guidance were consistent in terms of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.548-0.913) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.709, 95% CI: 0.526-0.955). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiography alone, OCT guidance may change reperfusion strategies and lead to better long-term survival in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. Findings in the current observational study should be further corroborated in randomised trials.