Implementing social network analysis to understand the socioecology of wildlife co-occurrence and joint interactions with humans in anthropogenic environments.

Human population expansion into wildlife habitats has increased interest in the behavioural ecology of human-wildlife interactions. To date, however, the socioecological factors that determine whether, when or where wild animals take risks by interacting with humans and anthropogenic factors still remains unclear. We adopt a comparative approach to address this gap, using social network analysis (SNA). SNA, increasingly implemented to determine human impact on wildlife ecology, can be a powerful tool to understand how animal socioecology influences the spatiotemporal distribution of human-wildlife interactions. For 10 groups of rhesus, long-tailed and bonnet macaques (Macaca spp.) living in anthropogenically impacted environments in Asia, we collected data on human-macaque interactions, animal demographics, and macaque-macaque agonistic and affiliative social interactions. We constructed 'human co-interaction networks' based on associations between macaques that interacted with humans within the same time and spatial locations, and social networks based on macaque-macaque allogrooming behaviour, affiliative behaviours of short duration (agonistic support, lip-smacking, silent bare-teeth displays and non-sexual mounting) and proximity. Pre-network permutation tests revealed that, within all macaque groups, specific individuals jointly took risks by repeatedly, consistently co-interacting with humans within and across time and space. GLMMs revealed that macaques' tendencies to co-interact with humans was positively predicted by their tendencies to engage in short-duration affiliative interactions and tolerance of conspecifics, although the latter varied across species (bonnets>rhesus>long-tailed). Male macaques were more likely to co-interact with humans than females. Neither macaques' grooming relationships nor their dominance ranks predicted their tendencies to co-interact with humans. Our findings suggest that, in challenging anthropogenic environments, less (compared to more) time-consuming forms of affiliation, and additionally greater social tolerance in less ecologically flexible species with a shorter history of exposure to humans, may be key to animals' joint propensities to take risks to gain access to resources. For males, greater exploratory tendencies and less energetically demanding long-term life-history strategies (compared to females) may also influence such joint risk-taking. From conservation and public health perspectives, wildlife connectedness within such co-interaction networks may inform interventions to mitigate zoonosis, and move human-wildlife interactions from conflict towards coexistence.

Evaluation of low-dose dexmedetomidine and neostigmine with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in orthopedic surgeries: A prospective randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Neuraxial adjuants to local anesthetics is an effective technique of improving the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia. The safety and efficacy of drugs like dexmedetomidine and neostigmine as epidural medications have been sparsely investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed in 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients who required lower limb surgeries of ≤3 h duration. The epidural drug was administered at the end of surgery with patients randomized into three groups. Group I, II and III received 6 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine alone, with 1 ug/kg of neostigmine and with 0.5 ug/kg of dexmedetomidine + 1 ug/kg of neostigmine, respectively. The patients were prescribed 50 mg tramadol intravenous as rescue analgesic. Patients were assessed for hemodynamic parameters, pain scores, duration of analgesia, rescue analgesic requirements and the incidence of side-effects over the next 10 h. Data was analyzed using SPSS(®) version 17.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients in Group III had significantly longer mean duration of analgesia (273.5 min) compared to Group II (176.25 min) and Group I (144 min). There was increased requirement of fluids to maintain blood pressures in Group III. Neostigmine did not cause significant incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Epidurally administered dexmedetomidine and neostigmine exhibit synergism in analgesic action. The incidence of drug-related side-effects was low in our study.

A Comparative Study of Periarticular Infiltration with Dexmedetomidine versus Ketorolac as an Additive to Ropivacaine after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular infiltration (PAI) analgesia has been found to be an effective analgesia modality after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Dexmedetomidine has many beneficial effects on postoperative analgesia by different routes, but studies on PAI are lagging. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared postoperative analgesia after PAI with dexmedetomidine versus ketorolac as an additive to ropivacaine after TKA. SETTING AND DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study conducted on 75 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III, undergoing total knee arthroplasty, of either gender, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent, patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group C (n = 25) received cocktail of 60 mL ropivacaine (0.25%) infiltration with adrenaline 5 mL (0.1 mg.mL-1), Group D (n = 25) received additive dexmedetomidine 1 ug.kg-1 to above cocktail, and Group K (n = 25) received ketorolac 30 mg. Postoperatively pain by Visual Analog Scale, vitals, total duration of analgesia, need for rescue analgesia, sedation, patient satisfaction, mobilization time, and complications were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance has been used to find the significance of study parameters between the three groups of patients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Postoperative pain score was lesser in the ketorolac group (1.52 ± 0.71, P = 0.001) than the other two groups. Duration of analgesia was more with ketorolac (343.00 ± 144.45, P < 0.001) compared with the other two groups, and epidural activation timings (462 ± 235.84) were significantly delayed in Group K compared to Group C and Group D. There was no significant difference in mobilization time, patient satisfaction, and complications between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac was a better additive to ropivacaine than dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after TKA.