Real-life omalizumab exposure and discontinuation in a large nationwide population-based study of paediatric and adult asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: This real-life study aimed to assess omalizumab treatment patterns in adult and paediatric asthma patients, and to describe asthma control and healthcare resource use (HCRU) at omalizumab initiation and discontinuation. METHODS: The French healthcare database system (Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS)) was used to identify asthma patients aged ≥6 years who initiated omalizumab for at least 16 weeks from 2009 to 2019. We examined omalizumab treatment patterns using dispensation records. RESULTS: We identified 16 750 adults and 2453 children initiating omalizumab. Median treatment persistence before discontinuation (TSTOP) was 51.2 (95% CI 49.3-53.4) months in adults and 53.7 (95% CI 50.6-56.4) months in children. At 2 years of omalizumab exposure, rate of hospitalisation for asthma decreased by 75% and use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) by 30%, in adults and children. Among adults who discontinued omalizumab while asthma was controlled, 70%, 39% and 24% remained controlled and did not resume omalizumab at 1, 2 and 3 years after discontinuation, respectively. These proportions were higher in children (76%, 44% and 33%, respectively). Over 2 years of follow-up after discontinuation, HCRU remained stable in adults and children, notably rate of hospitalisations for asthma (none before TSTOP, 1.3% and 0.6% at 2 years) and use of OCS (in adults and children, respectively: 20.0% and 20.2% before TSTOP, 33.3% and 24.6% at 2 years). CONCLUSION: This is the first large-scale study describing omalizumab real-life exposure patterns in adult and paediatric asthma patients in France with >10 years of follow-up. We showed the long-term maintenance of low HCRU in adults and children who discontinued omalizumab while asthma was controlled, notably for OCS use and hospitalisations for asthma.

Dasatinib dose optimisation based on therapeutic drug monitoring reduces pleural effusion rates in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients.

Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Dasatinib 100 mg per day is associated with an increased risk of pleural effusion (PlEff). We randomly evaluated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may reduce dasatinib-associated significant adverse events (AEs) by 12 months (primary endpoint). Eligible patients started dasatinib at 100 mg per day followed by dasatinib (C)min assessment. Patients considered overdosed [(C)min ≥ 3 nmol/l) were randomised between a dose-reduction strategy (TDM arm) and standard of care (control arm). Out of 287 evaluable patients, 80 patients were randomised. The primary endpoint was not met due to early haematological AEs occurring before effective dose reduction. However, a major reduction in the cumulative incidence of PlEff was observed in the TDM arm compared to the control arm (4% vs. 15%; 11% vs. 35% and 12% vs. 39% at one, two and three years, respectively (P = 0·0094)). Molecular responses were superimposable in all arms. Dasatinib TDM during treatment initiation was feasible and resulted in a significant reduction of the incidence of PlEff in the long run, without impairing molecular responses. (NCT01916785; https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Safety profile of drugs for advanced melanoma: A report based on 2008-2018 US Food and Drug Administration Data.

We describe the safety profiles of all drug classes used for the treatment of advanced melanoma from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System over 2008-2018. Adverse reactions reported in 25 900 pharmacovigilance cases are described for chemotherapies, immunomodulators, targeted therapies and immunotherapies. There was a sharp increase in the number of cases over time, with peaks associated with the launch of new treatments. The adverse reactions diversified over time; notably, skin (alopecias, dermatitis) and retinal disorders were frequently associated with targeted therapies and endocrine disorders (hypothalamus, thyroid and adrenal dysfunctions) with immunotherapies. Less well-known reactions were also detected, such as neuropsychiatric disorders with targeted therapies and gastrointestinal ulcers, pneumothorax and pleural effusions with immunotherapies. The findings highlight the need for various health professionals (including medical specialists or trained nurses) to enhance management of complications.

Medicine misuse: A systematic review and proposed hierarchical terminology.

AIMS: Although medicine misuse is a public health issue, it has multiple meanings in the medical literature. This study aimed to characterize, classify and identify the most appropriate definitions of medicine misuse. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in Medline, ISI Web of Science, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, PsycArticles and Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Collection, using keywords related to "misuse", "appropriateness" and "medicine" between 1 November 2008 and 25 August 2020. Additional searches were conducted in websites of regulatory agencies and public health institutions. Two authors independently selected studies providing both definitions and examples of misuse, while a third resolved disagreements. Definitions were used to propose a hierarchical classification based on initiator, intent, purpose and context of medicine misuse. The study is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018115789. RESULTS: Of 3404 identified records, 51 were included. A total of 71 definitions and 74 examples of misuse were retrieved. When the prescriber is initiator and according to intent, potential medicine misuse referred to "intentional or unintentional prescribing not in line with clinical evidence". Based on context, they could prescribe medicines not clinically justified, i.e. overprescribing, or prescribe indicated medicines incorrectly, i.e. misprescribing. Among other groups of definitions, those overlapping with drug abuse or medication use errors were considered out-of-scope. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the terms and definitions used to characterize medicine misuse and could serve as a basis for a terminology that makes clear distinctions between misuse, abuse and errors.

Nurses' internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess internal antineoplastic drugs (ADs) contamination in the nursing staff in French hospital centers, using highly sensitive analytical methods. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included nurses practicing in care departments where at least one of the five ADs studied was handled (5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, methotrexate). The nurses study participation lasted 24 h including collection of three urine samples and one self-questionnaire. All urine samples were assayed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods with very low value of the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). RESULTS: 74 nurses were included, 222 urine samples and 74 self-questionnaires were collected; 1092 urine assays were performed. The percentage of nurses with internal AD contamination was 60.8% and low levels of urinary concentrations were measured. Regarding nurses with internal contamination (n = 45), 42.2% presented internal contamination by methotrexate, 37.8% by cyclophosphamide, 33.3% by ifosfamide, 17.8% by 5-fluorouracil metabolite and 6.7% by doxorubicine. Among the positive assays, 17.9% (n = 26/145) were not explained by exposure data from the self-questionnaire but this could be due to the skin contact of nurses with contaminated work surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported high percentage of nurses with internal ADs contamination. The low LLOQ values of the used analytical methods, allowed the detection of ADs that would not have been detected with the current published methods: the percentage of contamination would have been 17.6% instead of the 60.8% reported here. Pending toxicological reference values, urine ADs concentrations should be reduced as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of the Suitability of Standard Dosing Regimens of Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients with Open-Abdomen and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

The aim was to assess the appropriateness of recommended regimens for empirical MIC coverage in critically ill patients with open-abdomen and negative-pressure therapy (OA/NPT). Over a 5-year period, every critically ill patient who received amikacin and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) while being treated by OA/NPT was retrospectively included. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling was performed considering the effect of 10 covariates (age, sex, total body weight [TBW], adapted body weight [ABW], body surface area [BSA], modified sepsis-related organ failure assessment [SOFA] score, vasopressor use, creatinine clearance [CLCR], fluid balance, and amount of fluids collected by the NPT over the sampling day) in patients who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or did not receive CRRT. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the fractional target attainment (FTA) for the PK/pharmacodynamic [PD] targets (maximum concentration of drug [Cmax]/MIC ratio of ≥8 and a ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24]/MIC of ≥75). Seventy critically ill patients treated by OA/NPT (contributing 179 concentration values) were included. Amikacin PK concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination and proportional residual error, with CLCR and ABW as significant covariates for volume of distribution (V) and CLCR for CL. The reported V) in non-CRRT and CRRT patients was 35.8 and 40.2 liters, respectively. In Monte Carlo simulations, ABW-adjusted doses between 25 and 35 mg/kg were needed to reach an FTA of >85% for various renal functions. Despite an increased V and a wide interindividual variability, desirable PK/PD targets may be achieved using an ABW-based loading dose of 25 to 30 mg/kg. When less susceptible pathogens are targeted, higher dosing regimens are probably needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). Further studies are needed to assess the effect of OA/NPT on the PK parameters of antimicrobial agents.

Immunotherapy with grass pollen tablets reduces medication dispensing for allergic rhinitis and asthma: A retrospective database study in France.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR) may increase the risk of developing or worsening asthma, whereas treatment of AR with subcutaneously or sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) may slow this progression. METHODS: In a retrospective real-world analysis, prescription fulfilment data were gathered from French retail pharmacies between 1 March 2012 and 31 December 2016. Using linear regression analyses, patients having received at least two prescriptions of grass pollen SLIT tablets over at least 2 successive years were compared with control patients having received symptomatic medications only. RESULTS: A total of 1099 SLIT patients and 27 475 control patients were included in the main analysis. With regard to symptomatic AR medication dispensing, we observed a 50% decrease in the pre-index/follow-up ratio in the SLIT group, a 30% increase in the control group without age matching (P < 0.0001 vs SLIT) and a 20% increase in the control group with age matching (P < 0.0001 vs SLIT). During the follow-up, 11 (1.8%) and 782 (5.3%) patients initiated asthma treatment in the SLIT and control groups, respectively. The relative risk of medication dispensing for new asthma was lower in the SLIT group (by 62.5% [29.1%-80.1%] without age matching (P = 0.0025) and by 63.7% [31.5%-80.7%] with age matching; P = 0.0018). SLIT was also associated with slower progression of asthma medication dispensing during the follow-up period, relative to the control group (regression coefficient: -0.58 [-0.74 to 0.42] without age matching (P < 0.0001) and -0.61 [-0.76 to -0.46] with age matching; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prescription of grass pollen SLIT tablets reduced the dispensing of AR and asthma medications in real life.

Omalizumab effectiveness in patients with severe allergic asthma according to blood eosinophil count: the STELLAIR study.

Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody used to treat severe allergic asthma (SAA). The aim of the STELLAIR study was to determine the importance of pre-treatment blood eosinophil count as a predictive measure for response to omalizumab.This retrospective real-life study was conducted in France between December 2015 and September 2016 using medical records of SAA omalizumab-treated patients. Response to omalizumab was assessed by three criteria: physician evaluation, reduction of ≥40% in annual exacerbation rate and a combination of both. Response rate was calculated according to blood eosinophil count measured in the year prior to omalizumab initiation.872 SAA omalizumab-treated patients were included by 78 physicians (723 adults (age ≥18 years) and 149 minors (age 6-17 years)). Blood eosinophil count was ≥300 cells·µL-1 in 52.1% of adults and 73.8% of minors. By physician evaluation, 67.2% of adults and 77.2% of minors were responders and 71.1% adults and 78.5% minors had a ≥40% reduction in the exacerbation rate. In adults, the response rate for combined criteria was 58.4% (95% CI 53.2-63.4%) for blood eosinophils ≥300 cells·µL-1 (n=377) and 58.1% (95% CI 52.7-63.4%) for blood eosinophils <300 cells·µL-1 (n=346).This study shows that a large proportion of patients with SAA have a blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells·µL-1, and suggests that omalizumab effectiveness is similar in "high" and "low" eosinophil subgroups.

Biomonitoring of occupational exposure to 5-FU by assaying α-fluoro-ß-alanine in urine with a highly sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used antineoplastic drugs handled by healthcare professionals (HCP). To monitor occupational exposure to 5-FU, a highly sensitive ESI-UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the assay of its main human metabolite, α-fluoro-ß-alanine (FBAL), in urine. After a derivatization step, solid phase extraction was used for the urine. Good linearity (r > 0.996), precision (CV < 14.76%), and accuracy (bias < 12.16%) were achieved. The lower limit of quantification (LOQ), 20 pg ml-1, is the lowest one published to date. Seven urine samples from 73 HCP exposed to 5FU were positive for FBAL, indicating 5FU contamination (9.6%). FBAL urine concentrations ranged from 25 to 301 pg ml-1. Such an efficient analytical tool combining high specificity with high sensitivity is essential for the reliable detection and routine biological monitoring of healthcare professionals occupationally exposed to this widely used antineoplastic drug. This method allows biomonitoring of occupational exposure to 5-fluorouracil in a routine manner, with the aim of assessing the effectiveness of collective and individual protective measures.

Comorbidities and COPD severity in a clinic-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. The aim of our study was to determine the association between specific comorbidities and COPD severity. METHODS: Pulmonologists included patients with COPD using a web-site questionnaire. Diagnosis of COPD was made using spirometry post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%. The questionnaire included the following domains: demographic criteria, clinical symptoms, functional tests, comorbidities and therapeutic management. COPD severity was classified according to GOLD 2011. First we performed a principal component analysis and a non-hierarchical cluster analysis to describe the cluster of comorbidities. RESULTS: One thousand, five hundred and eighty-four patients were included in the cohort during the first 2 years. The distribution of COPD severity was: 27.4% in group A, 24.7% in group B, 11.2% in group C, and 36.6% in group D. The mean age was 66.5 (sd: 11), with 35% of women. Management of COPD differed according to the comorbidities, with the same level of severity. Only 28.4% of patients had no comorbidities associated with COPD. The proportion of patients with two comorbidities was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in GOLD B (50.4%) and D patients (53.1%) than in GOLD A (35.4%) and GOLD C ones (34.3%). The cluster analysis showed five phenotypes of comorbidities: cluster 1 included cardiac profile; cluster 2 included less comorbidities; cluster 3 included metabolic syndrome, apnea and anxiety-depression; cluster 4 included denutrition and osteoporosis and cluster 5 included bronchiectasis. The clusters were mostly significantly associated with symptomatic patients i.e. GOLD B and GOLD D. CONCLUSIONS: This study in a large real-life cohort shows that multimorbidity is common in patients with COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients.

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be prevented by inhaled treatment. Errors in inhaler handling, not taken into account in clinical trials, could impact drug delivery and minimise treatment benefit. We aimed to assess real-life inhaler device handling in COPD patients and its association with COPD exacerbations.To this end, 212 general practitioners and 50 pulmonologists assessed the handling of 3393 devices used for continuous treatment of COPD in 2935 patients. Handling errors were observed in over 50% of handlings, regardless of the device used. Critical errors compromising drug delivery were respectively made in 15.4%, 21.2%, 29.3%, 43.8%, 46.9% and 32.1% of inhalation assessment tests with Breezhaler® (n=876), Diskus® (n=452), Handihaler® (n=598), pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (n=422), Respimat® (n=625) and Turbuhaler® (n=420).The proportion of patients requiring hospitalisation or emergency room visits in the past 3 months for severe COPD exacerbation was 3.3% (95% CI 2.0-4.5) in the absence of error and 6.9% (95% CI 5.3-8.5) in the presence of critical error (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14-3.04, p<0.05).Handling errors of inhaler devices are underestimated in real life and are associated with an increased rate of severe COPD exacerbation. Training in inhaler use is an integral part of COPD management.

National trends in use and costs of oral anticancer drugs in France: An 8-year population-based study.

PURPOSE: During the last decade, many oral anticancer drugs (OAcDs) have been marketed, providing interesting but potentially costly pharmaceutical alternatives to intravenous treatments. This study aims to provide updated information on their use and costs. METHODS: A cross-sectional yearly repeated study was conducted from 2006 to 2014 using the representative sample of the French national health care insurance system claims database (EGB). OAcD use was described for each year, among prevalent (ie, patients with at least 1 OAcD reimbursement) and incident users (ie, patients with no OAcD reimbursement within the prior year) and according to their pharmacological classes (Hormone Therapy [HT], Cytotoxic Therapy [CT], Targeted Therapy [TT], and others). Demographic characteristics were described for both users; comorbidities and direct medical costs were described for incident users only. RESULTS: The yearly prevalence and incidence of OAcD use, mainly represented by HT, remained stable from 2006 to 2014 (1.2%; 0.4%). Compared with users of other OAcD classes, the proportion of TT users substantially increased over the 8-year study period (+9.3%), and TT incident users had more severe comorbidities at treatment initiation. The health expenditures were the most important in TT users with median monthly medical direct costs varying from 2995€ to 4968€ per patient between 2006 and 2014. CONCLUSION: With the development of new OAcDs, the TTs use reaches a wider population of patients but is responsible for increasing health expenditures.

Pazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Imatinib followed by sunitinib and regorafenib is the standard sequence of treatment for advanced disease. Pazopanib is effective in soft tissue sarcomas but has never been assessed in advanced GIST in a randomised trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with previously treated advanced GIST. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label phase 2 study, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib from 12 comprehensive cancer centres or university hospitals in France and randomly assigned them 1:1 using an interactive web-based centralised platform to 800 mg oral pazopanib once daily in 4-week cycles plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Randomisation was stratified by the number of previous treatment regimens (2 vs ≥3); no-one was masked to treatment group allocation. Upon disease progression, patients in the best supportive care group were allowed to switch to pazopanib as compassionate treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. All randomised participants who received at least one dose of pazopanib were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01323400. FINDINGS: Between April 12, 2011, and Dec 9, 2013, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pazopanib plus best supportive care (n=40) or best supportive care alone (n=41). The median follow-up was 26·4 months (IQR 22·0-37·8) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 28·9 months (22·0-35·2) in the best supportive care group. 4-month investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 45·2% (95% CI 29·1-60·0) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group versus 17·6% (7·8-30·8) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·59, 95% CI 0·37-0·96; p=0·029). Median progression-free survival was 3·4 months (95% CI 2·4-5·6) with pazopanib plus best supportive care and 2·3 months (2·1-3·3) with best supportive care alone (HR 0·59 [0·37-0·96], p=0·03). 36 (88%) of the patients originally assigned to the best supportive care group switched to pazopanib following investigator-assessed disease progression; these patients had a median progression-free survival from pazopanib initiation of 3·5 months (95% CI 2·2-5·2). 55 (72%) of the 76 pazopanib-treated patients had pazopanib-related grade 3 or worse adverse events, the most common of which was hypertension (15 [38%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 13 [36%] in the best supportive care group). 20 (26%) patients had pazopanib-related serious adverse events (14 [35%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and six [17%] in the best supportive care group), including pulmonary embolism in eight (9%) patients (five [13%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and three [7%] in the best supportive care group). Three pazopanib-related deaths occurred (two pulmonary embolisms [one in each group] and one hepatic cytolysis [in the best supportive care group]). Three adverse event-related but not pazopanib-related deaths occurred in the best supportive care group after switch to pazopanib; these deaths were from hyperammonaemic encephalopathy, pneumopathy, and respiratory failure. INTERPRETATION: Pazopanib plus best supportive care improves progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone in patients with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib, with a toxicity profile similar to that reported for other sarcomas. This trial provides reference outcome data for future studies of targeted inhibitors in the third-line setting for these patients. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline, French National Cancer Institute, EuroSARC (FP7-278742), Centre Léon Bérard.

Comparison of serious inhaler technique errors made by device-naïve patients using three different dry powder inhalers: a randomised, crossover, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Serious inhaler technique errors can impair drug delivery to the lungs. This randomised, crossover, open-label study evaluated the proportion of patients making predefined serious errors with Pulmojet compared with Diskus and Turbohaler dry powder inhalers. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with asthma and/or COPD who were current users of an inhaler but naïve to the study devices were assigned to inhaler technique assessment on Pulmojet and either Diskus or Turbohaler in a randomised order. Patients inhaled through empty devices after reading the patient information leaflet. If serious errors potentially affecting dose delivery were recorded, they repeated the inhalations after watching a training video. Inhaler technique was assessed by a trained nurse observer and an electronic inhalation profile recorder. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between randomisation arms for the Pulmojet-Diskus (n = 277) and Pulmojet-Turbohaler (n = 144) comparisons. Non-inferiority in the proportions of patients recording no nurse-observed serious errors was demonstrated for both Pulmojet versus Diskus, and Pulmojet versus Turbohaler; therefore, superiority was tested. Patients were significantly less likely to make ≥1 nurse-observed serious errors using Pulmojet compared with Diskus (odds ratio, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.19-0.51) or Pulmojet compared with Turbohaler (0.23; 0.12-0.44) after reading the patient information leaflet with additional video instruction, if required. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest Pulmojet is easier to learn to use correctly than the Turbohaler or Diskus for current inhaler users switching to a new dry powder inhaler. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01794390 (February 14, 2013).

Information and communication on risks related to medications and proper use of medications for healthcare professionals and the general public: precautionary principle, risk management, communication during and in the absence of crisis situations.

Recent drug crises have highlighted the complexity, benefits and risks of medication communication. The difficulty of this communication is due to the diversity of the sources of information and the target audience, the credibility of spokespersons, the difficulty to communicate on scientific uncertainties and the precautionary principle, which is influenced by variable perceptions and tolerances of the risk. Globally, there is a lack of training in risk management with a tendency of modern society to refuse even the slightest risk. Communication on medications is subject to regulatory or legal requirements, often uses tools and messages that are not adapted to the target audience and is often based on a poor knowledge of communication techniques. In order to improve this situation, the available information must be coordinated by reinforcing the unique medication information website and by coordinating communication between authorities by means of a single spokesperson. A particular effort must be made in the field of training in the proper use and risk of medications for both the general population and patients but also for healthcare professionals, by setting up a unified academic on-line teaching platform for continuing medical education on medications and their proper use.

Assessing the benefit-risk balance of drugs. Some lessons from the COVID pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Drug efficacy and effectiveness are assessed respectively through clinical trials and pharmaco-epidemiological studies. However, relative and absolute benefits of drugs are distinct measures that must be considered in relation to the baseline risk of disease incidence, complication or progression. On the other hand, adverse drug reactions are independent of the basic risk but depend on the characteristics of the population treated. Given these prerequisites, how can we balance the benefits and risks of drugs? AREAS COVERED: We use the example of therapeutics evaluated during Covid to describe how assessing the benefit-risk balance of drugs is a complex process. EXPERT OPINION: Clinical trials are not designed to identify rare adverse events, underscoring the necessity for a pharmacovigilance system. Evaluating the balance between the benefits and risks of drugs is an ongoing process, demanding the simultaneous analysis of data from clinical trials, potential drug-drug interactions, pharmacovigilance monitoring and pharmaco-epidemiological studies, to identify potential safety concerns. In addition, pharmacologists must play a major role in educating the general public about drugs, aiding in the accurate interpretation of the benefit-risk balance and preventing misinformation.

Transition of care from adolescence to early adulthood in severe asthmatic patients treated with omalizumab in real life.

Half of severely asthmatic adolescents treated with omalizumab transitioning to adulthood discontinue the treatment, suggesting insufficient asthma control. However, most of the other half have low rates of HCRU markers, their asthma being under control. https://bit.ly/49ixpxt.

Impact of liquid sublingual immunotherapy on asthma onset and progression in patients with allergic rhinitis: a nationwide population-based study (EfficAPSI study).

Background: The only disease-modifying treatment currently available for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The main objective of the EfficAPSI real-world study (RWS) was to evaluate the impact of liquid sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT-liquid) on asthma onset and evolution in AR patients. Methods: An analysis with propensity score weighting was performed using the EfficAPSI cohort, comparing patients dispensed SLIT-liquid with patients dispensed AR symptomatic medication with no history of AIT (controls). Index date corresponded to the first dispensation of either treatment. The sensitive definition of asthma event considered the first asthma drug dispensation, hospitalisation or long-term disease (LTD) for asthma, the specific one omitted drug dispensation and the combined one considered omalizumab or three ICS ± LABA dispensation, hospitalisation or LTD. In patients with pre-existing asthma, the GINA treatment step-up evolution was analysed. Findings: In this cohort including 112,492 SLIT-liquid and 333,082 controls, SLIT-liquid exposure was associated with a significant lower risk of asthma onset vs. control, according to all definitions (combined: HR [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.60-0.63], sensitive: 0.77 [0.76-0.78], and specific: 0.67 [0.61-0.72]). Exposure to SLIT was associated with a one-third reduction in GINA step-up regardless baseline steps. Interpretation: In this national RWS with the largest number of person-years of follow-up to date in the field of AIT, SLIT-liquid was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of asthma onset or worsening. The use of three definitions (sensitive or specific) and GINA step-up reinforced the rigorous methodology, substantiating SLIT-liquid evidence as a causal treatment option for patients with respiratory allergies. Funding: Stallergenes Greer.