Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Neurosurg ; 34(3): 329-332, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31736374

RESUMO

Background: Patients with titanium cranioplasties can develop skin defects and plate exposure requiring revision surgery to prevent infection. The management of these patients has historically been staged surgery to remove the exposed plate followed by re-implantation of a sterile plate at a later date.Objectives: We describe an alternative where the exposed plate is removed, sterilised by autoclaving and re-implanted, in one operation.Methods: Patients with exposed titanium cranioplasties who underwent single-stage revisions were identified over a 30-month period. All patients received antibiotics post-procedure and were followed up.Results: Between June 2015 and December 2017 four patients had five single-stage revision cranioplasties with intraoperative autoclave sterilisation (SSRC). The mean time from initial procedure to revision was 5.6years. The mean time from plate exposure to surgery was 7 days. Plate exposure recurred in 60% (3/5) of cases post-SSRC. Two of these had the plate removed. The other had a second SSRC. On average recurrent plate exposure developed 17 months after SSRC. The 2 cases who had the plate removed remained complication-free to last follow up at 25 and 52 months after SSRC.Conclusions: Single procedure revision cranioplasty with intra-operative autoclave following titanium plate exposure may be considered as an option in patients with plate exposure who do not have other evidence on infection but we found recurrent plate exposure occurred in 50%.


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Titânio , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esterilização
3.
Prim Health Care Res Dev ; 20: e142, 2019 10 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31663488

RESUMO

AIM: We sought to establish the impact on vaccine uptake of sending out a single appointment letter inviting patients to attend a vaccine clinic. BACKGROUND: Coeliac disease is associated with splenic dysfunction and so patients with coeliac disease are at a higher risk of overwhelming infection. Additional vaccinations are recommended for these individuals to provide additional protection against infection. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 54 patients with diagnosed coeliac disease, and all vaccines previously received by these patients. By comparing this to the Green Book [Department of Health (2013) Immunisation of individuals with underlying medical conditions: the green book, chapter 7, London: Department of Health. Retrieved 26 February 2019 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/566853/Green_Book_Chapter7.pdf], we determined the patients who were due vaccinations and the specific vaccines they were due. An invitation letter was then sent out to patients requiring further vaccinations and vaccine uptake for these patients was re-audited six months later. FINDINGS: Our results show a mild increase in the total uptake of vaccines six months after the letter was sent out, from 38.6% to 49.2%.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca , Correspondência como Assunto , Controle de Infecções , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agendamento de Consultas , Feminino , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA