Medical Versus Surgical ICU Obese Patient Outcome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis to Resolve Clinical Trial Controversies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the short- and long-term mortality of obese ICU patients following medical as opposed to surgical admission and the relation between obesity and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, using a propensity score-matched analysis of patients with medical or surgical admission. SETTING: One French mixed medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Critically ill obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m) and nonobese patients admitted during a 14-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven-hundred ninety-one obese patients and 4,644 nonobese patients were included, 338 (43%) and 2,367 (51%) medical and 453 (57%) and 2,277 (49%) surgical obese and nonobese patients, respectively. Mortality was significantly higher in medical than in surgical obese patients in ICU (25% vs 12%; p < 0.001) and up to 365 days (36% vs 18%; p < 0.001) post ICU admission. One-to-one propensity score matching generated 260 pairs with well-balanced baseline characteristics. After matching on propensity score, mortality was still significantly higher in medical patients both in the ICU (21% vs 13%; p = 0.03) and up to 365 days (30% vs 20%; p = 0.01) post ICU admission. Obesity was not significantly associated with mortality both in univariate analysis (140 obese patients [15%] in the dead group vs 651 [14%] in the alive group; p = 0.72) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.86-1.38]; p = 0.49) after adjustment for Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, category of admission, history of cardiac disease, and history of respiratory disease. CONCLUSIONS: After careful matching, the data suggest that ICU mortality in obese population was higher in the medical group than in the surgical group and remains significantly higher 365 days post ICU admission.

Impact of the driving pressure on mortality in obese and non-obese ARDS patients: a retrospective study of 362 cases.

PURPOSE: The relation between driving pressure (plateau pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure) and mortality has never been studied in obese ARDS patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between 90-day mortality and driving pressure in an ARDS population ventilated in the intensive care unit (ICU) according to obesity status. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of prospectively collected data of all ARDS patients admitted consecutively to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU from January 2009 to May 2017. Plateau pressure, compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) and driving pressure of the respiratory system within 24 h of ARDS diagnosis were compared between survivors and non-survivors at day 90 and between obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used for mortality at day 90. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two ARDS patients were included, 262 (72%) non-obese and 100 (28%) obese patients. Mortality rate at day 90 was respectively 47% (95% CI, 40-53) in the non-obese and 46% (95% CI, 36-56) in the obese patients. Driving pressure at day 1 in the non-obese patients was significantly lower in survivors at day 90 (11.9 ± 4.2 cmH2O) than in non-survivors (15.2 ± 5.2 cmH2O, p < 0.001). Contrarily, in obese patients, driving pressure at day 1 was not significantly different between survivors (13.7 ± 4.5 cmH2O) and non-survivors (13.2 ± 5.1 cmH2O, p = 0.41) at day 90. After three multivariate Cox analyses, plateau pressure [HR = 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07) for each point of increase], Crs [HR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) for each point of increase] and driving pressure [HR = 1.07 (95% CI 1.04-1.10) for each point of increase], respectively, were independently associated with 90-day mortality in non-obese patients, but not in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to non-obese ARDS patients, driving pressure was not associated with mortality in obese ARDS patients.

Rapid response team and hospital mortality in hospitalized patients.

PURPOSE: Although rapid response systems are known to reduce in-hospital cardiac arrest rate, their effect on mortality remains debated. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing an intensivist-led rapid response team (RRT) on mortality in hospitalized patients. METHODS: An implementation of an intervention and a comparison with retrospective data analysis were performed in the four hospitals of Montpellier regional healthcare centre, in France. An intensivist-led RRT was implemented on a 24/7 basis along with educational modules, publicity and bedside simulation-based training in only one of the four hospitals from January 2012 to June 2012. A single activation criterion (heart rate below 40/min or above 140/min, systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg, cardiac arrest, respiratory rate below 8/min or above 30/min, pulse oximetry below 90% with O2 above 6 l/min, respiratory distress in a tracheotomised patient, respiratory arrest, coma or sudden change in level of consciousness, seizure) allowed any caregiver to directly contact the RRT using a dedicated cell phone number. Patients over 18 years admitted for more than 24 h in the medical-surgical wards from July 2010 to December 2011 (pre-RRT period) and from July 2012 to December 2013 (RRT period) were included. The main outcome was unexpected mortality. Analyses of data from one RRT hospital and three control hospitals (no RRT hospital) were performed. RESULTS: RRT implementation was associated with a decrease in unexpected mortality rate in the hospital that implemented RRT (from 21.9 to 17.4 per 1000 discharges; p = 0.002). Reduction in unexpected mortality associated with RRT implementation could be estimated at 1.5 lives saved per week in the RRT hospital. In the three other hospitals, mortality rate was not significantly modified (from 19.5 to 19.9 per 1000 discharges; p = 0.69). Overall mortality decreased from 39.6 to 34.6 per 1000 discharges between the pre-RRT and RRT period in the RRT hospital (p = 0.012), but did not significantly change in the other hospitals. Patients in the RRT hospital were more frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the RRT period (45.8 vs 52.9 per 1000; p = 0.002), and their sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score upon ICU admission significantly decreased from 7 (4-10) to 5 (2-9); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In the present retrospective study, implementation of an intensivist-led RRT along with educational modules, publicity and bedside simulation-based training was associated with a significant decrease in unexpected and overall mortality of inpatients.

Apnoeic oxygenation via high-flow nasal cannula oxygen combined with non-invasive ventilation preoxygenation for intubation in hypoxaemic patients in the intensive care unit: the single-centre, blinded, randomised controlled OPTINIV trial.

PURPOSE: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) has the potential to provide apnoeic oxygenation. We decided to assess in a proof-of-concept study whether the addition of HFNC to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) could reduce oxygen desaturation during intubation, compared with NIV alone for preoxygenation, in severely hypoxaemic intensive care unit (ICU) patients with respiratory failure. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, controlled, single-centre trial with assessor-blinded outcome assessment in patients admitted to the ICU. Hypoxaemic patients requiring orotracheal intubation for respiratory failure were randomised to receive preoxygenation using HFNC [flow = 60 L/min, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) = 100 %] combined with NIV (pressure support = 10 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure = 5 cmH2O, FiO2 = 100 %) in the intervention group or NIV alone in the reference group prior to intubation. The primary outcome was the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2) during the intubation procedure. Secondary outcomes were intubation-related complications and ICU mortality. RESULTS: Between July 2015 and February 2016, we randomly assigned 25 and 24 patients to the intervention and reference groups, respectively. In both groups the main reasons for respiratory failure were pneumonia and ARDS. During the intubation procedure, the lowest SpO2 values were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the reference group [100 (95-100) % vs. 96 (92-99) %, p = 0.029]. After exclusion of two patients from analysis for protocol violation, no (0 %) patients in the intervention group and five (21 %) patients in the reference group had SpO2 below 80 % (p = 0.050). We recorded no significant difference between the groups in intubation-related complications or ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A novel strategy for preoxygenation in hypoxaemic patients, adding HFNC for apnoeic oxygenation to NIV prior to orotracheal intubation, may be more effective in reducing the severity of oxygen desaturation than the reference method using NIV alone.