Assessing antibacterial efficacy of a polyhexanide hydrogel versus alginate-based wound dressing in burns.

OBJECTIVE: Burn injuries pose a heightened risk of infection, which is primarily responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Factors such as extensive skin damage and compromised immunity exacerbate this vulnerability. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are frequently identified in burns, with Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa often resistant to antibacterial agents. While Flaminal, an alginate-based wound dressing (Flen Health, Belgium), aids wound healing, its antibacterial effects are limited compared with 1% silver sulfadiazine (1% SSD). In contrast, Prontosan Wound Gel X, a betaine and polyhexanide-based hydrogel (B. Braun Medical AG, Switzerland), has been shown to effectively combat various microbes and promotes wound healing. METHOD: In this study, two research cohorts were retrospectively established (control group: patients receiving standard of care with the alginate-based wound dressing; intervention group: patients receiving the polyhexanide hydrogel wound dressing), comprising patients admitted to a burn centre between 2019 and 2022. Patients were eligible when continuous wound treatment with either of the two wound dressings was performed. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) scans were conducted. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on LDI scans and divided into healing time categories. Wound swabs were collected and the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus was documented. Bacterial load was evaluated using a semiquantitative scale. Wound healing was recorded. RESULTS: The control group consisted of 31 patients with 93 ROIs, while the intervention group had 67 ROIs involving 29 patients. Both groups exhibited similar proportions of healing time categories (p>0.05). The polyhexanide hydrogel dressing outperformed the alginate-based dressing in antiseptic efficacy by significantly reducing the incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa- and Staphylococcus aureus-positive cultures in patients' wounds. Wound healing time for conservative treatment was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, the polyhexanide hydrogel dressing minimised Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in burn wounds, demonstrating strong antibacterial properties, emphasising its potential to minimise infections in burn injuries.

Photo-crosslinkable polyester microneedles as sustained drug release systems toward hypertrophic scar treatment.

Burn injuries can result in a significant inflammatory response, often leading to hypertrophic scarring (HTS). Local drug therapies e.g. corticoid injections are advised to treat HTS, although they are invasive, operator-dependent, extremely painful and do not permit extended drug release. Polymer-based microneedle (MN) arrays can offer a viable alternative to standard care, while allowing for direct, painless dermal drug delivery with tailorable drug release profile. In the current study, we synthesized photo-crosslinkable, acrylate-endcapped urethane-based poly(ε-caprolactone) (AUP-PCL) toward the fabrication of MNs. Physico-chemical characterization (1H-NMR, evaluation of swelling, gel fraction) of the developed polymer was performed and confirmed successful acrylation of PCL-diol. Subsequently, AUP-PCL, and commercially available PCL-based microneedle arrays were fabricated for comparative evaluation of the constructs. Hydrocortisone was chosen as model drug. To enhance the drug release efficiency of the MNs, Brij®35, a nonionic surfactant was exploited. The thermal properties of the MNs were evaluated via differential scanning calorimetry. Compression testing of the arrays confirmed that the MNs stay intact upon applying a load of 7 N, which correlates to the standard dermal insertion force of MNs. The drug release profile of the arrays was evaluated, suggesting that the developed PCL arrays can offer efficient drug delivery for up to two days, while the AUP-PCL arrays can provide a release up to three weeks. Finally, the insertion of MN arrays into skin samples was performed, followed by histological analysis demonstrating the AUP-PCL MNs outperforming the PCL arrays upon providing pyramidical-shaped perforations through the epidermal layer of the skin.

AUP-PCL MN arrays provide long-term transdermal drug delivery of hydrocortisoneAUP-PCL-based MN arrays provide superior drug release profiles compared to PCL MNsEffective skin penetration AUP-PCL-based MNs on skin was achieved.