RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the accuracy of the 10-item Physical Function (PF-10) questions of the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire as a sarcopenia screening tool among patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicenter study that included adult patients on hemodialysis. The revised European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People was used to diagnose sarcopenia. The 10 questions about daily activities from the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire were used to appoint the PF-10, where the final score could range from 10 to 30, and the lower the worse the physical function. The PF-10 accuracy to identify confirmed sarcopenia (low muscle strength + low muscle mass) was assessed through a receiver operating characteristic curve and the cutoff was calculated using the Youden index. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were included (median 59 years; 45% female). Prevalence of confirmed sarcopenia was 31.4%. The median PF-10 score was 23 (interquartile range: 17-27) and a significant association with all sarcopenia measurements was found (all P < .05). The best cutoff calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve was ≤26 points (area under the curve = 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.77) with sensitivity and specificity of 96.6% and 71.0%, respectively. Moreover, patients with ≤26 points (n = 133, 72%) had a higher prevalence of low muscle strength by handgrip (53 vs. 19%; P < .001) and 5-time sit-to-stand (41 vs. 10%; P < .001), low gait speed (44 vs. 19%; P = .002), confirmed sarcopenia (39 vs. 11%; P < .001), and severe sarcopenia (26 vs. 4%; P = .001), but not low muscle mass (49 vs. 35%; P = .08), in comparison with those >26 points (n = 52, 28%). CONCLUSION: The PF-10 may be a useful physical dysfunction and sarcopenia screening tool in patients on hemodialysis. A PF-10 threshold of around 26 points appeared to display the fairest accuracy for diagnosing sarcopenia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The arteriovenous fistula is the main vascular access in hemodialysis. Arteriovenous fistula access is generally evaluated by a vascular surgeon after 2 weeks of its surgery, however, exercise programs may begin earlier for improving outcomes. Therefore, we propose this guide with simple, but potentially effective exercises, using low-cost materials that can be safely performed by the patients at home or in the dialysis center. It also provides to the dialysis staff team a starting point for implementing an upper-limb exercise program that may facilitate arteriovenous fistula maturation and maintenance. METHODS: This exercise routine for arteriovenous fistula maturation can be performed three to four times a day, every day, from 2 to 4 weeks. After its maturation, it can be performed on every non-dialysis day for conventional treatment and every other day, before dialysis, for short daily treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, we have gathered some exercises, in a very easy and understandable language, that may potentially help arteriovenous fistula maturation and maintenance for hemodialysis patients.