Longitudinal Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stress and Occupational Well-Being of Mental Health Professionals: An International Study.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of occupational stress among health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic have been documented. Few studies have examined the effects of the pandemic on mental health professionals despite the heightened demand for their services. METHOD: A multilingual, longitudinal, global survey was conducted at 3 time points during the pandemic among members of the World Health Organization's Global Clinical Practice Network. A total of 786 Global Clinical Practice Network members from 86 countries responded to surveys assessing occupational distress, well-being, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. RESULTS: On average, respondents' well-being deteriorated across time while their posttraumatic stress symptoms showed a modest improvement. Linear growth models indicated that being female, being younger, providing face-to-face health services to patients with COVID-19, having been a target of COVID-related violence, and living in a low- or middle-income country or a country with a higher COVID-19 death rate conveyed greater risk for poor well-being and higher level of stress symptoms over time. Growth mixed modeling identified trajectories of occupational well-being and stress symptoms. Most mental health professions demonstrated no impact to well-being; maintained moderate, nonclinical levels of stress symptoms; or showed improvements after an initial period of difficulty. However, some participant groups exhibited deteriorating well-being approaching the clinical threshold (25.8%) and persistently high and clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (19.6%) over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that although most mental health professionals exhibited stable, positive well-being and low stress symptoms during the pandemic, a substantial minority of an already burdened global mental health workforce experienced persistently poor or deteriorating psychological status over the course of the pandemic.

An international survey examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telehealth use among mental health professionals.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has profoundly affected the work of mental health professionals with many transitioning to telehealth to comply with public health measures. This large international study examined the impact of the pandemic on mental health clinicians' telehealth use. METHODS: This survey study was conducted with mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists and psychologists, registered with WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN). 1206 clinicians from 100 countries completed the telehealth section of the online survey in one of six languages between June 4 and July 7, 2020. Participants were asked about their use, training (i.e., aspects of telehealth addressed), perceptions, and concerns. OUTCOMES: Since the pandemic onset, 1092 (90.5%) clinicians reported to have started or increased their telehealth services. Telephone and videoconferencing were the most common modalities. 592 (49.1%) participants indicated that they had not received any training. Clinicians with no training or training that only addressed a single aspect of telehealth practice were more likely to perceive their services as somewhat ineffective than those with training that addressed two or more aspects. Most clinicians indicated positive perceptions of effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Quality of care compared to in-person services and technical issues were the most common concerns. Findings varied by WHO region, country income level, and profession. INTERPRETATION: Findings suggest a global practice change with providers perceiving telehealth as a viable option for mental health care. Increasing local training opportunities and efforts to address clinical and technological concerns is important for meeting ongoing demands.

Post-thrombotic syndrome in children: Measurement properties of CAPTSure, a new diagnostic tool.

BACKGROUND: CAPTsure (Clinical Assessment of PTS) is a new tool for diagnosis and severity rating of pediatric postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Our objective was to test the reliability, measurement error, and minimal detectable change of CAPTSure. METHODS: Children aged newborn to 18 years who sustained upper extremity or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were enrolled ≥ 6 months after DVT diagnosis. Patients were assessed by 2 raters to determine the reliability of the clinician assessment component (CC) of CAPTSure. Patients/proxies completed CAPTSure at baseline and approximately 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability of the symptoms component (SC). RESULTS: Of 148 patients enrolled in the study; 30 had sustained either bilateral or both upper and lower extremity DVT. Hence, 178 extremities were assessed for PTS signs (86 upper extremity, 92 lower extremity). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the CC was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.93) for upper extremity and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) for lower extremity. Nonclinicians performed 59% of measurements. Ninety-eight patients completed the SC at baseline and follow-up, for a total of 60 upper extremity and 61 lower extremity assessments. ICC for the SC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.93) for upper extremity and 0.92 (0.87-0.95) for lower extremity. ICC for CAPTSure was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95) for upper extremity and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95) for lower extremity assessment. Measurement error ranged between 1.7 and 4.3 of 100 points. A change of approximately 11 of 100 points in CAPTSure score would be required to be confident that there was a change in PTS severity. CONCLUSION: CAPTSure has excellent reliability and a small measurement error, even when applied by nonhematologists.

Characteristics of pain, other symptoms and function in pediatric post-thrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms and function in pediatric post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) remain poorly characterized. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study describes the characteristics of pain, other symptoms, and impaired function in pediatric PTS in a cohort of children with history of upper or lower limb deep vein thrombosis and PTS diagnosis. The frequency of clinical findings was compared between patients with and without pain, and between patients with upper and lower extremity PTS. RESULTS: Seventy-eight children were included in the study. The most common PTS symptoms were pain, tired limb and heaviness. Symptoms were usually reported to occur at mid-day or later and were typically triggered by exercise. Half the patients reported impaired endurance. Pain was reported by 45% of patients and was usually mild-moderate. Heaviness, tightness, tired limb, paresthesia, self-reported limb edema, and impaired endurance were most common in patients with than in patients without pain. Conversely, activity and participation scores, skin redness, and clinician-assessed limb edema did not differ between patients with and without pain. Lastly, there was no difference in pain intensity or frequency of paresthesia, swelling, heaviness, or impaired endurance when comparing the upper and lower extremities. CONCLUSION: Tired limb, heaviness, pain, and impaired endurance were the most frequent clinical findings in pediatric PTS. Frequency of symptoms and pain intensity did not differ between upper and lower extremities. Pain was associated with the presence of other symptoms and impaired function, but not with activity limitation and participation restriction. Better tools are needed to measure these two latter aspects of health.

Assessment of limb edema in pediatric post-thrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric tools for diagnosis of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) include the assessment of limb edema as a symptom (patient/proxy-reported) and as a sign. However, it is unclear whether these two approaches refer to the same clinical aspect of PTS. This could result in overestimation of disease severity. We sought to evaluate the correlation among different techniques to assess limb edema as a sign and as a symptom in children who sustained upper extremity (UE) or lower extremity (LE) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and were, therefore, at risk of PTS. METHODS: Limb edema was cross-sectionally measured as a symptom (ie, patient- or proxy-reported) and as a sign (ie, clinician-assessed limb circumference difference, limb volume ratio, bioimpedance spectroscopy ratio (BIS), and durometry ratio) in 140 children at risk of PTS (n = 70 UE-DVT, n = 70 LE-DVT). Item-item correlations were estimated using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate, and separately for the UE and LE groups. RESULTS: In the UE-DVT group, proxy-reported swelling correlated weakly to moderately with circumference difference and with volume ratio, but not with BIS ratio. In the LE-DVT group, proxy-reported swelling correlated moderately with thigh circumference difference and volume ratio, and patient-reported swelling correlated moderately with BIS ratio. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patient/proxy-reported and clinician-assessed limb edema measure slightly different aspects of PTS, justifying their inclusion in pediatric PTS tools. In addition, proxy-reported swelling was in closer agreement with clinician-assessed total limb size (ie, observed edema), and patient-reported swelling in the LE seemed to reflect limb fluid content (ie, perceived edema).

Normal values for segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy in pediatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: Localized limb edema is a clinically relevant sign in diseases such as post-thrombotic syndrome and lymphedema. Quantitative evaluation of localized edema in children is mainly done by measuring the absolute difference in limb circumference, which includes fat and fat-free mass. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) provides information on the fluid volume of a body segment. Our objective was to determine normal ranges for segmental (arm and leg) BIS measurements in healthy children. Additionally, we determined the normal ranges for the difference in arm and ankle circumference and explored the influence of handedness and the correlation between techniques. METHODS: Healthy children aged 1-18 years were recruited. The ratio of extracellular fluid content between contralateral limbs (estimated as the inter-arm and inter-leg extracellular impedance ratio), and the ratio of extracellular to intracellular fluid content for each limb (estimated as the intracellular to extracellular impedance ratio) were determined with a bioimpedance spectrometer. Arm and ankle circumference was determined with a Gulick II tape. RESULTS: We recruited 223 healthy children (48 infants, 54 preschoolers, 66 school-aged children, and 55 teenagers). Normal values for arm and leg BIS measurements, and for the difference in arm and ankle circumference were estimated for each age category. No influence of handedness was found. We found a statistically significant correlation between extracellular impedance ratio and circumference difference for arms among teenagers. CONCLUSION: We determined normal BIS ranges for arms and legs and for the difference in circumference between arms and between ankles in children. There was no statistically significant correlation between extracellular impedance ratio and difference in circumference, except in the case of arms in adolescents. This may indicate that limb circumference measures quantities other than fluid, challenging the adequacy of this technique to determine the presence of localized edema in most age groups.