Prognostic factors in neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors associated with survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment [chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or chemotherapy] followed by surgery (CRTS) in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 118 patients diagnosed with stage T1-T3N2M0 NSCLC and treated with CRTS at 14 hospitals in Spain between January 2005 and December 2014. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Surgery consisted of lobectomy (74.5% of cases), pneumectomy (17.8%), or bilobectomy (7.6%). Neoadjuvant treatment was CRT in 62 patients (52.5%) and chemotherapy alone in 56 patients (47.5%). Median follow-up was 42.5 months (5-128 months). 5-year OS and PFS were 51.1% and 49.4%, respectively. The following variables were independently associated with worse OS and PFS: pneumonectomy (vs. lobectomy); advanced pathologic T stage (pT3 vs. pT0-pT2); and presence of persistent N2 disease (vs. ypN0-1) in the surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with CRTS, 5-year survival (both OS and PFS) was approximately 50%. After CRTS, the patients with the best prognosis were those whose primary tumour and/or mediastinal nodal metastases were downstaged after induction therapy and those who underwent lobectomy. These findings provide further support for neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in selected patients.

Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiation in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study by the oncologic group for the study of lung cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

OBJECTIVES: The role of surgery in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an actively debated in oncology. To evaluate the value of surgery in this patient population, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy plus surgery (CRTS) to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 247 patients with potentially resectable stage T1-T3N2M0 NSCLC treated with either CRTS or dCRT between January 2005 and December 2014 at 15 hospitals in Spain were identified. A centralized review was performed to ensure resectability. A propensity score matched analysis was carried out to balance patient and tumor characteristics (n = 78 per group). RESULTS: Of the 247 patients, 118 were treated with CRTS and 129 with dCRT. In the CRTS group, 62 patients (52.5%) received neoadjuvant CRT and 56 (47.4%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery consisted of either lobectomy (97 patients; 82.2%) or pneumonectomy (21 patients; 17.8%). In the matched samples, median overall survival (OS; 56 vs 29 months, log-rank p = .002) and progression-free survival (PFS; 46 vs 15 months, log-rank p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CRTS group. This survival advantage for CRTS was maintained in the subset comparison between the lobectomy subgroup versus dCRT (OS: 57 vs 29 months, p < 0.001; PFS: 46 vs 15 months, p < 0.001), but not in the comparison between the pneumonectomy subgroup and dCRT. CONCLUSION: The findings reported here indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (preferably lobectomy) yields better OS and PFS than definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Effects of dotarizine and flunarizine on chromaffin cell viability and cytosolic Ca2+.

Dotarizine (a novel piperazine derivative with antimigraine properties) and flunarizine (a Ca2+ channel antagonist) were compared concerning: first, their ability to cause chromaffin cell damage in vitro; second, the possible correlation of their octanol/water partition coefficients and those of another 28 compounds (i.e., Ca2+ channel antagonists, blockers of histamine H1 receptors, antimycotics, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, neuroleptics), with their ability to cause cell damage; third, their capacity to protect the cells against the damaging effects of veratridine; and fourth, their capabilities to enhance the basal cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in fura-2-loaded single chromaffin cells, or to modify the pattern of [Ca2+]i oscillations elicited by veratridine. After 24-h exposure to 1-30 microM dotarizine, the viability of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells (measured under phase contrast or as lactate dehydrogenase, released into the medium) was similar to that of control, untreated cells; at 100 microM, 80% lactate dehydrogenase release was produced. At 1-3 microM flunarizine caused no cell damage; however 10 microM caused 20% lactate dehydrogenase release and 30 and 100 microM over 90% lactate dehydrogenase release. The time course of cell damage was considerably faster for flunarizine, in comparison to dotarizine. Out of 30 molecules tested (at 10 microM), having different octanol/water partition coefficients (log P), dotarizine was among the molecules causing no cell damage; flunarizine caused 20% cell loss, lidoflazine and verapamil over 50% cell loss, and penfluridol, draflazine, astemizole or nifedipine over 80% cell loss. No correlation was found between log P and cytotoxicity. Both dotarizine (10-30 microM) and flunarizine (3-10 microM) provided protection against veratridine-induced cell death; however, at 30 microM dotarizine afforded a pronounced protection while flunarizine enhanced the cytotoxic effects of veratridine. Dotarizine (30 microM) (but not flunarizine) caused a prompt transient elevation of the basal [Ca2+]i. Both compounds abolished the K+-induced increases of [Ca2+]i as well as the oscillations of [Ca2+]i induced by veratridine. The blocking effects of dotarizine were readily reversed after washout, while those of flunarizine were long-lasting. These differences might be relevant to the clinical use of dotarizine as an antimigraine drug.