Non-English Primary Language: A Growing Population's Access to Cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to cholecystectomy and postoperative outcomes among non-English primary-speaking patients. BACKGROUND: The population of U.S. residents with limited English proficiency is growing. Language affects health literacy and is a well-recognized barrier to health care in the United States of America. Historically marginalized communities are at greater risk of requiring emergent gallbladder operations. However, little is known about how primary language affects surgical access and outcomes of common surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients after receipt of cholecystectomy in Michigan, Maryland, and New Jersey utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (2016-2018). Patients were classified by primary spoken language: English or non-English. The primary outcome was admission type. Secondary outcomes included operative setting, operative approach, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Multivariable logistics and Poisson regression were used to examine outcomes. RESULTS: Among 122,013 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 91.6% were primarily English speaking and 8.4% were non-English primary language speaking. Primary non-English speaking patients had a higher likelihood of emergent/urgent admissions (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44, P = 0.015) and a lower likelihood of having an outpatient operation (odds ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P = 0.0008). There was no difference in the use of a minimally invasive approach or postoperative outcomes based on the primary language spoken. CONCLUSIONS: Non-English primary language speakers were more likely to access cholecystectomy through the emergency department and less likely to receive outpatient cholecystectomy. Barriers to elective surgical presentation for this growing patient population need to be further studied.

Evaluation of the educational quality of publicly available online videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy by utilizing the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Despite its common nature, there is no data on the educational quality of publicly available laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos. The LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool, released in 2020, has been developed to ensure that teaching videos are of appropriate quality. This study applies the LAP-VEGaS tool to currently available laparoscopic jejunostomy videos. METHODS: A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for "laparoscopic jejunostomy." Included videos were rated by three independent investigators using LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool (0-18). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in LAP-VEGaS scores between video categories and date of publication relative to 2020. Spearman's correlation test was performed to measure association between scores and length, number of views and likes. RESULTS: 27 unique videos met selection criteria. Academic and physician video walkthroughs did not demonstrate a significant difference in median scores (9.33 IQR 6.33, 14.33 vs. 7.67 IQR 4, 12.67, p = 0.3951). Videos published after 2020 demonstrated higher median scores than those published before 2020 (13 IQR 7.5, 14.67 vs. 5 IQR 3, 9.67, p = 0.0081). A majority of videos failed to provide patient position (52%), intraoperative findings (56%), operative time (63%), graphic aids (74%), and audio/written commentary (52%). A positive association was demonstrated between scores and number of likes (rs = 0.59, p = 0.0011) and video length (rs = 0.39, p = 0.0421), but not number of views (rs = 0.17, p = 0.3991). CONCLUSION: The majority of available YouTube® videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy fail to meet the basic educational needs of surgical trainees, and there is no difference between those produced by academic centers or independent physicians. However, there has been improvement in video quality following the release of the scoring tool. Standardization of laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos with the LAP-VEGaS score can ensure that videos are of appropriate educational value with logical structure.

The University of Pennsylvania Medical School Commencement of 1889: Aequanimitas and the Agnew Clinic.

Academic commencements ceremonies usually do not result in memorable occasions and once ended usually are forgotten. Not so for the University of Pennsylvania's School of Medicine commencement on May 1,1889, which was marked by an address by William Osler, the retirement of the renowned Professor of Surgery, D. Hayes Agnew, and the presentation to the University of Thomas Eakins' remarkable masterpiece, "The Agnew Clinic." Osler had been on the faculty of the University for 5 years and in his keynote address, Aequanimitas, he laid out 2 elements, imperturbability and equanimity, that he stated would "make or mar" the lives of the students he was addressing. His words and message that day have continued to resonate for medical students and many others up to the present day. Osler ended his address on a more somber note, seemingly surprising the assembled, by announcing his imminent departure from the University. He would soon be one of the 4 founders of the Johns Hopkins Hospital along with fellow Penn faculty member, Howard Kelly. Osler was not the only one on the verge of leaving as this commencement also marked the end of the career of D. Hayes Agnew. To honor him on this occasion of his retirement the 3 classes of medical students had commissioned Eakins to paint a portrait of their revered professor, which was presented on this commencement day and accepted by Trustee Dr S. Weir Mitchell on behalf of the University. The day was indeed one to be remembered.

The Center for Surgical Health: A Compassion-Driven Urban Surgical Mission.

We are the Center for Surgical Health (CSH), an academic community partnership that supports, educates, and advocates for vulnerable Philadelphians with surgical diseases, founded in 2016 by Dr. Jon B. Morris, a leader in surgical education and a general surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Alan Herbst, a current third-year Penn general surgery resident. At the time, Dr. Morris, raised in a Reform Jewish household, had been participating in an RCIA Program to convert to Catholicism. The mission of providing surgery to uninsured patients, primarily undocumented individuals, by helping them obtain insurance and see Penn providers was seen by Dr. Morris as a form of Catholic charity, which he has continued to remain dedicated to as his faith in Jesus Christ has deepened. Dr. Herbst, now Associate Director of Clinics for the CSH, recalls working with Dr. Morris as a sub-intern during his conversion, beginning with passion and a neon poster board inviting people to "See the Surgeon." Since that time, the CSH has grown from an organization with 10 volunteers, called "personal patient navigators," who provide insurance support and advocacy at every step of the perioperative continuum, to one with over 50, who have now seen 156 patients and assisted in providing 49 needed procedures. Much of this growth has been brought about through the dedication and vision of Dr. Matthew Goldshore, the Deputy Director of the CSH and a fifth-year Penn general surgery resident, as well as Dr. Carrie Z. Morales, Associate Deputy Director of the CSH and a recent Perelman School of Medicine graduate. Through their leadership, and the talent and commitment of other members of the CSH board, overseen by Director Dr. Morris, the CSH now has policy and research divisions, a surgical equity curriculum, and continues to develop new ways of providing better care.

Does Surgeon Sex Matter?: Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Female and Male Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare postoperative outcomes of female surgeons (FS) and male surgeons (MS) within general surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: FS in the workforce are increasing in number. Female physicians provide exceptional care in other specialties. Differences in surgical outcomes of FS and MS have not been examined. METHODS: We linked the AMA Physician Masterfile to discharge claims from New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania (2012 to 2013) to examine practice patterns and to compare surgical outcomes of FS and MS. We paired FS and MS operating at the same hospital using cardinality matching with refined balance and compared inpatient mortality, any postoperative complication, and prolonged length of stay (pLOS) in FS and MS. RESULTS: Overall practice patterns differed between the 663 FS and 3219 MS. We identified 2462 surgeons (19% FS, 81% MS) at 429 hospitals who met inclusion criteria for outcomes analysis. FS were younger (mean age ±â€ŠSD FS: 48.5 ±â€Š8.4 years, MS: 54.3 ±â€Š9.4y; P < 0.001) with less clinical experience (mean years ±â€ŠSD FS: 11.6 ±â€Š8.3 y, MS: 17.6 ±â€Š10.0 years; P < 0.001) than MS before matching. FS had lower rates of inpatient mortality (FS: 1.51%, MS: 2.30%; P < 0.001), any postoperative complication (FS: 12.6%, MS: 16.1%; P < 0.001), and pLOS (FS: 18.4%, MS: 20.7%; P < 0.001) before matching. After matching, FS and MS outcomes were equivalent. CONCLUSION: Surgeon practice patterns vary by sex and experience. FS and MS with similar characteristics who treat similar patients at the same hospital have equivalent rates of inpatient morality, postoperative complications, and prolonged length of hospital stay. Patients should select the surgeon who is the best fit for them regardless of sex.

Resection of gallbladder remnants after subtotal cholecystectomy: presentation and management.

BACKGROUND: Subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) involves removal of a portion of the gallbladder typically due to hazardous inflammation. While this technique reliably prevents common bile duct (CBD) injury, future procedures can be required if the gallbladder remnant becomes symptomatic. The morbidity associated with resection of gallbladder remnants in patients that previously underwent SC is reviewed. METHODS: Records for patients having undergone redo cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder remnants in a tertiary care system from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent repeat cholecystectomy. Five surgeons dictated the initial procedure as a subtotal cholecystectomy. All patients returned with symptomatic cholelithiasis between zero months and seven years after the index cholecystectomy. Redo cholecystectomy was attempted laparoscopically in two patients but ultimately required an open approach in all. One patient had a recognized CBD injury requiring a hepaticojejunostomy, and a second patient had a minor wound infection. Symptoms resolved in 13/14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Redocholecystectomy (RC) for gallbladder remnants has been detailed in case reports, but no sizable North American series have been presented. These results illustrate a drawback to the reconstituting technique of SC. RC effectively resolves symptoms but requires adherence to safe principles of cholecystectomy and is one indication for an open approach.

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data.

BACKGROUND: There is still considerable debate regarding the best operative approach to ventral hernia repair. Using two large statewide databases, this study sought to evaluate the longitudinal outcomes and associated costs of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair from 2007-2011 were identified from inpatient discharge data from California and New York. In-hospital morbidity, in-hospital mortality, incidence of readmission, and incidence of revisional ventral hernia repair were evaluated as a function of surgical technique. The associated costs of medical care for laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair were evaluate for both the index procedure and all subsequent admissions and procedures within the study period. RESULTS: A total of 13,567 patients underwent elective ventral hernia repair with mesh; 9228 (69%) underwent OVHR and 4339 (31%) underwent LVHR. At time of the index procedure, LVHR was associated with a lower incidence of reoperation (OR 0.29, CI 0.12-0.58, p = 0.001), wound disruption (OR 0.35, CI 0.16-0.78, p = 0.01), wound infection (OR 0.50, CI 0.25-0.70, p < 0.001), blood transfusion (OR 0.47, CI 0.36-0.61, p < 0.001), ARDS (OR 0.74, CI 0.54-0.99, p < 0.05), and total index visit complications (OR 0.72, CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001). LVHR was associated with significantly fewer readmissions (OR 0.81, CI 0.75-0.88, p < 0.001) and a lower risk for revisional VHR (OR 0.75, CI 0.64-0.88, p < 0.001). LVHR was associated with lower total costs at 1 year ($3451, CI 1892-5011, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Open ventral hernia repair was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, postoperative readmissions and need for revisional hernia repair when compared to laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, even when controlling for patient sociodemographics. In congruence, open ventral hernia repair was associated with higher costs for both the index hernia repair and tallied over the length of follow-up for readmissions and revisional hernia repair.

Goal orientation in surgical residents: a study of the motivation behind learning.

BACKGROUND: The subconscious way in which an individual approaches learning, goal orientation (GO), has been shown to influence job satisfaction, job performance, and burnout in nonmedical cohorts. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate an instrument to assess GO in surgical residents, so that in the future, we can better understand how differences in motivation affect professional development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residents were recruited to complete a 17-item survey adapted from the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). The survey included three scales assessing GO in residency-specific terms. Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and the psychometric properties of the adapted and original PALS were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of residents (61/64) participated. Median age was 30 y and 33% were female. Mean (standard deviation) scale scores for the adapted PALS were: mastery 4.30 (0.48), performance approach (PAP) 3.17 (0.99), and performance avoid 2.75 (0.88). Mean (standard deviation) scale scores for the original PALS items were: mastery 3.35 (1.02), PAP 2.76 (1.15), and performance avoid 2.41 (0.91). Cronbach alpha were α = 0.89 and α = 0.84 for the adapted PAP and avoid scales, respectively, which were comparable with the original scales. For the adapted mastery scale, α = 0.54. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors, and factor loadings for individual mastery items did not load consistently onto a single factor. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first steps in the development of a novel tool to measure GO among surgical residents. Understanding motivational psychology in residents may facilitate improved education and professional development.

Hernia repair in the presence of ascites.

BACKGROUND: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been validated as a prediction tool for postoperative mortality, but its role in predicting morbidity has not been well studied. We sought to determine the role of MELD, among other factors, in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients with nonmalignant ascites undergoing hernia repair. METHODS: All patients undergoing hernia repair in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database (2009-11) were identified. Those with nonmalignant ascites were compared with patients without ascites. A subset analysis of patients with nonmalignant ascites was performed to evaluate the association between MELD and morbidity and mortality with adjustment for potential confounders. The association of significant factors with the rate of morbidity was displayed using a best-fit polynomial regression. RESULTS: Of 138,366 hernia repairs, 778 (0.56%) were performed on patients with nonmalignant ascites. Thirty-day morbidity (4% versus 19%) and mortality (0.2% versus 5.3%) were significantly more frequent in patients with ascites (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis of the 636 patients with a calculable MELD, MELD was associated with both morbidity and mortality (P < 0.001 each). In multivariate analysis, MELD remained significantly associated with morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11). Ventral hernia repair (OR = 2.9), dependent functional status (OR = 2.3), alcohol use (OR = 2.3), emergent operation (OR = 2.0) white blood count (OR = 1.1), and age (OR = 1.02) were also significantly associated with morbidity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Before hernia repair, the MELD score can be used to risk-stratify patients with nonmalignant ascites not only for mortality but also morbidity. Morbidity rates increase rapidly with MELD above 15, but other factors should additionally be accounted for when counseling patients on their perioperative risk.

Telemedicine and Access to Elective Cholecystectomy for Socially Vulnerable Adults: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Socially vulnerable patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis are more likely to face barriers to accessing surgical care. This barrier to access can lead to delays in treatment, the need for emergent cholecystectomy, and worse outcomes. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of telemedicine vs in-person surgical consultation on access to elective cholecystectomy in socially vulnerable populations and to evaluate the association of scheduling navigation with access to elective cholecystectomy in these populations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pilot randomized clinical trial conducted in a single academic center enrolled 60 adults from February 1, 2023, to February 21, 2024, with 3-month follow-up of clinical outcomes. Data were also collected retrospectively on a comparison group of 32 patients referred from June 30 to December 29, 2022. Adults with social vulnerability, such as being non-White or Hispanic or having nonprivate insurance or low income, with a diagnosis of symptomatic cholelithiasis and referral for outpatient surgical consultation were included. Interventions: All trial participants were randomized to the telemedicine or in-person surgical consultation group, and received professional scheduling navigation. The latter intervention was compared with a historical cohort without navigation assistance. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was completion of outpatient surgical consultation. Secondary outcomes included receipt of treatment and operative urgency. Results: The trial enrolled 60 participants (30 per arm). Their mean (SD) age was 48.2 (18.2) years, 50 (83.3%) were female, 2 (3.3%) were Asian, 39 (65.0%) were Black, 8 (13.3%) were Hispanic, 11 (18.3%) were White, and 41 (68.3%) had no private insurance. The historical patient cohort included 32 participants (mean [SD] age, 45.9 [3.2] years; 27 [84.4%] female; 3 [9.4%] Asian, 15 [46.9%] Black, 10 [31.3%] Hispanic, and 6 [18.8%] White; and 18 [56.3%] without private insurance). In total, 18 trial participants assigned to telemedicine (60.0%) completed surgical consultations compared with 23 trial participants assigned to in-person visits (76.7%; P = .17). For telemedicine participants who underwent cholecystectomy, 3 of 7 (42.9%) underwent emergent cholecystectomy compared with 0 of 14 (0%) participants with in-person consultations (P = .03). Of 30 trial participants who received scheduling navigation, 23 (76.7%) completed surgical consultations compared with 15 of 32 patients in the historical cohort who did not receive scheduling navigation (46.9%; P = .02). Of 14 trial participants who received scheduling navigation and cholecystectomy, no participants underwent emergent cholecystectomy compared with 4 of 16 (25.0%) participants in the historical cohort without scheduling navigation (P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot randomized clinical trial of socially vulnerable adults with symptomatic cholelithiasis, telemedicine consultation compared with in-person visits did not improve access to elective outpatient surgical care. However, scheduling navigation services may improve access to elective outpatient surgical care. Future large-scale studies are needed to identify possible barriers to virtual health care and mechanisms to address inequities. Trial Registration: ClincialTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05745077.

Resident Self-Efficacy in Grantsmanship Lags Behind Key Funding Deadlines.

PURPOSE: Extramural funding is critical to career success and advancement in academic surgery, and surgical residents can apply for both societal and federal funding. Many federal funding mechanisms require proposals to be submitted before residents' formal research years. METHODS: To better understand the resident experience with grantsmanship, we distributed a validated grantsmanship self-efficacy assessment inventory for voluntary completion at our academic general surgery training program with 2 years of dedicated research. The survey covers 3 domains: conceptualizing, designing and analyzing, and funding a study. All questions are scored 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no confidence and 10 indicating complete confidence. Median scores for the 3 domains were calculated for all respondents and compared between training years using Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn testing. RESULTS: Forty-four surveys were completed with a response rate of 84%. Resident self-efficacy in grantsmanship improved throughout the training years with the greatest changes being in their comfort with conceptualizing and funding a study. Dunn testing identified specific differences between PGY2 and PGY7 comfort with conceptualizing studies (median 5 vs. 7.5, p = 0.003) and understanding of funding mechanisms (median 2.0 vs. 7, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: While comfort with conceptualizing and funding studies does increase throughout the training years, this often develops after critical funding deadlines have already passed and can disadvantage surgical residents interested in academic careers. A curriculum that emphasizes familiarity with the grant writing and funding processes may better facilitate long term career success.

Evaluating patient experience with a surgical navigation program for under-resourced patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize patient satisfaction with navigators and surgical care accessed through a novel navigation program for under-resourced communities. METHODS: PSN-I and PSQ-18 questionnaires assessed satisfaction with navigators and care, respectively. Primary outcomes were PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. Secondary analyses tested associations between satisfaction and patient factors and between PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. RESULTS: Of 294 patients contacted, 88 (29.9 â€‹%) responded. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (76.1 â€‹%), Spanish-speaking (71.5 â€‹%), and uninsured (85.2 â€‹%). Participants were highly satisfied with navigators (mean 38.5, SD 7.6; max. 45) and most care domains except Financial Aspects (mean 3.2, SD 1.0; max. 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean 3.5, SD 0.6; max. 5). Higher navigator satisfaction was associated with post-consultation need for surgery (coeff. 5.6, 95 â€‹% CI[0.9, 10.3]) and increased the odds of care satisfaction (OR 1.1, 95 â€‹% CI[1.0, 1.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are satisfied with navigation services-a previously unstudied aspect of this unique surgical equity program.

High-Fidelity Bleeding Control Simulation Scenario During Medical Student Orientation Improves Students' Self-Reported Ability to Identify and Treat Life-Threatening Bleeding with 3-year Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Increasingly, medical schools integrate clinical skills into early didactic coursework. The Stop the Bleed® Campaign emphasizes prehospital hemorrhage control to reduce preventable deaths; however, this course overlooks team interactions. We assessed the impact of high-fidelity simulation during medical student orientation on identification and treatment of life-threatening hemorrhage in a team setting. DESIGN: In this mixed method, prospective pre-, post-, and follow-up survey analysis assessing student knowledge and attitudes, student teams encountered a standardized patient in a prehospital environment with pulsatile bleeding from an extremity wound. Individual students completed surveys assessing previous experience, willingness and ability to assist bleeding person(s), and knowledge and attitudes about tourniquets. Postscenario, faculty preceptors made qualitative observations on teamwork. SETTING: Medical student orientation at a tertiary care academic medical center with long-term follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (N = 150). RESULTS: Ninety students (60%) completed both pre- and postsimulation questionnaires. Sixteen (17%) students had previous tourniquet training experience although none had applied a tourniquet outside of training. Postsimulation, students reported increased likelihood of providing treatment until additional help arrived (p = 0.035), improved ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and more favorable opinions about tourniquet use (p < 0.001) and potential for limb-salvage (p = 0.018). Long-term follow-up respondents (n = 34, 23%) reported increased ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (p = 0.010) and universal willingness to intervene until additional help arrived. Follow-up survey responses elicited themes in hemorrhage control including recognition of the importance of continuous pressure, appropriate use of tourniquets, a desire for repeated team training, and the recognition of clerkship rotations as an optimal setting for skill reinforcement. Preceptors noted variable team responses but uniformly endorsed the exercise. CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity bleeding simulation during medical student orientation improved students' knowledge and attitudes about treating life-threatening hemorrhage and served as an introduction to team-based emergency care. Future studies should further explore team training and hemorrhage control education.

Incorporation and Utilization of an Additional Needs Screener by Surgical Trainees for Comprehensive Care of Underserved and Underinsured Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive, socially-minded healthcare has historically been delivered in the primary care setting. For underserved patient populations, however, a surgical care episode may serve as the health care access point. To maximize patient wellbeing during the perioperative period, our surgical center developed the Additional Needs Screener (ANS). Operationalized into practice by GME and UME trainees, this tool screens surgical patients across 3 domains (social, emotional, and immigration needs) and connects patients to partner organizations if appropriate. This study describes the pilot utilization of the ANS among underserved and underinsured surgical patients. DESIGN: Clinical quality improvement and retrospective cohort study of patients completing the ANS from implementation in September 2021 to September 2022. SETTING: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, PA-a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and 10 underinsured and/or underserved patients completed at least 1 ANS domain. RESULTS: Patients were majority female (55F, 53M, 2 other) and Hispanic/Latinx (72%) with a median age of 38 (IQR = 34-48). Most patients spoke a primary language other than English (77%), and nearly all were either uninsured (82%) or received emergency medical assistance or Medicaid (14%) at referral. Patients demonstrated significant needs; 39% endorsed difficulty affording housing, 32% endorsed difficulty paying for food, 29% endorsed experiencing current life-interfering distress, and 75% had undocumented immigration status. Ultimately, 57% of screened patients accepted referrals to our needs response teams. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved and underinsured patients presenting for surgical care face significant challenges relating to social, emotional, and immigration needs. Through adoption of the ANS, trainees gained competency identifying and addressing these barriers in the perioperative period. Future works will focus on categorizing referral outcomes, developing interventions to increase patient trust, and improving screener dissemination.

Introducing Surgical Equity into Contemporary Medical Education: Results From Operation Equity, a Pilot Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis. SETTING: At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys. RESULTS: From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care. CONCLUSIONS: Formal curricula can improve students' ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.

Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization.

Importance: Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recurrence, but long-term prosthetic-mesh footprint may increase complication risk during subsequent abdominal operations. Objective: To investigate the association of prior incisional hernia repair with mesh (IHRWM) with postoperative outcomes and health care utilization after common abdominal operations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing inpatient abdominal surgical procedures during the period of January 2009 to December 2016, with at least 1 year of follow-up within 5 geographically diverse statewide inpatient/ambulatory databases (Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, New York, Utah). History of an abdominal operation was ascertained within the 3-year period preceding the index operation. Patients admitted to the hospital with a history of an abdominal operation (ie, bariatric, cholecystectomy, small- or large-bowel resection, prostatectomy, gynecologic) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Patients with prior IHRWM were propensity score matched (1:1) to controls both with and without a history of an abdominal surgical procedure based on clinical and operative characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to November 27, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of adverse postoperative outcomes (surgical and nonsurgical). Secondary outcomes included health care utilization determined by length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and 1-year readmissions. Logistic and Cox regression determined the association of prior IHRWM with the outcomes of interest. Additional subanalyses matched and compared patients with prior IHR without mesh (IHRWOM) to those with a history of an abdominal operation. Results: Of the 914 105 patients undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures (81 123 bariatric [8.9%], 284 450 small- or large-bowel resection [31.1%], 223 768 cholecystectomy [24.5%], 33 183 prostatectomy [3.6%], and 291 581 gynecologic [31.9%]), all 3517 patients (age group: 46-55 years, 1547 [44.0%]; 2396 majority sex [68.1%]) with prior IHRWM were matched to patients without a history of abdominal surgical procedures. After matching, prior IHRWM was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), surgical complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70), length of hospital stay (mean increase of 1.03 days; 95% CI, 0.56-1.49 days; P < .001), index admission charges (predicted mean difference of $11 896.10; 95% CI, $6096.80-$17 695.40; P < .001), and 1-year unplanned readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002). This trend persisted even when comparing matched patients with prior IHRWM to patients with a history of abdominal surgical procedures, and the treatment outcome disappeared when comparing patients with prior IHRWOM to those without a previous abdominal operation. Conclusions and Relevance: Reoperation through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical complications and health care utilization. This risk appeared to be independent of a history of abdominal surgical procedures and was magnified by the presence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.

Teaching status: the impact on emergency and elective surgical care in the US.

OBJECTIVE(S): To examine the relation between hospital teaching status and surgical outcomes for both emergency and elective general surgery cases using a national database. BACKGROUND: Teaching hospitals (TH) have been shown to have better outcomes for complex elective surgical cases when compared with nonteaching hospitals (NTH). Less is known about the effect of teaching status on outcomes for more common procedures, especially where emergency surgical cases are concerned. Worse outcomes seen in this cohort are often attributed to patient disease, but systems level variables such as TH status may also play a role. METHODS: We performed a nationally representative retrospective cohort study of surgical admissions during 2000 to 2006 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were included if they were more than 18 years of age and had a general surgical procedure performed on the day of admission. We examined unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality (IHM) and postoperative complications (POC) for elective and emergency patients. RESULTS: We identified 1,052,809 admissions. Patients treated at THs were more likely to be nonwhite and at extremes of income when compared with those treated at NTH. Adjusted outcomes revealed an increased risk of IHM at TH (overall OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.40, P = 0.017) for emergency admissions with no difference in IHM seen after elective procedures. Postoperative infections were more likely to occur at TH than NTH after elective procedures (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.17, P < 0.007). Postoperative fistula was more likely to occur at TH than NTH after elective surgery (OR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.32-1.85, P < 0.005) whereas postoperative ileus was less likely to occur at TH than NTH (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.91, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Teaching status is associated with increased risk of IHM after emergency cases. POC profiles also differ by TH status. Investigation of the way in which systems-level variables that differ between TH and NTH contribute to postoperative outcomes may identify novel targets for performance improvement.

Looking Beyond the Numbers: Increasing Diversity and Inclusion Through Holistic Review in General Surgery Recruitment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is the examine the effect of a holistic review process on the recruitment of women and students underrepresented in medicine (UIM) in a general surgery residency program. DESIGN: A retrospective study comparing the proportion of women and UIM students ranked and matched into categorical positions from 2013 to 2020 before and after the implementation of the holistic application review process. United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores and American Board of Surgery In-training Exam (ABSITE) scores were also compared between groups. SETTING: General Surgery residency program at a tertiary, academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students applying for and matriculated to categorical positions. RESULTS: After the implementation of holistic review in 2017, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of women (42% vs. 61%, p < 0.01) and UIM students (14% vs. 20%, p = 0.046) ranked in our program compared with the prior "traditional" approach. The proportion of matched female (33% vs. 54%, p = 0.11) and UIM applicants (14% vs. 21%, p = 0.48) also increased after holistic review, although the changes were not statistically significant. The median USMLE Step 1 scores were equivalent for both ranked (250 vs. 250, p = 0.81) and matched (250 vs. 249, p = 0.32) applicants before and after the intervention. The median ABSITE scores for the matched intern classes was lower after initiation of holistic review (519 vs. 483, p = 0.01). However, these scores were consistently above the national medians and subgroup analysis showed no difference between the median aggregate ABSITE scores for UIM and female categorical interns and non-UIM males (475 vs. 520, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing emphasis is being placed on the diversification of residency training to reflect an expanding, diverse patient population. The incorporation of a holistic review process, providing broader assessment of applicants, can play a pivotal role in increasing the proportion of women and UIM students represented in the general surgery recruitment process.

Surgical Boot Camps Increases Confidence for Residents Transitioning to Senior Responsibilities.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical boot camps enhance the confidence of medical students and surgical interns. The impact of boot camps on the confidence of post-graduate year (PGY) 2 residents is unknown. We hypothesized that a postinternship boot camp would improve the confidence of PGY-2 residents in managing their newfound responsibilities. We also hypothesized that the effect of a tailored high-impact boot camp would persist over time. DESIGN: A 2-hour boot camp at our simulation center was implemented for PGY-2 residents in 2016 and 2017. Confidence in handling boot camp scenarios was measured on a 1 to 5 Likert scale before and after the boot camp. Three-month follow-up was assessed in the 2017 cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one PGY-2 residents (n = 16 in 2016, n = 15 in 2017) completed the boot camp. RESULTS: Residents reported increased confidence in placing central lines (p < 0.001), placing chest tubes (p = 0.01), managing emergency airways (p < 0.001), running a code (p = 0.03), and fulfilling the role of in-house senior resident (p < 0.001). Three-month follow-up in 2017 (n = 10) demonstrated no difference in confidence compared to postboot camp results. CONCLUSIONS: Boot camps can durably improve confidence in skills expected of PGY-2 residents assuming in-house senior resident responsibilities.

(Re)thinking the Residential in Residency: Modern Surgical Practice Continues to Move Away From the Inpatient Setting.

PURPOSE: Despite the overall shift in care delivery to an ambulatory setting, the majority of general surgical education still relies on the experience of caring for inpatients. We aimed to investigate how the inpatient practice patterns of newly minted general surgeons (GS) have changed since 2008, in order to better inform education policies regarding both training approach and setting for modern surgical trainees. METHODS: State discharge data from NY and FL (2008-2017) were linked to data on GS from the American Medical Association Masterfile, and to hospital data from the American Hospital Association annual survey. Mean annual inpatient case volume (CV) and case type breadth (CB) were compared between surgeons who were new-to-practice (0-3 years of experience) in 2008 and in 2013. Each new surgeon cohort was followed for 5 years. Case type was classified by organ system. RESULTS: The 2008 cohort included 328 GS with a mean age of 37.1, 79.6% male and 94.2% board-certified. The 2013 cohort included 359 GS with a mean age of 36.2, 73.0% male and 93.9% board-certified. CV was higher among the 2008 cohort than the 2013 cohort for each year of practice in the study period. CB included at least 4 organ system types for all new GS with greater breadth among the 2008 cohort for each year in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Declining rates of inpatient surgery affect general surgeons who were new-to-practice in 2013 significantly more than those entering practice only 5 years ahead of them. New surgeons continue to start their practices broadly, suggesting a need to continue broad training while expanding formal educational policies to include the full spectrum of ambulatory surgery.