RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preoperative coronary artery disease risk factors (CADRFs) distribution and pattern may also have an important role in determining major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the CADRFs distribution and trend over 10 years and also the long-term outcome of CABG in different age-sex categories. METHOD: In this registry-based serial cross-sectional study, we enrolled 24,328 patients who underwent isolated CABG and evaluated the prevalence of CADRFs according to sex and age. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) to compare survival and MACE between the sexes. We also used Cox regression to determine each CADRFs effect on survival and MACEs. RESULTS: In general, DLP (56.00%), HTN (53.10%), DM (38.40%), and positive family history (38.30%) were the most frequent risk factors in all patients. Prevalence of HTN, DLP, DM, obesity, and positive family history were all higher in women, all statistically significant. The median follow-up duration was 78.1 months (76.31-79.87 months). After inverse probability weighting (to balance risk factors and comorbidities), men had lower MACEs during follow-up (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.91; P value 0.006) and there was no significant difference in survival between sexes. DM and HTN were associated with higher mortality and MACEs in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Although DLP is still the most frequent CADRF among the CABG population, the level of LDL and TG is decreasing. Women experience higher MACE post CABG. Therefore, health care providers and legislators must pay greater attention to female population CADRFs and ways to prevent them at different levels.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the amount of time saved and the degree of contour difficulty between the two methods of contouring, mouse/keyboard, versus touch screen/stylus in radiotherapy. METHODS: Each of 94 patients consisting of 26 breast cancer cases, 24 lymph nodes cases, 25 rectal cancer cases, and 19 heart cases has been contoured twice. One with a mouse/keyboard, and the next one with the touch screen/stylus. Three radiation oncologists participated in this study. Contouring information including measured time, estimated time spent, volume of contour performed and organ contoured are recorded. To evaluate the differences between the contouring methods, the results regarding target volume and time to completion were analyzed using two-way robust ANOVA. Ease of use and contouring difficulty were compared for differences in distribution of the response choices between the groups using Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: In this study, 94 clinical cases were studied. The average time required for contouring with the touch screen/stylus method was half the time needed for contouring patients with the mouse/keyboard method. The reduction in the time in breast cancer cases was the highest (48.2%) and the lowest in head and neck cancer cases (32.4%). In comparing the contoured volumes, no significant difference was observed between the two methods. the mean estimated time reported by the radiation oncologist in the mouse/keyboard method was 5.6 minutes longer and, in the touch screen/stylus method, was 3.9 minutes less than the actual measured time. CONCLUSIONS: All the measured and analyzed variables show the superiority of contouring with the touch screen/stylus method and reduced the time required for patient contouring by an average of 50%.
Assuntos
Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Humanos , Feminino , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , MasculinoRESUMO
In this topical study the influence of Aloe Vera, on the wound healing process was investigated in 63 male rats with microscopic and cell count methods. On the day of surgery a round wound, of diameter 20 mm, was created on the back of rats necks under sterile conditions. The surgery day was determined as day zero (0). Then the rats were divided randomly into control and experimental groups 1 and 2. Animals in each group were sub-divided to three smaller groups, investigated every 4, 7, and 14 days. From day 0, wound surfaces were covered with gel once daily in experimental group 1 and twice daily, for 12 h interval, in experimental group 2. Each rat received 30 g of the gel. The wound surface and healing were assessed on days 4, 7, and 14, and then a sample from the wound was prepared and investigated microscopically. The results show that the number of neutrophil, macrophage, and fibroblast cells and the wound thickness in the control group were statistically different from the experimental groups. It was found that the wound diameter thickness in the experimental group was greatly lower due to twice administration of gel and the power of wound healing was more than other groups.