Gastrocnemius Myocutaneous Flaps for Knee Joint Coverage.

INTRODUCTION: The gastrocnemius muscular flap has already proven its efficiency for soft tissue coverage in cases of knee joint exposure. However, it may be too small to cover large defects and has not the same aesthetic and mechanical properties as normal skin. Perforator fasciocutaneous flaps have recently been described in knee joint coverage with good results as they replace skin by skin, but they can be hard to harvest. Gastrocnemius flaps can be easily harvested with a planned skin paddle designed over the chosen muscle. This simple technique combines the advantages of muscular and fasciocutaneous flaps for knee joint area coverage. Perforator fasciocutaneous flap take a growing place in coverage of this localization in recent literature, but very few articles report the results of gastrocnemius myocutaneous flaps (MCFs). METHODS: All patients who underwent knee joint coverage with the use of a lateral or medial gastrocnemius MCFs between January 2012 and February 2017 in our university institution were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Sixteen gastrocnemius MCFs (10 medial and 6 lateral) were performed. The indication was posttraumatic in 5 cases, posttumoral in 5 cases, and after total knee prosthesis exposure in 6 cases. Skin paddles up to 15 cm in width and 18 cm in length were harvested. Complete healing was achieved in 15 days in all cases without suffering or nonunion. Three flaps were secondarily raised to allow total knee prosthesis reimplantation or arthrodesis, and 4 patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy without complication. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its reliability and very easy harvesting, the gastrocnemius MCF allows a robust joint coverage and good skin resurfacing that makes eventual revision easier and allows early radiotherapy. Furthermore, skin paddle also increases the effective area of the flap. This technique should always be considered with the other classic alternatives.

Soft Tissue Coverage in Distal Lower Extremity Open Fractures: Comparison of Free Anterolateral Thigh and Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps.

BACKGROUND: When microsurgical transfers are required in posttraumatic lower limb reconstruction, surgeons must choose among many types of free flaps. Historically, surgeons have advocated muscular flaps for coverage of open lower extremity wounds, but fasciocutaneous free flaps are now often used with good results. This study aimed to compare the functional and aesthetic outcome of reconstruction by free muscular latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and free fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap used for soft tissue coverage of distal lower extremity open fractures. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of subjects with distal lower limb open fractures treated with LD flaps or ALT flaps between 2008 and 2014. Patients with limited follow-up or incomplete data were excluded from the analysis. Donor and recipient sites, early complications and long-term outcomes (functional and aesthetic) were studied and compared according to the type of flap. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included: 27 patients in the LD flap group and 20 patients in the ALT flap group. No significant difference was found regarding early and late complications and long-term functional outcomes (bone healing, infectious bone complications, flap healing). As for aesthetic outcome and donor-site morbidity, reconstruction using the ALT free flap had significantly better results (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In posttraumatic lower limb injury, either LD or ALT free flaps can be used for wound coverage with comparable long-term functional outcomes. The ALT flap provides better cosmetic results than LD.