Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in gynaecological mesenchymal tumours: diagnostic implications and pitfalls.

AIMS: NTRK-rearranged sarcomas of the female genital tract mainly occur in the uterus (more commonly cervix than corpus) and are characterized by a "fibrosarcoma-like" morphology and NTRK gene rearrangements. These neoplasms may exhibit histological overlap with other entities and can present diagnostic difficulties without molecular confirmation. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was developed to identify tumours harbouring NTRK rearrangements. The aim of this study was to characterize pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression in a large cohort of gynaecological mesenchymal neoplasms and investigate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry to distinguish NTRK-rearranged sarcoma from its mimics. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 473 gynaecological mesenchymal tumours (461 without known NTRK fusions and 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas) were selected. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (EPR17341, Abcam) was performed on whole tissue sections and tissue microarrays. Molecular interrogation of pan-TRK positive tumours was performed by RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of the 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, 11 (92%) exhibited diffuse (≥70%) cytoplasmic pan-TRK staining with moderate/marked intensity, while the other was negative. Eleven (2.4%) additional tumours also exhibited pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression: three low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, seven high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, and an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Molecular confirmation of the absence of NTRK rearrangements was possible in nine of these tumours. Of these nine neoplasms, seven exhibited focal/multifocal (<70%) pan-TRK cytoplasmic staining with weak/moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: Even though pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression is not entirely sensitive or specific for NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, these neoplasms tend to exhibit diffuse staining of moderate/strong intensity, unlike its mimics. Pan-TRK should be performed in monomorphic uterine (corpus and cervix) spindle cell neoplasms that are negative for smooth muscle markers and hormone receptors and positive for CD34 and/ or S100. Ultimately, the diagnosis requires molecular confirmation.

The KAT6B::KANSL1 Fusion Defines a New Uterine Sarcoma With Hybrid Endometrial Stromal Tumor and Smooth Muscle Tumor Features.

Neoplasms harboring a KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion were initially reported as benign (leiomyomas) and malignant (leiomyosarcomas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas [LG-ESSs]) uterine neoplasms. However, they may represent an emerging entity characterized by clinical aggressiveness contrasting with a rather reassuring microscopic appearance. Here, we aimed to confirm that this neoplasm is a distinct clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma and identify criteria that should alert pathologists and lead to KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion testing in routine practice. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study, including array comparative genomic hybridization, whole RNA-sequencing, unsupervised clustering, and cDNA mutational profile analyses of 16 tumors with KAT6B::KANSL1 fusion from 12 patients. At presentation, patients were peri-menopausal (median, 47.5 years), and the primary tumors were located in the uterine corpus (12/12, 100%), with an additional prevesical location in 1 (8.3%) of 12 cases. The relapse rate was 33.3% (3/9). All tumors (16/16, 100%) showed morphologic and immunohistochemical features overlapping between leiomyoma and endometrial stromal tumors. A whirling recurrent architecture (resembling fibromyxoid-ESS/fibrosarcoma) was found in 13 (81.3%) of 16 tumors. All tumors (16/16, 100%) exhibited numerous arterioliform vessels, and 13 (81.3%) of 18 had large hyalinized central vessels and collagen deposits. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were expressed in 16 (100%) of 16 and 14 (87.5%) of 16 tumors, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization performed on 10 tumors classified these neoplasms as simple genomic sarcomas. Whole RNA-sequencing on 16 samples and clustering analysis on primary tumors found that the KAT6B::KANSL1 fusion always occurred between exons 3 of KAT6B and 11 of KANSL1; no pathogenic variant was identified on cDNA, all neoplasms clustered together, close to LG-ESS, and pathway enrichment analysis showed cell proliferation and immune infiltrate recruitment pathway involvement. These results confirm that the sarcomas harboring a KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion represent a distinct clinicopathologic entity, close to LG-ESS but different, with clinical aggressiveness despite a reassuring morphology, for which the KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion is the molecular driver alteration.