Treatment and outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Auckland, 1995-2018.

BACKGROUND: New Zealand has a low burden of tuberculosis; however, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) still represents a challenge for clinicians. This is the first description of clinical aspects of MDR-TB in New Zealand. AIMS: To evaluate the treatment and outcomes of patients with MDR-TB disease in Auckland. Secondary aims were to review the incidence and clinical characteristics of MDR-TB disease. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained for patients treated for MDR-TB at Auckland District Health Board (ADHB). RESULTS: There were 60 patients nationally with MDR-TB between 1989 and 2018; 41 (69%) of 60 patients received care at ADHB. Pulmonary infection was present in 36 (88%) of 41 patients, with 19 (46%) of 41 patients with smear-positive sputum (smear 1-2+ in 6/41, 15%; smear 3-4+ in 13/41, 32%). The median duration of treatment was 22 months (range 7.5-26) for 18 (44%) of 41 patients who completed MDR-TB treatment by August 2018. The median duration of amikacin treatment was 6 months (range 2-12) for the 23 (61%) of 38 patients in whom these data were available. All 38 patients who received treatment for MDR-TB experienced adverse effects, most commonly gastrointestinal (66%), neurological (50%), ototoxicity (47%) and psychiatric (37%). Complications of intravenous access were experienced by 10 (27%) of 37 patients. Of the 19 (46%) of 41 patients who completed treatment, 18 (95%) achieved cure. There was one case who had recurrence because of inadequate treatment, and one case who had spontaneous resolution without treatment. Seventeen (41%) patients left Auckland prior to completion of treatment, mostly to return to their country of origin (15/17, 88%). CONCLUSION: MDR-TB is uncommon in New Zealand. Treatment is frequently associated with adverse events; however, rates of cure for people completing treatment in New Zealand are high.

Diagnosing malignant pleural effusions: how do we compare?

INTRODUCTION: Accurate and prompt diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is important as patients with suspected MPE often wait for many days before the diagnosis is secure. AIMS: (1) To evaluate the diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology for patients admitted to Middlemore Hospital (MMH) in Auckland, New Zealand with MPE between 31 May 2010-1 June 2011. (2) To document the waiting time for cytology results to be made available and whether this contributed to length of stay. (3) To evaluate whether the volume of pleural fluid analysed contributed to diagnostic yield. METHODS: A retrospective audit of pleural fluid cytology results on 36 consecutive patients admitted to MMH with a pleural effusion which was subsequently proven to be due to malignancy. Data was obtained from hospital medical records and Web Eclair databases. RESULTS: 54.8% (17/31) of patients had positive pleural fluid cytology. Initial pleural fluid cytology was positive in 16 (51.6%). Only 4/15 patients with negative pleural fluid cytology had a repeat aspiration (1 was positive). Median cytology turnaround time was 6.72 days, range 2.23-43.06 days. Average length of stay (ALOS) was 7.78 days, range 1.11-20.8 days. Cytology turnaround times seem shorter for inpatients and when a diagnosis of cancer is unknown but the ALOS is longer if patients have negative initial cytology and when a diagnosis of cancer is uncertain. Samples >50mL appear to have a higher diagnostic yield compared to samples less than and equal to 50mL but this was not statistically significant (77.8% to 41.2%, p=0.08). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic yield from pleural fluid cytology at our hospital is comparable with other documented studies. ALOS appears to be influenced by a negative initial pleural fluid cytology and the uncertainty of diagnosis of cancer, not cytology turnaround time. The results suggest a more efficient diagnostic and treatment algorithm could be considered with emphasis on Day Stay investigation and treatment.