Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respir Med ; 108(8): 1180-8, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933205

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV(1)) during spirometry reflects the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is known to be an important prognostic factor. It is uncertain whether the response to short-acting bronchodilators may predict long-term outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a total of 1203 consecutive COPD patients without significant comorbidities during a mean (±SD) of 69 ± 39 months of follow-up. At baseline the subjects were classified as those with positive or negative bronchodilator test (BDT) and also in quartiles of absolute bronchodilator response to 400 µg of salbutamol. Hospital visits and mortality were the end points. RESULTS: A positive bronchodilator test was observed in 332 (27.6%) of the patients. There were 73 (21.9%) deaths in patients with a positive BDT versus 253 (28.7%) in those with a negative BDT (p = 0.04). In adjusted Cox regression analysis a positive BDT was significantly associated with a prolonged time to first hospitalization. After stratifying the population by quartiles of response to BDT, a dose-response relationship was observed with the best outcomes in the quartile with highest level of airflow reversibility, even after controlling for age, sex, BMI, smoking status and baseline postbronchodilator FEV(1). CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of well characterized COPD patients without significant comorbidities, those demonstrating higher levels of reversibility at baseline presented better long-term outcomes even after controlling for other known prognostic factors.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Testes de Provocação Brônquica , Broncodilatadores , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Capacidade Vital/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 46 Suppl 8: 15-9, 2010.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21334551

RESUMO

Patients' and specialist physicians' perspectives of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not always coincide. Specialists are mainly interested in evaluating and monitoring pulmonary function deterioration, since this feature is the hallmark of the disease and indicates its severity. However, patients worry more about their symptoms (especially breathlessness), limitations for activities of daily living and progressive impairment of quality of life. These elements have been called "patient-reported parameters" (PRP). These parameters are of interest to physicians in daily clinical practice but clinical trials of new drugs or therapies for the treatment of COPD rarely include PRP determination in their design as measures of efficacy, although a change can be discerned in the latest trials.


Assuntos
Pacientes/psicologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/psicologia , Tolerância ao Exercício , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA