Standard Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal and Lung Cancer: Variability in the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes Among Pathologists and Its Survival Implication.

AIM: We compared variability in number of examined lymph nodes between pathologists and analyzed survival implications in lung and esophageal cancer after standardized lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Outcomes of 294 N2 dissected lung cancer patients and 132 2-field dissected esophageal cancer patients were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was difference in reported lymph node count among pathologists. Secondary outcomes were overall and disease-specific survival related to this count and survival related to the 50% probability cut-off value of detecting metastasis based on the number of examined lymph nodes. RESULTS: The median number of examined lymph nodes in lung cancer was 13 (IQR 9-17) and in esophageal cancer it was 22 (18-29). The pathologist with the highest median number of examined nodes had > 50% higher lymph node yield compared with the pathologist with the lowest median number of nodes in lung (15 vs. 9.5, p = 0.003), and esophageal cancer (28 vs. 17, p = 0.003). Survival in patients stratified by median reported lymph node count in both lung (adjusted RMST ratio < 14 vs. ≥ 14 lymph nodes 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.10; p = 0.810) and esophageal cancer (adjusted RMST ratio < 25 vs. ≥ 25 lymph nodes 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.15, p = 0.612) was similar. The cut-off value for 50% probability of detecting metastasis by number of examined lymph nodes in lung cancer was 15.7 and in esophageal cancer 21.8. When stratified by this cut-off, no survival differences were seen. CONCLUSION: The quality of lymphadenectomy based on lymph node yield is susceptible to error due to detected variability between pathologists in the number of examined lymph nodes. This variability in yield did not have any survival effect after standardized lymphadenectomy.

Immunophenotype based on inflammatory cells, PD-1/PD-L1 signalling pathway and M2 macrophages predicts survival in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune response against cancer has prognostic impact but its role in gastric cancer is poorly known. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic significance of immune cell score (CD3+, CD8+), tumour immune escape (PD-L1, PD-1) and immune tolerance (Clever-1). METHODS: After exclusion of Epstein-Barr virus positive (n = 4) and microsatellite instable (n = 6) tumours, the study included 122 patients with GC undergoing D2 gastrectomy. CD3+ and CD8+ based ICS, PD-L1, PD-1 and Clever-1 expressions were evaluated. Differences in survival were examined using Cox regression adjusted for confounders. The primary outcome was 5-year survival. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 43.4%. High ICS was associated with improved overall survival (adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.26-0.87)) compared to low ICS. In the high ICS group, patients with PD-L1 expression (5-year survival 69.2 vs. 53.1%, p = 0.317), high PD-1 (5-year survival 70.6 vs. 55.3% p = 0.312) and high Clever-1 (5-year survival 72.0% vs. 45.5% (p = 0.070) had poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: High ICS was associated with improved survival. In the high ICS group, patients with high PD-L1, PD-1 and Clever-1 had poor prognosis highlighting the importance of immune escape and immune tolerance in GC.

Cost-analysis and effectiveness of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endolaparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: One-stage laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC) for cholecystocholedocholithiasis ( CCL) can be performed with similar short and long-term outcomes than two-stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiography followed by subsequent LC (ERCP+LC). This study examined retrospectively the outcome and hospital costs of one-stage versus two-stage treatment of CBD stones. METHODS: From January 1999 and December 2014, 217 consecutive, elective patients underwent one-stage (LCBDE + LC ) or two-stage (ERCP + subsequent LC ) treatment for CBD stones. The data from the one-stage management was collected prospectively, and from the two-stage management retrospectively. The main measure of outcome was hospital costs, with the success of one-stage versus two-stage management, postoperative morbidity and postoperative stay as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: One-stage laparoscopic transcystic management was the least costly option compared to laparoscopic one-stage transductal approach (TC 5455€ versus TD 9364, p < 0.001) or two-stage management (6913 €, p = 0.02). Overall success rate of primary intervention (including conversions to open surgery) for CBD stone clearance was 96.9%, 97.0% and 98.3% after transcystic one-stage, transductal one-stage and two-stage approach, p = 0.79. Postoperative morbidity was 15.5% versus 7.5%, p = 0.64, and postoperative hospital stay median 2 days (IQR 2-5) versus 4.5 days ( IQR 3-7), p < 0.001 in the one-stage and two-stage management groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that laparoscopic one-stage transcystic management of CCL results in high rate of CBD clearance, fewer procedures per patient, shorter hospital and lower costs than the two-stage management. Therefore the one-stage transcystic management seems to be an attractive strategy for the treatment of CCL depending on local resources and surgical expertise .

Day-care laparoscopic cholecystectomy with diathermy hook versus fundus-first ultrasonic dissection: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To examine the impact of day-care laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with ultrasonic scissors dissection versus diathermy hook dissection method in a randomized setting. METHODS: From April 2012 to September 2014, a total of 169 elective day-care patients were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic scissors using fundus-first approach (n = 88) or diathermy hook dissection starting from the triangle of Calot (n = 79). Main measures of outcome were operative time, same-day discharge and intraoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain (numeric rating scale), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), readmissions and 30-day morbidity. RESULTS: Median operative time was similar in the ultrasonic dissection and diathermy hook dissection groups (45 vs 45 min, p = 0.95). Same-day discharge was possible in 77 patients (87 %) in the ultrasonic dissection group and in 69 patients (87 %) in the diathermy group, p = 0.98. Intraoperative gallbladder perforations, mean intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain and PONV at 1, 2 and 4 h (p = 0.78) did not differ significantly between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Day-care LC using either diathermy hook or ultrasonic dissection resulted in excellent same-day discharge in both groups (87 %). LC with ultrasonic dissection does not offer any clinical advantages compared to diathermy dissection.

An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To audit short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and factors influencing the success of the laparoscopic treatment. METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2011, 288 patients (93 males) underwent a single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with LCBDE in two Finnish Hospitals. Short-term outcome data were collected prospectively. Long-term outcomes were examined retrospectively. The main measures of outcome were the success of laparoscopic CBD stone clearance and recurrence of CBD stones in the long-term, with 30-day mortality, morbidity, and the length of postoperative hospital stay as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: CBD stones were successfully removed by one-stage laparoscopic procedure in 232 of the 279 patients (83.2%) with verified CBD stones and after conversion to open surgery in additional 28 patients (93.2%). Nineteen patients (6.8%) having residual stones after surgery were successfully treated with postoperative ERCP. On multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with a failed laparoscopic stone clearance were stone size over 7 mm [OR 3.51 (95% CI 1.53-8.03), p = 0.003], difficult anatomy [OR 18.01 (5.03-64.49), p < 0.001] and transcholedochal approach [OR 2.98 (1.37-4.47), p = 0.006]. Laparoscopic stone clearance also failed in all 11 patients having impacted stones at the ampulla of Vater. Cumulative long-term recurrence rate was 3.6% at 5 years and 6.0 % at 10 years. Thirty-day mortality was 0.3% and morbidity 12.2%. Postoperative hospital stay was median 2 (IQR 1-3) days after transcystic CBD removal and 4 (IQR 3-7) days after transcholedochal CBD removal, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Our results show that one-stage LC combined with LCBDE stone clearance is safe and effective in most patients thus reducing the number of additional, potentially dangerous endoscopic procedures. Moreover, large or impacted stones are a risk factor for failed stone clearance.

Routine preoperative MRCP in screening choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis compared to selective approach: a population-based study.

Choledocholithiasis is more common in acute cholecystitis than in elective situations. Preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is essential to facilitate adequate planning of CBD (common bile duct) stone removal, preferably performed as a single-stage procedure. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of routine preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in acute cholecystitis followed by consequent cholecystectomy. A total of 180 consecutive patients operated for acute cholecystitis between January 2019 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative routine MRCP was performed for bile duct evaluation when feasible. The control cohort consisted of 180 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy before the study period. Intraoperative cholangiography was used routinely in both groups when technically achievable. We examined the proportion of patients recruited in preoperative MRCP, possible time delay to MRCP and surgery, and the incidence of CBD stones compared to the control cohort. Routine MRCP in acute cholecystitis was achieved in 114/180 (63%) patients compared to 42/180 (23.3%) patients of the control group. The triage time from emergency to MRCP and the operating theatre was similar in both cohorts. The percentage of patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis in the study group was notably higher (almost 18% vs 11%), p < 0.05. After a median follow-up time of 2.5 years in the study group and almost 4 years in the control group, recurrent choledocholithiasis was not detected in either group. Routine MRCP in patients with acute cholecystitis can be implemented with a fair execution rate in a population-based setting with minor effects on hospital stay and delays but higher detection of choledocholithiasis. We observed no additional benefit compared to the selective use of MRCP. However, routine preoperative MRCP allows an advantage when considering the appropriate exploration method if choledocholithiasis is detected.

Tertiary lymphoid structures and gastric cancer prognosis.

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are part of immune response against cancer. Their high density and high diameter have been shown to be associated with prognosis in different cancer types. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of TLS density and diameter in gastric cancer and reproducibility of their assessments. TLS densities and maximal TLS diameter were assessed from hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained slides of 721 surgically treated gastric cancer patients from two hospitals in Finland. Mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for TLS densities and maximal TLS diameter were analyzed. TLS densities and maximal TLS diameter were assessed with moderate interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.50-0.62). Maximal TLS density was not associated with survival (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.02) and neither was hotspot TLS density (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.02). High maximal TLS diameter was associated with longer survival in overall study population (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89) and in diffuse type subgroup (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.85). In conclusion, high maximal TLS diameter is associated with improved survival in gastric cancer and can be assessed from HE-stained slides. Its prognostic value might be limited to diffuse histological type.

Cyclooxygenase-2 and gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, although its incidence has been steadily declining during recent decades. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is elevated in gastric carcinomas and in their precursor lesions. COX-2 expression associates with reduced survival in gastric cancer patients, and it has also been shown to be an independent factor of poor prognosis. Several molecular mechanisms are involved in the regulation of COX-2 expression in gastric cancer cell lines, including signal transduction pathways activated by Helicobacter pylori. In gastric tumor models in vivo the role of COX-2 seems to be predominantly to facilitate tumor promotion and growth.

Exercise capacity in the stair-climbing test predicts outcomes of operable esophageal cancer in minimally invasive era.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of complications after esophagectomy highlights the need for careful preoperative assessment. Aim was to assess whether stair-climbing test (SCT) could predict outcomes of patients with operable esophageal cancer in minimally invasive era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical treatment in Central Finland Central Hospital from 2012 to March 2021. Of evaluated 162 patients, 138 were scheduled to eventually undergo surgery. The exercise capacity was evaluated with symptom limited SCT. Patients were divided into four study groups on intent-to-treat basis: surgery and the SCT >14 m (Group 1), surgery and the SCT <11 m (Group 2), non-surgical therapy and the SCT <11 m (Group 3) and non-surgical therapy and the SCT >14 m (Group 4). Results were adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Major complication rate was 10.1% vs 40.0% between Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.006), and 90-day mortality 0% vs 20.0% (p < 0.001). Overall survival rates in Groups 1-4 at 1-year were 92.3% vs 72.2% vs 46.8% vs 81.8%, at 3-year 68.5% vs 52.7% vs 15.6% vs 27.3% and at 5-year 58.7% vs 39.5% vs 0% vs 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis when compared to Group 1, other groups had increased 5-year mortality hazard (Group 2 HR 2.88 (95% CI 1.25-6.63), Group 3 HR 15.6 (95% CI 5.57-43.5) and Group 4 HR 5.35 (95% CI 2.08-13.7)). CONCLUSION: Exercise capacity measured with SCT in esophageal cancer patients is a strong predictor of complications and survival, and is a potential parameter to be included in any risk or prognostic models.

Implementation of Multimodality Therapy and Minimally Invasive Surgery: Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Gastric Cancer Surgery in Medium-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal treatment of gastric cancer includes careful preoperative staging, perioperative oncological treatment, and selective minimally invasive approach. The aim was to evaluate whether this approach improves short- and long-term outcomes in operable gastric cancer. METHODS: This study included 181 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative intent surgery in Central Finland Central Hospital between years 2005 and 2021 for gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Those 65 patients in group 1 operated between years 2005-2010 had open surgery with possible adjuvant therapy. During the second period including 58 patients (2011-2015), perioperative chemotherapy and minimally invasive surgery were implemented. The period, when these treatments were standard practise, was years 2016-2021 including 58 patients (group 3). Outcomes were lymph node yield, major complications and 1- and 3-year survival rates. RESULTS: Median lymph node yield increased from 17 in group 1 and 20 in group 2 to 23 in group 3 (p < 0.001). Major complication rates in groups 1-3 were 12.3%, 32.8%, and 15.5% (group 1 vs. group 2, p = 0.007; group 2 vs. group 3, p = 0.018), respectively. Overall 1-year survival rates between study groups 1-3 were 78.5% vs. 69.0% vs. 90.2% (p = 0.018) and 3-year rates 44.6% vs. 44.8% vs. 68.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. For overall 3-year mortality, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.02 (95%CI 0.63-1.66) in group 2 and HR 0.37 (95%CI 0.20-0.68) in group 3 compared to group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In medium-volume center, modern multimodal therapy in operable gastric cancer combined with minimally invasive surgery increased lymph node yield and improved long-term survival without increasing postoperative morbidity.

Increasing Use of PET-CT, Neoadjuvant Treatment, Minimally Invasive Approach and Surgical Radicality in Esophageal Cancer Surgery are Associated with Improved Short- and Long-term Outcomes in Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence has improved outcomes in several cancers. Our aim was to evaluate whether the rate of PET-CT, neoadjuvant treatment, minimally invasive approach, and surgical radicality, suggested also by recent guidelines, would improve short- and long-term operative outcomes in esophageal cancer in real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective study in two Finnish Hospitals between 2010 and 2020 included 296 esophageal cancer patients. Grouping factors based on four factors with annual cut-offs by center were 90% rate in PET-CT-based staging, 70% in neoadjuvant therapy usage, 80% in minimally invasive approach, and 20 in annual mean lymph node yield. If none of factors were reached, all patients operated in that year were classified into group 1. With one to three cut-offs reached, grouping was into group 2. If all annual cut-offs were reached, patients were classified into group 3. Primary end points were major complication rate and overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. RESULTS: Major complication rate decreased significantly from 38.2% in group 1 (p < 0.001) and 34.2% in group 2 (p < 0.001) to 10.2% in group 3. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates between groups 1-3 were 77.9% vs. 80.3% vs. 94.2% (p = 0.004), 51.5% vs. 51.1% vs. 67.3% (p = 0.022), and 44.1% vs. 47.4% vs. 55.5% (p = 0.065), respectively. Adjusted 5-year overall mortality was reduced significantly in group 3 compared to group 1 (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.75). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that increasing rate of PET-CT, neoadjuvant treatment, minimally invasive surgery, and surgical radicality improves short- and long-term outcomes in operated esophageal cancer patients.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy learning curves with different types of background experience.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with learning associated morbidity. The aim was to evaluate the learning curve for MIE focusing on short-term outcomes in two settings: (I) experienced MIE surgeon in new hospital (Hospital 1); (II) surgeons experienced with open esophagectomy and minimally invasive surrogate surgery (Hospital 2). METHODS: In Hospital 1 and Hospital 2, on intent-to-treat basis number of MIEs were 132 and 57, respectively. The primary outcomes were major complications and anastomosis leaks. Secondary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield, hospital stay and 1-year mortality. Length of learning curves were analyzed with risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) method. RESULTS: In Hospital 1, major complication and anastomosis leak rates were 9.8% and 4.5%, 22.8% and 12.3% in Hospital 2, respectively. In Hospital 1, complication and leak rates remained stable. In Hospital 2, improvement occurred after 34 cases in major complications and 29 cases in leaks. Of secondary outcomes, improvements were seen in Hospital 1 in operative time after 61, blood loss after 86, lymph node yield after 52, hospital stay after 19 and 1-year mortality after 24 cases. In Hospital 2, improvement occurred in operative time after 30, blood loss after 15, lymph node yield after 45, hospital stay after 50 and 1-year mortality after 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, learning phase of the individual surgeon determines the outcomes of MIE, not the institutional learning phase.

COX-2 is associated with proliferation and apoptosis markers and serves as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an important factor in gastric carcinogenesis, and COX-2 expression in gastric cancer patients correlates with prognosis. We have now studied the impact of COX-2 in comparison to six other tissue tumor markers, DNA index, and S-phase fraction (SPF) in a large series of gastric cancer specimens. From 342 consecutive patients, 337 archival tissue specimens were available for immunohistochemistry of COX-2, HuR, cyclin A, MMP-2, p53, p21, and Ki-67 and 313 for analysis of DNA index and S-phase fraction by flow cytometry. Associations between factors were assessed by chi-square test and survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model. A significant association emerged between of COX-2 and p53 (p < 0.0001), Ki-67 (p = 0.013), DNA ploidy (p < 0.0001), and SPF (p < 0.0001). In an extended multivariate analysis, COX-2 and p53 expression were independent prognostic factors for poor survival, in addition to high stage and non-curative surgery. In gastric cancer, COX-2 expression associated with markers for apoptosis and proliferation, and furthermore, it was confirmed that COX-2 and p53 are strong prognostic indicators.

MMP-7 overexpression is an independent prognostic marker in gastric cancer.

To enable cancer to invade and to metastasize, the surrounding stroma must be degraded. Matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) is capable of degrading many extracellular matrix proteins and cellular adhesions, is overexpressed in many malignancies, and plays a role in tumour progression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between MMP-7 tissue expression and patients' prognosis in gastric cancer. From 264 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer, surgical specimens were collected on tissue array blocks and stained by immunohistochemistry for MMP-7. In 27 (10.2%) of the specimens, immunopositivity was found as high, in 50 (18.9%) as moderate and in 51 (19.3%) as weak. In 136 cases (51.5%), the immunopositivity was negative. A statistically significant correlation appeared between high MMP-7 expression and poor survival. In conclusion, our results suggest that MMP-7 expression may prove helpful in evaluating gastric cancer prognosis.

Laparoscopic treatment of small bowel strangulation caused by an intramesosigmoid hernia and review of literature.

An internal hernia is defined as a protrusion of an abdominal viscera through the defects of the gastrointestinal mesentery or peritoneum-lined fossa. Sigmoid mesocolic hernias are an uncommon type of internal hernias, accounting for only 6% of all internal hernias. Furthermore, intramesosigmoid hernia is one of the three subtypes of the sigmoid mesocolic hernias. Internal hernias are potentially fatal conditions with diagnostic challenges. Patients presenting with acute obstruction, no surgical history and no external hernia should receive an urgent CT scan to facilitate early surgery and to minimise the risk of strangulation and bowel resection. Here, we report a case of strangulated small bowel obstruction secondary to an intramesosigmoid hernia with a successful laparoscopic repair. We also present a literature review of all reported cases so far and give an up-to-date perspective on intramesosigmoid hernia.

Immune Cell Infiltrate and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine and compare the prognostic value of immune cell score (ICS) and Klintrup-Mäkinen (KM) grade in gastric cancer. METHODS: Gastric adenocarcinoma tissues from samples of 741 patients surgically treated in two hospitals in Finland were assessed for ICS and KM grade. Cox regression with adjustment for confounders provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses were performed in intestinal and diffuse type subgroups. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. RESULTS: High ICS was associated to longer 5-year survival (adjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94), compared to low ICS. The difference was significant in intestinal type subgroup (adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81) but not in diffuse type subgroup (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.58-1.46). High KM grade was an independent prognostic factor for longer 5-year overall survival (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77) in both intestinal (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.85) and diffuse subgroups (adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.86). ICS and KM grade were moderately correlated (ρ = 0.425). When both immune cell score and KM grade were included in the regression analysis, only KM grade remained prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: Both ICS and KM grade are prognostic factors in gastric adenocarcinoma, but immunohistochemistry-based ICS might not have additional prognostic value over hematoxylin-eosin-based KM grade.

Can We Increase the Resection Rate by Minimally Invasive Approach? Experience from 100 Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies.

BACKGROUND: Whether we can increase the resection rate of esophageal cancer by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is unknown. The aim was to report the number and results of MIE in high-risk patients considered unsuitable for open surgery and compare these results to other operated patients and to high-risk patients not undergoing surgery. METHODS: At Central Finland Central Hospital, between September 2012 and July 2018, the number of operated MIEs was 100. Of these, 10 patients were prospectively considered unfit for open approach. Nineteen additional high-risk patients with operable disease were ruled out of surgery. The short- and long-term outcomes of these 3 groups were compared. RESULTS: In patients eligible for any approach (n=90), MIE only (n=10), and no surgery (n=19), WHO performance status Grade 0 was observed in 66.7%, 20.0%, and 5.3%, respectively; stair climbing with ≥4 stairs was successfully completed in 77.8%, 50%, and 36.8%, respectively. Between any approach and MIE only groups, rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) was 6.7% vs. 50.0% (p<0.001) without a difference in median hospital stay (9 vs. 10 days, p=0.542). Readmission rates were 4.4% vs. 30.0% (p=0.003). Survival rates were 100% vs. 80% (p<0.001) at 90-days, 91.5% vs. 66.7% (p=0.005) at 1-year, and 68.9% vs. 53.3% (p=0.024) at 3-years, respectively. In comparison between MIE only and no surgery groups, these survival rates from day of diagnosis were 80% vs. 100%, 68.6% vs. 67.1%, and 45.7% vs. 32.0% (p=0.290), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By operating patients unsuitable for open approach with MIE, the resection rate increased 11.1%. These high-risk patients had, however, higher early morbidity and reduced long-term survival compared to other operated patients. Though there seems to be long-term benefit of surgery compared to nonsurgical patients, we have to be cautious when offering surgery to those considered unfit for open surgery.