Green Tea Extract to Prevent Colorectal Adenomas, Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical, epidemiological, and small clinical studies suggest that green tea extract (GTE) and its major active component epigallocatechingallate (EGCG) exhibit antineoplastic effects in the colorectum. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial of GTE standardized to 150 mg of EGCG b.i.d. vs placebo over 3 years was conducted to prevent colorectal adenomas (n = 1,001 with colon adenomas enrolled, 40 German centers). Randomization (1:1, n = 879) was performed after a 4-week run-in with GTE for safety assessment. The primary end point was the presence of adenoma/colorectal cancer at the follow-up colonoscopy 3 years after randomization. RESULTS: The safety profile of GTE was favorable with no major differences in adverse events between the 2 well-balanced groups. Adenoma rate in the modified intention-to-treat set (all randomized participants [intention-to-treat population] and a follow-up colonoscopy 26-44 months after randomization; n = 632) was 55.7% in the placebo and 51.1% in the GTE groups. This 4.6% difference was not statistically significant (adjusted relative risk 0.905; P = 0.1613). The respective figures for the per-protocol population were 54.3% (151/278) in the placebo group and 48.3% (129/267) in the GTE group, indicating a slightly lower adenoma rate in the GTE group, which was not significant (adjusted relative risk 0.883; P = 0.1169). DISCUSSION: GTE was well tolerated, but there was no statistically significant difference in the adenoma rate between the GTE and the placebo groups in the whole study population.

Harmonization of summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) of drugs with the same active ingredients: an evaluation of SmPCs of the most frequently prescribed active substances.

PURPOSE: In aut-idem or generic substitution, discrepancies between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) referring to the same active substance (AS) may cause difficulties regarding informed consent and medical liability. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of such discrepancies are insufficiently studied, impeding harmonization of same-substance SmPCs and compromising safe drug treatment. METHODS: SmPCs of the one hundred most frequently prescribed ASs in Germany were analyzed for discrepancies in the presentation of indications (Inds) and contraindications (CInds). Inclusion and exclusion criteria of drugs/SmPCs were chosen according to the standards of the aut-idem substitution in Germany. RESULTS: According to the study protocol, we identified 1486 drugs, of which 1426 SmPCs could be obtained. 41% respectively 65% of the ASs had same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC in the number of listed Inds respectively CInds. The number of listed Inds/CInds varied considerably between same-substance SmPCs with maximum ranges in Inds of 7 in amoxicillin, and in CInds of 11 in lisinopril. Many ASs had large proportions (> 50%) of associated same-substance SmPCs that differed from the respective reference SmPC. A considerable proportion of ASs had same-substance SmPCs with formal and content-related differences other than the discrepancy in the number of Inds/CInds. CONCLUSION: This evaluation of same-substance SmPCs shows a clear lack of harmonization of same-substance SmPCs. Considering that generic substitution has become the rule and that physicians usually do not know which drug the patient receives in the pharmacy, these discrepancies raise several questions, that require a separate legal evaluation.

Incidence of inpatient cases with mental disorders due to use of cannabinoids in Germany: a nationwide evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative (e.g. increasing recreational cannabinoid use) and qualitative (e.g. increasing availability and use of synthetic cannabinoids and cannabis preparations with increased tetrahydrocannabinol content) changes in cannabinoid use may be associated with changes in the prevalence of cannabinoid-related mental and behavioural disorders and, accordingly, changes in the need for medical care. We aimed to investigate if there are changes in the number of inpatient cases (ICs) due to cannabinoid-related disorders in Germany. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis) and comprised type and number of hospital main diagnoses (according to ICD-10) of all ICs in Germany in the period 2000-18. Linear trend analysis of absolute and relative annual frequencies (AFs) of ICs with diagnoses related to the use of cannabinoids (DRUCs), and, as controls, alcohol-related psychiatric disorders and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders was performed. RESULTS: Absolute AFs of ICs with DRUCs increased statistically significantly (P<0.0001, trend analysis) in Germany between 2000 and 2018 and corresponding relative AFs increased considerably (4.8-fold increase when comparing 2000 and 2018). Specifically, absolute AFs of ICs with cannabinoid intoxications (P<0.0001), harmful use (P=0.0005), dependence syndrome (P< 0.0001), withdrawal state (P<0.0001), psychotic disorders (P< 0.0001) and residual and late-onset psychotic disorder (P<0.0001) statistically significantly increased. Absolute AFs of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders slightly, but statistically significantly decreased (P=0.008), and alcohol dependence did not statistically significantly change (P=0.844). CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation demonstrates increasing numbers of ICs with mental and behavioural disorders due to use of cannabinoids in Germany and emphasizes the need for adequate prevention of such disorders.

A phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab for patients with marginal zone lymphoma: treatment rationale and protocol design of the COUP-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced stage marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an incurable indolent B-cell lymphoma, for which a wide variety of treatments ranging from single agent rituximab to more dose intense immunochemotherapy exists. One of the major goals in this palliative setting is to develop chemotherapy-free treatments, which approach the efficacy of immunochemotherapies, but avoid chemotherapy associated toxicity in this often elderly patient population. The PI3K inhibitor copanlisib has recently shown remarkable clinical activity in refractory or relapsed indolent B-cell lymphomas, among them MZL. Based on these data, copanlisib monotherapy was granted breakthrough designation by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed marginal zone lymphoma who have received at least two prior therapies. However, data are still limited in particular for MZL. Based on this, the COUP-1 trial aims at testing the toxicity and efficacy of copanlisib in combination with rituximab in treatment naive and relapsed MZL. METHODS: COUP-1 is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial of 6 cycles (28 days cycle) of copanlisib (60 mg intravenous day 1, 8, 15) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenous day 1) in the induction phase followed by a maintenance phase of copanlisib (d1, d15 every 4 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles) and rituximab (d1 every 8 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles) in patients aged ≥18 years with previously untreated or relapsed MZL in need of treatment. A total of 56 patients are to be enrolled. Primary endpoint is the complete response (CR) rate determined 12 months after start of induction therapy. Secondary endpoints include the overall response (OR) rate, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and patient related outcome with quality of life. The study includes a translational bio-sampling program with the prospect to measure minimal residual disease. The study was initiated in November 2019. DISCUSSION: The COUP-1 trial evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment of copanlisib in combination with rituximab in patients with MZL and additionally offers the chance for translational research in this heterogenous type of lymphoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03474744 . Registration date: 03/23/2018.

The Impact of Serotonin Transporter Binding Affinity on the Risk of Bleeding Related to Antidepressants.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The alleged primary mechanism underlying bleeding events associated with antidepressants is inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets resulting in reduced platelet aggregability and activity, and prolonged bleeding time. There is some evidence that a substance's degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition in terms of its binding affinity to the serotonin transporter (SERT) affects the magnitude of bleeding risk increase. METHODS/PROCEDURE: To test this hypothesis, we performed data mining in the worldwide largest pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) and conducted pharmacodynamically informed quantitative signal detection. Reporting odds ratios related to the standardized Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities query term "haemorrhages" and 24 antidepressants were calculated, and SERT binding affinities (pKi) were obtained and correlated (Pearson correlation). FINDINGS/RESULTS: A strong and statistically significant correlation between substance-related reporting odds ratios and SERT binding affinities was found (r = 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.82; P = 0.00097). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our findings strengthen the hypothesis that inhibition of serotonin uptake contributes to the antidepressant-related bleeding risk and suggest an association between the degree of the SERT binding affinity and the bleeding risk. This supports the preferential use of antidepressants with low or no SERT binding affinity in depressed patients at risk of bleeding.

A complex intervention to promote prevention of delirium in older adults by targeting caregiver's participation during and after hospital discharge - study protocol of the TRAnsport and DElirium in older people (TRADE) project.

BACKGROUND: Among potentially modifiable risk factors for delirium, transfers between wards, hospitals and other facilities have been mentioned with low evidence. TRADE (TRAnsport and DElirium in older people) was set up to investigate i) the impact of transfer and/or discharge on the onset of delirium in older adults and ii) feasibility and acceptance of a developed complex intervention targeting caregiver's participation during and after hospital discharge or transfer on cognition and the onset of delirium in older adults. METHODS: The study is designed according to the guidelines of the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) for development and evaluation of complex interventions and comprises two steps: development and feasibility/piloting. The development phase includes i) a multicenter observational prospective cohort study to assess delirium incidence and cognitive decline associated with transfer and discharge, ii) a systematic review of the literature, iii) stakeholder focus group interviews and iv) an expert workshop followed by a Delphi survey. Based on this information, a complex intervention to better and systematically involve family caregivers in discharge and transport was developed. The intervention will be tested in a pilot study using a stepped wedge design with a detailed process and health economic evaluation. The study is conducted at four acute care hospitals in southwest Germany. Primary endpoints are the delirium incidence and cognitive function. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of caregiver companionship, functional decline, cost and cost effectiveness, quality of discharge management and quality of admission management in admitting hospitals or nursing homes. Data will be collected prior to discharge as well as after 3, 7 and 90 days. DISCUSSION: TRADE will help to evaluate transfer and discharge as a possible risk factor for delirium. In addition, TRADE evaluates the impact and modifiability of caregiver's participation during patient's transfer or discharge on delirium incidence and cognitive decline providing the foundation for a confirmatory implementation study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS (Deutsches Register für klinische Studien) DRKS00017828 . Registered on 17th September 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Transbronchial cryobiopsy increases diagnostic confidence in interstitial lung disease: a prospective multicentre trial.

INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of individual interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is often challenging, but is a critical determinant of appropriate management. If a diagnosis cannot be made after multidisciplinary team discussion (MDTD), surgical lung biopsy is the current recommended tissue sampling technique according to the most recent guidelines. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has been proposed as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, international study analysed the impact of TBLC on the diagnostic assessment of 128 patients with suspected idiopathic interstitial pneumonia by a central MDTD board (two clinicians, two radiologists, two pathologists). The level of confidence for the first-choice diagnoses were evaluated in four steps, as follows: 1) clinicoradiological data alone; 2) addition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings; 3) addition of TBLC interpretation; and 4) surgical lung biopsy findings (if available). We evaluated the contribution of TBLC to the formulation of a confident first-choice MDTD diagnosis. RESULTS: TBLC led to a significant increase in the percentage of cases with confident diagnoses or provisional diagnoses with high confidence (likelihood ≥70%) from 60.2% to 81.2%. In 32 out of 52 patients nondiagnostic after BAL, TBLC provided a diagnosis with a likelihood ≥70%. The percentage of confident diagnoses (likelihood ≥90%) increased from 22.7% after BAL to 53.9% after TBLC. Pneumothoraces occurred in 16.4% of patients, and moderate or severe bleeding in 15.7% of patients. No deaths were observed within 30 days. INTERPRETATION: TBLC increases diagnostic confidence in the majority of ILD patients with an uncertain noninvasive diagnosis, with manageable side-effects. These data support the integration of TBLC into the diagnostic algorithm for ILD.

Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab in patients with marginal zone lymphoma.

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) belongs to the group of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, which is characterized by an indolent course. In this mostly elderly patient population, the development of chemotherapy-free approaches is of particular interest. In this situation, single-agent treatment with the next-generation anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab is an attractive approach, which promises high efficacy without major toxicity. We describe here an open-label, multicentric Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in de novo MZL patients, who are treatment naive for systemic therapy and not eligible for or failed local treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03322865.

[Cluster-Randomized Trials: Methodical and Practical Implications]. / Cluster-randomisierte Studien: Methodische und praktische Aspekte.

Quite often critics demand more randomized studies in rehabilitation science to gather methodological evidence of high quality. However, it is also recognized that the design of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies often cannot simply be transferred into rehabilitation science. Validity concerning the health care is here in the focus. Thus, treatment as-usual is mostly used as placebo treatment and double-blinding is partly not definable. Additionally, it is often difficult to offer 2 similar forms of treatment in one rehabilitation hospital due to lack of capacity. Additionally, contamination effects are to be expected when patients of different study arms communicate. Here cluster-randomized studies may be helpful. However, in comparison to individual randomized studies they need often higher sample sizes, a more complex methodology of sample size calculation as well as extensive methods of statistical analysis.Within this article advantages and disadvantages as well as the characteristics of cluster randomization are described and information is given how they can be implemented into the field of rehabilitation science.

[Different number of contraindications between summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) of drugs with the same active ingredients - an analysis of data from SmPCs of neuropsychiatric drugs]. / Unterschiedliche Anzahl von Kontraindikationen zwischen Fachinformationen wirkstoffgleicher Arzneimittel ­ eine Analyse von Daten aus Fachinformationen von neuropsychiatrischen Arzneimitteln.

OBJECTIVE: In the case of prescriptions of pharmaceuticals in the context of the aut-idem-regulation the physician frequently does not know, which same-substance medication is dispensed in the pharmacy; the contemplable same-substance medications may differ in numerous features which raises questions regarding the obligation to give information and medical liability for medical malpractice. Currently, systematic evaluations regarding differences between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) of same-substance medications are missing. To determine size and type of those differences SmPCs of most (neuro)psychiatric drugs that are approved in Germany were evaluated regarding the number of listed contraindications (CI). METHODS: Basis for the selection of substances was the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System (group ATC N Nervous System). Substances that are approved in Germany for the treatment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 F were included. Brand-name medications and SmPCs were searched by means of further in- and exclusion criteria via the online services of PharmNet.Bund, Gelbe Liste, Rote Liste®/Fachinfo-Service® and communication with the manufacturer. RESULTS: N = 941 SmPCs (=116 substances) were evaluated. Considering only the group of SmPCs with > 1 brand-name medication (n = 78; 67.2 %) differences in the number of CIs were found in more than the half of substances (N = 43; 55.1 %). Considering indication groups most groups of SmPCs of same-substance medications with differences in the numbers of CIs were found in - considering only substances with > 1 brand-name medication - hypnotics and sedatives (77.8 %), anxiolytics (75.0 %), drugs for treatment of substance use disorders (66.7 %), antidepressants (61,9 %), anticonvulsant drugs and mood stabilizers (53.8 %), followed by antipsychotics (41.2 %), antidementia-drugs (20.0 %), and psychostimulants (0 %). Largest ranges regarding the number of CIs were found in the SmPCs of morphine (14), amitriptyline (8), chlorprothixene (6), lorazepam (6) and citalopram (4). CONCLUSION(S): In numerous (neuro-)psychopharmacologic substances differences exists between the SmPCs of the associated same-substance medications regarding the number of CIs. Due to the outstanding evaluation of content aspects of these differences and legal evaluation the relevance of this result for clinical practice is not yet clear.