Midshaft clavicle fractures: is anterior plating an acceptable alternative to superior plating?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether anterior plating is better tolerated than superior plating for midshaft clavicle fractures. METHODS: This was a prospective non-randomized observational cohort study following operative vs. non-operative management of clavicle fractures from 2003 to 2018 at 7 level 1 academic trauma centers in the USA. The subset of patients treated with plate and screws is the basis for this comparative study. Adults aged 18-85 with closed clavicle fractures displaced over 100% or shortened by more than 1.5 cm were eligible for enrollment. Patients were followed for 2 years following enrollment. Allowable fixation methods at the discretion of the surgeon consisted of anterior-inferior or superior plating. A total of 412 patients were enrolled. Of these, 192 patients received either superior or anterior plating for a displaced clavicle fracture with complete documented prospective research forms capturing type of plating technique. The primary outcome measure was hardware removal (HWR). Secondary outcomes were Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Visual Analog Pain (VAP) score, and satisfaction score (1 = high satisfaction; 5 = low satisfaction). RESULTS: There was no difference in HWR rates (7.1% superior 9/127; 6.2% anterior 4/65, p = 0.81), VAP score (mean 1.5 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.6 anterior, p = 0.21), DASH score (mean 7.5 SD 12.4 superior; mean 5.2 SD 15.2 anterior; p = 0.18) or satisfaction score (mean 1.6 SD 1.0 superior; mean 1.7 SD 0.60 anterior, p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in HWR rates or functional outcomes when using a superior vs. anterior plating technique.

Characterization of vitamin D deficiency and use of a standardized supplementation protocol in orthopaedic trauma patients.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of vitamin D deficiency in orthopaedic trauma patients, evaluate the safety and efficacy of a vitamin D supplementation protocol, and investigate the utility of vitamin D supplementation in reducing nonunions. METHODS: Three hundred seventy patients with operative tibia and/or fibula fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Both overall and matched cohorts were analysed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight per cent (n = 210) were found to have vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25(OH)D level < 30 ng/ml). There were no cases of vitamin D toxicity following vitamin D replacement. Median follow-up vitamin D level was 22.7 ng/mL. No statistical difference between union rates was found between either the two consecutive cohorts or matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: This vitamin D replacement protocol was a safe treatment for hypovitaminosis D, but post hoc analysis shows there would need to be over 1200 matched patients to achieve adequate power.

Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures.

PURPOSE: To assess outcomes for patients who sustained peri-implant fractures (PIFs). METHODS: Medical records of patients who sustained a PIF were reviewed for demographic, injury, outcome, and radiographic data. PIFs were classified using a reproducible system and stratified into cohorts based on fracture location. Clinical outcomes were evaluated for each cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with 61 PIFs with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. The mean age of the cohort was 60.4 ± 19.5 years. Twenty-two (36.1%) PIFs occurred in males, while 39 (63.9%) occurred in females. Fifty-two (85.2%) PIFs were sustained from a low-energy injury mechanism. PIFs were most often treated with plate/screw constructs (50.8%). Complications included: 6 (9.8%) nonunions, 5 of which were successfully treated to healing, 5 (8.2%) fracture related infections (FRI), and 1 (1.6%) hardware failure. Sixty (98.4%) PIFs ultimately demonstrated radiographic healing. CONCLUSION: PIFs are usually treated surgically and have a relatively high incidence of complications, with nonunion in femoral PIFs being the greatest. Despite this, the rate of ultimate healing is quite high.

Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate if nonoperative or operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures delivers reduced rates of nonunion and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational. SETTING: Seven Level 1 Trauma Centers in the United States. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adults with closed, displaced (100% displacement/shortened >1.5 cm) midshaft clavicle fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association 15.2) were treated nonoperatively, with plates and screw fixation, or with intramedullary fixation from 2003 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: DASH scores (2, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months), reoperation, and nonunion were compared between the nonoperative, plate fixation, and intramedullary fixation groups. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients were enrolled, with 203 undergoing plate fixation, 26 receiving intramedullary fixation, and 183 treated nonoperatively. The average age of the nonoperative group was 40.1 (range 18-79) years versus 35.8 (range 18-74) in the plate group and 39.3 (range 19-56) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.06). One hundred forty (76.5%) patients in the nonoperative group were male compared with 154 (75.9%) in the plate group and 18 (69.2%) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.69). All groups showed similar DASH scores at 2 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months (P > 0.05). Plate fixation demonstrated better DASH scores (median = 20.8) than nonoperative (median = 28.3) at 6 weeks (P = 0.04). Intramedullary fixation had poorer DASH scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months than plate fixation and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months (P < 0.05). The nonunion rate for nonoperative treatment (14.6%) was significantly higher than the plate group (0%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures provided lower rates of nonunion than nonoperative treatment. Except at 6 weeks, no difference was observed in DASH scores between plate fixation and nonoperative treatment. Intramedullary fixation resulted in worse DASH scores than plate fixation at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months. Implant removal was the leading reason for reoperation in the plate and intramedullary fixation groups, whereas surgery for nonunion was the primary reason for surgery in the nonoperative group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Orthopaedic Trauma and Anemia: Conservative versus Liberal Transfusion Strategy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic musculoskeletal injured trauma patients who are no longer in the initial resuscitative period. METHODS: Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients aged 18-50 with an associated musculoskeletal injury with Hgb less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery who were stable and no longer being actively resuscitated were randomized once their Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL to a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL versus a liberal threshold of 7.0 g/dL. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Postoperative infection, other post-operative complications and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were compared for liberal and conservative transfusion thresholds. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients completed 1 year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection (P = 0.01), with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. This study was adequately powered at 92% to detect a difference in superficial infection (7% for liberal group, 0% for conservative, P < 0.01) but underpowered to detect a difference for deep infection (14% for liberal group, 6% for conservative group, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: A conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL in an asymptomatic young trauma patient with associated musculoskeletal injuries leads to a lower infection rate without an increase in adverse outcomes and no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early Results of Orthopaedic Trauma and Anemia: Conservative Versus Liberal Transfusion Strategy.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic patients with musculoskeletal-injured trauma out of the initial resuscitative period. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, nonblinded, randomized study done at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred patients were enrolled. One patient was inappropriately enrolled, withdrawn from the study, and excluded from analysis leaving 99 patients (49 liberal and 50 conservative) with 30-day follow-up. After initial resuscitation, patients were enrolled and randomized to either a liberal or a conservative transfusion strategy. This strategy was followed throughout the index hospitalization. The primary outcome of the study was infection. Superficial infection was defined as clinical diagnosis of cellulitis or other superficial infection treated with oral antibiotics only. Deep infection was defined as clinical diagnosis of fracture-related infection requiring IV antibiotics and/or surgical débridement. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were successfully followed for 30 days with 100% follow-up during this time. Seven infections (14%) occurred in the liberal group and none in the conservative group ( P < 0.01). Five deep infections (10%) occurred in the liberal group and none in the conservative group ( P = 0.03). Three superficial infections (6%) occurred in the liberal and none in the conservative group, which was not a significant difference ( P = 0.1). No difference was observed in length of stay between groups. DISCUSSION: Transfusing young healthy asymptomatic patients with orthopaedic trauma for hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL increases the risk of infection. No increased risk of anemia-related complications was identified with a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL. DATA AVAILABILITY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data are available on request. IRB protocol number is 1402557771. This study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02972593. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, unblinded prospective randomized multicenter study.

Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures). OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery. RESULTS: 195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277-733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160-661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99-249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tranexamic Acid and Holding Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Morning of Surgery Do Not Decrease Transfusion Requirements in Patients Undergoing Anterior Intrapelvic Approach for Acetabular Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine factors that may affect transfusion rates for patients requiring an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach for an acetabulum fracture. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective comparison study (3 trauma centers at two urban academic centers). Patients who had an AIP approach for an acetabulum fracture without other notable same-day procedures (irrigation and débridement and/or external fixation were only other allowed procedures) were included. One hundred ninety-five adult (18 and older) patients had adequate records to complete analysis with no preexisting coagulopathy. The main outcome evaluated was the number of units transfused at the time of surgery and up to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: Factors that were found to affect intraoperative transfusion rates were older age, lower preoperative hematocrit, longer surgery duration, and requiring increased intraoperative intravenous fluids. Factors that did not affect transfusion rate included sex, body mass index, hip dislocation at the time of injury, fracture pattern, AIP approach alone or with lateral window ± distal extension, Injury Severity Score, preoperative platelet count, use of tranexamic acid, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis received morning of surgery. When followed out through the remainder of a week after surgery, the results for any factor did not change. DISCUSSION: In this large multicenter retrospective study of patients requiring an AIP approach, tranexamic acid and use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (or holding it the morning of surgery) did not affect transfusion rates either during surgery or up to a week after surgery. Older age, lower preoperative hematocrit level, longer surgery time, and increased intraoperative intravenous fluids were associated with higher transfusion rates. DATA AVAILABILITY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data are available on request. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective case-control study.

High Nonunion and Amputations Rates With Either Early Intramedullary Nail Removal or Retention for Tibial Shaft Fracture-Related Infections.

OBJECTIVES: To compare debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and intramedullary nail (IMN) removal with subsequent strategy for fracture stabilization in the treatment of tibia fracture-related infections (FRIs) occurring within 90 days of initial IMN placement. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control. SETTING: Four academic, Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients who subsequently received unplanned operative treatment for FRI diagnosed within 90 days of initial tibia IMN. INTERVENTION: DAIR versus IMN removal pathways. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fracture union. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (42.4%) were treated with DAIR and 38 (57.6%) via IMN removal with subsequent strategy for fracture stabilization. Mean follow-up was 16.3 months. At final follow-up, ultimate bone healing was achieved in 75.8% (47/62), whereas 24.2% (15/62) had persistent nonunion or amputation. No significant difference was observed in ultimate bone healing ( P = 0.216) comparing DAIR and IMN removal. Factors associated with persistent nonunion or amputation were time from injury to initial IMN ( P < 0.001), McPherson systemic host grade B ( P = 0.046), and increasing open-fracture grade, with Gustilo-Anderson IIIB/IIIC fractures being the worst ( P = 0.009). Fewer surgeries after initial FRI treatment were positively associated with ultimate bone healing ( P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of FRI within 90 days of tibial IMN with DAIR or IMN removal with subsequent strategy for fracture stabilization results in a high rate, nearly 1 in 4, of persistent nonunion or amputation, with neither appearing superior for improving bone healing outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk of Postoperative Sciatic Nerve Palsy After Posterior Acetabular Fracture Fixation: Does Patient Position Matter?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the prone or lateral position is associated with postoperative sciatic nerve palsy in posterior acetabular fracture fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with acetabular fractures treated with a posterior approach (n = 1045). INTERVENTION: Posterior acetabular fixation in the prone or lateral positions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the prevalence of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy by position. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for nerve palsy, using multiple regression analysis and propensity scoring. RESULTS: The rate of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy was 9.5% (43/455) in the prone position and 1.5% (9/590) in the lateral position ( P < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration were significantly higher for patients who developed a postoperative sciatic nerve palsy. Subgroup analysis showed that position did not influence palsy prevalence in posterior wall fractures. For other fracture patterns, propensity score analysis demonstrated a significantly increased odds ratio of palsy in the prone position [aOR 7.14 (2.22-23.00); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of posterior wall fracture patterns, the results of this study suggest that factors associated with increased risk for postoperative sciatic nerve palsy after a posterior approach are fractures treated in the prone position, increased blood loss, and prolonged operative duration. These risks should be considered alongside the other goals (eg, reduction quality) of acetabular fracture surgery when choosing surgical positioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Locked Plating versus Nailing for Proximal Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter RCT.

OBJECTIVES: The main 2 forms of treatment for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked lateral plating (LLP). The goal of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: 16 academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 108 patients were enrolled. 99 patients were followed for 12 months. 52 patients were randomized to IMN, and 47 patients were randomized to LLP. INTERVENTION: IMN or lateral locked plating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, Bother Index, EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5DVAS. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory aid and number, and complications. RESULTS: Functional testing demonstrated no difference between the groups, but both groups were still significantly affected 12 months postinjury. Similarly, there was no difference in time of surgery, alignment, nonunion, pain, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, need for ambulatory support, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMN and LLP provide for similar outcomes after these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired even 1 year later. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Techniques of anterior pelvic fixation.

Although definitive fixation of anterior pelvic ring injuries is usually referred to an orthopaedic trauma surgeon or a surgeon proficient in pelvic surgery, all orthopaedic surgeons should be familiar with the initial management and resuscitation of patients with high-energy pelvic ring injuries. The initial treatment may be limited to sheet or binder application in the emergency department to allow transfer of the patient to a trauma center or the application of an external fixator by an on-call surgeon, even though that surgeon may not be responsible for definitive fixation. It is important to understand the general principles and approaches used at the time of definitive surgery because decisions made by the initial treating physician may affect (or limit) the ability of the orthopaedic traumatologist to provide definitive care.

Unilateral Sacral Fractures Demonstrate Slow Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcomes Irrespective of Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To report functional outcomes of unilateral sacral fractures treated both operatively and nonoperatively. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Sixteen Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Skeletally mature patients with unilateral zone 1 or 2 sacral fractures categorized as displaced nonoperative (DN), displaced operative (DO), nondisplaced nonoperative (NN), and nondisplaced operative (NO). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pelvic displacement was documented on injury plain radiographs. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores were obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. Displacement was defined as greater than 5 mm in any plane at the time of injury. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six patients with unilateral sacral fractures were initially enrolled, with a mean age of 40 years and mean injury severity score of 16. One hundred twenty-three patients completed the 2-year follow-up as follows: 29 DN, 30 DO, 47 NN, and 17 NO with 56% loss to follow-up at 2 years. Highest dysfunction was seen at 3 months for all groups with mean SMFA dysfunction scores: 25 DN, 28 DO, 27 NN, and 31 NO. The mean SMFA scores at 2 years for all groups were 13 DN, 12 DO, 17 NN, and 17 NO. CONCLUSIONS: All groups (operative/nonoperative and displaced/nondisplaced) reported worst function 3 months after injury, and all but (DN) continued to recover for 2 years after injury, with peak recovery for DN seen at 1 year. No functional benefit was seen with operative intervention for either displaced or nondisplaced injuries at any time point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Proximal tibia fracture dislocations: Management and outcomes of a severe and under-recognized injury.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal tibia fracture dislocations (PTFDs) are a subset of plateau fractures with little in the literature since description by Hohl (1967) and classification by Moore (1981). We sought to evaluate reliability in diagnosis of fracture-dislocations by traumatologists and to compare their outcomes with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (BTPFs). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at 14 level 1 trauma centers throughout North America. In all, 4771 proximal tibia fractures were reviewed by all sites and 278 possible PTFDs were identified using the Moore classification. These were reviewed by an adjudication board of three traumatologists to obtain consensus. Outcomes included inter-rater reliability of PTFD diagnosis, wound complications, malunion, range of motion (ROM), and knee pain limiting function. These were compared to BTPF data from a previous study. RESULTS: Of 278 submitted cases, 187 were deemed PTFDs representing 4% of all proximal tibia fractures reviewed and 67% of those submitted. Inter-rater agreement by the adjudication board was good (83%). Sixty-one PTFDs (33%) were unicondylar. Eleven (6%) had ligamentous repair and 72 (39%) had meniscal repair. Two required vascular repair. Infection was more common among PTFDs than BTPFs (14% vs 9%, p = 0.038). Malunion occurred in 25% of PTFDs. ROM was worse among PTFDs, although likely not clinically significant. Knee pain limited function at final follow-up in 24% of both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: PTFDs represent 4% of proximal tibia fractures. They are often unicondylar and may go unrecognized. Malunion is common, and PTFD outcomes may be worse than bicondylar fractures.

Arthroscopy Should be Used With Caution for Gunshot Wounds to the Hip.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hip arthroscopy immediately following gunshot wound (GSW) to the hip. METHODS: Patients who received hip arthroscopy for GSWs from 2006 to 2020 by 2 surgeons at a level I trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Inclusion criteria were those patients who suffered a GSW to the hip, received hip arthroscopy for treatment, and had a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The exclusion criteria were any patients younger than 18 years of age. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical details, clinical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 50 hip arthroscopy cases were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Of the 50 cases identified, 8 patients met the inclusion criteria. All 8 patients were male, African-American, and the mean age was 31 years (range, 19-54 years) with mean follow-up of 14 months. Five of 8 cases were noted to have poor visualization with arthroscopy. Common reasons for poor visualization were difficult access to the bullet fragments, morbid obesity, hematoma formation, and pre-existing arthritis. Of these 5 cases, 2 were converted to open procedures to retrieve the remaining bullet fragments. One patient developed abdominal compartment syndrome, most likely due to increased pulse pressure over a prolonged operative period and involvement of the acetabular fovea. Emergent exploratory laparotomy and abdominal compartment fluid release were performed, and the patient had an otherwise unremarkable hospital course. CONCLUSIONS: There are risks with the use of arthroscopic methods to remove GSW fragments, which may be greater than elective hip arthroscopy. Certain factors, such as the surgeon's arthroscopic experience, locations of bullets fragments, visual quality, length of procedure, and concomitant acetabular fractures, must be considered before proceeding with arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic case series.

Bone healing: Advances in biology and technology.

Fracture healing is a complex cascade of cellular and molecular processes. These processes require the appropriate cellular and molecular environment to ensure the restoration of skeletal stability and resolution of inflammation. In order for fracture healing to occur, the necessary building blocks for bone metabolism and synthesis must be supplied through proper nutrition. Pharmacologic therapies aimed at modulating the inflammatory response to fractures have the potential to interfere with the synthesis of molecules needed for the production of bone. Infection can interfere with, and even prevent normal fracture healing from occurring. Cellular and genetic treatment strategies are actively being developed to target deficiencies, and bridge gaps that can influence how fractures heal. Evolving technologies, including nutritional supplementation, pharmacotherapies, antibiotics, surgical techniques, as well as genetic and cellular therapies, have the potential to enhance, optimize, and even revolutionize the process of fracture healing.

The Fate of Patients After a Staged Nonunion Procedure for Known Infection.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with successful union and eradication of infection in the setting of staged procedures to treat obviously infected nonunions of long bones. We hypothesize that patients with positive intraoperative cultures obtained at the time of definitive surgery for infected nonunions are more likely to have persistent nonunion than those with negative cultures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Eight academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent staged management for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: For each patient, initial fracture management, management of retained implants, number of debridements, grafting, bacteriology, antibiotic course, bone defect management, soft-tissue coverage, and definitive surgery performed were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were treated with staged procedures for obviously infected nonunion of a long bone (mean age 49 years, 60% open fractures, and mean follow-up 22 months). During definitive procedures, 120 patients had intraoperative cultures taken with 43% having positive cultures. For culture-positive patients, 41 patients achieved eventual union and 10 had persistent nonunion. Of 69 culture-negative patients, 66 achieved eventual union and 3 had persistent nonunion. The number of patients with union versus persistent nonunion was statistically significant between culture-positive and culture-negative groups (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Management of infected nonunion in long bones with staged treatments before definitive fixation are beneficial but ultimately less effective when performed in the setting of positive bacterial cultures at the time of definitive management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Gunshot Fractures of the Forearm: A Multicenter Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a large series of open fractures of the forearm after gunshot wounds (GSWs) to determine complication rates and factors that may lead to infection, nonunion, or compartment syndrome. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Nine Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients had 198 radius and ulna fractures due to firearm injuries. All patients were adults, had a fracture due to a firearm injury, and at least 1-year clinical follow-up or follow-up until union. The average follow-up was 831 days. INTERVENTION: Most patients (91%) received antibiotics. Formal irrigation and debridement in the operating room was performed in 75% of cases along with either internal fixation (75%), external fixation (6%), or I&D without fixation (19%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications including neurovascular injuries, compartment syndrome, infection, and nonunion. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of patients had arterial injuries, and 40% had nerve injuries. Nine patients (5%) developed compartment syndrome. Seventeen patients (10%) developed infections, all in comminuted or segmental fractures. Antibiotics were not associated with a decreased risk of infection. Infections in the ulna were more common in fractures with retained bullet fragments and bone loss. Twenty patients (12%) developed a nonunion. Nonunions were associated with high velocity firearms and bone defect size. CONCLUSIONS: Open fractures of the forearm from GSWs are serious injuries that carry high rates of nonunion and infection. Fractures with significant bone defects are at an increased risk of nonunion and should be treated with stable fixation and proper soft-tissue handling. Ulna fractures are at a particularly high risk for deep infection and septic nonunion and should be treated aggressively. Forearm fractures from GSWs should be followed until union to identify long-term complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Smith-Petersen Versus Watson-Jones Approach Does Not Affect Quality of Open Reduction of Femoral Neck Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To compare immediate quality of open reduction of femoral neck fractures by alternative surgical approaches. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENTS: Eighty adults 18-65 years of age with isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or -B3 femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. INTERVENTION: Thirty-two modified Smith-Petersen anterior approaches versus 48 Watson-Jones anterolateral approaches for open reduction performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME: Reduction quality as assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the rate of acceptable reduction by modified Smith-Petersen (81%) versus Watson-Jones (81%) approach (risk difference null, 95% confidence interval -17.4% to 17.4%, P = 1.00) with 90.4% panel agreement (Fleiss' weighted κ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses did not identify a significant difference in the rate of acceptable reduction between approaches when stratified by Pauwels angle, basicervical or transcervical fracture location, or posterior comminution. The Smith-Petersen approach afforded a better reduction when preoperative skeletal traction was not applied (RR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.52] vs. RR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.08], P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in the quality of open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults when a Watson-Jones anterolateral approach versus a modified Smith-Petersen anterior approach was performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hip dislocation: evaluation and management.

A simple hip dislocation is one without fracture of the proximal femur or acetabulum. Complex fracture-dislocations involve the acetabulum, femoral head, or femoral neck. The incidence of posttraumatic arthritis is much lower in simple dislocations than in fracture-dislocations. The most common mechanism of injury is a high-energy motor vehicle accident, which is usually associated with other systemic and musculoskeletal injuries. The hip should be reduced emergently in an atraumatic fashion. For acetabular fracture, intraoperative stress views may be necessary to evaluate for instability and to determine whether surgical fixation is required. The appearance of a concentric reduction on plain radiographs and CT does not rule out intra-articular hip pathology; such injury may contribute to long-term degenerative changes. Other complications of hip dislocation include osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, and sciatic nerve injury. Indications for surgical management include nonconcentric reduction, associated proximal femur fracture (including hip, femoral neck, and femoral head), and associated acetabular fracture producing instability. Surgical management ranges from formal open arthrotomy to minimally invasive hip arthroscopy. Hip arthroscopy has become popular for treating intra-articular hip pathology, including loose bodies, chondral defects, and labral tears.