Effects of variable power on tissue ablation dynamics during magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy with the Visualase system.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat various intracranial pathologies. This study investigated the effects of variable power on maximal estimated thermal damage during ablation and duration required to reach maximal ablation. MATERIALS/METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase Thermal Therapy System (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota), which uses a 980 nm diffusing tip diode laser. Cases were stratified into low, medium and high power. Maximal thermal damage estimate (TDEmax) achieved in a single plane and time to reach maximal damage (ttdemax) were measured and compared between groups using a 2×3 Fixed Factor Analysis of Covariance. Ablation area change for cases in which an initial thermal dose was followed by a subsequent dose, with increased power, was also assessed. RESULTS: We used real-time ablation data from 93 patients across various intracranial pathologies. ttdemax (mean ± SEM) decreased linearly as power increased (low: 139.2 ± 10.4 s, medium: 127.5 ± 4.3 s, high: 103.7 ± 5.8 s). In cases where a second thermal dose was delivered at higher power, the TDE expanded an average of 51.4 mm2 beyond the initial TDE generated by the first ablation, with the second ablation approaching TDEmax at a higher rate than the initial ablation. CONCLUSION: Increased power results in a larger TDEmax and an increased ablation rate. In cases where an initial thermal dose does not fully ablate the target lesion, a second ablation at higher power can increase the area of ablation with an increased ablation rate.

Controlling Signal Artifact With Software Threshold Imaging for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) uses intraoperative temperature mapping and thermal damage estimates to guide ablations of intracranial targets. In select cases, signal artifact presents at the target site and impairs intraprocedural decision-making by obscuring the visualization of both temperature imaging and the thermal damage estimate calculation. To date, the etiology and impact of signal artifact are unknown. However, user-selected MRgLITT software settings may play a role in generating artifact. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the thresholding feature in MRgLITT software on signal artifact generation during intracranial ablations. METHODS: Ablations were performed with the Visualase MRI-guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). For each LITT procedure, raw thermal data were extracted at a reference threshold of 40 and reprocessed at 5 additional threshold values ranging from 35 to 60. Artifact growth rates relative to threshold values were derived using simple linear regressions and then assessed within the context of laser power and duration using Pearson correlations. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included, with 28 artifact-containing and 5 artifact-free cases. For artifact-containing cases, a 13% increase in artifact area occurred for every 1-point increase in threshold (R2 > 0.99). Artifact growth rates were not correlated with laser power (r = 0.15, P = .44) or duration (r = 0.0049, P = .98). One of the 5 artifact-free cases developed artifact at a threshold of 60. CONCLUSION: Artifact generation is likely multifactorial involving tissue properties and software settings. Operators can minimize software-introduced artifact by reducing threshold values.

Mathematical Modeling of Thermal Damage Estimate Volumes in MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that produces real-time thermal damage estimates (TDEs) of ablation. Currently, MRgLITT software provides limited quantitative parameters for intraoperative monitoring, but orthogonal TDE-MRI slices can be utilized to mathematically estimate ablation volume. The objective of this study was to model TDE volumes and validate using post-24 hours MRI ablative volumes. METHODS: Ablations were performed with the Visualase Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Using ellipsoidal parameters determined for dual-TDEs from orthogonal MRI planes, TDE volumes were calculated by two definite integral methods (A and B) implemented in Matlab (MathWorks). Post-24 hours MRI ablative volumes were measured in OsiriX (Pixmeo) by two-blinded raters and compared to TDE volumes via paired t-test and Pearson's correlations. RESULTS: Twenty-two ablations for 20 patients with various intracranial pathologies were included. Average TDE volume calculated with method A was 3.44 ± 1.96 cm3 and with method B was 4.83 ± 1.53 cm3 . Method A TDE volumes were significantly different than post-24 hours volumes (P < .001). Method B TDE volumes were not significantly different than post-24 hours volumes (P = .39) and strongly correlated with each other (r = .85, R2 = .72, P < .0001). A total of eight of 22 (36%) method A versus 17 of 22 (77%) method B TDE volumes were within 25% of the post-24 hours ablative volume. CONCLUSION: We present a viable mathematical method integrating dual-plane TDEs to calculate volumes. Future algorithmic iterations will incorporate additional calculated variables that improve ablative volume estimations.

Effects of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy on Thermal Damage Estimate and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ablative Area Concordance.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has considered the impact of this artifact on TDE accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of intraoperative MRTI signal artifact on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-predicted ablative area. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Patients were grouped based on whether the intraoperative MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region. Cross-sectional area of the ablative lesion from the MRI image was measured, and the difference between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was calculated and compared between groups with and without intraoperative MRTI artifact. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 43.9% of cases overall. The mean absolute difference between TDE and the postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was 94.8 mm2 (SEM = 11.6) in the group with intraoperative MRTI artifact and 54.4 mm2 (SEM = 5.5) in the nonartifact group. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. The presence of signal artifact during intraoperative MRTI results in higher variation between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional ablative area. In cases in which intraoperative MRTI artifact is observed, there may be a larger degree of variation between observed intraoperative TDE and measured postoperative MRTI ablative area.

Understanding the Relationship Between Real-Time Thermal Imaging and Thermal Damage Estimate During Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy is a minimally invasive procedure that uses intraoperative magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. This study aimed to compare areas produced by the MRT heat map with the system-generated TDE produced by Visualase software. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase laser ablation system. MRT heat map and TDE were quantified using MATLAB version R2014a. TDE was compared with the summed area of green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 63.9 [HM63.9]) and the summed area of light blue, green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 50.4 [HM50.4]) produced by the MRT heat map. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients undergoing magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy were examined. Mean TDE produced was 236 mm2 (SEM = 9.5). Mean HM63.9 was 231 mm2 (SEM = 8.7), and mean HM50.4 was 370 mm2 (SEM = 12.8). There was no significant difference between TDE and HM63.9 (P = 0.51). There was a significant difference between TDE and HM50.4 (P < 0.001) and between HM63.9 and HM50.4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The system-generated TDE consistently remains contained within the boundaries of the MRT heat map. At standard factory settings, TDE and the area produced within the periphery of HM63.9 are similar in magnitude. The light blue portion of the MRT heat map may serve as an additional means of predicting when critical structures may be at risk during laser ablation if exposed to further thermal stress.

Characterization of Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Magnetic Resonance Guided Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has attempted to characterize this artifact. OBJECTIVE: To characterize MRTI signal the artifact in select cases to better understand its potential relevance and impact on the ablation procedure. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser ablation system (Medtronic). Patients were included if the MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region during the first thermal dose delivered. Ablation artifact was quantified using MATLAB version R2018a (Mathworks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 37.0% of cases overall. Incidence of artifact was greater at higher powers (P < .001) and with longer ablation times (P = .024), though artifact size did not correlate with laser power or ablation duration. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. Higher powers and longer ablation times result in greater incidence of ablation artifact, though artifact size is not correlated with power or duration. Future studies should aim to evaluate effects of artifact on postoperative imaging and, most notably, patient outcomes.

Ablation dynamics of subsequent thermal doses delivered to previously heat-damaged tissue during magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative dynamics of magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have been previously characterized for ablations of naive tissue. However, most treatment sessions require the delivery of multiple doses, and little is known about the ablation dynamics when additional doses are applied to heat-damaged tissue. This study investigated the differences in ablation dynamics between naive versus damaged tissue. METHODS: The authors examined 168 ablations from 60 patients across various surgical indications. All ablations were performed using the Visualase MRI-guided laser ablation system (Medtronic), which employs a 980-nm diffusing tip diode laser. Cases with multiple topographically overlapping doses with constant power were selected for this study. Single-dose intraoperative thermal damage was used to calculate ablation rate based on the thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the maximum area of ablation achieved (TDEmax) and the total duration of ablation (tmax). We compared ablation rates of naive undamaged tissue and damaged tissue exposed to subsequent thermal doses following an initial ablation. RESULTS: TDEmax was significantly decreased in subsequent ablations compared to the preceding ablation (initial ablation 227.8 ± 17.7 mm2, second ablation 164.1 ± 21.5 mm2, third ablation 124.3 ± 11.2 mm2; p = < 0.001). The ablation rate of subsequent thermal doses delivered to previously damaged tissue was significantly decreased compared to the ablation rate of naive tissue (initial ablation 2.703 mm2/sec; second ablation 1.559 mm2/sec; third ablation 1.237 mm2/sec; fourth ablation 1.076 mm/sec; p = < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between TDEmax and percentage of overlap in a subsequent ablation with previously damaged tissue (r = -0.164; p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of previously ablated tissue results in a reduced ablation rate and reduced TDEmax. Additionally, each successive thermal dose in a series of sequential ablations results in a decreased ablation rate relative to that of the preceding ablation. In the absence of a change in power, operators should anticipate a possible reduction in TDE when ablating partially damaged tissue for a similar amount of time compared to the preceding ablation.

A Unique Case of Recurrent Intracranial Extravascular Papillary Endothelial Hyperplasia After Gross Total Resection and Brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Extravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (EPEH) is an extremely uncommon form of papillary endothelial hyperplasia characterized by an exuberant reactive endothelial proliferation in areas of extravascular hemorrhage rather than within the vascular lumen. Intracranial EPEH is known to develop after radiosurgery in patients with intracranial neoplasms, suggesting a causative relationship between radiotherapy and the development of EPEH. Intracranial EPEH is typically treated with surgical resection; to date, there have been no reported cases of EPEH recurrence after gross total resection. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 75-year-old man with a history of atypical meningioma presented to our hospital with progressive right upper and lower extremity weakness. Eight and a half years before admission, he had undergone surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for a World Health Organization grade II meningioma. Several years later, he experienced a mass in the prior resection cavity and was subsequently treated with gross total resection and cesium-131 brachytherapy seeds. Postoperative pathologic examination of the resected tissue at that time showed EPEH with no evidence of recurrent atypical meningioma. On this admission, magnetic resonance imaging showed a recurrent mass in the area of prior resection, at which time the patient underwent a third craniotomy and gross total resection. Postoperative histopathologic examination showed findings consistent with the diagnosis of recurrent EPEH. CONCLUSIONS: This case report is the first known recurrence of intracranial EPEH occurring after gross total resection and brachytherapy.