The Maxillary Nerve Block in Cleft Palate Care: A Review of the Literature and Expert's Opinion on the Preferred Technique of Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Although the maxillary nerve block (MNB) provides adequate pain relief in cleft palate surgery, it is not routinely used globally, and reported techniques are heterogeneous. This study aims to describe relevant anatomy and to present the preferred technique of MNB administration based on the current literature and the expert opinion of the authors. METHOD AND MATERIALS: First, a survey was sent to 432 registrants of the International Cleft Palate Master Course Amsterdam 2023. Second, MEDLINE (PubMed interface) was searched for relevant literature on maxillary artery (MA) anatomy and MNB administration in pediatric patients. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 18% (n=78). Thirty-five respondents (44.9%) used MNB for cleft palate surgery before the course. A suprazygomatic approach with needle reorientation towards the ipsilateral commissure before incision was most frequently reported, mostly without the use of ultrasound. Ten and 20 articles were included on, respectively, MA anatomy and MNB administration. A 47.5% to 69.4% of the MA's run superficial to the lateral pterygoid muscle and 32% to 52.5% medially. The most frequently described technique for MNB administration is the suprazygomatic approach. Reorientation of the needle towards the anterior aspect of the contralateral tragus appears optimal. Needle reorientation angles do not have to be adjusted for age, unlike needle depth. The preferred anesthetics are either ropivacaine or (levo)bupivacaine, with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant. CONCLUSION: Described MNB techniques are heterogeneous throughout the literature and among survey respondents and not routinely used. Further research is required comparing different techniques regarding efficacy and safety.

Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cleft lip and/or palate can undergo numerous procedures to improve appearance, speech, dentition and hearing. We developed a cleft-specific patient-reported outcome instrument to facilitate rigorous international measurement and benchmarking. METHODS: Data were collected from patients aged 8-29 years with cleft lip and/or palate at 30 hospitals in 12 countries between October 2014 and November 2016. Rasch measurement theory analysis was used to refine the scales and to examine reliability and validity. Normative CLEFT-Q values were computed for age, sex and cleft type. RESULTS: Analysis led to the refinement of an eating and drinking checklist and 12 scales measuring appearance (of the face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws and cleft lip scar), health-related quality of life (psychological, social, school, speech distress) and speech function. All scales met the requirements of the Rasch model. Analysis to explore differential item functioning by age, sex and country provided evidence to support the use of a common scoring algorithm for each scale for international use. Lower (worse) scores on CLEFT-Q scales were associated with having a speech problem, being unhappy with facial appearance, and needing future cleft-related treatments, providing evidence of construct validity. Normative values for age, sex and cleft type showed poorer outcomes associated with older age, female sex and having a visible cleft. INTERPRETATION: The CLEFT-Q represents a rigorously developed instrument that can be used internationally to collect and compare evidence-based outcomes data from patients aged 8-29 years of age with cleft lip and/or palate.